• No results found

Basic theorems for fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Basic theorems for fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Basic theorems for fuzzy differential

equations in the quotient space of fuzzy

numbers

Dong Qiu

1,2*

, Chongxia Lu

2

, Wei Zhang

2

, Qinghua Zhang

2

and Chunlai Mu

3

*Correspondence: [email protected] 1School of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Shapingba, Chongqing, 400044, P.R. China 2College of Mathematics and Physics, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanan, Chongqing, 400065, P.R. China

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

In this paper, we study the fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers. We solve the initial value problem for fuzzy differential equations provided that the involved mappings are continuous, of uniformly bounded variation, and are bounded functions. Then we establish a variety of comparison results for the solutions of fuzzy differential equations.

MSC: 34A07; 46S40

Keywords: fuzzy number; equivalence classes; fuzzy differential equation; comparison theorems

1 Introduction

Fuzzy sets were introduced in  by Zadeh [] with a view to reconcile mathematical modeling and human knowledge in the engineering science. Fuzzy set theory and its ap-plications have been extensively developed since the s and the industrial interest in fuzzy control has dramatically increased since then [–].

The fuzzy differential equation was first introduced by Kandel and Byatt []. Since then, it has been extensively investigated on the metric space (En,D) of a normal fuzzy convex

set with the distanceDgiven by the maximum of the Hausdorff distance between the cor-responding level sets. The fuzzy differential equation was studied by Kaleva [, , ] and Wu and Song [–], for the fuzzy-valued function of a real variable whose values are nor-mal, convex, upper semicontinuous, and are compactly supported fuzzy sets inRn. Many

authors studied the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the initial value problems for fuzzy differential equations under various kinds of conditions and obtained many mean-ingful results in [, –]. One found the local existence and uniqueness theorems for the Cauchy problem when the fuzzy-valued functionf satisfies the generalized Lipschitz condition []. The existence theorems under compactness-type conditions were studied in []. Based on these works, the global existence of solutions of the Cauchy problem was investigated in [].

The above results of the fuzzy differential equation were based on the well-known and widely used Hukuhara difference, proposed by [], and the H-differentiability of Puri and Ralescu [], which generalized the Hukuhara differentiability of a set-valued mapping. In [, ], Mareš presented a natural equivalence relation between fuzzy quantities. This

(2)

equivalence relation can be used to partition the set of fuzzy quantities into equivalence classes having the desired group properties under the addition operation [–]. Hong and Do [] defined a more refined equivalence relation than Mareš [] and improved Mareš’s results. In [], Qiuet al.showed that the method of finding the inverse operation of fuzzy numbers in the sense of Mareš is very intuitive. The authors introduced a new concept of convergence under which the quotient space in complete. As an application of the main results, it is shown that if we identify every fuzzy number with the corresponding equivalence class, there would be more differentiable fuzzy functions than what is found in the literature. In [] Qiuet al.further investigated the differentiability and integrability properties of such functions and gave an existence and uniqueness theorem for a solution to a fuzzy differential equation in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers.

In this paper, we will study the basic theory of fuzzy differential equations in the quo-tient space of fuzzy numbers. In Section , we recall some related concepts. In Section , we will solve the initial value problem for fuzzy differential equations. In Section , we will establish a variety of comparison results for the solutions of fuzzy differential equations, which form the essential tools for studying the fundamental theory of fuzzy differential equations. The comparison discussion shows how one can develop the theory of differen-tial inequalities with the minimum linear structure.

2 Preliminaries

We start this section by recalling some pertinent concepts and key lemmas from the func-tions of bounded variation, fuzzy numbers, and fuzzy equivalence classes which we need for the discussion below.

Definition .[] Letf : [a,b]→R.f is said be of bounded variation if there exists a

C>  such that

n

i=

f(xi–) –f(xi)C

for every partition a=x<x <x<· · ·<xn=b on [a,b]. The set of all functions of bounded variation on [a,b] is denoted byBV[a,b].

Definition .[] Letf: [a,b]→Rbe a function of bounded variation. The total vari-ation off on [a,b] is defined by

Vab(f) =sup

p n

i=

f(xi–) –f(xi),

whereprepresents all partitions of [a,b].

Lemma .[] For any constants c∈R,if f∈BV[a,b],then so is cf and

Vab(cf) =|c|Vab(f).

Lemma .[] For any constants c,d∈R,if f,g∈BV[a,b],then so is cf +dg and

(3)

Lemma .[] Let f be a function of bounded variation on[a,b],and let V be a function defined by V(x) =Vb

x(f).Then if f is continuous from the left(or right)at a point x∗,so is V.

Lemma .[] If a<b<c,then

Vac(f) =Vab(f) +Vbc(f).

Lemma . [] Every monotonic function f is of bounded variation, and Vb a(f) = |f(a) –f(b)|.

Lemma .[] If f,g∈BV[a,b],then so is fg and

Vab(fg)≤cVab(f) +dVab(g),

where c=sup|g(x)|<∞,d=sup|f(x)|<∞.

A fuzzy setx˜ ofRis characterized by a membership functionμx˜ :R→[, ]. Anα -level set of x˜ is [x˜]α={xR:μ

˜

x(x)≥α}for eachα∈(, ]. We define the set [x˜]by

[x˜]={xR:μ˜

x(x) > }, whereAdenotes the closure of a crisp setA. A fuzzy setx˜is said

to be a fuzzy number if it satisfies the following conditions []: () x˜is normal,i.e., there exists anx∈Rsuch thatμx˜(x) = ;

() x˜is convex,i.e.,μx˜(λx+ ( –λ)x)≥min{μx˜(x),μx˜(x)}, for allx,x∈Rand

λ∈[, ];

() x˜is upper semicontinuous; () [x˜]is compact.

Equivalently, a fuzzy numberx˜is a fuzzy set with nonempty bounded level sets [x˜]α=

[x˜L(α),x˜R(α)] for allα∈[, ], where [x˜L(α),x˜R(α)] denotes a closed interval with the left

end pointxL˜ (α) and the right end pointxR˜ (α). We denote the class of fuzzy numbers byF.

Notice that the real numbers Rcan be embedded inF by defining a fuzzy numbera˜

as

μa˜(x) =

, ifx=a,

, otherwise

for eacha∈R. Thus we will represent the singleton{a}bya˜ for any real numbera∈R

and in particular is just the usual zero.˜

For anyx˜,˜yF anda∈R, owing to Zadeh’s extension principle [–], addition and scalar multiplication are defined for anyx∈Rby

μx˜+y˜(x) = sup

x·x:x+x=x

minμx˜(x),μy˜(x)

and

μaטx(x) =μax˜(x) =

μ(xa), ifa= ,

˜

(4)

For anyx˜∈F, we define the fuzzy number –x˜∈F by –x˜= (–)× ˜x,i.e.,μx˜(x) =μx˜(–x), for allx∈R. It is well known that

[x˜+y˜]α= [x˜]α+ [y˜]α=xL˜ (α) +yL˜ (α),xR˜ (α) +yR˜ (α)

and

[ax˜]α=a[x˜]α=

⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩

[axL˜ (α),axR˜ (α)], ifa> ,

{}, ifa= , [axR˜ (α),axL˜ (α)], ifa< 

for allx˜,˜yF anda∈R. In particular, [–x˜]α= –[x˜]α= –[xL˜ (α),xR˜ (α)] = [–xR˜ (α), –xL˜ (α)].

By the level set representations of the fuzzy numbersx˜,y˜,z˜, we can get

[x˜]α+ [y˜]α+ [z˜]α= [x˜]α+[y˜]α

+ [z˜]α

=xL˜ (α) +yL˜ (α) +zL˜ (α),xR˜ (α) +yR˜ (α) +˜zR(α), [x˜]α+ [y˜]α= [y˜]α+ [x˜]α=xL˜ (α) +yL˜ (α),xR˜ (α) +˜yR(α),

which impliesF is a commutative semigroup under addition. We say that a fuzzy number

˜

sF is symmetric [], if

μ˜s(x) =μ˜s(–x)

for allx∈R,i.e.s= –s˜. The set of all symmetric fuzzy numbers will be denoted byS.

Definition .[] Letx˜,˜yF. We say thatx˜is equivalent toy˜and writex˜∼ ˜yif and only if there exist symmetric fuzzy numberss˜,˜s∈S such that

˜

xs=y˜+˜s.

The equivalence relation defined above is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive []. Let

˜xdenote the equivalence class containing the elementx˜and denote the set of equivalence classes byF/S.

Definition .[] For a fuzzy numberx˜, we define a functionxM˜ : [, ]→Rby assign-ing the midpoint of eachα-level set toxM˜ (α) for allα∈[, ],i.e.,

˜

xM(α) =xL˜ (α) +xR˜ (α)

 .

Then the functionxM˜ : [, ]→Rwill be called the midpoint function of the fuzzy num-berx˜.

Lemma .[] For anyx˜∈F,the midpoint functionxM˜ is continuous from the right at

(5)

It is interesting to note that the midpoint functionxM˜ is actually a gradual number and all of the gradual numbers form a group structure under addition [, ]. Among appli-cations of the decomposition of a fuzzy interval using a symmetric fuzzy number and a midpoint function is the study of the fuzzy variance of a fuzzy interval [, ].

Definition .[] Letx˜∈F and letxˆbe a fuzzy number such thatx˜=xˆ+˜sfor some

˜

sS, ifxˆ=y˜+˜sfor some˜yF ands˜∈S, then˜s=. Then the fuzzy number˜ xˆwill be called the Mareš core of the fuzzy numberx˜.

In [], Qiuet al.not only pointed out thatx˜is equivalent toy˜if and only if they have the same midpoint function, which implies that each equivalence class corresponding to each midpoint function, but they also pointed out that for each fuzzy numberx˜has only one Mareš core, andx˜ is equivalent to˜yif and only if they have the same Mareš core, which implies that all elements of an equivalence class˜xhave the same Mareš corexˆ. Hence, the Mareš corexˆofx˜is also called the Mareš core of the equivalence class˜xthat contains the fuzzy numberx˜. It is natural to define the midpoint function for an equivalence class as follows.

Definition .[] For an equivalence class˜xF/S, we define a midpoint function

M˜x: [, ]→Rby

M˜x(α) =xˆM(α)

for allα∈[, ], wherexˆis the Mareš core of˜x.

Definition .[] For any˜xyF/S, we define˜xyby

˜xyx+y˜.

It is obvious thatM˜xy(α) =M˜xy(α) =M˜x(α) +M˜y(α), for allα∈[, ]. Moreover,

it follows from Definitions . and . that

˜xyz˜=x˜+˜y:x˜∈ ˜x,y˜∈ ˜y

for any˜xyF/S. In [] Qiuet al.have given an example to show that the above inclusion can become strict.

Remark . The addition operation defined by Definition . is a group operation over the set of equivalence classesF/S up to the equivalence relation in Definition .. It means that

˜xyyx,

˜xyzxyz,

˜xyx if and only if ˜y=˜,

˜xy=˜ if and only if ˜y=–x˜= –˜x

(6)

Lemma .[, ] (F/S, +)is a group.

For any˜xyF/S, the midpoint functionsM˜xandM˜yare continuous from the

right at  and continuous from the left on [, ], and they are functions of bounded varia-tion on [, ] []. Then the funcvaria-tionM˜xM˜yis also continuous from the right at  and continuous from the left on [, ]. In addition, by Lemma ., we know thatM˜xM˜yis a function of bounded variation on [, ]. Hence,M˜xM˜yis the midpoint function for

some fuzzy number equivalence class.

Definition .[] Let˜xyzF/S. If

M˜z(α) =M˜x(αM˜y(α)

for allα∈[, ], then what we called˜zis the product of˜xand˜y,i.e.zx · ˜y.

Definition . For any˜xF/S andλ∈R, we defineλ· ˜x=λ˜xby

λ˜x=λx˜.

It is obvious that˜x(α) =Mλx˜(α) =λM˜x(α), for allα∈[, ]. Ifxˆis the Mareš core

of˜x, thenλxˆis the Mareš core ofλ˜x. In fact, letyˆbe the Mareš core ofλ˜x. Then, by Theorems . and . in [], and Lemma ., we have

ˆ

xL(α) =M˜x(α) –(M˜x),

ˆ

xR(α) =M˜x(α) +(M˜x)

and

ˆ

yL(α) =˜x(α) –(˜x) =λM˜x(α) –|λ|(M˜x),

ˆ

yR(α) =˜x(α) +(˜x) =λM˜x(α) +|λ|(M˜x)

for allα∈[, ]. Hence, we get [yˆ]α=λ[xˆ]α= [λxˆ]αfor allα[, ],i.e.,yˆ=λxˆ.

Definition . Definedsup:F/S ×F/S→R+∪ {}by

dsup

˜xy= sup

α∈[,]

M˜x(α) –M˜y(α)

for all˜xyF/S.

(F/S,dsup) is a metric space []. From Definition ., we list here some simple prop-erties of the metricdsup(˜xy):

() dsup(˜xz)≤dsup(˜xy) +dsup(˜yz); () dsup(λ˜x,λ˜y) =|λ|dsup(˜xy);

() dsup(˜xzyz) =dsup(˜xy)

for all ˜xyzF/S andλ∈R, where the addition and scalar multiplication on

(7)

3 Initial value problem

In this section, we will firstly give some definitions and basic results for the fuzzy differen-tials and fuzzy integrals. Then we will solve the initial value problem for fuzzy differential equations.

Definition .[] LetT= [a,b]. A mappingF:TF/S is differentiable att∈T if there exists anF(t)∈F/S such that

lim

h→dsup

F(t+h) –F(t)

h ,F

(t

)

= .

Ift=a(ort=b), then we consider onlyh→+(orh→–). IfF,Gare differentiable att, then we have (F+G)(t) =F(t) +G(t) and (λF)(t) =λF(t),λ∈R.

Lemma .[] If F:TF/S is differentiable,then it is continuous with respect to dsup.

Definition .[] A mappingF:TF/S is measurable ifFis measurable with re-spect todsup.

A mappingF:TF/S is called integrably bounded if there exists an integrable func-tionh:T →R+∪ {}such that|M

F(t)(α)| ≤h(t) for alltT andα∈[, ]; a mapping

F:TF/S is said to be of uniformly bounded variation with respect toα∈[, ] (for short, uniformly bounded variation) if there exists a constantK>  such that

V(MF(t))≤K

for alltT[].

Definition .[] LetF:TF/S be measurable. The integral ofFoverT, denoted

TF(t)dtor

b

a F(t)dt, is a mappingMTF(t)dt: [, ]→R, which is defined by the equation

M

TF(t)dt(α) =

T

MF(t)(α)dt

for allα∈[, ]. The mappingF:TF/S is said to be integrable overTif there exists an˜x ∈F/S such thatMTF(t)dt=M˜x. In this case, we denote the integral by

T

F(t)dtx.

IfF:TF/S is a measurable, integrably bounded, and uniformly bounded variation of a mapping, then Fis integrable onT andTF(t)dtF/S []. Also the following properties of the integral are valid. IfF,G:TF/S are integrable onT andλ∈R, then:

()

T

(F+G)(t)dt=

T

F(t)dt+

T G(t)dt,

()

T

λF(t)dt=λ

(8)

() dsup(F,G) is integrable,

() dsup

T F(t)dt,

T G(t)dt

T dsup

F(t),G(t)dt,

()

b a

F(t)dt=

c a

F(t)dt+

b c

F(t)dt, acb.

Lemma .[] Let F:TF/S be continuous with respect to dsupand of uniformly

bounded variation.Then the integral G(t) =atF(s)ds is differentiable and G(t) =F(t)for all tT.

Lemma .[] Let F:TF/S be differentiable and the derivative Fbe integrable over T.Then for all tT,we have F(t) =F(t) +

t

tF(s)ds,at≤tb.

Lemma .[] Let F:TF/S be continuous with respect to dsupand of uniformly

bounded variation and G(t) =atF(s)ds.Then for at≤t≤b we have

dsup

G(t),G(t)

≤(t–t) sup

t∈[t,t]

sup

α∈[,]

MF(t)(α)= (t–t) sup

t∈[t,t]

dsup

F(t),˜.

Assume thatf :T×F/SF/S is continuous and of uniformly bounded variation. Consider the initial value problem

x(t) =ft,x(t), x(a) =˜. ()

From Lemmas ., ., and ., a lemma immediately follows.

Lemma . A mapping x:TF/S is a solution to the problem()if and only if it is continuous,uniformly bounded variation and satisfies the integral equation

x(t) =˜+

t a

fs,x(s)ds=

t a

fs,x(s)ds

for all tT.

Theorem . Let f :T×F/SF/S be continuous with respect to dsupand of

uni-formly bounded variation on T.Suppose there exists an L> such that

dsup

ftx,˜≤L

for all tT and˜xF/S.Then the problem()has a solution on T.

Proof Sincef is of uniformly bounded variation, there exists a constantK>  such that

V(Mf(tx))≤K

for all tT and˜xF/S. LetK= (ba)K. Denote by CBV(T,F/S) the set of

(9)

V

((t))≤Kfor alltT. We metricizeCBV(T,F/S) by setting

D(ξ,ψ) =sup

T dsup

ξ(t),ψ(t)

forξ,ψ∈CBV(T,F/S). Since (F/S,dsup) is a metric space, it is easy to show that also (CBV(T,F/S),D) is metric space. Next, we shall show that (CBV(T,F/S),D) is com-plete. By Definition ., we have

D(ξ,ψ) = sup

tT,α∈[,]

(t)(α) –(t)(α).

Let{ξn}∞n=is a Cauchy sequence inCBV(T,F/S),i.e., for anyε> , there exists a positive integerNsuch that

D(ξm,ξn) = sup tT,α∈[,]

Mξm(t)(α) –Mξn(t)(α)<ε

for allm,n>N. Denote byC(T×[, ],R) the set of all continuous function with respect to the first variabletT. Let

d(x,y) = sup

tT,α∈[,]

x(t,α) –y(t,α)

for anyx,yC(T×[, ],R). Then{Mξn}is a Cauchy sequence inC(T×[, ],R), which implies that for any giventTandα∈[, ],{Mξn(t)(α)}is a Cauchy sequence. Thus, there

exists an(t)(α) such that

lim

n→∞Mξn(t)(α) –(t)(α)= .

Now we shall show that(t)(α)∈C(T×[, ]). Firstly, we have

Mξm(t)(α) –(t)(α)≤Mξm(t)(α) –Mξn(t)(α)+Mξn(t)(α) –(t)(α)

for alltTandα∈[, ]. Thus, lettingn→ ∞we have

sup

tT,α∈[,]

Mξm(t)(α) –(t)(α)≤ε,

wheneverm>N, which implies thatMξn(t)(α) converges uniformly to(t)(α) with respect

to (t,α) onT×[, ]. Thus, we find that(t)(α) is continuous with respect totT,i.e.,

(t)(α)∈C(T×[, ],R). For any givenα∈[, ], let{αn}∞n=⊆[, ] be a nondecreasing sequence converging toα. For any giventT, we have

(t)(αn) –(t)(α)≤Mξm(t)(αn) –(t)(αn)+Mξm(t)(αn) –Mξm(t)(α)

+Mξm(t)(α) –(t)(α).

(10)

above inequality is equal to  asn,m→+∞. Hence(t)is continuous from the left on [, ] with respect toα. Similarly, we can find that(t)is continuous from the right at . Since{Mξn(t)(α)}∞n=are of bounded variation on [, ] and converge uniformly to(t)(α) with respect toα, by Theorem . in [] we obtain

V((t))≤ lim

n→∞infV

(Mξn(t))≤K.

Hence, by Lemma ., we know that(t)(α) is a midpoint function of some fuzzy number equivalence class, we still useξ(t) to denote this fuzzy equivalence class for anytT. It is obvious thatξ(t) is a mapping of uniformly bounded variation fromT toF/F and for arbitraryε>  there exists a positive integerNsuch that

D(ξn,ξ) = sup tT,α∈[,]

Mξn(t)(α) –(t)(α)≤ε/

for alln>N. Sinceξn(t) is continuous, for any givent∈Tand the sameε> , there exists aδ>  such that if|tt|<δ, then

dsup

ξn(t),ξn(t)

= sup

α∈[,]

Mξn(t)(α) –Mξn(t)(α)<ε/.

Thus, we have

(t)(α) –(t)(α)≤Mξn(t)(α) –(t)(α)+Mξn(t)(α) –Mξn(t)(α)

+Mξn(t)(α) –Mξn(t)(α)

≤D(ξn,ξ) +dsup

ξn(t),ξn(t)

< ε/ +ε/ =ε,

which implies that

dsup

ξ(t),ξ(t)

= sup

α∈[,]

(t)(α) –(t)(α)≤ε.

Thus, we getξ∈CBV(T,F/S). Hence, (CBV(T,F/S),D) is complete. Forξ∈CBV(T,F/S) define onTby the relation

(t) =˜+

t a

fs,ξ(s)ds=

t a

fs,ξ(s)ds.

Then for anyα∈[, ], we have

MGξ(t)(α) =Mt

af(s,ξ(s))ds(α) =

t a

Mf(s,ξ(s))(α)ds.

By Lemma ., we get

V(MGξ(t)) =V

t a

Mf(s,ξ(s))ds

t a

(11)

Thus, we see thatis of uniformly bounded variation. Hence, by Corollaries . and . continuous with respect todsup, for anyε> , there existsN>  such that

(12)

for alln>N. By Lemma ., we have

dsup

(Gx)(t),˜=dsup

(Gx)(t), (Gx)(a)

≤(ta)sup

T dsup

ft, (Gx)(t),˜

≤(ba)L

for allx∈CBV(T,F/F). Thus we get

DGx,˜=sup

T dsup

(Gx)(t),˜≤(ba)L.

Hence,Gis a continuous mapping ofBinto itself,i.e.,GBB. For anyt,t∈T,t≤t, andxB, by Lemma ., we have

dsup

(Gx)(t), (Gx)(t)

≤(t–t) sup

t∈[t,t]

dsup

ft, (Gx)(t),˜≤(t–t)L,

which implies thatGBis equicontinuous. SinceGBis totally bounded if and only if it is equicontinuous, we see thatGBis totally bounded. By Ascoli’s theorem, we conclude that

GBis a relatively compact subset ofCBV(T,F/F). By Schauder’s fixed point theorem,G

has a fixed point, and by Lemma ., we know that this fixed point is a solution of ().

Example . DefineF:T= [a,b]→F/S by the level sets of the fuzzy mapping

F(t)α=, (ta), α[, ],

whereF(t) is the Mareš core ofF(t), for allt∈[a,b]. Thus, we have

MF(t)(α) =(ta)

for allα∈[, ] andt∈[a,b]. It is obvious thatMF(t)(α) is continuous from the right at  and continuous from the left on [, ] with respect toα. SinceMF(t)(α) is increasing with respect toαand by Lemma ., we get

V(MF(t)) =e(ta)– ≤eba– .

Thus, we find thatF(t) is of uniformly bounded variation. SinceMF(t)(α) is uniformly con-tinuous with respect tot∈[a,b], we see thatF(t) is continuous with respect todsup. Define

f : [a,bF/SF/S by

ftx=F(t).

It is obvious thatf is continuous with respect todsup. Since

(13)

for allα∈[, ] and by Lemma ., we get

V(Mf(tx)) =V(MF(t)) =e(ta)– ≤eba– .

Thus,f is of uniformly bounded variation. Since

dsup

ftx,˜=dsup

F(t),˜= sup

α∈[,]

MF(t)(α) – 

= sup

α∈[,]

(ta)eba

for allt∈[a,b] and˜xF/S. Thenf(tx) satisfies the assumptions of Theorem . and hence the initial value problem

x(t) =ft,x(t), x(a) =˜,

has a unique solution on [a,b]. By the proof of Theorem ., we know that the unique solutionx(t) of the initial value problem is

x(t) =˜+

t a

F(s)ds.

Then we get

Mx(t)(α) =M˜(α) +

t a

MF(s)(α)ds=  +

t a

(sa)ds

=

ta, α= , 

α(e

α(ta)– ), α(, ].

Thus, we have

(Mx(t)) =etat+a– 

for allα∈[, ]. By Theorems . and . in [], we see that the left end points and the right end points of level sets of the Mareš corex(t) forx(t), respectively, obey

x(t)L(α) =Mx(t)(α) –(Mx(t))

=

(ta) –eta+ , α= ,

α(e

α(ta)– ) –eta+ta+ , α(, ],

x(t)R(α) =Mx(t)(α) +(Mx(t))

=

eta– , α= ,

α(e

α(ta)– ) +etat+a– , α(, ].

4 Comparison theorems

(14)

Definition . Defined+:C[T,R]Rby

formly bounded variation on T.Suppose

(15)

Example . DefineF:T= [a,b]→F/S by the level sets of the fuzzy mapping

F(t)α=

⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩

[, ( –αt+b–ab–a )], ifα∈(, ),

[, ], ifα= ,

{}, ifα= ,

whereF(t) is the Mareš core ofF(t), for allt∈[a,b]. Thus, we have

MF(t)(α) =

⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩

 –αt+b–ab–a , ifα(, ),

, ifα= ,

, ifα= .

It is obvious thatFis continuous with respect todsup. Since

V(MF(t)) = 

for allt∈[a,b], we see thatFis of uniformly bounded variation. Definef : [a,bF/S

F/S by

ftx=F(tx,

where the multiplication inF/S is defined by Definition .. It is obvious thatf is con-tinuous with respect todsupand of uniformly bounded variation. By Definition ., we have

dsup

ftx,fty=dsup

F(tx,F(ty

= sup

α∈[,]

MF(t)(α)M˜x(α) –MF(t)(α)M˜y(α)

≤ sup

α∈[,]

MF(t)(α)dsup

˜xy

=dsup

˜xy

for allt∈[a,b] and˜xyF/S. Define the scalar differential equation

dt =g(t,ϕ), ϕ(a) = ,

where the functiong(t,ϕ) =γ(t)ϕandγ(t) = eta. It is obvious thatγ(t)≥ for allt

[a,b],gC[T×R+,R+] andg(t,ϕ) is nondecreasing with respect toϕfor allt∈[a,b]. Then

gt,dsup

˜xy=γ(t)dsup

˜xy≥dsup

˜xy

for allt∈[a,b] and˜xyF/S. Hence, we obtain

dsup

ftx,ftygt,dsup

(16)

for allt∈[a,b] and˜xyF/S. Letx(a) =xandy(a) =y, such thatdsup(x,y)≤. By Theorem ., we conclude that

dsup

x(t),y(t)≤e(et–a–)

for allt∈[a,b], wherex(t),y(t) are two solutions of fuzzy differential equation

x(t) =ft,x(t)

through (a,x), (a,y) on [a,b].

Corollary . Let f :T×F/SF/S be continuous with respect to dsupand of

uni-formly bounded variation on T.Suppose

dsup

ftx,˜≤gt,dsup

˜x,˜

for all tT and˜xF/S,where g satisfies the assumptions of Theorem..Then,if dsup(x,˜)≤ϕ,we have

dsup

x(t),˜≤r(t)

for all tT,where x(t)is any solution of()through(a,x)on T and r(t) =r(t,a,ϕ)is the

maximal solution of the scalar differential equation()on T.

Proof In fact, we can show this corollary by a similar method to Theorem ..

Theorem . Let f :T×F/SF/S be continuous with respect to dsup and of

uni-formly bounded variation on T.Suppose

dsup

ftx,ftygt,dsup

˜xy

for all tT and˜xyF/S,where gC[T×R+,R+].Suppose the maximal solution

r(t) =r(t,a,ϕ)of the scalar differential equation()exists on T.Then,if x(t),y(t)are any

two solutions of ()through(a,x), (a,y)on T,respectively,and dsup(x,y)≤ϕwe have

dsup

x(t),y(t)≤r(t)

for all tT.

Proof Letm(t) =dsup(x(t),y(t)). Thenm(t) =dsup(x,y)≤ϕand for any fixedtTand

h=  witht+hT, we have

m(t+h) –m(t) =dsup

x(t+h),y(t+h)–dsup

x(t),y(t). Since

dsup

x(t+h),y(t+h)≤dsup

x(t+h),x(t) +hft,x(t) +dsup

(17)

dsup

Thus, by Definition ., we get

d+m(t) = lim

formly bounded variation on T.If

dsup

maximal solution of the scalar differential equation()on T.

(18)

Theorem . Let f :T×F/SF/S be continuous with respect to dsup and of

uni-formly bounded variation on T.Suppose

lim

formly bounded variation on T.Suppose

lim

(19)

Proof In fact, we can show this corollary by a similar method to Theorem ..

where the addition and multiplication inF/S are defined by Definitions . and ., re-spectively. It is obvious thatf is continuous with respect todsupand of uniformly bounded variation. By Definition ., we get

(20)

= –

for allh>  sufficiently small. Hence

lim By Theorem ., we conclude that

dsup

In this paper, we have researched the basic theory of fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers. We have solved the initial value problem for the fuzzy differential equations provided thatf is a continuous with respect todsup, of uniformly bounded variation onT, and is a bounded function, and then we have established a vari-ety of comparison results for the solutions of fuzzy differential equations which form the essential tools for studying the fundamental theory of fuzzy differential equations. The comparison discussion shows how, with the minimum linear structure, one can develop the theory of differential inequalities that are important in comparison principles. We also hope that our results in this paper may lead to significant, new, and innovative results in related fields.

Competing interests

(21)

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Author details

1School of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Shapingba, Chongqing, 400044, P.R. China.2College of Mathematics and Physics, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanan, Chongqing, 400065, P.R. China.3School of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Shapingba, Chongqing, 400044, P.R. China.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant Nos. 11201512 and 61472056) and The Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (cstc2012jjA00001).

Received: 24 June 2014 Accepted: 19 November 2014 Published:02 Dec 2014

References

1. Zadeh, LA: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control8, 338-353 (1965)

2. Chalco-Cano, Y, Román-Flores, H: Some remarks on fuzzy differential equations via differential inclusions. Fuzzy Sets Syst.230, 3-20 (2013)

3. Ding, Z, Shen, H, Kandel, A: Hypergraph partitioning for the parallel computing of fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst.230, 142-161 (2013)

4. Dizicheh, AK, Salahshour, S, Ismail, FB: A note on ‘Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations by extended Runge-Kutta-like formulae of order 4’. Fuzzy Sets Syst.233, 96-100 (2013)

5. Drainkov, D, Hellendoom, H, Reinfrank, M: An Introduction to Fuzzy Control. Springer, Berlin (1996)

6. Dubois, D, Prade, H: Towards fuzzy differential calculus, part 1: integration of fuzzy mappings. Fuzzy Sets Syst.8, 1-17 (1982)

7. Dubois, D, Prade, H: Towards fuzzy differential calculus, part 2: integration on fuzzy intervals. Fuzzy Sets Syst.8, 105-116 (1982)

8. Dubois, D, Prade, H: Towards fuzzy differential calculus, part 3: differentiation. Fuzzy Sets Syst.8, 225-234 (1982) 9. Kaleva, O: Fuzzy differential equation. Fuzzy Sets Syst.24, 301-317 (1987)

10. Lakshmikantham, V, Mohapatra, RN: Theory of Fuzzy Differential Equations and Inclusions. Academic Press, New York (2003)

11. Novak, V: Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications. Hilger, Bristol (1988)

12. Kandel, A, Byatt, WJ: Fuzzy differential equations. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, Tokyo (1978)

13. Kaleva, O: The Cauchy problem for fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst.35, 389-396 (1990) 14. Kaleva, O: On the calculus of fuzzy valued mappings. Appl. Math. Lett.3, 55-59 (1990)

15. Song, SJ: Global existence of solutions to fuzzy differential equation. Fuzzy Sets Syst.115, 371-376 (2000) 16. Wu, CX, Song, SJ, Lee, ES: Approximate solutions, existence and uniqueness of the Cauchy problem of fuzzy

differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.202, 629-644 (1996)

17. Wu, CX, Song, SJ: Existence theorem of fuzzy differential equations under compactness-type condition. Inf. Sci.108, 123-134 (1998)

18. Buckley, JJ, Feuring, TH: Fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst.110, 43-54 (2000)

19. Ding, Z, Ming, M, Kandel, A: Existence of solutions of fuzzy differential equations. Inf. Sci.99, 205-217 (1997) 20. Gasilov, N, Amrahov, SE, Fatullayev, AG: Solution of linear differential equations with fuzzy boundary values. Fuzzy

Sets Syst.257, 169-183 (2014)

21. Karpenko, D, Gorder, RAV, Kandel, A: The Cauchy problem for complex fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst.

245, 18-29 (2014)

22. Lakshmikantham, V, Mohapatra, RN: Basic properties of solutions of fuzzy differential equations. Nonlinear Stud.8, 113-124 (2000)

23. Li, JX, Zhao, AM, Yan, JR: The Cauchy problem of fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiability. Fuzzy Sets Syst.200, 1-24 (2012)

24. Nieto, JJ: The Cauchy problem for continuous fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst.102, 113-124 (1999) 25. Puri, ML, Ralescu, DA: Differentials of fuzzy functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl.91, 552-558 (1983)

26. Hukuhara, M: Intégration des applications mesurables dont la valeur est un compact convexe. Funkc. Ekvacioj10, 205-223 (1967)

27. Mareš, M: Addition of fuzzy quantities: disjunction-conjunction approach. Kybernetika25, 104-116 (1989) 28. Mareš, M: Additive decomposition of fuzzy quantities. Fuzzy Sets Syst.47, 341-346 (1992)

29. Jamison, KD: A normed space of fuzzy number equivalence classes. UCD/CCM Report No. 112, October (1997) 30. Panda, G, Panigrahi, M, Nanda, S: Equivalence class in the set of fuzzy numbers and its application in decision-making

problems. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.35, 741-765 (2006)

31. Wu, CX, Zhao, Z: Some notes on the characterization of compact sets of fuzzy sets withLpmetric. Fuzzy Sets Syst.

159, 2104-2115 (2008)

32. Hong, D, Do, H: Additive decomposition of fuzzy quantities. Inf. Sci.88, 201-207 (1996)

33. Qiu, D, Lu, CX, Zhang, W, Lan, YY: Algebraic properties and topological properties of the quotient space of fuzzy numbers based on Mareš equivalence relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst.245, 63-82 (2014)

34. Qiu, D, Zhang, W, Lu, CX: On fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. (2014, submitted)

35. Kolmogorov, AN, Fomin, SV: Introductory Real Analysis. Dover, New York (1975) 36. Dubois, D, Prade, H: Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Academic Press, New York (1980)

37. Zadeh, LA: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I. Inf. Sci.8, 199-251 (1975)

(22)

39. Zadeh, LA: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - III. Inf. Sci.9, 43-80 (1975)

40. Dubois, D, Prade, H: Gradual elements in a fuzzy set. Soft Comput.12, 165-175 (2008)

41. Fortin, J, Dubois, D, Fargier, H: Gradual numbers and their application to fuzzy interval analysis. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.

16, 388-402 (2008)

42. Dubois, D, Fargier, H, Fortin, J: The empirical variance of a set of fuzzy intervals. In: Proc. of the 2005 IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2005), Reno, Nevada, 22-25 May, pp. 885-890. IEEE Press, New York (2005)

43. Dubois, D, Kerre, E, Mesiar, R, Prade, H: Fuzzy interval analysis. In: Dubois, D, Prade, H (eds.) Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets. The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets, pp. 483-581. Kluwer Academic, Boston (2000)

44. Jamison, KD: Modeling uncertainty using probabilistic based possibility theory with applications to optimization. Doctoral thesis, University of Colorado at Denver (1998)

45. Jamison, KD: Possibility as cumulative probability and a normed space of congruence classes of fuzzy numbers motivated by an expected utility functional. Fuzzy Sets Syst.111, 331-339 (2000)

46. Lakshmikantham, V, Leela, S: Differential and Integral Inequalities, vol. I. Academic Press, New York (1996)

10.1186/1687-1847-2014-303

Cite this article as:Qiu et al.:Basic theorems for fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers.

References

Related documents

In conversation with former Lundy students they unanimously state that attending as a level- two student was excellent preparation for their third year project, even if it was not done

The Clustering and Enhancing Digital Archives for Research (CEDAR) project was initiated to enhance and embed e-content in teaching and learning, of the existing East London

In order to guarantee performance SLAs, service providers in the Cloud tend to over provision mainly due to the lack of capacity planning tools that guide

Thus the 2010 control for England’s Saturday match was taken as the average rate per thousand population aged 16 or over (based on ONS 2010 mid-year estimates) for the four

For a more sceptical perspective on the concept of ‘trickle down economics’ see Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents (Penguin.. describes policies popularized

The diff erence between the code for drawing a circle and the code for drawing a Voronoi diagram using the traditional ‘computational geometry’ approach is huge: the two

The result summarise the benefits of government program services in Kurdistan region of Iraq, also identify the drawbacks of the current system, and the factors that influence

Controlling the Internet has for a long time been the privilege of academics in the USA. However, with the evolution of the Internet as the world communication