• No results found

SCIENTOLOGY 0-8

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "SCIENTOLOGY 0-8"

Copied!
128
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

SCIENTOLOGY 0-8

T H E B O O K O F B A S I C S

By

L. RON HUBBARD

SPO A/S

(2)

Published by SPO A/S

(SCIENTOLOGY PUBLICATIONS ORGANIZATION a Danish Company with limited liability)

Toldbodgade 33 1253 Copenhagen K Denmark

Copyright © 1970 1950,1951,1952,1953,1954,1955, 1956,1957,1958,1959,1960,1961,1962,1963,

1964,1965,1966,1967,1968,1969 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No part of this book may be reproduced without permission of the copyright owner.

First Edition

“A Description of Scientology” was compiled by staff book editor, SPO A/S, from writings and lectures of L. Ron Hubbard.

Note: The E-Meter is not intended or effective for the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease.

Printed in Denmark by J. Jorgensen & Co.

Whisper this to

your sons and their sons. . . the work was free.

Keep it so.

LRH

Proofread and Typeset by

If any errors are encountered during study, please inform your course supervisor. He will know what to do.

April 2006.

The Rising Phoenix

(3)

Have you ever had the experience of coming to the end of a page and realizing you didn’t know what you had read?

Somewhere earlier on that page you went past a word that you had no definition for.

This discovery about misunderstood words is actually the most important fact in the whole subject of study.

The only reason a person gives up a study or becomes confused or unable to learn is that he or she has gone past a word that was not understood.

Therefore, in studying Scientology, be very, very certain you never go past a word you do not fully understand.

And if the material becomes confusing or you can’t seem to grasp it, don’t go any further, but return to the last portion you understood easily, go forward from there, locate the misunderstood word and get it defined. And then go on.

It will not only be the new and unusual words that you have to look up, so don’t depend only on our glossary (pages 117 to 121), but use also a good general English dictionary as well.

This is the first version produced and checked. If any errors arise and are corrected these numbers will be changed here, 1.00 will become 1.01, 1.02 etc.

This box will also contain corrections.

V 1.00

(4)

A Note from the Editor:

This publication is not to be confused with the products of the Church of Scientology, CST or RTC. The publication of this book is purely for historic, scientific and research purposes.

This is part of a restoration project at digitalizing the original work, thus making it possible for current masses as well as our future generations to receive, at first hand, the data that was released originally in the times when LRH was still on lines developing the Tech. The information about the publication of the book (known as colophon) is included so that the book remains trackable. If there were to be a digital library for the collection of such books then indeed our books would encounter no difficulties in being included.

All care has been taken, through proofreading, that the original text stay exactly the same, however, the minor typographic errors that existed in the original have been removed for grammatical correctness (see Errata, page 121). The text has also been reflown (repaginated) and formatted to the A4 paper size.

We hope you enjoy reading this book as much as we have enjoyed restoring it.

The Rising Phoenix

March 2006.

(5)

A Description of Scientology

. . . .

7

I 1. The Factors

. . . .

15

2. The Qs (The Prelogics)

. . . .

17

3. Consideration and Mechanics

. . . .

19

4. The Axioms of Scientology

. . . .

21

II 1. The Auditor’s Code AD 18

. . . .

29

2. The Code of Honor

. . . .

31

3. The Code of a Scientologist

. . . .

33

4. The Creed of the Church

. . . .

35

5. The Supervisor’s Code and Stable Data

. . . .

37

6. The Credo of a Good and Skilled Manager

. . . .

41

III 1. Primary Axioms from the Original Thesis

. . . .

45

2. The Fundamental Axioms of Dianetics

. . . .

47

3. The Logics

. . . .

49

4. The Axioms of Dianetics

. . . .

53

IV Perceptics

. . . .

71

V A Book of Scales Scales

. . . .

75

i The Tone Scale

. . . .

77

ii Emotion and Affinity Scale

. . . .

78

iii Reality and Communication Scale

. . . .

79

iv Behavior and Physiological Scale

. . . .

81

v Scale of Motion

. . . .

83

vi The Emotional Tone Scale

. . . .

84

vii DEI to CDEI

. . . .

85

viii CDEI Cycle with Lower Scale

. . . .

87

ix Points of Case Address

. . . .

88

x Scale of Identification

. . . .

89

(6)

xiv A Pan Determinism Scale

. . . .

93

xv Responsibility Scale

. . . .

94

xvi Havingness Scale

. . . .

95

xvii The Pre-Havingness Scale

. . . .

96

xviii Effect Scale

. . . .

97

xix Effect Scale

. . . .

100

xx An Awareness Scale

. . . .

101

xxi Scale of Confront

. . . .

102

xxii Reality-Spotting by E-Meter

. . . .

103

xxii Time Sense, Deterioration of

. . . .

104

Charge and the Time Track

. . . .

104

xxiv State of Case Scale

. . . .

105

xxv Awareness Characteristics

. . . .

106

xxvi Lower Awareness Levels

. . . .

107

xxvii States Attained

. . . .

108

VI The Axioms of S O P 8-C

. . . .

113

Glossary

. . . .

117

Errata

. . . .

121

Books

. . . .

123

(7)

i

My purpose is to bring a barbarism out of the mud it thinks conceived it and to form, here on Earth, a civilization based on human understanding, not violence.

That’s a big purpose. A broad field. A star-high goal.

But I think it’s your purpose, too.

ii

While Scientology encompasses a broader scope than any previous Eastern or Western religion ever has, it should be realized that a great deal of what is known today in Scientology, with an added exactness of understanding, was already known and lost thousands of years ago.

What we are DOING with this data is NEW. The technology for bringing about a new state in man is new. But the basic hope of man as it appears today in Scientology is thousands of years old. And when we call Scientology a religion we are calling it a religion out of a much deeper well than only the last two thousand years. It is a wisdom in the tradition of ten thousand years of search in Asia and in Western civilization.

Scientology stands complete today, with the oldest philosophical tradition of man, with new discoveries about man, and with a technology of tremendous power and breadth which treats the livingness and beingness of man, and demonstrates to him a pathway to greater freedom.

Subjects which were consulted in over a third of a century of organization and development of Scientology include the Veda; the Tao of Lao-tze; the Dharma and the Discourses of Gautama Buddha; the general knowingness about life extant in the lamaseries of the Western Hills of China; the technologies and beliefs of various barbaric cultures; the various materials of Christianity; the mathematical and technical methodologies of the early Greeks, Romans and Arabians; the physical sciences, including the various speculations of western philosophers such as Kant, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Herbert Spencer and Dewey, and the various technologies extant in the civilization of both the Orient and Occident in the first half of the twentieth century. Scientology is an organization of the pertinencies which are mutually held true by all men in all times, and the development of technologies which demonstrate the existence of new phenomena not hitherto known, which are useful in creating states of beingness considered more desirable by man.

But the philosopher had ordinarily spent most of his working years in his ivory tower and

was pretty well isolated from his subject. To know life you’ve got to be part of life, you must

get down there and look, you must get into the nooks and crannies of existence, and you must

rub elbows with all kinds and types of men before you can finally establish what man is. I lived

with bandits in Mongolia and hunted with pygmies in the Philippines—as a matter of fact I

studied twenty-one different primitive races—including the white race—and my conclusions

were that man, regardless of his state or culture, was essentially the same, that he was a spiritual

being pulled down to the material, and I concluded finally that he needed a hand.

(8)

iii

In 1932 an investigation was undertaken to determine the dynamic principle of existence in a workable form which might lead to the resolution of some of the problems of mankind. A long research in ancient and modern philosophy culminated in 1938 in the heuristically discovered primary law. A work was written at that time which embraced man and his activities.

In the following years further research was undertaken in order to prove or disprove the axioms so established.

My first effort was to find a common denominator to all men. Having seen man in his more primitive states and his highly cultured states I knew that if we could isolate a common denominator that embraced all men, then perhaps from that we could unlock this riddle.

I discovered that the common denominator of existence was SURVIVE. Whatever else man was trying to do, whether he was cultured or primitive, he was attempting to survive. Well, what of such things as morals, ideals, love? Don’t these things go above “mere survival”?

Unfortunately or fortunately, they do not. Ideals, honesty, love of one’s fellow man—one cannot find good survival for one or for many where these things are absent. Even the most esoteric concepts fall within this understanding. Survival is not a matter of being alive this moment and dead the next. Survival is actually a graduated scale.

The Dynamic was discovered to have eight sub-divisions with each single Dynamic then being the urge, thrust and purpose of Life—SURVIVE!—in any of one of eight manifestations.

The First Dynamic is the urge toward survival of self.

The Second Dynamic is the urge toward survival through sex, or children.

The Third Dynamic is the urge toward survival through a group of individuals or as a group.

The Fourth Dynamic is the urge toward survival through all mankind and as all mankind.

The Fifth Dynamic is the urge toward survival through life forms such as animals, birds, insects, fish and vegetation, and is the urge to survive as these.

The Sixth Dynamic is the urge toward survival as the physical universe and has as its components Matter, Energy, Space and Time (from which we derive the word MEST).

The Seventh Dynamic is the urge toward survival through spirits or as a spirit. Anything spiritual, with or without identity, would come under the Seventh Dynamic. A sub-heading of this Dynamic is ideas and concepts such as beauty, and the desire to survive through these.

The Eighth Dynamic is the urge toward survival through a Supreme Being, or more exactly, Infinity.

Covering the first four of these Dynamics, Dianetics became, of all the past studies of man, the grandpa, the immediate ancestor of Scientology. Dianetics was the basic discovery which led to and was the reason for Scientology.

None of the postulates and early discoveries in this research outlawed any concept concerning the human soul or divine or creative imagination. The optimum survival conduct pattern was formulated and then studied for exceptions, and there were no exceptions found.

It was understood perfectly that Dianetics was a study in the finite universe only and that spheres and realms of thought and action might well exist above this finite sphere. But it was also discovered that none of these factors were needed to resolve the entire problem of human aberration and irrational conduct.

— 8 —

(9)

because man had not been able to distinguish between irrational conduct derived from poor data, and irrational conduct derived from another, far more vicious source.

The Reactive Mind was discovered. It had managed to bury itself from view so thoroughly that only inductive philosophy, travelling from effect back to cause, served to uncover it. The Reactive Mind is a portion of a person’s mind which works on a totally stimulus-response basis, which is not under his volitional control, and which exerts force and the power of command over his awareness, purposes, thoughts, body and actions.

Stored in the Reactive Mind are engrams, and here we find the single source of aberrations and psychosomatic ills.

These engrams are a complete recording, down to the last accurate detail, of every perception present in a moment of partial or full unconsciousness.

In all laboratory tests on these engrams they were found to possess “inexhaustible” sources of power to command the body.

The Reactive Mind comprises an unknowing, unwanted series of aberrated computations which bring about an effect upon the individual and those around him. It is an obsessive strata of unknown, unseen, uninspected data which are forcing solutions, unknown and unsuspected, on the individual—which tells you why it remained hidden from man for so many thousands of years.

The isolation and resolution of the Reactive Mind was a major breakthrough for man. The exact moment of the breakthrough is recorded at the public level with the book, DIANETICS:

The Modern Science of Mental Health, and if people have not read this book, they just will not have broken through, whatever else they have studied. And when people are asking you questions about Dianetics and Scientology, no matter how obtuse or abstruse the questions are, your best answer to these is still my earliest answer and that was DIANETICS: The Modern Science of Mental Health. This book burst on the western world in May 1950, shot to the top of the leading

“best-seller” lists and stayed there, and stayed there. It still sells more copies around the world than the average best seller in any given year.

Man had no inkling whatever of Dianetics. None. This was the bolt from the blue. Man was hacking and sawing and shocking and injecting and teaching and moralizing and counselling and hanging and jailing men with enthusiasm without any idea at all of what caused Man to behave as he did or what made him sick or well.

The answer, and the place where one begins, was and still is Dianetics. It is Man’s most advanced school of the mind. Though they hold in common certain basic tools, Dianetics and Scientology are not identical subjects and their technologies are not the same. But the early days of Dianetics were the early beginnings of Scientology. Dianetics is the route from aberrated (or aberrated and ill) human to a well, happy, high-I.Q. human being. This breakthrough had never before been achieved in Man’s history. Scientology is the route from there to total freedom and ability as a spiritual being.

Oddly enough, the step from a human being to a spirit had been achieved, if rarely—

Buddhism, other spiritual practices, even Christianity—but it was not generally credited.

Scientology really achieves it and for the first time with TOTAL stability, no relapse and

invariably one for one. Nevertheless man had an inkling of the goals of Scientology even though

he considered them almost beyond God. But man had no inkling whatever of Dianetics.

(10)

iv

There are two distinct divisions in Scientology. The first is philosophic, the second is technical. Under the philosophic heading one discovers the ways and means of forming new ways of life and evaluating or creating standards of livingness and beingness. By this knowingness alone and without processing (individual technical applications), it should be understood clearly that a new way of life could be created, or an old way of life could be understood and better endured or altered.

Under the technical division we have a long series of developed processes which, applied immediately and directly to life or an organism thereof, produce desirable changes in the conditions of life. This division comprises Applied Scientology or Scientology, Applied Philosophy and contains standard technology.

Scientology concludes and demonstrates certain truths. These truths might be considered to be the highest common denominators of existence itself. They have the aspect of precision observations rather than philosophic hazardings. When treated as precision observations, many results occur. When regarded as philosophic opinions, only more philosophy results.

I looked early and long at man to find out what methods he used to survive, how he adapted himself to environments in his attempt at survival, and what I found was that man advanced to the degree that he preserved his spiritual integrity, that he preserved his values, that he remained honest, that he remained decent—and I found that he disintegrated or deteriorated to the degree that he abandoned these things.

The average man is up against problems. He’s asking himself, how can I make more money?

How can I make my wife faithful to me? How can I help my children grow up? These questions absorb a tremendous quantity of his energy. But he can’t do anything about it because he is so immersed in it. So in Scientology processing he resolves these questions, he understands what he’s doing, and he turns from a man who is simply a puzzled static being into somebody who is more than that.

We see governments and societies desperately trying to help man. They’re trying, however, to solve his problems for him and their efforts to do this have not resulted in any great advance for man.

Now the real work is to put an individual into a mental condition where he can confront his own problems and solve them—to put him in a position where he can confront life better, where his reaction-time is better, where he can identify the factors in his life more easily. And so he looks around, starts solving his own problems and betters his own life. That is an essential difference between Scientology and other efforts to help man.

We have in the technical division of Scientology basically two activities—processing and training. Scientology processing is done on the principle of making an individual look at his own existence, and improve his ability to confront what he is and where he is. An auditor is the person trained in the technology and whose job it is to ask the person to look, and get him to do so. There is a large technology for this but an auditor has to be able to get his questions answered and the individual who is being processed finally has to answer the questions. The question is asked until it is totally answered and the person is totally aware that he has answered it. The word auditor is used because it means one who listens, and a Scientology auditor does listen.

As people come into Scientology (and they’re coming in in very swiftly increasing numbers all over the world), normally what they do first is read a book, and then they may read quite a few books, and go around and about Scientology for some time. They attend some of the

— 10 —

(11)

They begin to get along better physically, and then to make increasingly larger gains. Their I.Q.

goes up, their abilities increase, they are more capable of handling their lives—and they are prepared for the gains of Scientology.

And when one then decides to be an auditor he or she goes to an Academy of Scientology and studies and learns how to audit and so help others. And here again, one can begin with Dianetics, the first training ground for an auditor.

You’ll find throughout Scientology that the gradient approach is a primary and regulating factor. And a gradient approach has been very, very important in this line of research. The principle is incidentally quite new. The essence of a gradient is just being able to do a little bit more and a little bit more and a little bit more until you finally make the grade.

v

We live in a world that is desperately in need of some good order—it isn’t, aberration on our part that we say some things ought to be changed. Actually I rarely tell you things should be changed—I simply tell you that a world has to be created. I don’t even assume one exists. I figure that this one’s on its way out and that somebody had better put one in its place. Just how we go about doing that is up to you and up to me. This is what we call Scientology: Applied Philosophy.

People think of professional practitioners as doctors, who, aloof from other concerns, practice on the sick. This is a very novel idea, however. It was dreamed up, probably, by the first lazy witch-doctor, and used forever thereafter by most mental specialists. I want to banish that idea from amongst us all.

If we are doctors (by which might be meant “repairers”) then we are doctors on the Third and Fourth Dynamics, the Dynamics of groups and of mankind as a whole, and we handle the First (self) and the Second (sex and family) only to achieve better function on the Third and Fourth.

The Third and Fourth Dynamics subdivide. Any Third breaks down into many activities and professions—a neighborhood, a business concern, a military group, a city government, etc. The Fourth breaks down, just now, mainly to races and nations.

So you see that the idea people sometimes have that a Scientologist must be an auditor who audits individuals in private sessions is too limited an idea.

We find ourselves for instance today with the job of cleaning up the whole field of mental health. That is at least what it calls itself. Mental “health” has been perverted for something over a half a century into an excuse for a Belsen or an Auschwitz. It’s an operating climate of danger and chaos. That field couldn’t even begin to clean itself up. It was unaware of or cold to human rights. It had no technology that worked, upon which to base any actual professional ethics. As we do in Scientology have the technology and the ethics, we inherited the job. It’s like trying to pull a wounded water buffalo out of a wallow, but we are doing it.

Where we have made the breakthrough in Scientology and where we have made progress, we have done so in accomplishing the goals which man has had as long as he has been man.

What he has considered good and what he has considered desirable in the field of philosophy,

we have accomplished technically. We have now arrived in Scientology at a point where man

(12)

You are in a very fortunate position of not having to develop the technology of auditing. A good auditor has found this out. He uses the tools he’s got and he uses them well. There is a tremendous amount of understanding involved here. There are millions of words written on the subject of auditing technology. An auditor can be pretty staggered to suddenly realize how much he really knows.

Auditors are dedicated and sincere in getting this job done. There has never been a more sincere group on the face of the Earth than those who are in the ranks of Scientology auditors.

We wouldn’t have started on auditing if we weren’t good people who wanted to help our fellow man. We are the first people to appear on Earth since its first solidification out of nebulous vaporings who can get this job done, and who really know what we are doing.

The very truth that we know, its simplicity and ease of grasp, the very honesty with which we approach our task, give us probably the largest barriers we have to overcome. Man has been defrauded so often, persuaded so wrongly, and has returned to the same old rut so inevitably and in such a defeated frame of mind, that he is not able to grasp easily the firm and friendly hand of the auditor which is being reached out to him.

The route to highest states of existence has been sought long by man in the fields of religion, mysticism, spiritualism, philosophy, mental arts, metaphysics, science and allied studies.

Vast libraries could be filled with the scraps of information gathered in the course of this search. The great achievement of Scientology has been the culling of truth from this sea of data and finding that the truth was a tiny group of data possessed of the overwhelming power of changing all other facts in this universe and in livingness.

The opening of the road depended upon the success of codifying this information so that it could be relayed to others.

The philosophical and technical information of a Scientologist includes the following as basic material.

— 12 —

(13)

1. THE FACTORS

2. THE Qs (THE PRELOGICS)

3. CONSIDERATION AND MECHANICS

(14)
(15)

(Summation of the considerations and examinations of the human spirit and the material universe completed between A.D. 1923 and 1953)

1. Before the beginning was a Cause and the entire purpose of the Cause was the creation of effect.

2. In the beginning and forever is the decision and the decision is TO BE.

3. The first action of beingness is to assume a viewpoint.

4. The second action of beingness is to extend from the viewpoint, points to view, which are dimension points.

5. Thus there is space created, for the definition of space is: viewpoint of dimension. And the purpose of a dimension point is space and a point of view.

6. The action of a dimension point is reaching and withdrawing.

7. And from the viewpoint to the dimension points there are connection and interchange.

Thus new dimension points are made. Thus there is communication.

8. And thus there is light.

9. And thus there is energy.

10. And thus there is life.

11. But there are other viewpoints and these viewpoints outthrust points to view. And there comes about an interchange amongst viewpoints; but the interchange is never otherwise than in terms of exchanging dimension points.

12. The dimension point can be moved by the viewpoint, for the viewpoint, in addition to creative ability and consideration, possesses volition and potential independence of action; and the viewpoint, viewing dimension points, can change in relation to its own or other dimension points or viewpoints. Thus comes about all the fundamentals there are to motion.

13. The dimension points are each and every one, whether large or small, solid. And they are solid solely because the viewpoints say they are solid.

14. Many dimension points combine into larger gases, fluids or solids. Thus there is matter.

But the most valued point is admiration, and admiration is so strong its absence alone permits persistence.

15. The dimension point can be different from other dimension points and thus can possess an individual quality. And many dimension points can possess a similar quality, and others can possess a similar quality unto themselves. Thus comes about the quality of classes of matter.

16. The viewpoint can combine dimension points into forms and the forms can be simple or complex and can be at different distances from the viewpoints and so there can be combinations of form. And the forms are capable of motion and the viewpoints are capable of motion and so there can be motion of forms.

17. And the opinion of the viewpoint regulates the consideration of the forms, their

stillness or their motion, and these considerations consist of assignment of beauty or

(16)

18. It is the opinion of the viewpoints that some of these forms should endure. Thus there is survival.

19. And the viewpoint can never perish; but the form can perish.

20. And the many viewpoints, interacting, become dependent upon one another’s forms and do not choose to distinguish completely the ownership of dimension points and so comes about a dependency upon the dimension points and upon the other viewpoints.

21. From this comes a consistency of viewpoint of the interaction of dimension points and this, regulated, is TIME.

22. And there are universes.

23. The universes, then, are three in number: the universe created by one viewpoint, the universe created by every other viewpoint, the universe created by the mutual action of viewpoints which is agreed to be upheld—the physical universe.

24. And the viewpoints are never seen. And the viewpoints consider more and more that the dimension points are valuable. And the viewpoints try to become the anchor points and forget that they can create more points and space and forms. Thus comes about scarcity. And the dimension points can perish and so the viewpoints assume that they, too, can perish.

25. Thus comes about death.

26. The manifestations of pleasure and pain, of thought, emotion and effort, of thinking, of sensation, of affinity, reality, communication, of behavior and being are thus derived and the riddles of our universe are apparently contained and answered herein.

27. There is beingness, but Man believes there is only becomingness.

28. The resolution of any problem posed hereby is the establishment of viewpoints and dimension points, the betterment of condition and concourse amongst dimension points, and, thereby, viewpoints, and the remedy of abundance or scarcity in all things, pleasant or ugly, by the rehabilitation of the ability of the viewpoint to assume points of view and create and uncreate, neglect, start, change and stop dimension points of any kind at the determinism of the viewpoint. Certainty in all three universes must be regained, for certainty, not data, is knowledge.

29. In the opinion of the viewpoint, any beingness, any thing, is better than no thing, any effect is better than no effect, any universe better than no universe, any particle better than no particle, but the particle of admiration is best of all.

30. And above these things there might be speculation only. And below these things there is the playing of the game. But these things which are written here Man can experience and know. And some may care to teach these things and some may care to use them to assist those in distress and some may desire to employ them to make individuals and organizations more able and so give to Earth a culture of which we can be proud.

Humbly tendered as a gift to Man by L. Ron Hubbard, April 23, 1953

— 16 —

(17)

THE Qs (THE PRELOGICS)

Q1 SELF-DETERMINISM IS THE COMMON DENOMINATOR OF ALL LIFE IMPULSES.

(a) DEFINITION OF SELF-DETERMINISM: THE ABILITY TO LOCATE IN SPACE AND TIME ENERGY AND MATTER, ALSO THE ABILITY TO CREATE SPACE AND TIME IN WHICH TO CREATE AND LOCATE ENERGY AND MATTER.

(b) THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE SOURCE OF THAT WHICH PLACES MATTER AND ENERGY AND ORIGINATES SPACE AND TIME IS NOT NECESSARY TO THE RESOLUTION OF THIS PROBLEM AT THIS TIME.

Q2 THETA CREATES SPACE, ENERGY AND OBJECTS BY POSTULATES.

Q3 UNIVERSES ARE CREATED BY THE APPLICATION OF SELF-DETERMINISM ON EIGHT DYNAMICS.

Q4 SELF-DETERMINISM, APPLIED, WILL CREATE, ALTER, CONSERVE AND POSSIBLY DESTROY UNIVERSES.

Q5 THE ACTION CYCLE IS ONE OF THE ABILITIES OF A THETAN. AN ACTION CYCLE GOES FROM 40.0 TO 0.0 ON THE TONE SCALE. AN ACTION CYCLE IS THE CREATION, GROWTH, CONSERVATION, DECAY AND DEATH OR DESTRUCTION OF ENERGY AND MATTER IN A SPACE. ACTION CYCLES PRODUCE TIME.

NOTE: This edition restores the Q numbers as given in the

Philadelphia Doctorate Course Lectures of December, 1952.

(18)
(19)

CONSIDERATION AND MECHANICS

Considerations take rank over the mechanics of space, energy, and time. By this it is meant that an idea or opinion is, fundamentally, superior to space, energy, and time, or organizations of form, since it is conceived that space, energy, and time are themselves broadly agreed-upon considerations. That so many minds agree brings about Reality in the form of space, energy, and time. These mechanics, then, of space, energy, and time are the product of agreed-upon considerations mutually held by life.

The aspects of existence when viewed from the level of Man, however, is a reverse of the greater truth above for Man works on the secondary opinion that mechanics are real, and that his own personal considerations are less important than space, energy, and time. This is an inversion. These mechanics of space, energy, and time, the forms, objects and combinations thereof, have taken such precedence in Man that they have become more important than considerations as such, and so his ability is overpowered and he is unable to act freely in the framework of mechanics. Man, therefore, has an inverted view. Whereas considerations such as those he daily makes are the actual source of space, energy, time and forms, Man is operating so as not to alter his basic considerations; he therefore invalidates himself by supposing another determinism of space, energy, time and form. Although he is part of that which created these, he gives them such strength and validity that his own considerations thereafter must fall subordinate to space, energy, time, and form, and so he cannot alter the Universe in which he dwells.

The freedom of an individual depends upon that individual’s freedom to alter his considerations of space, energy, time, and forms of life and his roles in it. If he cannot change his mind about these, he is then fixed and enslaved amidst barriers such as those of the physical universe, and barriers of his own creation. Man thus is seen to be enslaved by barriers of his own creation. He creates these barriers himself, or by agreeing with things which hold these barriers to be actual.

There is a basic series of assumptions in processing, which assumptions do not alter the philosophy of Scientology. The first of these assumptions is that Man can have a greater freedom. The second is that so long as he remains relatively sane, he desires a greater freedom.

And the third assumption is that the auditor desires to deliver a greater freedom to that person with whom he is working. If these assumptions are not agreed upon and are not used, then auditing degenerates into “the observation of effect”, which is, of course, a goal-less, soulless pursuit, and is, indeed, a pursuit which has degraded what is called modern science.

The goal of processing is to bring an individual into such thorough communication with the

physical universe that he can regain the power and ability of his own considerations

(postulates).

(20)
(21)

THE AXIOMS OF SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 1. LIFE IS BASICALLY A STATIC.

Definition: a Life Static has no mass, no motion, no wavelength, no location in space or in time. It has the ability to postulate and to perceive.

AXIOM 2. THE STATIC IS CAPABLE OF CONSIDERATIONS, POSTULATES, AND OPINIONS.

AXIOM 3. SPACE, ENERGY, OBJECTS, FORM AND TIME ARE THE RESULT OF CONSIDERATIONS MADE AND/OR AGREED UPON OR NOT BY THE STATIC, AND ARE PERCEIVED SOLELY BECAUSE THE STATIC CONSIDERS THAT IT CAN PERCEIVE THEM.

AXIOM 4. SPACE IS A VIEWPOINT OF DIMENSION.

AXIOM 5. ENERGY CONSISTS OF POSTULATED PARTICLES IN SPACE.

AXIOM 6. OBJECTS CONSIST OF GROUPED PARTICLES.

AXIOM 7. TIME IS BASICALLY A POSTULATE THAT SPACE AND PARTICLES WILL PERSIST.

AXIOM 8. THE APPARENCY OF TIME IS THE CHANGE OF POSITION OF PARTICLES IN SPACE.

AXIOM 9. CHANGE IS THE PRIMARY MANIFESTATION OF TIME.

AXIOM 10. THE HIGHEST PURPOSE IN THIS UNIVERSE IS THE CREATION OF AN EFFECT.

AXIOM 11. THE CONSIDERATIONS RESULTING IN CONDITIONS OF EXISTENCE ARE FOUR-FOLD.

(a) AS-IS-NESS is the condition of immediate creation without persistence, and is the condition of existence which exists at the moment of creation and the moment of destruction, and is different from other considerations in that it does not contain survival.

(b) ALTER-IS-NESS is the consideration which introduces change and therefore time and persistence, into an AS-IS-NESS to obtain persistency.

(c) IS-NESS is an apparency of existence brought about by the continuous alteration of an AS-IS-NESS. This is called, when agreed upon, Reality.

(d) NOT-IS-NESS is the effort to handle IS-NESS by reducing its condition through the use of force. It is an apparency and cannot entirely vanquish an IS-NESS.

AXIOM 12. THE PRIMARY CONDITION OF ANY UNIVERSE IS THAT TWO SPACES, ENERGIES, OR OBJECTS MUST NOT OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE. WHEN THIS CONDITION IS VIOLATED (PERFECT DUPLICATE) THE APPARENCY OF ANY UNIVERSE OR ANY PART THEREOF IS NULLED.

AXIOM 13. THE CYCLE OF ACTION OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE IS: CREATE,

(22)

AXIOM 14. SURVIVAL IS ACCOMPLISHED BY ALTER-IS-NESS AND NOT-IS-NESS, BY WHICH IS GAINED THE PERSISTENCY KNOWN AS TIME.

AXIOM 15. CREATION IS ACCOMPLISHED BY THE POSTULATION OF AN AS-IS- NESS.

AXIOM 16. COMPLETE DESTRUCTION IS ACCOMPLISHED BY THE POSTULATION OF THE AS-IS-NESS OF ANY EXISTENCE AND THE PARTS THEREOF.

AXIOM 17. THE STATIC, HAVING POSTULATED AS-IS-NESS, THEN PRACTICES ALTER-IS-NESS, AND SO ACHIEVES THE APPARENCY OF IS-NESS AND SO OBTAINS REALITY.

AXIOM 18. THE STATIC, IN PRACTICING NOT-IS-NESS, BRINGS ABOUT THE PERSISTENCE OF UNWANTED EXISTENCES, AND SO BRINGS ABOUT UNREALITY, WHICH INCLUDES FORGETFULNESS, UNCONSCIOUSNESS, AND OTHER UNDESIRABLE STATES.

AXIOM 19. BRINGING THE STATIC TO VIEW AS-IS ANY CONDITION DEVALUATES THAT CONDITION.

AXIOM 20. BRINGING THE STATIC TO CREATE A PERFECT DUPLICATE CAUSES THE VANISHMENT OF ANY EXISTENCE OR PART THEREOF.

A perfect duplicate is an additional creation of the object, its energy, and space, in its own space, in its own time, using its own energy. This violates the condition that two objects must not occupy the same space, and causes a vanishment of the object.

AXIOM 21. UNDERSTANDING IS COMPOSED OF AFFINITY, REALITY, AND COMMUNICATION.

AXIOM 22. THE PRACTICE OF NOT-IS-NESS REDUCES UNDERSTANDING.

AXIOM 23. THE STATIC HAS THE CAPABILITY OF TOTAL KNOWINGNESS. TOTAL KNOWINGNESS WOULD CONSIST OF TOTAL ARC.

AXIOM 24. TOTAL ARC WOULD BRING ABOUT THE VANISHMENT OF ALL MECHANICAL CONDITIONS OF EXISTENCE.

AXIOM 25. AFFINITY IS A SCALE OF ATTITUDES WHICH FALLS AWAY FROM THE CO-EXISTENCE OF STATIC, THROUGH THE INTERPOSITIONS OF DISTANCE AND ENERGY, TO CREATE IDENTITY, DOWN TO CLOSE PROXIMITY BUT MYSTERY.

By the practice of Is-ness (Beingness) and Not-is-ness (refusal to Be) individuation progresses from the Knowingness of complete identification down through the introduction of more and more distance and less and less duplication, through Lookingness, Emotingness, Effortingness, Thinkingness, Symbolizingness, Eatingness, Sexingness, and so through to not-Knowingness (Mystery). Until the point of Mystery is reached, some communication is possible, but even at Mystery an attempt to communicate continues. Here we have, in the case of an individual, a gradual falling away from the belief that one can assume a complete Affinity down to the conviction that all is a complete Mystery. Any individual is somewhere on this Know-to-Mystery scale. The original Chart of Human Evaluation was the Emotion section of this scale.

AXIOM 26. REALITY IS THE AGREED-UPON APPARENCY OF EXISTENCE.

— 22 —

(23)

AGREED WITH BY OTHERS IT CAN THEN BE SAID TO BE A REALITY.

The anatomy of Reality is contained in Is-ness, which is composed of As-is-ness and Alter-is-ness. Is-ness is an apparency, it is not an Actuality. The Actuality is As-is-ness altered so as to obtain a persistency.

Unreality is the consequence and apparency of the practice of Not-is-ness.

AXIOM 28. COMMUNICATION IS THE CONSIDERATION AND ACTION OF IMPELLING AN IMPULSE OR PARTICLE FROM SOURCE-POINT ACROSS A DISTANCE TO RECEIPT-POINT, WITH THE INTENTION OF BRINGING INTO BEING AT THE RECEIPT-POINT A DUPLICATION OF THAT WHICH EMANATED FROM THE SOURCE-POINT.

The formula of Communication is: Cause, Distance, Effect, with Attention and Duplication.

The component parts of Communication are Consideration, Intention, Attention, Cause, Source-point, Distance, Effect, Receipt-point, Duplication, the Velocity of the impulse or particle, Nothingness or Somethingness. A non-communication consists of Barriers. Barriers consist of Space, Interpositions (such as walls and screens of fast-moving particles), and Time. A communication, by definition, does not need to be two-way. When a communication is returned, the formula is repeated, with the receipt-point now becoming a source-point and the former source-point now becoming a receipt-point.

AXIOM 29. IN ORDER TO CAUSE AN AS-IS-NESS TO PERSIST, ONE MUST ASSIGN OTHER AUTHORSHIP TO THE CREATION THAN HIS OWN.

OTHERWISE HIS VIEW OF IT WOULD CAUSE ITS VANISHMENT.

Any space, energy, form, object, individual, or physical universe condition can exist only when an alteration has occurred of the original As-is-ness so as to prevent a casual view from vanishing it. In other words, anything which is persisting must contain a “lie” so that the original consideration is not completely duplicated.

AXIOM 30. THE GENERAL RULE OF AUDITING IS THAT ANYTHING WHICH IS UNWANTED AND YET PERSISTS MUST BE THOROUGHLY VIEWED, AT WHICH TIME IT WILL VANISH.

If only partially viewed, its intensity, at least, will decrease.

AXIOM 31. GOODNESS AND BADNESS, BEAUTIFULNESS AND UGLINESS, ARE ALIKE CONSIDERATIONS AND HAVE NO OTHER BASIS THAN OPINION.

AXIOM 32. ANYTHING WHICH IS NOT DIRECTLY OBSERVED TENDS TO PERSIST.

AXIOM 33. ANY AS-IS-NESS WHICH IS ALTERED BY NOT-IS-NESS (BY FORCE) TENDS TO PERSIST.

AXIOM 34. ANY IS-NESS, WHEN ALTERED BY FORCE, TENDS TO PERSIST.

AXIOM 35. THE ULTIMATE TRUTH IS A STATIC.

A Static has no mass, meaning, mobility, no wave-length, no time, no location in

space, no space.

(24)

AXIOM 36. A LIE IS A SECOND POSTULATE, STATEMENT OR CONDITION DESIGNED TO MASK A PRIMARY POSTULATE WHICH IS PERMITTED TO REMAIN.

Examples:

Neither truth nor a lie is a motion or alteration of a particle from one position to another.

A lie is a statement that a particle having moved did not move, or a statement that a particle, not having moved, did move.

The basic lie is that a consideration which was made was not made or that it was different.

AXIOM 37. WHEN A PRIMARY CONSIDERATION IS ALTERED BUT STILL EXISTS, PERSISTENCE IS ACHIEVED FOR THE ALTERING CONSIDERATION.

All persistence depends on the Basic Truth, but the persistence is of the altering consideration, for the Basic Truth has neither persistence nor impersistence.

AXIOM 38. 1: STUPIDITY IS THE UNKNOWNESS OF CONSIDERATION.

2: MECHANICAL DEFINITION: STUPIDITY IS UNKNOWNESS OF TIME, PLACE, FORM AND EVENT.

1: TRUTH IS THE EXACT CONSIDERATION.

2: TRUTH IS THE EXACT TIME, PLACE, FORM, AND EVENT.

Thus we see that failure to discover Truth brings about stupidity.

Thus we see that the discovery of Truth would bring about an As-is-ness by actual experiment.

Thus we see that an ultimate truth would have no time, place, form or event.

Thus, then, we perceive that we can achieve a persistence only when we mask a truth.

Lying is an alteration of time, place, event, or form.

Lying becomes Alter-is-ness, becomes Stupidity.

(The blackness of cases is an accumulation of the case’s own or another’s lies.) Anything which persists must avoid As-is-ness. Thus, anything, to persist, must contain a lie.

AXIOM 39. LIFE POSES PROBLEMS FOR ITS OWN SOLUTION.

AXIOM 40. ANY PROBLEM, TO BE A PROBLEM, MUST CONTAIN A LIE, IF IT WERE TRUTH, IT WOULD UNMOCK.

An “unsolvable problem” would have the greatest persistence.

It would also contain the greatest number of altered facts. To make a problem, one must introduce Alter-is-ness.

AXIOM 41. THAT INTO WHICH ALTER-IS-NESS IS INTRODUCED BECOMES A PROBLEM.

— 24 —

(25)

PROBLEM.

It is a problem because it contains Alter-is-ness.

AXIOM 43. TIME IS THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF UNTRUTH.

Time states the untruth of consecutive considerations.

AXIOM 44. THETA (THE STATIC) HAS NO LOCATION IN MATTER, ENERGY, SPACE, OR TIME. IT IS CAPABLE OF CONSIDERATION.

AXIOM 45. THETA CAN CONSIDER ITSELF TO BE PLACED, AT WHICH MOMENT IT BECOMES PLACED, AND TO THAT DEGREE A PROBLEM.

AXIOM 46. THETA CAN BECOME A PROBLEM BY ITS CONSIDERATIONS, BUT THEN BECOMES MEST.

A problem is to some degree MEST. MEST is a problem.

AXIOM 47. THETA CAN RESOLVE PROBLEMS.

AXIOM 48. LIFE IS A GAME WHEREIN THETA AS THE STATIC SOLVES THE PROBLEMS OF THETA AS MEST.

AXIOM 49. TO SOLVE ANY PROBLEM IT IS ONLY NECESSARY TO BECOME THETA, THE SOLVER, RATHER THAN THETA, THE PROBLEM.

AXIOM 50. THETA AS MEST MUST CONTAIN CONSIDERATIONS WHICH ARE LIES.

AXIOM 51. POSTULATES AND LIVE COMMUNICATION NOT BEING MEST AND BEING SENIOR TO MEST CAN ACCOMPLISH CHANGE IN MEST WITHOUT BRINGING ABOUT A PERSISTENCE OF MEST. THUS AUDITING CAN OCCUR.

AXIOM 52. MEST PERSISTS AND SOLIDIFIES TO THE DEGREE THAT IT IS NOT GRANTED LIFE.

AXIOM 53. A STABLE DATUM IS NECESSARY TO THE ALIGNMENT OF DATA.

AXIOM 54. A TOLERANCE OF CONFUSION AND AN AGREED-UPON STABLE DATUM ON WHICH TO ALIGN THE DATA IN A CONFUSION ARE AT ONCE NECESSARY FOR A SANE REACTION ON THE EIGHT DYNAMICS.

THIS DEFINES SANITY.

AXIOM 55. THE CYCLE OF ACTION IS A CONSIDERATION. CREATE, SURVIVE, DESTROY, THE CYCLE OF ACTION ACCEPTED BY THE G.E.*, IS ONLY A CONSIDERATION WHICH CAN BE CHANGED BY THE THETAN MAKING A NEW CONSIDERATION OR DIFFERENT ACTION CYCLES.

AXIOM 56. THETA BRINGS ORDER TO CHAOS.

Corollary: Chaos brings disorder to theta.

____________________

(26)

AXIOM 57. ORDER MANIFESTS WHEN COMMUNICATION, CONTROL AND HAVINGNESS ARE AVAILABLE TO THETA.

Definition:

Communication: the interchange of ideas across space.

Control: positive postulating, which is intention, and the execution thereof.

Havingness: that which permits the experience of mass and pressure.

AXIOM 58. INTELLIGENCE AND JUDGEMENT ARE MEASURED BY THE ABILITY TO EVALUATE RELATIVE IMPORTANCES.

COROLLARY: THE ABILITY TO EVALUATE IMPORTANCES AND UNIMPORTANCES IS THE HIGHEST FACULTY OF LOGIC.

COROLLARY: IDENTIFICATION IS A MONOTONE ASSIGNMENT OF IMPORTANCE.

COROLLARY: IDENTIFICATION IS THE INABILITY TO EVALUATE DIFFERENCES IN TIME, LOCATION, FORM, COMPOSITION OR IMPORTANCE.

— 26 —

(27)

1. THE AUDITOR’S CODE AD 18

2. THE CODE OF HONOR

3. THE CODE OF A SCIENTOLOGIST

4. THE CREED OF THE CHURCH

(28)

THIS IS THE AUDITOR’S CODE OF 1968

It supersedes any earlier Codes. It has been developed as part of the Standard Tech Programme. It is the official Auditor’s Code.

It is required of auditors and students under training that they know this Code by heart, know what it means, and as they process, practice it. It is one thing to know it—another to practice it. A good auditor does both. It is not something to be read, agreed with and forgotten.

Following it means success in cases. Neglecting any part of it means failures. It combines the arduously won experiences collected during eighteen years from the practice of thousands of auditors.

We want successes.

LRH

THE AUDITOR Issue 43

____________________

AD 18 = “After Dianetics – eighteen years”.

— 28 —

(29)

IN CELEBRATION OF THE 100 PERCENT GAINS ATTAINABLE BY STANDARD TECH I HEREBY PROMISE AS AN AUDITOR TO FOLLOW THE AUDITOR’S CODE:

1. I promise not to evaluate for the preclear or tell him what he should think about his case in session.

2. I promise not to invalidate the preclear’s case or gains in or out of session.

3. I promise to administer only Standard Tech to a preclear in the standard way.

4. I promise to keep all auditing appointments once made.

5. I promise not to process a preclear who has not had sufficient rest and who is physically tired.

6. I promise not to process a preclear who is improperly fed or hungry.

7. I promise not to permit a frequent change of auditors.

8. I promise not to sympathize with a preclear, but be effective.

9. I promise not to let the preclear end session on his own determinism, but to finish off those cycles I have begun.

10. I promise never to walk off from a preclear in session.

11. I promise never to get angry with a preclear in session.

12. I promise to run every major case action to a floating needle.

13. I promise never to run any one action beyond its floating needle.

14. I promise to grant beingness to the preclear in session.

15. I promise not to mix the processes of Scientology with other practices except when the preclear is physically ill and only medical means will serve.

16. I promise to maintain Communication with the preclear and not to cut his comm or permit him to overrun in session.

17. I promise not to enter comments, expressions or enturbulence into a session that distract a preclear from his case.

18. I promise to continue to give the preclear the process or auditing command when needed in the session.

19. I promise not to let a preclear run a wrongly understood command.

20. I promise not to explain, justify or make excuses in session for any auditor mistakes whether real or imagined.

21. I promise to estimate the current case state of a preclear only by Standard Case

Supervision data and not to diverge because of some imagined difference in the case.

(30)

22. I promise never to use the secrets of a preclear divulged in session for punishment or personal gain.

23. I promise to see that any fee received for processing is refunded if the preclear is dissatisfied and demands it within three months after the processing, the only condition being that he may not again be processed or trained.

24. I promise not to advocate Scientology only to cure illness or only to treat the insane, knowing well it was intended for spiritual gain.

25. I promise to co-operate fully with the legal organizations of Dianetics and Scientology as developed by L. Ron Hubbard in safeguarding the ethical use and practice of the subject according to the basics of Standard Tech.

26. I promise to refuse to permit any being to be physically injured, violently damaged, operated on or killed in the name of “mental treatment”.

27. I promise not to permit sexual liberties or violation of the mentally unsound.

28. I promise to refuse to admit to the ranks of practitioners any being who is insane.

— 30 —

(31)

THE CODE OF HONOR

No one expects the Code of Honor to be closely and tightly followed.

An ethical code cannot be enforced. Any effort to enforce the Code of Honor would bring it into the level of a moral code. It cannot be enforced simply because it is a way of life which can exist as a way of life only as long as it is not enforced. Any other use but self-determined use of the Code of Honor would, as any Scientologist could quickly see, produce a considerable deterioration in a person. Therefore its use is a luxury use, and which is done solely on self- determined action, providing one sees eye to eye with the Code of Honor.

1. Never desert a comrade in need, in danger, or in trouble.

2. Never withdraw allegiance once granted.

3. Never desert a group to which you owe your support.

4. Never disparage yourself or minimize your strength or power.

5. Never need praise, approval or sympathy.

6. Never compromise with your own reality.

7. Never permit your affinity to be alloyed.

8. Do not give or receive communication unless you yourself desire it.

9. Your self determinism and your honor are more important than your immediate life.

10. Your integrity to yourself is more important than your body.

11. Never regret yesterday. Life is in you today, and you make your tomorrow.

12. Never fear to hurt another in a just cause.

13. Don’t desire to be liked or admired.

14. Be your own adviser, keep your own counsel and select your own decisions.

15. Be true to your own goals.

(32)
(33)

THE CODE OF A SCIENTOLOGIST

As a Scientologist I pledge myself to the Code of a Scientologist for the good of all:

1. To keep Scientologists, the Public and the Press accurately informed concerning Scientology, the world of Mental Health and society.

2. To use the best I know of Scientology to the best of my ability to help my family, friends, groups and the world.

3. To refuse to accept for processing and to refuse to accept money from any preclear or group I feel I cannot honestly help.

4. To decry and do all I can to abolish any and all abuses against life and Mankind.

5. To expose and help abolish any and all physically damaging practices in the field of Mental Health.

6. To help clean up and keep clean the field of Mental Health.

7. To bring about an atmosphere of safety and security in the field of Mental Health by eradicating its abuses and brutality.

8. To support true Humanitarian endeavors in the field of Human Rights.

9. To embrace the policy of equal justice for all.

10. To work for freedom of speech in the world.

11. To actively decry the suppression of knowledge, wisdom, philosophy or data which would help Mankind.

12. To support the freedom of religion.

13. To help Scientology organizations and groups ally themselves with public groups.

14. To teach Scientology at a level it can be understood and used by the recipients.

15. To stress the freedom to use Scientology as a philosophy in all its applications and variations in the humanities.

16. To insist upon standard and unvaried Scientology as an applied activity in ethics, processing and administration in Scientology organizations.

17. To take my share of responsibility for the impact of Scientology upon the world.

18. To increase the numbers and strength of Scientology over the world.

19. To set an example of the effectiveness and wisdom of Scientology.

20. To make this world a saner, better place.

1969 issue, replacing 1954 Code.

(34)
(35)

THE CREED OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY

We of the Church believe:

That all men of whatever race, color or creed were created with equal rights.

That all men have inalienable rights to their own religious practices and their performance.

That all men have inalienable rights to their own lives.

That all men have inalienable rights to their sanity.

That all men have inalienable rights to their own defense.

That all men have inalienable rights to conceive, choose, assist and support their own organizations, churches and governments.

That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely, to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others.

That all men have inalienable rights to the creation of their own kind.

That the souls of men have the rights of men.

That the study of the mind and the healing of mentally caused ills should not be alienated from religion or condoned in non-religious fields.

And that no agency less than God has the power to suspend or set aside these rights, overtly or covertly.

And we of the Church believe:

That man is basically good That he is seeking to survive

That his survival depends upon himself and upon his fellows and his attainment of brotherhood with the Universe.

And we of the Church believe that the laws of God forbid Man:

To destroy his own kind

To destroy the sanity of another To destroy or enslave another’s soul

To destroy or reduce the survival of one’s companions or one’s group.

And we of the Church believe That the spirit can be saved and

That the spirit alone may save or heal the body.

Ceremonies of the Founding Church

(36)
(37)

THE SUPERVISOR’S CODE AND STABLE DATA

THE SUPERVISOR’S CODE

1. The Supervisor must never neglect an opportunity to direct a student to the actual source of Scientology data.

2. The Supervisor should invalidate a student’s mistake ruthlessly and use good ARC while doing it.

3. The Supervisor should remain in good ARC with his students at all times while they are performing training activities.

4. The Supervisor at all times must have a high tolerance of stupidity in his students, and must be willing to repeat any datum not understood as many times as necessary for the student to understand and acquire reality on the datum.

5. The Supervisor does not have a “case” in his relationship with his students, nor discuss or talk about his personal problems to the students.

6. The Supervisor will, at all times, be a source point of good control and direction to his students.

7. The Supervisor will be able to correlate any part of Scientology to any other part and to livingness over the 8 dynamics.

8. The Supervisor should be able to answer any questions concerning Scientology by directing the student to the actual source of the data. If a Supervisor cannot answer a particular question, he should always say so, and the Supervisor should always find the answer to the question from the source, and tell the student where the answer is to be found.

9. The Supervisor should never lie to, deceive, or misdirect a student concerning Scientology. He shall be honest at all times about it with a student.

10. The Supervisor must be an accomplished auditor.

11. The Supervisor should always set a good example to his students, such as giving good demonstrations, being on time and dressing neatly.

12. The Supervisor should at all times be perfectly willing and able to do anything he tells his students to do.

13. The Supervisor must not become emotionally involved with students of either sex while they are under his or her training.

14. When a Supervisor makes any mistake, he is to inform the student that he has made one and rectify it immediately. This datum embraces all phases in training demonstrations, lectures and processing, etc. He is never to hide the fact that he made the mistake.

16. The Supervisor should never neglect to give praise to his students when due.

(38)

17. The Supervisor to some degree should be pan-determined about the Supervisor-student relationship.

17. When a Supervisor lets a student control, give orders to, or handle the Supervisor in any way, for the purpose of demonstration or other training purposes, the Supervisor should always put the student back under his control.

18. The Supervisor will at all times observe the Auditor’s Code during sessions, and the Code of a Scientologist at all times.

19. The Supervisor will never give a student opinions about Scientology without labelling them thoroughly as such; otherwise, he is to direct only to tested and proven data concerning Scientology.

20. The Supervisor shall never use a student for his own personal gain.

21. The Supervisor will be a stable terminal, point the way to stable data, be certain, but not dogmatic or dictatorial toward his students.

22. The Supervisor will keep himself at all times informed of the most recent Scientology data and procedures, and communicate this information to his students.

SUPERVISOR’S STABLE DATA

In addition to the Supervisor’s Code there is a primary stable datum about all supervision:

Get the student to accomplish auditing the preclear and then get the student to accomplish it with better form, speed and accuracy.

A Supervisor must never lose sight of the PURPOSE of auditing. Auditing is for the preclear, is intended to improve the preclear’s case. Auditing is not just a matter of good form.

The reason some students do not accomplish auditing is that they become so oriented on form alone that they forget the purpose of the form.

Good auditing form and correct sessioning obtains many times the result of bad form and incorrect sessioning. But total form and no effort to do something for the preclear results in no auditing.

The result comes before the form in importance. Because students may use this idea to excuse lack of form, Q and A-ing, and to squirrel with their processes, the stable datum becomes unpopular with supervisors.

A student should first be held responsible for the state of the preclear during and after sessions and made to know that as an auditor he is there to get a fast, good result. The student should then be taught that he can get a better, faster result with better form. After that the student should be taught that Scientology results are only obtained by correct and exact duplication of Scientology processes, not by off-beat variations.

The student wants to know how to do this or that. Refer him to his materials on how to do the most fundamental actions, but MAKE HIM OR HER DO IT. And keep up a running refrain that you want results, results, results, on his preclear.

The student will be all thumbs and faint. The Supervisor may be horrified by the goofs. But don’t bother with the goofs. Just demand results on the preclear, results on the preclear, results on the preclear.

— 38 —

(39)

results in auditing and (b) that results can be obtained and (c) that he or she sure needs better skill.

So the first address in training is to teach those above three things (a), (b) and (c).

You can’t teach a student who doesn’t realize that results in the preclear depend on the auditor and auditing and that results are expected from auditing; who believes results can’t be obtained from auditing or wants to prove auditing doesn’t work; and who doesn’t yet know that he or she doesn’t know. These are the barriers to training and a good auditor.

The gradient approach to the mind is vital. Clearing will not occur without it. But the gradient approach to auditing can be overdone to a point where the student completely loses sight of why he is auditing.

1. First and foremost the auditor accomplishes something for the preclear and without that there is neither sense nor purpose to auditing;

2. Excellent form accomplishes more for the preclear faster; and

3. Exact duplication of processes alone returns standard high level results on all preclears.

The student thrown in over his head learns:

A. Results in the preclear depend on the auditor and auditing and that results are expected from auditing;

B. That results can be obtained in auditing and the better the form and duplication, the better the results; and

C. That the student has more to learn about auditing and that the student doesn’t yet know.

Therefore the Supervisor must teach the student:

a. That he or she is supposed to get results in auditing;

b. That Scientology can obtain results; and

c. That better form and duplication obtain better, faster results.

I dare say many students learn things just because they are told to and find no relationship

between form, duplication and the preclear. Let them fall on their heads and yet obtain results

and this attitude will change—and you’ll save us a lot of off-beat nonsense and case failures in

organizations and the field.

(40)
(41)

THE CREDO OF A GOOD AND SKILLED MANAGER

To be effective and successful a manager must:

1. Understand as fully as possible the goals and aims of the group he manages. He must be able to see and embrace the ideal attainment of the goal as envisioned by a goal maker. He must be able to tolerate and better the practical attainments and advances of which his group and its members may be capable. He must strive to narrow, always, the ever existing gulf between the ideal and the practical.

2. He must realize that a primary mission is the full and honest interpretation by himself of the ideal and ethic and their goals and aims to his subordinates and the group itself.

He must lead creatively and persuasively toward these goals his subordinates, the group itself and the individuals of the group.

3. He must embrace the organization and act solely for the entire organization and never form or favor cliques. His judgement of individuals of the group should be solely in the light of their worth to the entire group.

4. He must never falter in sacrificing individuals to the good of the group both in planning and execution and in his justice.

5. He must protect all established communication lines and compliment them where necessary.

6. He must protect all affinity in his charge and have himself an affinity for the group itself.

7. He must attain always to the highest creative reality.

8. His planning must accomplish, in the light of goals and aims, the activity of the entire group. He must never let organizations grow and sprawl but, learning by pilots, must keep organizational planning fresh and flexible.

9. He must recognize in himself the rationale of the group and receive and evaluate the data out of which he makes his solutions with the highest attention to the truth of that data.

10. He must constitute himself on the orders of service to the group.

11. He must permit himself to be served well as to his individual requirements, practicing an economy of his own efforts and enjoying certain comforts to the end of keeping high his rationale.

12. He should require of his subordinates that they relay into their own spheres of management the whole and entire of his true feelings and the reasons for his decisions as clearly as they can be relayed and expanded and interpreted only for the greater understanding of the individuals governed by those subordinates.

13. He must never permit himself to pervert or mask any portion of the ideal and ethic on

which the group operates nor must he permit the ideal and ethic to grow old and

outmoded and unworkable. He must never permit his planning to be perverted or

censored by subordinates. He must never permit the ideal and ethic of the group’s

(42)

14. He must have faith in the goals, faith in himself and faith in the group.

15. He must lead by demonstrating always creative and constructive sub-goals. He must not drive by threat and fear.

16. He must realize that every individual in the group is engaged in some degree in the managing of other men, life and MEST and that a liberty of management within this code should be allowed to every such sub-manager.

Thus conducting himself a manager can win empire for his group, whatever that empire may be.

How to Live Though an Executive

— 42 —

(43)

1. PRIMARY AXIOMS FROM THE ORIGINAL THESIS

2. THE FUNDAMENTAL AXIOMS OF DIANETICS

3. THE LOGICS

(44)
(45)

AXIOM 1 SURVIVE!

AXIOM 2 THE PURPOSE OF THE MIND IS TO SOLVE PROBLEMS RELATING TO SURVIVAL.

AXIOM 3 THE MIND DIRECTS THE ORGANISM, THE SPECIES, ITS SYMBIOTES OR LIFE IN THE EFFORT OF SURVIVAL.

AXIOM 4 THE MIND, AS THE CENTRAL DIRECTION SYSTEM OF THE BODY, POSES, PERCEIVES AND RESOLVES PROBLEMS OF SURVIVAL AND DIRECTS OR FAILS TO DIRECT THEIR EXECUTION.

AXIOM 5 THE PERSISTENCY OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN LIFE IS DIRECTLY GOVERNED BY THE STRENGTH OF HIS BASIC DYNAMIC.

AXIOM 6 INTELLIGENCE IS THE ABILITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL, GROUP OR RACE TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS RELATING TO SURVIVAL.

Dianetics: The Original Thesis

1948

(46)

References

Related documents

I problematize three family images associated with the design and implementation of housing projects: the bureaucratic family, envisaged by policymakers as conflating with a model

Based on consistent evidence from multiple robust studies in three core reviews there is sufficient review-level evidence to support the effectiveness of OST in reducing the

Looking at the developments in 2013, the mobile revenue generated per device remained constant, but shows an interesting turn in early 2014: While all devices are increasing

• Verify that procedures are in place for storing off-site copies of applications and data. • Check currency back-ups

As with other rapidly reconfigurable devices, optically reconfigurable gate arrays (ORGAs) have been developed, which combine a holographic memory and an optically programmable

R1 How will barriers to outdoor play, such as weather conditions, safety concerns for the children, and accessibility to materials, be removed or diminished to encourage teachers

The encryption operation for PBES2 consists of the following steps, which encrypt a message M under a password P to produce a ciphertext C, applying a

The useful life of items recorded in this category should exceed one year, and dollar levels should be established by the board for inclusion in inventory or General Fixed