• No results found

Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Electronic Clinical

Transfusion Management System

The Chief Medical Officer’s

National Blood Transfusion Committee

right patient

right blood

(2)

1

National Patient Safety Agency November 2006 ©

Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System Contents

Contents

1 Introduction

3

1.1 Format

4

1.2 Purpose

5

1.3 Scope and objectives

5

1.4 Intended audience

6

1.5 Background

6

1.6 Further work

6

1.7 Abbreviations, acronyms and references

6

1.8 Useful documents

7

2 Description

9

2.1 System overview

10

2.2 Features

11

2.3 User types and characteristics

12

2.4 Design and implementation constraints

13

3 External interface requirements

15

3.1 Software interfaces

16

4 Specific requirements

17

4.1 System requirements

18

4.2 Blood transfusion process

18

4.3 Access rights

23

4.4 Blood transfusion process Use Cases

24

4.5 Use Cases

25

4.5.1 Use Cases 1+2

26

4.5.2 Use Case 2

28

4.5.3 Use Case 3

28

4.5.4 Use Case 4

30

4.5.5 Use Case 4a

32

4.5.6 Use Case 4b

34

4.5.7 Use Case 5

36

4.5.8 Use Case 6

39

4.5.9 Use Case 7

41

4.5.10 Use Case 8

44

4.5.11 Use Case 9

48

4.5.12 Use Case 10

50

4.5.13 Use Case 11

52

4.5.14 Use Case 11a

52

4.5.15 Use Case 11b

55

4.5.16 Use Case 12

57

4.5.17 Use Case 12a

57

4.5.18 Use Case 12b

58

(3)

2 National Patient Safety Agency November 2006 ©

Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System Contents

4.5.20 Use Case 14

64

4.5.21 Use Case 15

67

4.5.22 Use Case 15a

68

4.5.23 Use Case 15b

70

4.5.24 Use Case 15c

73

4.5.25 Use Case 16

76

4.5.26 Use Case 17

79

4.5.27 Use Case 17a

79

4.5.28 Use Case 17b

82

4.5.29 Use Case 18

85

4.5.30 Use Case 18a

85

4.5.31 Use Case 18b

88

4.5.32 Use Case 19

91

4.6 Additional requirements

94

5 Other non-functional requirements

95

5.1 Capacity, scalability and availability

96

5.2 Security

96

5.3 Maintainability

96

5.4 Applicable standards

97

5.5 Reports

97

5.6 Business rules

98

5.7 Future requirements

98

Appendix A – Glossary

99

Appendix B – The 'Do Once and Share' End to End

Process Map for Blood Transfusion

105

Appendix C – System requirements

131

Figures

Figure 1

Overall context diagram 10

Figure 2

Simple blood transfusion process map

19

Figure 3

Blood transfusion process map for special requirements 20

Figure 4

Process map for emergency issue of blood

21

Figure 5

Process map for returned and unused blood

22

(4)

3

Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System

Introduction

National Patient Safety Agency November 2006 ©

(5)

4 Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System Introduction

National Patient Safety Agency November 2006 ©

1 Introduction

Blood transfusions involve a complex sequence of activities, with a correspondingly high opportunity for error. To ensure the right patient receives the right blood, there must be strict checking procedures in place at each stage.

The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA), the Chief Medical Officer’s National Blood Transfusion Committee (NBTC) and Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) have collaborated to develop and evaluate a series of national initiatives to improve blood safety. The NPSA has set a target of reducing the number of ABO incompatible blood transfusion incidents by 50 per cent over three to five years, as measured by the SHOT database.

Following a blood safety stakeholder workshop, four initiatives to improve blood safety were selected for further testing and development. One of these initiatives was the use of bar code technology to help prevent final identity checks carried out at the patient's side (at the bedside) from failing.

This national specification, which is part of the NPSA's blood safety initiative,

Right patient, right blood, has been developed with the following objectives: • to address the patient safety risks in the transfusion process;

• to identify IT requirements for a blood tracking system; • to provide an initial specification for IT suppliers.

This specification for an Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System (ECTMS) focuses on the steps in the transfusion pathway taking place outside the laboratory and is relevant to both bar coding and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology.

This document also addresses the requirement of the 2005 Blood Safety and Quality Regulations (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, MHRA) to maintain a complete record for all blood components and products from donor to recipient for 30 years.

1.1 Format

This specification for an ECTMS is based on a widely-used Software Requirements Specification (SRS) template (Weigers et al, 2003; see Section 1.8) with some minor modifications by the NPSA. The implementation of an ECTMS will require more than the development of software, as it will need to be integrated with, for example, server hardware, client devices and remote terminals. In this respect the project can be seen as one of systems engineering rather than software engineeringper se. However, for the purposes of this initial specification, the Wiegers SRS template is more than adequate. The specification gives an overall context of the development, gives a user’s

(6)

5

Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System

Introduction

National Patient Safety Agency November 2006 ©

based largely on the Unified Modelling Language (UML), and specifies functional and non-functional requirements.

1.2 Purpose

The purposes of this specification for an ECTMS are to: • specify the steps in the blood transfusion pathway;

• address the patient safety risks identified in the blood transfusion pathway; • inform Hospital Blood Transfusion Committees and IT managers of the

requirements identified;

• form the basis of an initial requirements specification for IT suppliers;

• provide an initial specification that can be extended to cover other clinical tracking applications.

This document does not in itself provide sufficient detail for IT suppliers to develop the systems and software required for a complete blood tracking solution.

1.3 Scope and objectives

The specification builds on the experience of users of IT technology in blood

transfusion that is currently available and informs both Connecting for Health (CfH) and commercial companies producing both hardware and software.

The main objective of this specification is to support the automated tracking of blood products from the initial ordering of a blood transfusion for a patient, through to the taking of a blood sample for cross matching, to administration of a blood transfusion and subsequent updates to care records. The scope of the specification includes the following scenarios:

• routine blood transfusion;

• transfusion for special requirements (for example, cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative blood, irradiated blood or antigen negative blood);

• emergency issue of blood;

• management of returned and unused blood units.

This specification focuses on the actual requirements for an IT tracking system to work. It does not attempt to define or include any additional business processes or guidelines that may need to be in place, for example, the administration of users on the system, or transferring or transporting data to or from local systems.

The requirements described in this document are specifications for the tracking of blood products from arrival at hospital through to administration. In addition, it is anticipated that any system designed to meet the requirements in this document could be extended to cover other clinical tracking applications such as, for example, tracking drugs and pharmaceuticals.

(7)

6 Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System Introduction

National Patient Safety Agency November 2006 ©

1.4 Intended audience

This specification is aimed at: • IT suppliers;

• CfH;

• Informing Healthcare; • external stakeholders.

1.5 Background

The requirements detailed in this document have been derived from: • the outcomes of the CfH ‘Do Once and Share’ blood transfusion project

(www.transfusionguidelines.org.uk);

• the NPSA’s blood safety IT tracking user group held in September 2005; • discussions with various members of staff at the NPSA and Oxford Radcliffe

Hospital.

1.6 Further work

Starting in March 2007, CfH (with the support of the NPSA) will carry out a pilot with one or more acute healthcare organisations to build on and improve the requirements of the IT specification that will be delivered to Local Service Providers. The NPSA will also work with Informing Healthcare to facilitate introduction of similar technology in the acute sector in Wales.

1.7 Abbreviations, acronyms and references

All abbreviations and acronyms used in this document are consistent with the standards used elsewhere and are defined in the Glossary (Appendix A).

For the purposes of traceability of the requirements in the subsequent development phases, the requirements specified in this document have been identified and numbered using the RQ-xx notation.

(8)

7

Electronic Clinical Transfusion Management System

Introduction

National Patient Safety Agency November 2006 ©

1.8 Useful documents

Ref Title Issued by Source/location

1 Safer practice notice: Right patient, right blood

NPSA www.npsa.nhs.uk/ health/alerts 2 Safer practice notice:

Right patient – right care

NPSA www.npsa.nhs.uk/ health/alerts 3 Safer practice notice:

Wristbands for hospital inpatients improves safety

NPSA www.npsa.nhs.uk/ health/alerts

4 Briefing Sheet:Wristband specification: developing a standardised specification for wristband design in the NHS in England and Wales

NPSA www.npsa.nhs.uk

5 'Barcode technology: its role in increasing the safety of blood transfusion'

Turner CL et al Transfusion2003; 43: 1200-1209

6 Issues/requirements derived from the user group workshop held on 16/09/05

NPSA IT steering group for blood safety project

www.npsa.nhs.uk

7 'End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses'

Davies A et al Transfusion 2006; 46: 352-364

8 SHOT Annual Reports SHOT www.shotuk.org 9 The 'Do Once and Share' End

to End Process Map for Blood Transfusion

CfH 'Do Once and Share' programme

www.

transfusionguidelines. org.uk

10 BCSH IT Guidelines British Committee for Standards in Haematology

www.bcshguidelines. com

11 Software Requirements Karl Wiegers, Microsoft Press

www.processimpact. com

References

Related documents

When the results of the analysis were evaluated according to the Regulation of water pollution of Surface water quality management, the Kızılırmak river was

In this regard, the present study, while explaining the concept of business competition, which is among the key issues in economics, has sought to investigate some

stead, always has an incentive to deviate from e¢ ciency in the world’s resource allocation: from (39), domestic welfare is higher if Home pushes its relative resource use below the

Charter school students are compared with: (1) students in the public schools that charter school students had previously attended; (2) students in public schools that are like, but

Having studied the conditions for which a neural network outperforms a probit in the first step, we now study the implications for the general two-step model, where the outcome

For the poorest farmers in eastern India, then, the benefits of groundwater irrigation have come through three routes: in large part, through purchased pump irrigation and, in a

In nonholonomic mobile robot parallel parking process, the safety distance and minimum parking space is put under consideration during the scanning, positioning and

In addition to changes in selective and divided attention, according to the findings of the present study, Table 3 showed a significant difference in the behavioral problems