Supporting Information
Platinum-Copper Bimetallic Nanodendritic Electrocatalyst on TiO
2-based Support for Methanol Oxidation in Alkaline Fuel Cells
Hau Quoc Pham,
1,2and Tai Thien Huynh
3,*1
Future Materials & Devices Lab., Institute of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Duy Tan
University, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Viet Nam
2
The Faculty of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Duy Tan University, Da Nang,
550000, Viet Nam
3
Ho Chi Minh City University of Natural Resources and Environment (HCMUNRE), Ho Chi
Minh City, 700000, Viet Nam
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
Preparation for the mesoporous Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport
The mesoporous Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport was prepared via a calcination-free solvothermal
process
1. Firstly, 0.238 mg of tungsten (VI) chloride (WCl
6, 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was
dissolved into 50 mL of ethanol absolute (C
2H
5OH, 99.9%, Merck, Belgium) for 30 min. Next,
0.155 mL titanium (IV) chloride (TiCl
4, 99.5%, Aladdin, China) was added to the solution and
then was dropped into a Teflon-lined autoclave and then transferred to an oven in which the
reaction proceeded at 200
oC for 10 h. Next, the as-prepared suspension was washed with
acetone (CH
3COCH
3, 99.9%, Merck, Belgium) and purified water, and the resulting product
was dried at 80
oC for analysis.
Material characterization
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the catalysts was collected on a D2 PHASER (Bruker,
Germany) equipped with a Cu K
radiation source in the 2 range of 20
o– 80
o. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images were recorded on a JOEL-JEM 2100F instrument at 200 kV
to determine the morphology of the electrocatalysts. The composition and distribution of
energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping on a JEOF-JSM 6500F device with an
acceleration voltage of 10 kV. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was obtained on a
Kratos AXIS Nova (Shimadzu, Japan) with an Al K
source.
Electrochemical properties
The electrochemical properties of the catalysts were tested on a CHI 660C Electrochemical
Workstation (CH Instruments Inc., USA) equipped with a three-electrode electrochemical cell,
including a glassy carbon electrode as a working electrode, a Pt wire, and Hg/HgO electrode
as a count and reference electrodes, respectively. For preparing the electrocatalyst ink, 1.7 mg
of catalysts was dispersed in a mixture of 20 µL of Nafion (5%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 180
µL of absolute ethanol (99.9%, Merck, Belgium) and then ultrasonicated of 30 min to form a
homogeneous ink. Before coating catalyst ink, the surface of the working electrode was
polished with 0.5 µm Al
2O
3(BAS) and cleaned with absolute ethanol and purged water. To get
an active working electrode, 2.5 µL of the catalyst inks was drop-cast onto the surface of the
working electrode and dried naturally, then scanned in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH at a scan rate
of 50 mV s
-1for 100 cycles. The electrochemically surface area (ECSA) of different catalysts
was calculated based on hydrogen adsorption/desorption region from CV (cyclic voltammetry)
curves in N
2-purged 1 M KOH solution at a scan rate of 25 mV s
-1. The MOR performance of
the catalysts was determined by CV test in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH solution
at a scan rate of 25 mV s
-1. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was performed at a scan rate of
1 mV s
-1in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH. Additionally, the accelerated durability
test (ADT) was performed in N
2-purged 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH solution at a scan rate of
50 mV s
-1with 5000 cycling tests. Chronoamperometry (CA) tests were carried out at 0.5 V for
3600 s in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH solutions. The commercial Pt NPs/C (E-
TEK) was used as a reference catalyst for comparison. All values of potentials were reported
vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode using the Nernst equation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
As shown in Figure S1 (a), the Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport exhibited the anatase-TiO
2structures
(JCPDS 84-1286) with the typical diffraction peaks at 25.3
o; 38.1
o; 47.5
o; 54.4
oand 62.8
ocorresponding to (101); (004); (200); (105) and (204) crystal facets. No typical diffraction peaks
of tungsten oxide (JCPDS 020-1324) or the segregation of W and TiO
2were detected in the
XRD profile. The diffraction peak of the (101) crystal facet was negatively shifted compared to
the undoped TiO
2and the standard XRD pattern of anatase-TiO
2structure (JCPDS 84-1286),
suggesting incorporation of W into the anatase-TiO
2structure. In addition, the XRF result
indicated that the proportion of Ti and W was 70.67 and 29.33, respectively, which is close to
the theoretical ratio (Ti: W = 70: 30) (Figure S1(c)). The elemental mapping images of the
Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport are shown in Fig. S3d-e and indicate the uniform distribution of the
elements in the as-obtained catalyst support.
Figure S1. (a) XRD profile in the 2 range of 20
o– 80
oat a step size of 0.02
o; (b) TEM image,
(c) XRF spectrum, and (d-f) elemental mapping of the mesoporous Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport.
Figure S2 shows the N
2adsorption/desorption isotherms and pore size distribution of the as-
obtained Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport. As a result, the Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2catalyst support demonstrated
the hysteresis loops of the type IV isotherm, suggesting that the as-synthesized nanosupport
are the mesoporous materials with a pore size of around 3 nm. The surface area of the
mesoporous Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2supports was 201.48 m
2g
-1, which is comparable to the surface area
of the carbon black (~230 m
2g
-1). Additionally, the electrical conductivity of the Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport was around 2.20x10
-2S cm
-1that was measured by a four-point probe technique.
Figure S2. N
2adsorption-desorption isotherm of the mesoporous Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport.
Figure S3 shows the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results of the mesoporous
Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport. As shown in Figure S3(a), the Ti 2p spectrum of the Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport was deconvoluted to doublets peaks at 464.5 for Ti 2p
1/2and 458.75 eV for Ti
2p
3/2of Ti(4) states. These peaks were shifted to slightly higher binding energies than those of
the undoped TiO
2(464.0 for Ti 2p
1/2and 458.4 eV for Ti 2p
3/2)
2. In addition, the W 4f spectrum
of the Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport was deconvoluted into components of W(6) and W(4) states
(Figure S3(b)), suggesting the co-existence of W(6) and W(4) in the mesoporous Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport. Furthermore, the W 4f
5/2and W 4f
7/2peaks of the anatase Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport were observed at 37.25 and 35.15 eV, respectively, and were lower than that of
pure WO
3(37.4 eV for W 4f
5/2and 35.3 eV for W 4f
7/2)
3,4. These results indicate the successful
incorporation of tungsten into the anatase-TiO
2structures.
Figure S3. High-resolution of (a) Ti 2p and (b) W 4f spectrums of the Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2nanosupport.
Figure S4. XRD pattern of the commercial 20 wt% Pt/C electrocatalysts at a step size of 0.02
o.
Figure S5. EDX spectroscopy of the as-obtained PtCu NDs/Ti
0.7W
0.3O
2electrocatalysts.
Figure S6. (a-d) 2000-cycle ADT of investigated electrocatalysts in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH
aqueous solution at a scan rate of 25 mV s
-1.
Figure S7. (a, c, e, g) CV curves at different scan rate (5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100 mV s
-1) and (b, d,
f, h) The plots of anodic peak current density vs. the square root of a scan rate of the different
electrocatalysts in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH solution.
Figure S8. (a, c, e, g) CV curves at a scan rate of 25 mV s
-1with different methanol
concentrations (0.1; 0.3; 0.5; 0.7 and 1.0 M) and (b, d, f, h) The logarithm of the anodic peak
current density vs. the logarithm of methanol concentration of different catalysts.
Table S1. Electrocatalytic performance of various MOR catalysts in alkaline electrolytes.
Electrocatalysts Electrolyte
ECSA
(a)(m
2g
-1)
Current density
(b)(mA cm
-2)
Refs.
Pt
3Cu NDs/Ti
0.7W
0.3O
21.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 45.81 36.49 This work Pt NDs/Ti
0.7W
0.3O
21.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 43.58 28.92 This work
Pt
3Cu NDs/TiO
21.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 32.41 19.41 This work
Pt NPs/C 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 54.23 25.18 This work
RGOs/Pt-Pd HNSs
1.0 M NaOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH
18.5 28.20
5Au-GQDs@AgPt Yolk- shell
1.0 M NaOH + 0.5 M CH
3OH
241.32 33.20
6Au-GQDs@Pt
1.0 M NaOH + 0.5 M
CH
3OH
103.22 15.68
6Pd-Co porous array (PA) 0.5 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH – 16.90
7Pt/WO
3-NaTaO
3W:Ta = 5:1
0.5 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 13.70 28.00
8Pt/NaTaO
30.5 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 14.20 30.00
8NiFe-LDH/Pt 0.5 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH – 18.00
9MgAl-LDH/Pt 0.5 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH – 12.00
9Au@N-CQDs@Pd 20 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 90.54 25.08
10Pd
67Au
330.5 M KOH + 2.0 M CH
3OH – 5.34
11Commerical Pt/C 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 35.10 15.28
12Au@Pd/rGO 0.5 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH 39.01 28.48
13PtCo bowl-like array (BA) 1.0 M KOH + 0.5 M CH
3OH – 20.00
14(a)
Calculation from CV curves in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH aqueous solution at a scan rate of 25 mV s
-1(b)
Calculation from CV curves in N
2-saturated 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH at a scan rate of 25
mV s
-1.
Table S2. A summary of the electrocatalytic activity of catalysts before and after CO purging in
1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH aqueous solution at a scan rate of 25 mV s
-1.
Methanol electro-oxidation
Before CO
(a)After CO
(b)Catalysts
Onset
potential V vs.
RHE
Current
density mA cm
-2I
f/I
bOnset
potential V vs.
RHE
Current
density mA cm
-2I
f/I
bDegradatio
n %
Pt
3Cu NDs/Ti
0.7W
0.3O
20.28 36.49 6.05 0.29 34.12 5.98 6.49 Pt NDs/Ti
0.7W
0.3O
20.30 28.92 2.86 0.32 26.19 2.76 9.44
Pt
3Cu NDs/TiO
20.35 19.41 3.35 0.37 17.92 3.27 7.68
Pt NPs/C 0.43 25.18 1.66 0.50 17.22 1.09 31.61
(a)
Calculation form CV curves before CO purging in 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M CH
3OH aqueous solution at a scan rate of 25 mV s
-1(b)