• No results found

Basic elements of a medical malpractice claim:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Basic elements of a medical malpractice claim:"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Presentation by: Margaret Pisacano, BSN, JD Director of Risk Management UK H lth UK Healthcare

Basic elements of a medical malpractice claim:

DUTY:  To act as a reasonably  prudent family practice physician  under the same or similar circumstances as presented by the  under the same or similar circumstances as presented by the  matter at hand.  In medicine, this  duty is defined by the  relevant “standard of care.” • BREACH:  It must be proven, by expert testimony,  that you  breached this duty to your patient. • CAUSATION:  It must be proven, by expert testimony, that the  b h  f d t   d    bl  i j  t     ti t breach of duty caused a compensable injury to your patient. • DAMAGES:  It must be proven that the patient sustained  damages.

(2)

Pisacano Kubler‐Ross stages of being a 

defendant:

 Denial  Anger  Bargaining  Depression  Acceptance (?)

How it all begins…signs of a storm brewing:

• Phone call from a disgruntled patient or family complaining about  care • Unpaid medical bills in a case where the outcome was less than  favorable • Complaint letter from the patient • Letter from an attorney representing patient either requesting  records (passive) or advising you are the target of a potential suit (p ) g y g p (aggressive) • Notice from the Kentucky Medical Licensure Board of a grievance  filed by a patient

(3)

The Medical Malpractice Complaint: Off to the Races

DO

:

 IMMEDIATELY contact your professional liability insurance 

carrier or the individual responsible for your insurance

 Read the complaint

 Secure all medical records  administrative records  billing 

 Secure all medical records, administrative records, billing  records, etc.  Advise those individuals in your practice who need to know  Call your spouse

The Medical Malpractice Complaint: Off to the Races

DO NOT

: • Panic • Call the patient or his attorney to try and talk them  out of litigation • Make revisions, additions or clarifications to the  d l d medical record • Call other physicians named in the Complaint to see  what they remember and to brainstorm your defenses

(4)

The Medical Malpractice Complaint: Off to the Races

DO NOT

: Di  th  f t   f th      h     l  t  d f d  • Discuss the facts of the case or how you plan to defend  it with anyone other than your attorney, risk manager,  insurance carrier, spouse or minister • Discuss the case with reporters B i  t   h lit t   b it  t t b k   t   • Begin to research literature, websites, text books, etc.  on the medical issue presented in the Complaint • Call experts in the field presented in the Complaint to  get seek their insights/support. “ Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful  friendship.”

(5)

Meeting and helping your attorney ‐ pointers:

• You are on foreign turf:  take counsel from your attorney, g y y, just as you expect your patients who are attorneys to  listen to your medical advice. • Schedule a face to face meeting ASAP, before the Answer  is due (20 days after you receive the Complaint) • Prepare for initial meeting: study all available records,  be prepared to identify witnesses

Meeting and helping your attorney ‐ pointers:

• Cards on the table:  The good  the bad  and the ugly • Cards on the table:  The good, the bad, and the ugly

• Educate your attorney on the medicine and the facts

• Review and discuss each fact set forth in Complaint and  discuss responsep

(6)

Meeting and helping your attorney ‐ pointers:

• Be prepared to discuss legal defenses  Statute of limitations  Comparative fault  Superceding and intervening causes:  other providers • Provide all pertinent contact information and identify contact  personnel personnel • Ask questions

Interrogatories and Request for Production of 

Documents

• Written questions exchanged between counsel designed to  b i  i f i   d d   i     h   obtain information and documents pertinent to the case • Take seriously: your answers are binding • Can be very lengthy and time‐consuming to prepare  responses S k  l ifi ti     tl   hi h  ti     d t   • Seek clarification on exactly which questions you need to  answer, and what documents you need to provide • Ask to review all finalized drafts of discovery responses before  they are sent to Plaintiff

(7)

Depositions:  Purposes

 To collect facts: who, what , when, where and how  To build a foundation upon which experts will render  their opinions  To judge credibility and presence and to evaluate how a  jury will perceive the witness

Depositions:  Uses

To provide to experts to allow formulation of 

opinions

Fill in the holes from the medical records

Provide medical reasoning and justification

Settlement negotiations

Cross‐examination at trial

(8)

Depositions:  General considerations

• How many?  5 – 25 • Strategy in order of depositions:  preference to take the  Plaintiff’s deposition first • Who attends:  attorneys for all parties, parties (sometimes),  court reporter, videographer

Th     f i f lit   d ’t b  f l d thi  i  

The appearance of informality:  don’t be fooled, this is  intensely adversarial • Ask your attorney to notify you when depositions have been  scheduled and discuss the pros and cons of your attendance.

Should you attend the depositions of other parties or 

witnesses?

 The Plaintiff  Family members  Co‐defendants  Other treating physicians  Defense experts  Plaintiff’s  experts

(9)

Your deposition ‐ Getting ready:

• Preparation, preparation, preparation • KNOW your record • KNOW pertinent policies/procedures • Understand  each side’s position and theme • Review the complaint, answer, and responses to discovery  requests (yours and others) • Pre‐deposition meeting with your attorney:  spend the time  necessary

Your deposition ‐ Consider and discuss

:

• The advisability of :y • review of prior and subsequent records • The advisability of review of depositions of other witnesses • The advisability of research and review of pertinent medical  literature and standards • Whether you should be prepared to answer standard of  care questions:  serving as your own expert

(10)

Your deposition - Consider and discuss:

• Whether you should be prepared to answer causation questions: why did this patient have a bad outcome, and was it due to your treatment or some other cause?

• Consider a mock videotaped cross-examination

• Identify problem areas and practice answering the “hard questions.”

Your deposition:  The day has come

 Sleep and eat before your deposition  Bring your CV  Dress appropriately  Be alert to objections by your attorney  Try not to schedule patient care the day of your  deposition

(11)

Your deposition:  Responding to questions

 Answer only what is asked, do not volunteer information

 Do explain your actions and medical reasoning

 Listen for compound questions and answer each part

 Do not speculate   You can  however  discuss your usual 

 Do not speculate.  You can, however, discuss your usual  and customary practice  Do not take the hostility bait:  answer all questions  professionally and calmly

Be Alert:   

Plaintiff’s counsel tactics

 hypothetical questions and questions seeking an easy answer:  “it  depends.” h k d l  The awkward silence  Intimidation:  the incredulous look and tone:  “Do you mean to tell  me…..?”  Repetitive questions  Summary questions  Plaintiff’s counsel as a sympathetic friend

(12)

Elements of credibility

Timely and accurate documentation

A good recollection:  “I remember”

Establishing an event took place because it is 

Establishing an event took place because it is 

part of your regular practice

Elements of credibility:

(13)

Should I Settle?

Facts  and the medicine: most important?

 Venue  venue  venue

 Venue, venue, venue  Sympathy  Skill of opposing counsel  Strength of expertsStrength of experts  Judge:  key rulings on admissibility  Your own personal feelings about trial

Questions?

References

Related documents

In addition, ANU continues to pursue opportunities for taking forward quality improvement through involvement in international projects such as those funded by the World

very cold winds will cause early hatched young to succumb. Such a winter occurred in 1962/3; it was the coldest January in Wiltshire for a century, and the month of February was

medical malpractice risk management, physician wellness, medical malpractice stress, malpractice stress syndrome, MSS, medical malpractice litigation stress, medical

GROWTH is a collaborative project among California Institute of Technology (USA), University of Maryland College Park (USA), University of Wisconsin– Milwaukee (USA), Texas

Testing areas Developing search strategies Evaluating information sources Using information ethically Using English to engage with information effectively Overall

To give your Plan of Action a chance to work, it is important to make good decisions on important to make good decisions on small choices..

Sequence analysis of RCA products from two samples (Jinotega 2a and Nueva Guinea 15c) also indicated mixed infection with Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV)

Using PRB coal, the Transport Gasifier has produced commercially projected lower heating values as high as 147 Btu/SCF during air blown gasification and as high as 299 Btu/SCF