Next-Generation Firewalls:
Results from the Lab
esu ts o
t e ab
Robert Smithers Robert Smithers
Agenda
P ti i
ti
V d
d P d t
•
Participating Vendors and Products
•
How We Did It
Categories of Products Tested
•
Categories of Products Tested
•
About the Technology
– Secure Web Gateway
– Secure Web Gateway
– Next-Generation Firewall
– Unified Threat Management
– Sandbox
Agenda
•
Three High Risk Event Results
Three High Risk Event Results
– CryptoLocker
– Outbound Botnet
– Worm and Trojans
•
Industry Average Comparisons
y
g
p
– Layer 3 Firewall Throughput
– Malicious Files Legacy
– Malicious URLs: Blended Malicious Threats
Agenda
•
Industry Average Comparisons
•
Industry Average Comparisons
– Malicious URLs Wild: Malc0de
– Layer 7 Firewall Throughput MaxLayer 7 Firewall Throughput Max
– Layer 7 Firewall Throughput Mixed
Participating Vendors and Products
•
Blue Coat ProxySG 300-5
•
Check Point 4210 NGFW
•
Check Point SWG-12600
•
Cisco ASA 5545-X with CX Module
Cisco ASA 5545 X with CX Module
•
Cisco ISA550W
•
Cyberoam CR100iNG
Cyberoam CR100iNG
Participating Vendors and Products
•
Dell SonicWALL TZ 105 (Cloud)
•
Dell SonicWALL TZ 105 (Appliance)
( pp
)
•
FireEye Malware Protection System 1310
•
Fortinet FortiGate 20-C
Fortinet FortiGate 20 C
•
Fortinet FortiGate 100-D
•
Fortinet FortiGate 800-C
Fortinet FortiGate 800 C
Participating Vendors and Products
•
Palo Alto PA-3020
•
Sophos SG 210
p
•
Sophos SG 230
•
Sophos UTM 220
Sophos UTM 220
•
WatchGuard XTM 525
How We Did It
Test equipment included:
– Ixia XG12 and BreakingPoint FireStorm
– Spirent Studio Security
– Apposite Linktropy 7500 PRO
WildP k t O iP k f Wi d
– WildPackets OmniPeek for Windows
– Windows 7 and Windows XP
Clients/Endpoints
C e ts/ dpo ts
Categories of
Products Tested
Products Tested
•
Secure Web Gateway
•
Next-Generation Firewall
•
Unified Threat Management
g
•
Sandbox
Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
• Edge security platform against Web-borne threats
that can invade enterprise network via Internet browsing; enforces organization’s policies for browsing; enforces organization s policies for Internet usage and regulatory compliance
• Essential functionality: URL filtering, malicious y g,
code detection/filtering and application control
• Products with real-time, cloud-based content
l d f h h l k
analysis tend to outperform those that look up URLs and/or threat signatures in static database
Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
• Class of product for organizations of all sizes: SMB • Class of product for organizations of all sizes: SMBand Enterprise
• Essential functionality: URL filtering, malicious code
d t ti /filt i d li ti t l detection/filtering and application control
– SMB: protects against basic threats, easy to implement/manage
– Enterprise: protection extended to advanced and targeted threats, requires more skill and resources to
implement/manage
O i li t l ith ft
• On-premises appliance most popular with software,
virtual, cloud (SWG as a Service) and on-premises / cloud hybrid versions also available
Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)
E l ti t f t k d it d i
• Evolutionary type of network edge security device
• Possesses combination of functionality of basic
firewall and enhancements firewall and enhancements
– Traffic inspection enables
detection and blocking of malicious activity
malicious activity
– Application awareness enables
identification of attacks directed
k ll f
at network as well as enforcement of organization’s Internet usage and regulatory compliance policies
Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)
• Available for organizations of all sizesAvailable for organizations of all sizes
• Can be deployed as appliance, virtual appliance
or software-based solution
• Inline “bump in the wire” deployment: enabling
functionality does result in reduced network performance
performance
• Next-generation firewall arguably has caused
basic firewall to go the way of video cassette basic firewall to go the way of video cassette recorders and VHS tapes, into obsolescence
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
• Just as Next-Generation Firewall, an evolutionary
class of network edge security platform
• Combination of firewall and VPN of basic firewall Combination of firewall and VPN of basic firewall plus…
• Intrusion Prevention System also found in
Next-Generation Firewall, URL filtering and antivirus also found in Secure Web Gateway, and anti-spam and mail antivirus also found in Spam Filtering productsp g p
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
Available as appliance virtual• Available as appliance, virtual
appliance, software and cloud-based
• Network administrator must
find balance between security nd net o k pe fo m n e
and network performance
– Individual packets examined by each security function
Sandbox
• Security technique for protecting enterprise network • Security technique for protecting enterprise network
from malware by running applications and visiting Websites in a controlled environment
• FireEye leads market with competitors including
AhnLab, Blue Coat, Check Point, Damballa, McAfee, Palo Alto Networks and Sourcefire (acquired by Cisco ( q y in October 2013)
• Sandbox appliance or cloud-based
service is part of a multi layered service is part of a multi-layered security system
Sandbox
• Botnets zero day attacks and corporate
• Botnets, zero-day attacks and corporate
espionage among factors that fueled advent of sandbox; virtualization has facilitated utilization of sandbox
• Small percentage of malware has written-in
capability to try to defeat sandbox capability to try to defeat sandbox
– Check environment to determine if it is in a sandbox – Seek to be allowed to pass by attempting to time out
the sandbox, stalling by performing meaningless calculations
Spam Filtering
• Class of network security device that safeguard
against unwanted inbound and outbound Email: spam
– Inbound: protect networked computers against Inbound: protect networked computers against
dangerous forms of spam such as phishing attempts and Emails those
containing virusesg
– Outbound: protect against
networked computers from being compromised and used being compromised and used as a zombie in a botnet to generate spam
Spam Filtering
• Spam is no small problem: estimated 50-60% of
enterprise Email
• Key functionality: protect against inbound, targeted y y p g , g
phishing attacks
• Functionality growing in importance: ability to
re-evaluate URL link(s) in Email at the time of end re evaluate URL link(s) in Email at the time of end user click
• Available as appliance, software, managed service
Based on Gartner 2013 Magic Quadrant:
• Based on Gartner 2013 Magic Quadrant:
– Product leaders are Cisco, Proofpoint, Symantec, Microsoft and McAfee
Three High Risk Event Results
Specific High Risk Events
– CryptoLocker
– Outbound Botnet
CryptoLocker
•
Ransomware trojan
•
Encrypts specific types of files using RSA
yp
p
yp
g
public-key cryptography
•
Message displays an offer to decrypt the
g
p y
yp
Outbound Botnet
B t t i t k f i d t
• Botnet is a network of compromised computers
under control of a third party whose purpose is to invade the network
• Remains inactive until they get orders from their
command and control hosts
• Designed to steal the most valuable information
on a network
O tb d b t t d f t t t d t
• Outbound botnet defense protects corporate data
Worms
C t t f l th t
• Computer worms are a type of malware that
replicates functional copies of themselves to cause damage to data or software
• Host program or human help is not needed for
them to propagate
• Worm enters a computer through
a system vulnerability and uses a
file- or information-transport feature file- or information-transport feature to allow it to travel independently
Trojans
A T j i th t f l th t
• A Trojan is another type of malware that appears
as legitimate software
• Users are tricked into loading and executing it
• Users are tricked into loading and executing it
• Trojans can achieve a variety of attacks on the
host – from distractions (pop-up windows) to (p p p )
major damage (deleting files, activating and spreading other malware) on the host
• Can also create back doors to give malevolent
d
Industry Average Comparisons
• Layer 3 Firewall Throughputaye 3 e a oug put
• Malicious Files Legacy
• Malicious URLs: Blended Malicious ThreatsMalicious URLs: Blended Malicious Threats
• Malicious Files Wild
• Malicious Files Wild: Malc0deMalicious Files Wild: Malc0de
• Layer 7 Firewall Throughput Max
• Layer 7 Firewall Throughput Mixed
• Layer 7 Firewall Throughput Mixed
d
Industry Average Comparisons
• HTTP Proxy Throughputo y oug put
• Firewall + IPS Throughput
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
Layer 3 Firewall Throughput
2678 2500 3000 Mb p s) Industry Average 2029 1884 1886 1500 2000 T h ro ughput
( 2,057.3 Mbpsy g
1322 500 1000 yer 3 Fi re w al l 0 La y
CR100iNG SonicWALL FortiGate UTM 220 XTM 525 CR100iNG
NSA 2600 100-D
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
Malicious Files Legacy
81.8 80.0 100.0 d (% ) 74.2 60.0 F il es B locke d Industry Average 39.3 Mbps 20.0 40.0 M alic io u s FSWG-12600 Malware Protection Web Security
1.1
0.0
System 1310
y Gateway
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
Malicious URLs: Blended Malicious Threats
80.0 100.0 ked ( % ) 32.1 71.4 40.0 60.0 s UR Ls B loc k Industry Average 16.7 37.6
6.3 4.8 4.8
0.0 20.0 Ma li ci o u
s 25.1 Mbpsy g
4210
NGFW ProtectionMalware System 1310 ASA 5545-X with CX FortiGate
800-C ServicesSRX650 Gateway PA-3020 Web Security Gateway 0.0 1310 Module
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
Malicious Files Wild
83.8 93.0 90.3 82.0 97.5 60 0 80.0 100.0 B lo cke d ( % ) Industry Average 73.5 Mbps 47.5 50.0 34.0 62.0 9.5 30.3 20.0 40.0 60.0 alic io u s F ile s B 4.2 9.5 0.0 M a
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
Malicious URLs Wild: Malc0de
83.8 82.0 97.5 80.0 100.0 ed ( % ) 47.5 40.0 60.0 s URL s Bl oc ke Industry Average 41.6 Mbps 4.2 9.5 30.3 0 0 20.0 M alic io u s 4210
NGFW 5545-XASA with CX Malware Protection System 1310 FortiGate
800-C ServicesSRX650 Gateway PA-3020 Web Security Gateway 0.0 with CX Module 1310
Industry Average Comparisons
Layer 7 Firewall Throughput Max
3240 3225 3000 3500 (M bps )
y
g p
I d t A
2260 2310 1500 2000 2500 l T h ro ughput Industry Average 2,158 Mbps 1400 1078 1590 500 1000 1500 ayer 7 F ir ew al l
CR100iNG SonicWALL FortiGate UTM 220 SG 210 SG 230 XTM525
0 500
L
a
CR100iNG SonicWALL
NSA2600 100-D XTM525
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
3500
Layer 7 Firewall Throughput Mixed
3100 3280 2500 3000 3500 t ( M bps) 2170 2145 1500 2000 2500 l T h ro ughpu t Industry Average 1,987 Mbps
1072 1020 1120
500 1000 1500 ayer 7 F ir ew al
SonicWALL FortiGate UTM 220 SG 210 SG 230 XTM 525
0 500
L
a
CR100iNG SonicWALL
NSA 2600 100-D
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
Application Control
2650 3300 2500 3000 3500 p ut ( M bps ) 2090 2650 1500 2000 2500 tro l T h ro u g h p Industry Average 1130 500 1000 1500 p lic at io n C o nt 1,345 Mbps
SonicWALL
132 403 442
0
Ap
p
CR100iNG
FortiGate
100-D UTM 220 SG 210 SG 230 XTM 525
NSA 2600 100 D
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
800
HTTP Proxy Throughput
704 600 700 800 hput ( M bps) 585 400 500 rox y) T h ro ug Industry Average 380 Mbps 163 237 212 100 200 300 all a n d A V ( P r SonicWALL
CR100iNG FortiGate100 D UTM 220 SG 210 SG 230 XTM 525
N/A N/A 0 100 Fi re w a NSA 2600 CR100iNG 100-D
I d t A
C
i
Industry Average Comparisons
Firewall + IPS Throughput
700 658 500 600 700 u t (M b p s) 420 504 475 300 400 500 P S T h roughp u Industry Average 330 Mbps 163 132 190 100 200 300 ire w all a n d IP SonicWALL
CR100iNG FortiGate100-D UTM 220 SG 210 SG 230 XTM 525
132 0 F i NSA 2600 CR100iNG 100-D
Industry Average Comparisons
Application Control / URL Filtering
pp
/
g
97.1
80.0 90.0 100.0
B
locked Industry Average
73 3 %
56.9 65.9 50.0 60.0 70.0 o m b in at io n
s 73.3 %
20.0 30.0 40.0 o to co l/A p p C o
ProxySG SWG-12600 Web Security
0.0 10.0
% P
ro
y
300-5 SWG 12600
y Gateway