COMMENTARIES
913
important goal for future research. Such an
ap-proach would be greatly facilitated if decision mak-ing were based on gestational age. For that purpose,
detailed perinatal outcome data by gestational age
are needed for geographically defined populations including all very preterm live and stillbirths.
Op-timally, data concerning both neonatal and
post-neonatal mortality (through the minimum age of
12 months) should be provided, because almost 10%
of deaths that are direct consequences of prematur-ity are still postponed to infancy.’4 Besides
obser-vational studies, population-based prospective
cm-ical trials are unavoidable if efficacy of perinatal health services interventions is to be properly
meas-ured. The answer to the question in the title is
“yes”!
REFERENCES
KIR8TI M. HEINONEN, MD Children’s Hospital
University of Kuopio 70210 Kuopio, Finland
1. Greenough A, Roberton NRC. Morbidity and survival in neonates ventilated for the respiratory distress syndrome. Br Med J. 1985;290:597-600
2. Field DJ, Milner AD, Hopkin IE, et al. Changing patterns in neonate! respiratory distress. Pediatr PulmonoL 1987;3:231-235
3. Yu VYH, Zhao SM, Bajuk B. Results of intensive care for 375 very low birth weight infants. Aust Paediatr J. 1982;18:188-192
4. Yu VYH, Bajuk B, Orgill AA, et a!. Viability of infants born at 24 to 26 weeks’ gestation. Ann Aced Med. 1985;14:563-571
5. Sinclair JC, Torrance GW, Boyle MH, et al. Evaluation of neonatal-intensive-care programs. N EngI J Med. 1981;
305:489-494
6. Hakulinen A, Heinonen K, Jokela V. et al.
Prematurity-associated morbidity during the first two years of life. A population-based study. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988;77:430-448
7. Pomerance JJ, Ukrainski CT, Ukra T, et al. Cost of living
for infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth. Pediatrics. 1978;61:908-910
8. Sandhu B, Stevenson RC, Cooke RWI, et a!. Cost of neo-natal intensive care for very-low-birthweight infants. Lan-cet. 1986;1:600-603
9. Kitchen WH, Campbell N, Drew JH, et al. Provision of perinatal services and survival of extremely low birthweight infants in Victoria. Med JAust. 1983;2:314-318
10. Kitchen WH, Murton LI. Survival rates of infants with birth weights between 501 and 1000 g. Improvement by
excluding certain categories of cases. Am J Dix Child. 1985;139:470-471
11. Hoskins EM, Elliot E, Shennan AT, et al. Outcome of very
low birth weight infants born at a perinatal center. Am J Obstet GynecoL 1983;145:135-140
12. Yu VYH, Wong PY, Bajuk B, et a!. Outcome of extremely
low birthweight infants. Br J Obstet GynaecoL 1986;93:162-170
13. Hirata T, Epcar JT, Walsh A, et al. Survival and outcome
of infants 501 to 750 grams: a six-year experience. JPediatr.
1983;102:741-748
14. Heinonen KM, Hakulinen A, Jokela V. Survival of the smallest. Lancet. 1988;2:204-207
Intraventricular
Hemorrhage
In this issue, Philip et al’ present data concerning the declining incidence of intraventricular hemor-rhage in the premature infant in the 1980s without
planned intervention. Before discussing the
impli-cations of this work, it may be useful to review
some of the pertinent features of intraventricular hemorrhage in the neonate.
Intraventricular hemorrhage is characteristic of
the premature infant, particularly the infant less
than 32 weeks’ gestation. Bleeding typically
ema-nates from capillaries in subependymal germinal
matrix, a gelatinous area containing an elaborate
but immature capillary bed which, in turn, is
sub-served by an abundant arterial and venous supply.
It is a transitional zone that becomes less promi-nent during the last 12 to 16 weeks of gestation and is essentially exhausted at term.2 Current concepts
of pathogenesis of intraventricular hemorrhage
in-dude intravascular, vascular, and extravascular
factors, all of which may act in combination to
provoke intraventricular hemorrhage.2 In recent
years, it has become apparent that disturbances in
cerebral blood flow are particularly important fac-tors in causing hemorrhage. Particular importance has been attributed to fluctuations in cerebral blood flow, increases in cerebral blood flow, increases in
venous pressure, and decreases in cerebral blood
flow.2 A likely mechanism for the premature
in-fant’s propensity for dangerous alterations in cere-bral blood flow is a pressure-passive circulation,3 imparting extreme importance to events that affect the systemic blood pressure. Striking disturbances
in systemic blood pressure may occur during the
labor and delivery process and during routine
neo-natal
procedures such as suctioning and in infants with respiratory distress syndrome, pneumothorax,and patent ductus arteriosus. Intervention
strat-egies directed at the routine care of sick premature infants to minimize perturbations in systemic blood
pressure and cerebral blood flow have focused on
(1) simple measures, such as the early intubation
of infants with respiratory distress syndrome, the
avoidance ofrapid volume infusions, minimal
hand-ling of infants, etc and (2) pharmacologic interven-tions, such as the antenatal administration of phe-nobarbital,9”#{176} the postnatal use of phenobarbital,
indomethacin, vitamin E, and ethamsylate to a
heterogenous group of mothers and/or infants, with
conflicting results.”’6 The use of muscle paralysis in a subset of intubated infants with respiratory
distress syndrome and fluctuations in cerebral
blood flow velocity has resulted in a marked reduc-tion in both the incidence and severity of intraven-tricular hemorrhage.17
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news
914
PEDIATRICS
Vol. 84 No. 5 November
1989
The study of Philip et al is based on a retrospec-tive review of records during 8 years. Several per-tinent observations from this study require ampli-fication. Although the incidence of intraventricularhemorrhage declined from 39% in infants weighing
less than 1500 g at birth in 1980/1981 to 25% in
1986/1987, the incidence ofsevere hemorrhage, that
lesion that accounts for much of the brain injury in the premature infant, has not significantly changed
during the same time. The authors describe in some
detail
the changes introduced in clinicalmanage-ment that may have contributed to the observed
decrease in intraventricular hemorrhage by
mini-mizing fluctuations in systemic blood pressure.
Al-though none of the pharmacologic interventions
mentioned previously are administered in their
nursery to reduce intraventricular hemorrhage, it
is of interest to note that there is an increased use of narcotic analgesics in their mechanically
venti-lated infants. The use of analgesics may be an
important contributing factor in their observed
re-duction in intraventricular hemorrhage because, in
a recent report, elimination of fluctuations in ar-terial blood pressure in infants receiving morphine
sulfate and/or fentanyl was reported.’8 This issue
clearly requires further study. It is possible that the observed decrease in intraventricular hemorrhage
is unrelated to neonatal factors but rather to a
change in obstetrical management. Thus, pertinent obstetrical data not presented by Philip et al relate to the antenatal administration of steroids, tocoly-tic agents, and barbiturates, all of which have been reported to alter either the occurrence of postnatal respiratory distress syndrome and/or intraventric-ular hemorrhage.’#{176}”2’ The role of labor and de-livery in the genesis of intraventricular hemorrhage is controversial.22’ However, in one center, early
intraventricular hemorrhage, ie, diagnosed in the
delivery room, was a common finding.’ An
incon-clusive analysis has been undertaken by Philip et
al to assess the protective role of cesarean section
in the genesis of intraventricular hemorrhage. A
definitive conclusion in this regard could only be
made if a cranial ultrasound scan was obtained near the time of delivery. In this study the cranial
ultra-sound scans were obtained “sometime” in the first
3 postnatal days. Although the apparent incidence
of respiratory distress syndrome has not changed
in Portland during the 8 years, no information is
provided regarding the severity of respiratory dis-tress syndrome. A strong association exists between respiratory distress syndrome, and in particular, severity ofrespiratory distress syndrome, and
intra-ventricular hemorrhage.6’ One could argue that
the decline in intraventricular hemorrhage during
the 8 years is a reflection of less severe pulmonary
disease. In support of this hypothesis is the obser-vation that, of the 26 infants enrolled in a surfac-tant study carried out by Philip et al (presumably the sickest infants), the incidence of
intraventric-ular hemorrhage was 34% during 1986/1987 when
the lowest overall incidence (25%) of intraventric-ular hemorrhage was observed.
These notes represent an attempt to place the
study of Philip et al in perspective. They should
not detract from the basic value of the work. Their data raise several important issues. First, the
mci-dence of intraventricular hemorrhage may vary
substantially from institution to institution. This variation may not be related to any specific practice
but rather to the particular patient population.
Thus, in our experience, the incidence of
hemor-rhage in nonmechanically ventilated or
mechani-cally ventilated preterm infants with minimal
res-piratory distress syndrome is less than 10%. The
incidence increases markedly with the severity of
the lung disease and/or its complications.
More-over, in our experience, the incidence of
hemor-rhage is greater (approximately 60%) and the onset
earlier (10 ± 8 hours) in the extremely small
pre-mature infant, ie, less than 700 g, compared with
the incidence (approximately 20%) in “larger” birth weight infant, ie, greater than 1000 g, with an onset usually in the second or third postnatal day.27 This raises the distinct possibility that the pathogenesis
of intraventricular hemorrhage may be different in
infants of differing gestational ages. Thus, before
embarking on a prevention study, some ofthe
afore-mentioned factors should be taken into
considera-tion. Moreover, identifying the infants who are at
highest risk for the subsequent development of
intraventricular hemorrhage would reduce the
po-tential risk of administering a variety of
pharma-cologic agents unnecessary to a large group of
in-fants. Our own data indicate that infants at highest risk for intraventricular hemorrhage can be identi-fled before the onset of hemorrhage by the presence
of fluctuations in arterial blood pressure and/or
cerebral blood flow velocity.6 The former
observa-tion can easily be made at the bedside from the
arterial
blood pressure monitor. Elimination of these fluctuations is associated with a reduction notonly in the incidence but more importantly the
severity of intraventricular hemorrhage.’7 Because the fluctuations are tightly linked to the infant’s
own respiratory effect, intervention strategies
should be focused on minimizing the infant’s own
respiratory effort during the time of greatest vul-nerabiity, ie, the first 72 hours of life.
Presently, the most important contribution
ap-parent from this report should be to stimulate
everyone involved in the care of the critically ill
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news
COMMENTARIES
915
neonate to review their own experience and, in the
event of embarking on pharmacologic
interven-tions, to focus on those infants at highest risk for severe intraventricular hemorrhage.
REFERENCES
JEFFREY M. PERLMAN, MD Dept of Pediatrics
University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas
1. Philip AGS, Allan WC, Tito AM, Wheeler LR. Intraven-tricular hemorrhage in perterm infants: declining incidence in the 1980s. Pediatrics. 1989:84:797-801
2. Volpe JJ. Neurology of the Newborn. 2nd ad. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1987
3. Lou HC, Lassen NA, Friis-Hansen B. Impaired autoregula-tion of cerebral blood flow in the distressed newborn infant.
J Pediatr. 1979;94:118-124
4. Newton TH, Gooding CA. Compression of superior sagittal
sinus by neonatal calvarial moulding Radiology.
1979;115:635-639
5. Perlman JM, Volpe JJ. The effects of suctioning on cerebral blood flow velocity, intracranial and systemic blood pressure in the preterm infant. Pediatrics. 1983;72:329-334
6. Perlman JM, McMenamin JB, Volpe JJ. Fluctuating
cere-bral blood flow velocity in respiratory distress syndrome:
relationship to the development of intraventricular
hemor-rhage. N Engi J Med. 1983;309:209-213
7. Hill A, Perlman JM, Volpe JJ. Relationship of
pneumotho-rax to occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage in the premature infant. Pediatrics. 1982;69:144-149
8. Perlman JM, Hill A, Volpe JJ. The effect of patent ductus arteriosus on the anterior cerebral arteries: ducts.! steal in the premature newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1981;99:767-772 9. Shankaran 5, Cepeda E, Ilagan N, et a!. Antenatal
pheno-barbital for the prevention of neonatal intracerebral
hem-orrhage. Am J Obstet GynecoL 1986;154:53-57
10. Morales WJ, Koerten J. Prevention ofintraventricular hem-orrhage in very low birthweight infants by maternally ad-ministered phenobarbital. Obstet GynecoL 1986;68:295-299 11. Donn S, Roloff D, Goldstein G. Prevention of
intraventric-ular hemorrhage in preterin infants with phenobarbitone.
Lancet. 1981;2:215-217
12. Kuban KCK, Leviton A, Krishnamoorthy KS, et al.
Neo-natal intracranial hemorrhage and phenobarbital. Pediat-rics. 1986;77:443-450
13. Ment LR, Duncan CC, Ehrenkrantz RA, et aL Randomized
low dose indomethacin trial for prevention of intraventric-ular hemorrhage in very low birthweight infants. J Pediatr.
1988;112:948-955
14. Hanigan WC, Kennedy G, Roemisch F. Administration of indomethacin for the prevention of
periventricular-intra-ventricular hemorrhage in high-risk neonates. J Pediatr.
1988;112:941-947
15. Sinha S, Davies J, Toner N, et al. Vitamin E supplementa-tion reduces the frequency of periventricular hemorrhage in very preterm babies. Lancet. 1987;1:466-471
16. Benson JW, Drayton MR, Hayward C, et al. Multicentre trial of ethamsylate for prevention of periventricular hem-orrhage in very low birthweight infants. Lancet. 1986; 2:1297-1300
17. Perlman JM, Goodman S, Kreusser KL, et al. Reduction in
intraventricular hemorrhage by elimination of fluctuating
cerebral blood flow velocity in preterm infants with
respi-ratory distress syndrome. N Engi J Med. 1985;312:1253-1257
18. Goldstein RF, Coffins KA, Brazy JE. Narcotic sedation stabilizes arterial blood pressure fluctuations in infants with
respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res. 1988;23:409A. Abstract
19. Clarke CE, Clyman RI, Roth RS, et al. Risk factor analysis of intraventricular hemorrhage in newborn infants. J
Pe-diatr. 1981;99:625-628
20. Horbar JD, Leahy K, Lucen JF. The incidence of perinatal
intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following maternal
admin-istration of Isosuxphrine and betamethasone. Pediatr Res. 1981;15:664
21. Avery ME. The argument for prenatal administration of dexamethasone to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. J
Pediatr. 1984;104:240
22. Horbar JD, Pasnick M, McAuliffe C, et al. Obstetric events
and risk ofperiventricular hemorrhage in premature infants.
Am J Die Child. 1983;137:678-681
23. Tejani N, Rebod B, Tuck 5, et a!. Obstetric factors in the causation of early periventricular-intraventricular hemor-rhage. Obstet GynecoL 1984:64:510-514
24. Anderson GD, Bade HS, Sibai B. The relationship between
labor and route ofdelivery and intraventricular hemorrhage
in the preterm infant. Am J Obstet GynecoL 1988;158:1382-1390
25. Dykes FD, Lazzarra A, Ahmann P, et a!. Intraventricular hemorrhage: a prospective evaluation of etiopathogenesis. Pediatrics. 1980;66:42-49
26. Levene M, Fawer CL, Lamont HF. Risk factors in the development of intraventricular hemorrhage in the
prema-ture neonate. Arch Die ChikL 1982;57:410-417
27. Perlman JM, Volpe JJ. Intraventricular hemorrhage in
ex-tremely small premature infants. Am J Dis Child. 1986;
140:1122-1124
Respiratory
Distress
Syndrome
and Intracranial
Hemorrhage:
Cause
or
Association?
Inferences
From
Surfactant
Clinical
Trials
Among preterm newborns, those with respiratory distress syndrome are at increased risk of
intracra-nial hemorrhage.’’ Three hypotheses have been
offered as explanation for this association.
In the biology hypothesis, respiratory distress
syndrome in one way or another increases the risk
of intracranial hemorrhage. Variations on this
hy-pothesis
incorporate
specific adverse effects ofres-piratory
distress,
such as grunting (ie, increasedintrathoracic pressure leads to increased cranial
intravascular pressure), impaired cerebral blood
flow, and acidosis.’’#{176}
In the second
hypothesis,
treatment of respira-tory distress increases the risk of intracranialhem-orrhage. For example, rapid infusion of buffer for
treatment of acidosis was once thought to influence the risk of bleeding into the brain,” although sub-stantiation has not been provided.’2 Because babies
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news
1989;84;913
Pediatrics
JEFFREY M. PERLMAN
Intraventricular Hemorrhage
Services
Updated Information &
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/84/5/913
including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Permissions & Licensing
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml
entirety can be found online at:
Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its
Reprints
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml
Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news
1989;84;913
Pediatrics
JEFFREY M. PERLMAN
Intraventricular Hemorrhage
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/84/5/913
the World Wide Web at:
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on
American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397.
American Academy of Pediatrics, 345 Park Avenue, Itasca, Illinois, 60143. Copyright © 1989 by the
been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the
Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news