ISSN 0128-4428
Isolation Frequency Switchable MIMO Antenna for PCS, WIMAX and WLAN Application
Adamu Halilu Jabire1*, Anas Abdu1, Sani Saminu2, Abubakar M. Sadiq3 and Mohammed J. Adamu3
1School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology P.R. China.
2School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, P. R. China.
3School of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 30072 P.R. China.
*Corresponding author: [email protected], Tel: +8615510965699, +2348036570803
Abstract: In this study, a lumped component based frequency reconfigurable multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) receiving wire design is presented. The proposed antenna is composed of a planar structure in form of F-shaped together with a slotted and defected ground structure for bandwidth and isolation enhancement. The MIMO antenna operates in six frequencies upon the state of the four lumped element switches. The proposed receiving wire design exhibits a multiband frequency reconfigurable characteristics from 1-7GHz with isolation of more than 14dB for the whole band, with efficiency of about 75%. The MIMO antenna’s behavior in terms of ratio of square root of the sum of power reflected wave to the incident wave (TARC), ECC and CCL are all within the acceptable limits. The design is suitable for personal communication system (PCS), WIMAX and WLAN wireless applications.
Keywords: MIMO, Frequency reconfigurable, Lumped elements, Mutual coupling.
© 2019 Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved Article History: received 12 October 2019; accepted 5 December 2019; published 18 December 2019.
1.INTRODUCTION
The demand for multiple/wideband operating frequencies in wireless communication framework is increasing these days. With these, frequency reconfigurable MIMO antennas have gained a remarkable recognition due to their ability to adjust the operating frequency band based on spectrum availability [1]. Frequency reconfigurable antennas are better choice as they work over small band and reject the clamor from unused ones which upgrades the unwavering quality of the framework. Reconfigurable MIMO antennas proffer's a solution where by it can switch or tune the operating frequency to a desired band by using some techniques. We have several types of reconfigurable antennas such as radiation pattern reconfigurability [2], frequency [3] - [8], polarization [9]
and bandwidth [10].
This study only focused on frequency tunable antennas. One of the challenges of the MIMO antenna is the electromagnetic interaction among the array elements termed as mutual coupling [11]. Designing the MIMO antennas requires a lot of consideration for minimizing the mutual coupling effect because, the effect severely degrades how the MIMO antenna performs. Several designs of frequency reconfigurable MIMO antennas have been proposed in [12] - [19] of which most of the designs are reconfigurable antennas. A design of reconfigurable metal edge MIMO handset reception apparatus with circulated bolstering is introduced in [12].
The antenna depends on switches and the antenna cluster idea. Another design of reconfigurable antenna based on reconfigurable microstrip feedline is presented in [13], in which varactor diodes are integrated within the feedline
to achieve frequency reconfigurability. A design presented in [14] used RF switch for frequency tuning capability. The RF switch is used in the ground short pin of the dual port antenna for impedance switching. A pin diode is used in [15] to achieve operating band reconfigurability. The antenna framework gives switchable band gap capability for WIMAX (3.2 - 3.8GHz) band. The used of microelectromechanical (MEMS) switch is presented in [16] - [17]. The reception apparatus is proficient in beam steering on the XZ-plane upon MEMS put on the antenna feeding line. A pattern and frequency reconfigurable antenna is presented in [18]. The antenna used a single feed line with the help of diodes. The radiation pattern reconfiguration is achieved by rotating the patch. A lumped element switch is employed in [19] and [20]. The lumped components are utilized in the simulation environment to accomplish tunable capacitance which is responsible for frequency reconfigurability. However, the methodology used in majority of the above mentioned papers have some disadvantages for the fact that they are not easily modeled and are not conveniently integrated within the structure.
In this paper, a 2x2 isolation frequency reconfigurable MIMO antenna is designed on the FR4 substrate with thickness of 1.6mm. The MIMO antenna transmits in six different frequency bands which include personal communication system (PCS), WIMAX and WLAN band. The lumped components are employed as switch within the radiator to accomplish the frequency reconfigurability. The value of the R used which configure the state of the switch is R= 1Ω (switch ON) and R=1kΩ (switch OFF). A space of 1mm is saved for the integration of each switch. The rest of the manuscript
is sorted out as follows: section 2 is the antenna geometry and design, while section 3 discussed the simulation results, section 4 presents the MIMO system metrics and section 5 finishes up the study.
2.ANTENNADESIGN 2.1 Antenna Geometry
The proposed frequency reconfigurable MIMO antenna is derived from two planar rectangular monopole antenna fed by 50Ω microstrip line. The step-by step design procedure is shown in figure 1. The detailed geometry of the top and bottom view are shown in figure 2A and 2B, respectively. The optimum parameters of the proposed antenna are given in table 1. The 2x2 reception apparatus is designed on FR4 substrate with a permittivity of 4.3, tan
= 0.025, and 1.6mm thick. The electromagnetic design and simulation of this work are performed in the commercial full wave simulator CST 2017 version.Step 1
↓
Step 2
↓
Step 3
Figure 1. The design evolution of the 2x2 MIMO antenna
2.2 Parametric Analysis of the Design
The design evolution is presented using three different steps as mentioned above. Besides, the reflection coefficient plots for all the intermediate steps involved in design process are provided in figure 3 for identifying the effect or influence of each design step on the impedance bandwidth. The step 1, as shown in figure 1 is a 2x2 monopole with a partial ground plane having a length of GL=16mm. In the second step, slits are added in the ground plane which, alters the current distributions in the plane. The surface current of defective ground structure in step 2 alter the input impedance of the MIMO antenna and improve the impedance bandwidth. Four different slits are also added on the radiating elements which helps in improving the impedance bandwidth and also serve as
a place where our switches can be integrated for reconfigurability. In the final design step, that is, step 3 two notches are employed in the ground plane. The two notches introduced in step 3 alter the surface currents in the ground plane and contributes in impedance matching around -18dB as shown in figure 3.
W
L
x y
z
S1 S2
S3 S4
TL TW TW TL
W1 W2
W3 W4
W5
W5
PL
(A)
GL
W6 W7
W8 W9
x y
z
(B)
Figure 2. 2x2 MIMO antenna geometry: A, top layer, B, ground plane
Table 1. Optimized antenna parameters Parameter Size (mm) Parameter Size (mm)
L 40 W2 9
W 50 W3 2
GL 16 W4 3
PL 23 W5 1
TL 16 W6 3
TW 3 W7 2
H 1.6 W8 5
W1 2.81 W9 0.4
3.RESULTS ANDDISCUSSION
3.1. Reflection Coefficient of the MIMO Antenna Four element switches is used for four possible modes of procedure which is shown in table 2. Lumped element switch is preferred because it is easily configured in CST as a resistor of 1Ω and 1kΩ to control the switch in ON and OFF mode respectively. The MIMO antenna operates
in mode 1 when the switch is set in the ON state. In this mode the MIMO antenna gives two frequencies of 1.7GHz and 5.1GHz. The two frequencies are used for PCS and WLAN application. Figure 4 shows the simulated S11 for the ON state. Figure 5 remain the isolation coefficient (S21) of the MIMO antenna. Mode 2 is the OFF state that is, when the four switches are off, 3.35GHz was realized as shown in figure 6, while figure 7 is the S21 of the MIMO antenna when the switch is off.
Mode 3 is when S1 is ON, S2 is OFF, S3 is ON and S4 is OFF, 5.6GHz is attained as shown in figure 8. The S21 of the mode is presented in figure 9. In mode 4 which is the last mode S1 is OFF, S2 is ON, S3 is OFF and S4 is ON, two dual frequencies are realized at 3.3GHz and 5.28GHz as depicted in figure 10. The S21 is shown in figure 11. In all the four modes more than 14dB isolation is attained.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-20 -15 -10 -5 0
S11 (dB)
Freq (GHz) Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
Figure 3. S11 plots for each design step
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
S11 (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 4. Simulated S11 for mode 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
S21 (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 5. Simulated S21 for mode 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-15 -10 -5 0
S11 (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 6. Simulated S11 for mode 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12
S21 (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 7. Simulated S21 for mode 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
S11 (dB)
Freq (GHz
Figure 8. Simulated S11 for mode 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6
S21 (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 9. Simulated S21 for mode 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -15
-10 -5 0
S11 (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 10. Simulated S11 for mode 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12
S21 (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 11. Simulated S21 for mode 4
Table 2. Frequency mode of the proposed antenna Modes S1 S2 S3 S4 Frequency Mode 1 ON ON ON ON 1.7GHz, 5.1GHz
Mode 2 OFF OFF OFF OFF 3.35GHz
Mode 3 ON OFF ON OFF 5.6GHz
Mode 4 OFF ON OFF ON 3.3GHz, 5.28GHz
3.2 Radiation Pattern of the MIMO antenna
Radiation pattern of the proposed 2x2 MIMO antenna are simulated using CST studio version 2017. The plot at 1.7GHz, 3.3GHz and 3.35GHz is shown in figure 12, while figure 13 is the pattern plot at 5.1GHz, 5.28GHz and 5.6GHz.. As can be seen from all the plots the MIMO antenna has approximately omnidirectional radiation pattern
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0
30
60
90
120
150 180
210 240 270
300 330
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
XZ-Plane YZ-Plane
(a)
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0
30
60
90
120
150 180
210 240 270
300 330
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
XZ-Plane YZ-Plane
(b)
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0
30
60
90
120
150 180
210 240 270
300 330
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
XZ-Plane YZ-Plane
(c)
Figure 12. Radiation pattern at (a) 1.7GHz, (b) 3.3GHz, and (c) 3.35GHz
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0
30
60
90
120
150 180
210 240 270
300 330
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
XZ-Plane YZ-Plane
(a)
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 0
30
60
90
120
150 180
210 240 270
300 330
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10
XZ-Plane YZ-Plane
(b)
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0
30
60
90
120
150 180
210 240 270
300 330
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
XZ-Plane YZ-Plane
(c)
Figure 13. Radiation pattern at (a) 5.1GHz, (b) 5.28GHz and (c) 5.6GHz
4.MIMOSYSTEMMETRICS
The important parameters which serves as the determinant factors for the coupling coefficient between the MIMO antenna elements is called the envelope correlation coefficient. Virtually ECC factor must be less than 0.5 and is usually computed using the S-parameter given in equation 1. The ECC plot is pictured in figure 14 which is lower than 0.001 over the frequency of interest.
Another important parameter for the implementation of MIMO antenna is diversity gain, it is obtained when two or more antennas are used, which is calculated using equation 2. Diversity gain plot for the proposed MIMO antenna is presented in figure 15. It is clearly seen that the
value is almost 10dB. A good diversity gain performance is clearly exhibited by the antenna.
122
2 22 2
21 2 11
22 21 12 11
1
1 S S S S
S S S S
ECC
(1)
1
210 ECC
DG
(2)2 3 4 5 6 7
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
ECC
Freq (GHz)
Figure 14. ECC of MIMO antenna system
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8.8 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.6 9.8 10.0
DG (dB)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 15. Diversity gain of the MIMO antenna
Total active reflection coefficient (TARC) is one of the coupling coefficient between the MIMO antenna elements for a two-port MIMO antenna. TARC can be computed using equation 3 [21]. The TARC is dependent on scattering parameters from port 1 to port 2 and vice versa. Practically, the value of TARC must be lower than 0dB. Figure 16 is the TARC plot using Matlab 2018 and origin 8 for the plot.
is considered as variable angle which is related to phase of excitation signal. TARC was considered from 0 degrees to 180 degrees with an interval of30
o. The plot reveals that0 r
at 1
.2
2 21 22 2 12 11
j
j
S S e
e S S TARC
(3)Increasing the number of antennas will lead to an increase in the channel capacity of the MIMO system, some losses will be included in the channel due to the presence of correlation. Channel capacity loss is one of the important feature that describes data rate that can be supported in a particular channel. CCL can be calculated from simulated S-parameters using the equation 4 below. The CCL is
presented in figure 17 in which, the plot shows that the CCL are less than 0.2 over the frequency of interest.
RCCL log
2det
(4) Figure 18 is the peak gain over the frequency and the efficiency of the MIMO antenna, more than 70% of efficiency is attained by the MIMO antenna.1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
TARC (dB)
Freq (GHz) 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Figure 16. TARC of the 2x2 MIMO antenna system
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-1 0 1 2 3 4
CCL (bits/sec/Hz)
Freq (GHz)
Figure 17. CCL of the 2x2 MIMO antenna system
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 1 2 3 4
Realized gain (dBi)
Freq (GHz)
Efficiency (%) Gain
Figure 18. Realized gain and efficiency of the MIMO antenna
5.CONCLUSION
This work presents a frequency reconfigurable MIMO antenna for PCS, WIMAX and WLAN application.
Numerical outcomes are given to exhibit the proposed model. With an efficiency of more than 70% the proposed antenna provides low polarization diversity aims at attaining the low mutual coupling which provides low
latency, increased user rate, reduce cost and energy and finally increase the capacity in terms of traffic and connections.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors will like to thank the school of electronics and information engineering, Hebei University of Technology P.R China for their kind support.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Insang, M. F. Imani, S. Timothy et al,
“Enhancing capacity of spatial multiplexing systems using reconfigurable cavity-backed metasurface antennas in clustered MIMO channels,”
IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. 67(2), pp. 1070- 1084, 2019.
[2] L. Marantis, D. Rongas, A. Paraskevo poulas et al,
“Pattern reconfigurable ESPAR antenna for vehicle to vehicle communications,” IET Microw. Antennas and Propagation, vol. 12(3), pp. 280-286, 2018.
[3] M. Rohit and S. Dwari “Compact planar reconfigurable UWB-MIMO antenna with on- demand worldwide interoperability for microwave access/wireless local area network rejection,” IET Microw Antennas Propagation, vol. 13(10), pp.
1684-1689, 2019.
[4] A. Mansoul and M. L. Seddik, “Multiband reconfigurable bowtie slot antenna using switchable slot extensions for WIFI, WIMAX and WLAN applications,” Microw and Opt Tech. Lett, vol. 60 no.2, pp. 413-418, 2018.
[5] A. Tanweer, M. Khaleeq Mohammed and R. C.
Biradar, “A multiband reconfigurable slot antenna for wireless applications,”. Int. J. Elect and Commun, vol. 84, pp. 273-280, 2018.
[6] A. Tanweer, F. Nikhat and R. C. Biradar, “A miniaturized multiband reconfigurable fractal slot antenna for GPS/GNSS/Bloetooth/EIMAX/X-Band applications,” Int. J. Elect and Commun, vol. 94, pp. 234-243, 2018.
[7] G. Srivastava, A. Mohan and A. Chakraborty,
“Compact reconfigurable UWB slot antenna for cognitive radio applications,” IEEE Antennas Wirel.
Propag. Lett, vol. 16, pp.1139-1142, 2017.
[8] S. Chagharvand, M. Rijal Hamid, M. Ramlee Kamarudin et al, “Wide to narrowband reconfigurable vivaldi antenna using switched feed technique,” Telecomm System, vol. 63, pp. 711-717, 2016.
[9] Ke Li, and Yan Shi “A characteristic mode based polarization reconfigurable antenna and its array,”
IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 64587-64595, 2018.
[10] A. Mansoul, F. Ghanem, M. R. Hamid et al,
“Bandwidth reconfigurable antenna with a fixed lower and a variable upper limit,” IET Microw Antennas Propagation, vol. 10(15), pp. 1725-1733, 2016.
[11] A. Ghaffar, X. Jun LiS. Boon-Chong,”Dual frequency band and polarization reconfigurable antenna for mobile devices,” 2017 IEEE Int.
Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), Chengdu, China, 2017, pp. 696-700.
[12] A. H. Jabire, H-X Zheng, A. Abdu et al,
“Characteristic mode analysis and design of wide band MIMO antenna consisting of metamaterial unit cell,” Electronics, vol. 8(1), pp.1-14, 2019.
[13] L. Rasmiu, J-M Hannula, L. Anu et al, “Switch reconfigurable metal rim MIMO handset antenna with distributed feeding,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp.
48971-48981, 2019.
[14] X. Zhao and S. Riaz, “A dual band frequency reconfigurable MIMO patch slot antenna based on reconfigurable mixrostrip feedline. IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 4150-41457, 2018.
[15] W-W Lee and B-C Jang “A tunable MIMO antenna with dual port structure for mobile phones,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 34113-34120, 2019.
[16] A. Quddus, R. Saleem, M. F Shafique et al,
“Compact electronically reconfigurable WIMAX band-notched ultrawideband MIMO antenna,”
Radio Engineering vol. 27(4), pp. 998-1005, 2018
[17] H. Lago, Z. Zakaria, M. F. Jimlos et al, “A wide band reconfigurable folded planar dipole using MEMS and hybrid polymeric substrates,” Int. J.
Elect and Commun, vol. 99, pp. 347-353, 2019.
[18] Khan MS, A. Iftikhar, A-D Capo-bianco et al,
“Pattern and frequency reconfiguration of patch antenna using pin diodes,”Microw Opt. Technol Letters, vol. 59, pp.2180-2185, 2017
[19] A. Shah, S. Hayat, A. Basir, et al, ““Design and analysis of a hexa-band frequency reconfigurable antenna for wireless application,” Int. J. Elect and Commun, vol. 98, pp. 80-88, 2019.
[20] S. Ullah, S. Ahmad, B. A. Khan et al, “A multiband switchable antenna for WIFI, 3G advanced WIMAX and WLAN wireless application,” Int. J.
Microw Wirel Tech, vol. 10(8), pp. 991-997, 2018.
[21] Elwi Taha A. “A miniaturized folded antenna array for MIMO applications,” Wirel Personal Commun, vol. 98(2), pp. 1871-1883, 2018.