• No results found

Lug Support Design

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Lug Support Design"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mumbai : 400055

Mumbai : 400055

1 of 11 1 of 11

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFE

REFERENRENCECE PREPRESSUSSURE VRE VESSESSEL EL DESDESIGN IGN MAMANUANUAL BL BY DY D.R.M.R.MOSS OSS - (P- (PROCROCEDUEDUCE 3CE 3-7, -7, #2)#2)

SEISMIC DESIGN - VESSEL SUPPORT OF LUGS

SEISMIC DESIGN - VESSEL SUPPORT OF LUGS

IN THIS CALCULATION, EFFECT DUE TO WIND LOAD IS IGNORED AS EUIPMENT IS

IN THIS CALCULATION, EFFECT DUE TO WIND LOAD IS IGNORED AS EUIPMENT IS

LOCATED WITHIN BUILDING. DESIGN CHEC! IS CONDUCTED FOR SEISMIC LOAD

LOCATED WITHIN BUILDING. DESIGN CHEC! IS CONDUCTED FOR SEISMIC LOAD

D

D

S

SH

HE

EL

LL

L

O

OU

UT

TS

SIID

DE

E

D

DIIA

AM

ME

ET

TE

ER

R

9

90

0..0

00

0 iin

n

A

A

L

LE

EN

NG

GT

TH

H

O

OF

F

R..F

R

F.

.

A

AD

D

!

!"

"..0

00

0 iin

n

B

B

#

#IID

DT

TH

H

O

OF

F

R

R..F

F.

.

A

AD

D

!

!1

1..0

00

0 iin

n

C

C

#

#IID

DT

TH

H

O

OF

F

$

$A

AS

SE

E

L

LA

AT

TE

E

1

1%

%..0

00

0 iin

n

E

E

H

HE

EIIG

GH

HT

T

O

OF

F

L

LU

UG

G

S

SU

U



O

OR

RT

T

!

!&

&..0

00

0 iin

n

F

F

T

TH

HII'

'(

(N

NE

ES

SS

S

O

OF

F

$A

$

AS

SE

E

L

LA

AT

TE

E

1

1..0

00

0 iin

n

G

G

T

TH

HII'

'(

(N

NE

ES

SS

S

O

OF

F

G

GU

US

SS

SE

ET

TS

S

0

0..5

5)

) iin

n

H

H

D

DIIS

ST

TA

AN

N'

'E

E $

$E

ET

T#

#E

EE

EN

N

T

T#

#O

O G

GU

US

SS

SE

ET

TS

S

1

15

5..0

00

0 iin

n

"

"

L

LE

EA

AS

SE

E

R

RE

EF

FE

ER

R

A

A$

$O

O*

*E

E

S

S(

(E

ET

T'

'H

H

!

!..0

00

0 iin

n

M

M

L

LE

EA

AS

SE

E

R

RE

EF

FE

ER

R

A

A$

$O

O*

*E

E

S

S(

(E

ET

T'

'H

H

!

!..5

50

0 iin

n

, $

, $

+

+

$

$'

'D

D

,

,

D

D

-

-

!

!

1

1!

!..0

00

0 iin

n

W

W

#

#E

EIIG

GH

HT

T O

OF

F *

*E

ES

SS

SE

EL

L ,

, O

O

E

ER

RA

AT

TIIN

NG

G '

'O

ON

ND

DIIT

TIIO

ON

N

)

)0

00

00

00

0..0

00

0 //b

b

N

N

N

NO

O.

.

O

OF

F

L

LU

UG

G

SU

S

U



O

OR

RT

TS

S

4

4 N

No

o

..

%&

%&

T

TH

HII'

'(

(N

NE

ES

SS

S

OF

O

F

S

SH

HE

EL

LL

L

0

0..5

5 iin

n

%'

(2)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Mumbai : 400055

! of 11

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN MANUAL BY D.R.MOSS - (PROCEDUCE 3-7, #2)

SEISMIC DESIGN - VESSEL SUPPORT OF LUGS

IN THIS CALCULATION, EFFECT DUE TO WIND LOAD IS IGNORED AS EUIPMENT IS

LOCATED WITHIN BUILDING. DESIGN CHEC! IS CONDUCTED FOR SEISMIC LOAD

CALCULATE FORCES

FIND OUT BASE SHEAR  ( V )

(A& '* '*+* /01 0 IS4563-22)

SITE

MUM$AI INDIA

8ONE

III

8

2ONE

FA'TOR

0.1)

I

IMORTAN'E FA'TOR +Tab/3 , ) , IS:1"9&,!00!-

1

R

RESONSE REDU'TION FA'TOR +Tab/3 , % , IS:1"9&,!00!-

4

S$9/

 A*ERAGE RESONSE A''ELERATION 'O,EFFI'IENT

!.5

'/. ).4.5 , IS:1"9& , !00! Soi/ , M3ium oi/ i3

A:

DESIGN HORI2ONTAL A''ELERATION SE'TRUM

A:

2

6

I

R

6

+Sa7-

0.01)

LATERAL FORCES  (F:)

F:

 A8 . #

9)0 /b

HORI8ONTAL SHEAR PER LUG (V:)

V:

F8

N

!40 /b

VERTICAL FORCE  (F1)

F1

#

)0000.00 /b

VERTICAL SHEAR PER LUG (V1)

(3)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mumbai : 400055

& of 11

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN MANUAL BY D.R.MOSS - (PROCEDUCE 3-7, #2) SEISMIC DESIGN - VESSEL SUPPORT OF LUGS

ALL LUGS ARE MOUNTED OFF-CTR W.R.T PRICIPLE AIS

VERTICAL LOAD ON LUGS -- ( SIDE CONDITON ), (2)

2 * 15000 /b LONGITUDINAL MOMENT  ( ML) ML !.+a- 1"0000 /b.in CIRCUMFERENTIAL MOMENT  (MC) MC *8.+a- !""0 /b.in 2C4 H;!.G 1).1! in 2C2 E !&.00 in 24 $ !1.00 in 22  A !".00 in 4 !'1! ".0) in 2 !'!! 11.50 in 4 !1! 10.50 in 2 !!! 14.00 in

CALCULATE RADIAL LOAD  (;)

;  &.ML4.'! 1)%49.&%9% /b

STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTOR TO BE FOLLOWED FOR WELD AT ATTACHMENT

2*9 H RATIO OF #ELD RADIUS TO ATTA'HEMNT !

! STRESS 'ON'ENTRATION FA'TOR F OR TENSION + 5,!0- 1.4

!< STRESS 'ON'ENTRATION FA'TOR FOR $ENDING +5,!0- 1.!

STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTOR TO BE FOLLOWED FOR WELD AT END OF PAD

*9% RATIO OF #ELD RADIUS TO ATTA'HEMNT 1

! STRESS 'ON'ENTRATION FA'TOR F OR TENSION + 5,!0- 1.5

(4)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

4 of 11 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN MANUAL BY D.R.MOSS - (PROCEDUCE 3-7, #2) SEISMIC STRESS ANALYSIS

COMPUTE GEOMETRIC PARAMETER

A% E/ +; A%%$:=% A% E/ +; P$

R= > (D - %& ? %') 9 2 45.00 in R= > (D - %& ) 9 2 44.%5 in 0.%0% in % > %& 0.5 in )&.)40 "9.5 0.1%9 0.11% 0.&4 0.&1& 0.5!) 0.&%5 0.0)1 0.0&%

A% E/ +; A%%$:=% A% E/ +; P$

0.&!! 0.!)"

0.!%" 0.!!&

0.!!" 0.1%!

0.!") 0.!&1

COMPUTING STRESS FOR A RADIAL LOAD ( AT THE EDGE OF ATTACHMENT)

MEMBRANE F0/ VALUE FROM FIGURE

0.&!! @-47A 1."

0.!%" @-47B ).!

BENDING

0.!!" @-45A 0.045

0.!") @-45B M 9 ;   0.015

COMPUTING RADIAL LOAD AND MOMENTS ( AT THE EDGE OF ATTACHMENT)

MEMBRANE FORCES AND MOMENT

))9.9" /b

N !&0%.)9 /b

BENDING

%5&.%! /b.in

M (M9;);   !51.!4 /b.in

COMPUTING RADIAL LOAD AND MOMENTS ( AT THE EDGE OF ATTACHMENT)

MEMBRANE STRESS CALCULATION

))9.9" 1&!).4" SI

N !&0%.)9 45)9.00 SI

BENDING

%5&.%! 10"5&.)0 SI

% > ( %&2 ? %'2).@

2) 2)

COMPUTE EUIVALENT VALUE

 N  R= 9 ;  N  R= 9 ;   M N  (N  R= 9 ;)  ; 9 R=  (N  R= 9 ;)  ;9 R= M  (M N > !.N % > !.N % M > !<.M %2  > R= 9 %  > R= 9 % 4 > C4 9R= 4 > 4 9R= 2 > C2 93R= 2 > 2 9R= 4  9 2 4 9 2 4. 4. 4  9 2 4 $ ;+* N $ ;+* N < ;+* N < ;+* N  ;+* M  ;+* M  ;+* M  ;+* M $ ;+* N φ. < ;+* N  ;+* M  9 ;   ;+* M φ.  9 ;)  ;  φ   / φ /

(5)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

5 of 11

(6)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Mumbai : 400055

) OF 11 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN MANUAL BY D.R.MOSS - (PROCEDUCE 3-7, #2) SEISMIC STRESS ANALYSIS

COMPUTE GEOMETRIC PARAMETER

A% E/ +; A%%$:=% A% E/ +; P$

R= > (D - %& ? %') 9 2 45.00 in R= > (D - %& ) 9 2 44.%5 in 0.%0% in % > %& 0.5 in )&.)40 "9.5 0.1%91111111 0.11% 0.&4 0.&1& 0.5!) 0.&%5 0.0)1 0.0&%

A% E/ +; A%%$:=% A% E/ +; P$

0.&!! 0.!)"

0.!%" 0.!!&

0.!!" 0.1%!

0.!") 0.!&1

COMPUTING STRESS FOR A RADIAL LOAD ( AT THE EDGE OF PAD)

MEMBRANE F0/ VALUE FROM FIGURE

0.!)" @-22A !.%

0.!!& @-22B ".5

BENDING

0.1%! @-23A 0.04)

0.!&1 @-23B M 9 ;   0.014

COMPUTING STRESS FOR A RADIAL LOAD ( AT THE EDGE OF PAD)

MEMBRANE FORCES AND MOMENT

1004.9) /b

N &1)&.%% /b

BENDING

%%0.4% /b.in

M (M9;);   !&4.49 /b.in

COMPUTING STRESS FOR A RADIAL LOAD ( AT THE EDGE OF PAD)

MEMBRANE STRESS CALCULATION

1004.9) &014."9 SI N &1)&.%% "!!5."1 SI BENDING %%0.4% !40&".%1 SI % > ( %&2 ? %'2).@ 2) 2)

COMPUTE EUIVALENT VALUE

 N  R= 9 ;  N  R= 9 ;   M N  (N  R= 9 ;)  ; 9 R=  (N  R= 9 ;)  ;9 R= M  (M N > !.N % > !.N % M > !<.M %2  > R= 9 %  > R= 9 % 4 > C4 9R= 4 > 4 9R= 2 > C2 93R= 2 > 2 9R= 4  9 2 4 9 2 4. 4. 4  9 2 4 $ ;+* N $ ;+* N < ;+* N < ;+* N  ;+* M  ;+* M  ;+* M  ;+* M $ ;+* N φ. < ;+* N  ;+* M  9 ;   ;+* M φ.  9 ;)  ;  φ   / φ /

(7)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Mumbai : 400055

% OF 11

(8)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mumbai : 400055

" OF 11

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE P*&&* V&& D&0/ M$$ < D0& R. M+&&

COMBINED STRESS ANALYSIS - LUG SUPPORT WITH REINFORCEMENT PAD (AT THE EDGE OF ATTACHMENT)

STRESS DUE TO

RADIAL LOAD , ; 

MEMBRANE

1&!).4" 1&!).4" 1&!).4" 1&!).4"

N 45)9.00 45)9.00 45)9.00 45)9.00

BENDING

10"5&.)0 10"5&.)0 10"5&.)0 10"5&.)0 M &)1%."% &)1%."% &)1%."% &)1%."%

INTERNAL PRESSURE , P

!%0.00 !%0.00 !%0.00 !%0.00

1&5.00 1&5.00 1&5.00 1&5.00

5324.5 5324.5 5324.5 5324.5 42@.5 42@.5 42@.5 42@.5

COMBINED STRESS ANALYSIS - LUG SUPPORT WITH REINFORCEMENT PAD (AT THE EDGE OF RF PAD)

STRESS DUE TO

RADIAL LOAD , ; 

MEMBRANE

&014."9 &014."9 &014."9 &014."9 N "!!5."1 "!!5."1 "!!5."1 "!!5."1

BENDING

!40&".%09)%% !40&".%09)%% !40&".%09)%% !40&".%09)%% M %&1).1!90&!& %&1).1!90&!& %&1).1!90&!& %&1).1!90&!&

INTERNAL PRESSURE , P

!%0 !%0 !%0 !%0

1&5 1&5 1&5 1&5

4@7.6 4@7.6 4@7.6 4@7.6 27323. 27323. 27323. 27323. NOTES

1. ALL STRESS *ALUE IN A$O*E TA$LE IS IN SI.

!. INTERNAL DESIGN RESSURE 'ONSIDERED IN A$O*E 'AL'ULATION IS &.0 $ARG RESULT

MA<IMUM ALLO#A$LE TENSILE STRESS : S :!0000 SI FOR SHELL MATERIAL #ELD =OINT EFFI'IEN'> : 1.0

 ALLO#A$LE LIMIT FOR 'OM$INED STRESS IN 'ASE OF SEISMI' LOADING : 1.5 . S. E ? &0000 SI ALL STRESS ARE WELL WITHIN LIMIT H ENCE DESING IS SAFE

 6452764527 N M P. R= 9 %& P. R= 9 2 %& T+%$  6452764527 N M P. R= 9 %& P. R= 9 2 %& T+%$ δφ δφ  δφ >  >  δφ >  >

(9)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

9 OF 11

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE P*&&* V&& D&0/ M$$ < D0& R. M+&&

DESIGN OF LUG SUPPORT MEMBERS

:

HEIGHT

OF

LUG

SUORT

!&.00 in

+$'D

,

SHELL

OD-

!

1!.00 in

<

3

;

M

14.50 in

%<

THI'(NESS

OF

$ASE

LATE

1.00 in

%

THI'(NESS OF 'OMRESSION LATE , NOT RO*IDED

0 in

 ANGLE OF 'ONTA'T

)1 37

DISTAN'E $ET#EEN '.L. OF GUSSET

15.5) in

LENGTH

OF

$ASE

LATE

1%.00 in

%/

GUSSET

THI'(NESS

0.5) in

%&

SHELL

THI'(NESS

0.5 in

%'

THI'(NESS

OF

R.F.

AD

0.5 in

NO.

OF

GUSSETS

ER

LUG

! No

(INDL> NOTE THAT #E HA*E NOT IN'LUDED 'OMRESSION LATE AND HEN'E

DIMENSION @ AND  IS NOT ALI'A$LE

(10)

SUVIDYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Mumbai : 400055

10 OF 11

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE P*&&* V&& D&0/ M$$ < D0& R. M+&&

DESIGN OF GUSSETS AND BASE PLATE

7 ASSUMED THI'(NESS OF GUSSETS 0.5) in

 *ERTI'AL LOAD ON LUG , REFER AGE & FOR ! 15000 /b

 ANGLE OF 'ONTA'T )1 37.

a 1&110.0 /b

b %!)0.0 /b

' ).&4 in

 A 7. ' &.55

F >IELD STRESS OF GUSSETS &)000 SI

Fa ALLO#A$LE A<IAL STRESS : 0.4 . F 14400 SI

Fb ALLO#A$LE $ENDING STRESS : 0.). F !1)00 SI

2 &.%5

Mb bnA 10!!."% /b.in

fa an.A 1"4%.0" SI

fb Mb2 !%!."9 SI

DESIGN OF BASE PLATE

$ $EAM SUORT #IDTH UNDER $ASE LATE ) in

DISTAN'E $ET#EEN T#O GUSSETS 15.00 in

$OLTHOLEDIAMETER 0.9" in

BENDING MOMENT IN TENSION  (M<)

M< 4!500 /b.in

UNIFORM BEARING LOAD ON BASE PLATE  ()

 14%.0) SI . SIN θ . 'OS θ b. SIN θ / 2 in! 7. '! ) in&

INDU'ED A<IAL AND $ENDING STRESS ARE #ITHIN LIMIT AND HEN'E RO*IDE D GUSSETS THI'(NESS IS ADEUATE

l4

.l / 6

(11)

SUVIDYA INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY M=<$0 -  @@

11 of11

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION - VESSEL SUPPORTED ON LUGS

REFERENCE P*&&* V&& D&0/ M$$ < D0& R. M+&&

DESIGN OF GUSSETS AND BASE PLATE

BENDING MOMENT DUE TO BEARING LOAD

M<

&&0"."! /b.in

M<

GREATER MOMENT FROM TENSION OR $EARINGG

4!500 /b.in

REUIRED BASE PLATE THIC!NESS  (%<)

bB

0.9&5 in

%<

RO*IDED

$ASE

LATE

THI'(NESS

1.00 in

HENCE DESIGN IS SAFE

,6,6,6,

C.

l

1 !

  10

References

Related documents

• Ensure that all school staff routinely working with hazardous chemicals receives proper training in all phases of chemical management, including safe storage, proper use,

 Level of risk estimated or determined as an outcome of use of this framework screening tool should not be considered without adjunct sources of information including (but

The UNO Assessment Committee is responsible for guiding the process of campus-wide academic assessment of student learning, and to that end it conducts regular reviews of

THE INFLUENCE OF CAUSAL EXPLANATIONS AND DIAGNOSTIC LABELING ON PSYCHOLOGY STUDENTS’ BELIEFS ABOUT TREATMENTS, PROGNOSIS, DANGEROUSNESS AND UNPREDICTABILITY

• CAIR Research pilot using community based participatory principles to document stories of resilience among urban American Indian elders at the Tucson Indian Center. •

The schemes were: Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment (MDT, McKenzie) [42,43] (7 articles), Treat- ment Based Classification (TBC, Delitto) [11] (16 arti- cles);

Those with sciatica had higher levels of leg pain and more often reported below the knee pain and leg pain worse than back pain. These patients also scored higher on the SBI and

Part of Howden’s compressor division, Howden Process Compressors (HPC) designs, manufactures, supplies and supports the Howden ‘SG’ range of high efficiency turbo blowers