ISSN 2291-8639
Volume 13, Number 1 (2017), 15-21
http://www.etamaths.com
SOME NEW ESTIMATES OF HERMITE-HADAMARD INEQUALITIES FOR HARMONICALLY CONVEX FUNCTIONS WITH APPLICATIONS
WEN WANG1,2,∗ AND JIBING QI1
Abstract. In this paper, we first establish an integral identity. Further, using this identity, some new estimates for Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for harmonically convex functions are established. Finally, some applications to special mean are showed.
1. Introduction
In this article, let R= (−∞,∞),R++= (0,∞).
Theory of convex functions and theory of inequalities are closely related to each other. Therefore, some literature on inequalities can be found for convex functions.
One of the most extensively research on inequalities is Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities.
Definition 1.1 ( [1,2])A functionf :I⊂R→Ris convex function on I, if
f(tx+ (1−t)y)≤tf(x) + (1−t)f(y), ∀x, y∈I, t∈[0,1]. (1.1) f is concave function if−f is convex function.
Let f : I ⊂ R → R be a convex function. The following inequality is the well-known Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality
f a+b
2
≤ 1
b−a Z b
a
f(x)dx≤ f(a) +f(b)
2 , a, b∈I with a < b. (1.2)
Estimates for Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex functions are studied in a rich literature [8–16].
Theorem 1.2 ( [1])Let f :I0⊂R→Rbe a differentiable mapping on I0 anda, b∈I0 witha < b.
If|f0(x)|q is a convex function forq >1, then
f(a) +f(b)
2 −
1 b−a
Z b
a
f(x)dx
≤(b−a)(|f
0(a)|+|f0(b)|)
8 . (1.3)
Recently, ˙Iscan [3] introduced the concept of harmonically convex functions and established Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for harmonically convex functions.
Definition 1.3( [3,4])A function f :I⊂R\{0} →Ris said to be harmonically convex function onI, if
f
1
tx−1+ (1−t)y−1
≤tf(x) + (1−t)f(y), ∀x, y∈I, t∈[0,1]. (1.4)
f is said to be harmonically concave function if−f is harmonically convex function.
Theorem 1.4 ( [3,4]) Let f : I ⊂ R\{0} → R be a harmonically convex function a, b ∈ I with
a < b. Iff ∈L[a, b] , then
f
2ab a+b
≤ ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx≤
f(a) +f(b)
2 . (1.5)
Received 1stJuly, 2016; accepted 18th September, 2016; published 3rdJanuary, 2017.
2010Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15, 26A51.
Key words and phrases. Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality; harmonically convex function; estimate; mean; inequality.
c
2017 Authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Theorem 1.5( [3,4])Letf :I⊂R\{0} →Rbe a harmonically convex functiona, b∈Iwitha < b
andf0∈L[a, b]. If |f0(x)|q is harmonically convex on [a, b]forq >1, 1 p+
1
q = 1, then
f(a) +f(b)
2 −
ab b−a
Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤ ab(b−a)
2
1
p+ 1 1p
(µ1|f0(a)|q+µ2|f0(b)|q)1q, (1.6)
where
µ1=
a2−2q+b1−2q[(b−a)(1−2q)−a] 2(b−a)2(1−q)(1−2q) ,
µ2=
a2−2q+b1−2q[(b−a)(1−2q)−b] 2(b−a)2(1−q)(1−2q) .
For many recent results related to Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically functions, see [3–7].
The aim of this paper is first to establish a integral identity. Then, using this identity, some new estimates for Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for harmonically convex functions are established by ˙I. ˙Iscan in [3] are derived.
2. Some lemmas
In order to prove our main results we need some lemmas.
Lemma 2.1 Let f :I⊂R\{0} →R be a differentiable function onI0 anda, b∈I0 witha < b. If f0 ∈L[0,1], then forλ∈[0,1], one has
(1−λ)f
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
+λf
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
− ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
=b−a ab
" Z 1−λ
0
t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]f 0
1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
−
Z 1
1−λ
t−1
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]f 0
1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
. (2.1)
Proof. Letx=tb−1+(1−t)a1 −1,t∈[0,1] andx∈[a, b], then
1
a− 1 b
Z 1−λ
0
t
(tb−1+ (1−t)a−1)2f 0
1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
=tf
1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
1−λ
0 −
Z u
a
f(x) x2
ab b−adx
= (1−λ)f
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
− ab
b−a Z u
a
f(x)
x2 dx. (2.2)
and
1
b − 1 a
Z 1
1−λ
t
(tb−1+ (1−t)a−1)2f
0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
= tf
1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
1
1−λ −
Z b
u
f(x) x2
ab b−adx
=λf
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
− ab
b−a Z b
u
f(x)
x2 dx, (2.3)
Remark 2.2 From (7) we derive the following two identities.
f
2ab a+b
− 2ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
= 2(b−a) ab
" Z 12
0
t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]f
0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
−
Z 1
1 2
t−1
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]f
0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt #
; (2.4)
f(a) +f(b)
2 −
ab b−a
Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
= b−a 2ab
Z 1
0
t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]f 0
1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
−
Z 1
0
t−1
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]f
0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
. (2.5)
Proof. Takeλ= 12 in (7), we can derive (10).
We respectively takeλ= 0 andλ= 1 in (7) and add two inequalities, then (11) is obtained.
Lemma 2.3By integral calculation, then
C1(a, b, λ) =
Z 1−λ
0
t(1−t)[tb+ (1−t)a]2dt
= (1−λ)3 1
5(b−a)
2(1−λ)2+1
2a(b−a)(1−λ) + 1 3λ
2
; (2.6)
C2(a, b, λ) =
Z 1−λ
0
t2[tb+ (1−t)a]2dt
= (1−λ)2 1
20+ 1 5λ
(b−a)2(1−λ)2+ 1
6+ 1 2λ
a(b−a)(1−λ) + 1
6+ 1 3λ
λ2
;
(2.7)
C3(a, b, λ) =
Z 1
1−λ
t(1−t)[tb+ (1−t)a]2dt= Z λ
0
(1−u)u[(1−u)b+ua]2du
=−1
5(b−a)
2λ5+1
4(a
2+ 3b2−4ab)λ4+1
3(2ab−3b
2)λ3+1
2b
2λ2; (2.8)
C4(a, b, λ) =
Z 1
1−λ
(1−t)2[tb+ (1−t)a]2dt= Z λ
0
u2[(1−u)b+ua]2du
=1 5(b−a)
2λ5+1
2b(a−b)λ
4+1
3b
2λ3, (2.9)
whereu= 1−t.
3. Main results
Theorem 3.1 Let f :I ⊂R\{0} →R be a differentiable function andf0 ∈L[a, b]. If |f0(x)|q is
harmonically convex on[a, b] with0≤a < bforq≥1, then
(1−λ)f
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
+λf
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
− ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤ b−a
ab n
(C1(a, b, λ))1−
1
q|f0(b)|qC
1(a, b, λ) +|f0(a)|qC2(a, b, λ)
1q
+ (C3(a, b, λ))1−
1
q|f0(b)|qC
3(a, b, λ) +|f0(a)|qC4(a, b, λ)
1qo
. (3.1)
Proof. From Lemma 2.1 and using H¨older inequality, further, since|f0(x)|q is harmonically convex on
[a, b], we have
I=
(1−λ)f
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
+λf
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
− ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤b−a
ab "
Z 1−λ
0
t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]
f0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt + Z 1 1−λ
1−t [tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]
f0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
dt
≤b−a
ab Z 1−λ 0 t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2dt
!1−1q Z 1−λ
0
t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2
f0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
q dt
!1q
+ Z 1
1−λ
1−t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2dt
1−1qZ 1
1−λ
1−t [tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2
f0 1
tb−1+ (1−t)a−1
q dt #
≤b−a
ab Z 1−λ 0 t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2dt
!1−1q" Z 1−λ
0
t
t|f0(b)|q+ (1−t)|f0(a)|q [tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2 dt
#1q
+ Z 1
1−λ
1−t
[tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2dt
1−1q"Z 1
1−λ
(1−t)t|f0(b)|q+ (1−t)|f0(a)|q [tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]2 dt
#1q
.
Noticing that [tb−1+ (1−t)a−1]−1≤ta+ (1−t)b, and using (12-15), then, from above inequality we have
I≤b−a
ab Z 1−λ 0
t[tb+ (1−t)a]2dt !1−1q"
Z 1−λ
0
t[tb+ (1−t)a]2
t|f0(b)|q+ (1−t)|f0(a)|qdt #q1
+ Z 1
1−λ
(1−t)[tb+ (1−t)a]2dt
1−1qZ 1
1−λ
(1−t)[tb+ (1−t)a]2t|f0(b)|q+ (1−t)|f0(a)|q
dt 1q)
= b−a ab
(C1(a, b, λ))1−
1 q " Z 1−λ 0 h
|f0(b)|qt2[tb+ (1−t)a]2+|f0(a)|qt(1−t)[tb+ (1−t)a]2idt #q1
+ (C3(a, b, λ)) 1−1
q
Z 1
1−λ
h
|f0(b)|qt(1−t)[tb+ (1−t)a]2+|f0(a)|q(1−t)2[tb+ (1−t)a]2idt
1q)
= b−a ab
n
(C1(a, b, λ)) 1−1
q |f0(b)|qC
1(a, b, λ) +|f0(a)|qC2(a, b, λ)
q1
+ (C3(a, b, λ)) 1−1
q |f0(b)|qC
3(a, b, λ) +|f0(a)|qC4(a, b, λ)
1qo.
Corollary 3.2 Assume that all the assumptions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied. If we takeq= 1 and
M = max{|f0(a)|,|f0(b)|}, then
(1−λ)f
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
+λf
ab
(1−λ)a+λb
− ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤ M(b−a)
ab h
C1(a, b, λ) +C2(a, b, λ) +C3(a, b, λ) +C4(a, b, λ)
i
. (3.2)
Corollary 3.3 Assume that all the assumptions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied. If we takeλ=q= 1
andM = max{|f0(a)|,|f0(b)|}, then
f(a)− ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤M(b−a)
ab 1
4(b−a)
2+1
6b(b−4a)
. (3.3)
Corollary 3.4 Assume that all the assumptions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied. If we take λ = 0,
q= 1 andM = max{|f0(a)|,|f0(b)|}, then
f(b)− ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤ M(b−a)
ab
1 4(b−a)
2+2
3a(b−a)
. (3.4)
Corollary 3.5 Assume that all the assumptions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied. If we take λ = 12,
q= 1 andM = max{|f0(a)|,|f0(b)|}, then
f
2ab
a+b
− ab
b−a Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤M(b−a)
ab
×
C1(a, b,
1 2)
C1(a, b,
1
2) +C2(a, b, 1 2)
+C3(a, b,
1 2)
C3(a, b,
1
2) +C4(a, b, 1 2)
. (3.5)
Remark 3.6 By (18) and (19) we obtain the following inequality
f(a) +f(b)
2 −
ab b−a
Z b
a
f(x) x2 dx
≤ M(b−a)
ab 1
12(4b
2−6ab−a2)
. (3.6)
4. Some Applications for Special Means
Leta, bare two nonnegative number witha < b. Let us recall the following special means ofaand b.
(1) The arithmetic meanA=A(a, b) :=a+b
2 ; (2) The geometric meanG=G(a, b) := √
ab; (3) The harmonic mean H =H(a, b) :=a+b2ab; (4) The logarithmic meanL=L(a, b) := lnb−ab−lna; (5) The -logarithmic mean
Lp=Lp(a, b) :=
bp+1−ap+1
(p+ 1)(b−a) 1p
, a6=b, p∈R, p6= 0,−1.
These means are often applied to numerical approximation and in other areas. However, the fol-lowing simple relationships are known in the literature:
H≤G≤L≤A. (4.1)
It is also known that Lp is monotonically increasing respecting to p ∈ R, denoting L0 = I and
Proposition 1. Let 0< a < b. Then we obtain the following inequalities:
H−G 2
L
≤ b−a
ab
×
C1(a, b,
1 2)
C1(a, b,
1
2) +C2(a, b, 1 2)
+C3(a, b,
1 2)
C3(a, b,
1
2) +|C4(a, b, 1 2)
;
A−G 2
L
≤ b−a
ab 1
12(4b
2
−6ab−a2)
.
Proof. The assertion follows from inequalities (20) and (21), respectively, forf(x) =x,x∈R++.
Proposition 2. Let 0< a < b. Then we derive the following inequalities:
H2−G2≤
2(b−a) a
×
C1(a, b,
1 2)
C1(a, b,
1
2) +C2(a, b, 1 2)
+C3(a, b,
1 2)
C3(a, b,
1
2) +|C4(a, b, 1 2)
;
A(a2, b2)−G 2
L
≤ 2(b−a)
a 1
12(4b
2−6ab−a2)
.
Proof. The assertion follows from inequalities (20) and (21), respectively, forf(x) =x2,x∈R++.
Proposition 3. Let 0< a < b. Then we have the following inequalities:
Hp+2−LppG 2
≤
2bp+2(b−a)
ab
×
C1(a, b,
1 2)
C1(a, b,
1
2) +C2(a, b, 1 2)
+C3(a, b,
1 2)
C3(a, b,
1
2) +|C4(a, b, 1 2)
;
A(ap+2, bp+2)−LppG2≤
2bn+2(b−a) ab
1
12(4b
2−6ab−a2)
.
Proof. The assertion follows from inequalities (20) and (21), respectively, for f(x) = xp+2, x∈R ++
andp∈(−1,∞)\{0}.
References
[1] S. S. Dragomir and R. P. Agarwal, Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula, Appl. Math. Lett. 5 (1998), 91-95.
[2] J. E. Peˇcari´c, F. Proschan, Y. L. Tong, Convex Functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications, Academic Press, 1991.
[3] ˙I. ˙Iscan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 43 (6) (2014), 935-942.
[4] E. Set and ˙I. ˙Iscan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for Harmaonically convex functions on the co-ordinates, arXiv:1404.6397v1 [math.CA].
[5] ˙I. ˙Iscan, S. Wu, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions via fractional intergrals, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 238 (2014), 237-244.
[6] ˙I. ˙Iscan, Hermite-Hadamard and Simpson-like type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions, arXiv:1310.4851v1 [math.CA].
[7] ˙I. ˙Iscan, Hermite-Hadamard and Simpson-Like Type Inequalities for Differentiable Harmonically Convex Functions, Journal of Mathematics, 2014 (2014), Article ID 346305.
[8] ˙I. ˙Iscan, Generalization of different type integral inequalities for s-convex functions via fractional integrals, Appli-cable Analysis, 93 (9) 2014, 1846-1862.
[9] G. Toad er, Some generalizations of the convexity, Proceedings of the Colloquium on Approximation and Optimiza-tion, Univ. Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, 1985, 329-338.
[10] F. X. Chen and S. H. Wu, Some Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for Harmonically s-Convex Functions,The Scientific World Journal, 2014 (2014), Article ID 279158.
[11] Tian-Yu Zhang, Feng Qi, Integral Inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard Type for m-AH Convex Functions, Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory, 3(2) 2014, 60-64.
[12] U. S. Kirmaci, Inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to midpoint formula, Appl. Math. Comp. 147 (2004), 137-146.
[14] Constantin P. Niculescu, The Hermite-Hadamard inequality for log-convex functions, Nonlinear Analysis, 75 (2012), 662-669.
[15] W. Wang, S. G. Yang, Schur m-power convexity of a class of multiplicatively convex functions and applications, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014 (2014), Article ID 258108.
[16] W. Wang, ˙I. ˙Iscan, H. Zhou, Fractional integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for m-HH convex functions with applications, Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics (Kyungshang). 26 (3) (2016), 501-512.
1
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hefei Normal University, Hefei 230601,P.R.China
2
School of Mathematical Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China ∗