• No results found

EN :2005. Wind actions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "EN :2005. Wind actions"

Copied!
68
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 1

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

EN 1991 – Eurocode 1: Actions on structures

EN 1991-1-4:2005

Wind actions

Your

logo

(2)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 2

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

EN 1991-1-4:2005 Contents

1. General

2. Design situations

3. Modelling of wind actions

4. Wind velocity and velocity pressure

5. Wind actions

6. Structural factor

7. Pressure and force coefficients

8. Wind actions on bridges

(3)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 3

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

EN 1991-1-4:2005 Contents

Annex

A. Terrain effects

B. Procedure 1 for determining the structural factor

C. Procedure 2 for determining the structural factor

D. Structural factors for different types of structures

E. Vortex shedding and aeroelastic instabilities

(4)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 4

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 1 General – 1.1 Scope

(2) This Part is applicable to:

- Buildings and civil engineering works with heights up to 200 m

- Bridges having no span greater than 200 m, provided that they

satisfy the criteria for dynamic response

(3) This part is intended to predict characteristic wind actions on

land-based structures, their components and appendages

(5)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 5

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 1 General – 1.1 Scope

Draft corrigendum to EN 1991-1-4:2005

22 January 2008

(11) Guyed masts and lattice towers are treated in EN 1993-3-1 and

lighting columns in EN 40

(12) This part does not give guidance on the following aspects:

- torsional vibrations, e.g. tall buildings with a central core

- bridge deck vibrations from transverse wind turbulence

- wind actions on cable supported bridges

- vibrations where more than the fundamental mode needs to be

considered

(6)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 6

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 2 Design situations

(1)P The relevant wind actions shall be determined for each design

situation identified in accordance with EN 1990, 3.2.

(2) Traffic, snow and ice

(3) Execution

(4) Where in design windows and doors are assumed to be shut

under storm conditions, the effect of these being open should be

treated as an accidental design situation

(7)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 7

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 3 Modelling of wind actions

3.1 Nature

3.2 Representations of wind actions

3.3 Classification of wind actions

(1) Unless otherwise specified, wind actions should be classified as

variable fixed actions

3.4 Characteristic values

(1)

Note: All coefficients or models, to derive wind actions from basic

values, are chosen so that the probability of the calculated wind

actions does not exceed the probability of these basic values

3.5 Models

(8)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 8

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 4 Wind vel. and vel. pres. - 4.2 Basic values

0

,

b

season

dir

b

c

c

v

v

=

(9)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 9

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 4 Wind vel. and vel. pres. - 4.2 Basic values

(10)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 10

EUROCODES

(11)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 11

EUROCODES

(12)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 12

EUROCODES

(13)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 13

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Faroe Islands – extreme winds

(14)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 14

EUROCODES

(15)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 15

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Faroe Islands - Glyvursnes

(16)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 16

EUROCODES

(17)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 17

EUROCODES

(18)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 18

EUROCODES

(19)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 19

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Basis for updated European wind map?

(20)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 20

EUROCODES

(21)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 21

EUROCODES

(22)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 22

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 4.3 Mean wind

b

o

r

m

z

c

z

c

z

v

(23)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 23

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 4.3.2 Terrain roughness

m

z

z

z

k

z

z

k

z

c

II

II

r

r

r

05

,

0

19

,

0

)

/

ln(

)

(

,

0

07

,

0

,

0

0

0

=

=

=

(24)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 24

EUROCODES

(25)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 25

EUROCODES

(26)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 26

EUROCODES

(27)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 27

EUROCODES

(28)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 28

EUROCODES

(29)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 29

EUROCODES

(30)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 30

EUROCODES

(31)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 31

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

A.2 Transition between roughness categories

Procedure 1

If the structure is situated near a change of terrain roughness

at a distance:

- less than 2 km from the smoother category 0

- less than 1 km from the smoother categories I to III

the smoother terrain category in the upwind direction should

be used.

Small areas (less than 10% of the area under consideration)

with deviating roughness may be ignored.

(32)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 32

EUROCODES

(33)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 33

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 4.4 Wind turbulence. Turbulence intensity

)

/

ln(

1

)

(

0

z

z

k

c

z

I

I

o

v

=

(34)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 34

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 4.5 Peak velocity pressure, peak velocity

)

(

)

(

7

1

)

(

)

(

2

1

))

(

7

1

(

)

(

2

z

v

z

I

z

v

z

v

z

I

z

q

m

v

p

m

v

p

+

=

+

=

ρ

(35)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 35

EUROCODES

(36)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 36

EUROCODES

(37)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 37

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 5.2 Wind pressure on surfaces

pe

e

p

e

q

z

c

w

=

(

)

pi

i

p

i

q

z

c

w

=

(

)

(38)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 38

EUROCODES

(39)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 39

EUROCODES

(40)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 40

EUROCODES

(41)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 41

EUROCODES

(42)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 42

EUROCODES

(43)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 43

EUROCODES

(44)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 44

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 5.3 Wind forces

ref

e

p

f

d

s

w

c

c

c

q

z

A

F

=

(

)

(45)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 45

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 6 Structural factor

6.2 Determination of structural factor

The structural factor may be taken as 1 for

a) buildings with a height less than 15 m

b) facade and roof elements having a natural frequency

greater than 5 Hz

c) framed buildings which have structural walls and which are

less than 100 m high and whose height is less than 4 times the

in-wind depth

d) chimneys with circular cross-sections whose height is less

than 60 m and 6,5 times the diameter

(46)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 46

EUROCODES

(47)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 47

EUROCODES

(48)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 48

EUROCODES

(49)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 49

EUROCODES

(50)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 50

EUROCODES

(51)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 51

EUROCODES

(52)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 52

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Section 6.3 Detailed procedure

2

2

2

2

2

2

)

(

7

1

)

(

2

1

)

(

7

1

)

(

7

1

)

(

7

1

)

(

2

1

B

z

I

R

B

z

I

k

c

z

I

B

z

I

c

z

I

R

B

z

I

k

c

c

s

v

s

v

p

d

s

v

s

v

s

s

v

s

v

p

d

s

+

+

+

=

+

+

=

+

+

+

=

(53)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 53

EUROCODES

(54)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 54

EUROCODES

(55)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 55

EUROCODES

(56)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 56

EUROCODES

(57)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 57

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Structural factor. Procedure 1 or 2?

Procedure 2 has a more accurate representation of the theoretical

background compared to procedure 1

(58)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 58

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Annex E Vortex shedding

Chimneys

(59)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 59

EUROCODES

(60)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 60

EUROCODES

(61)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 61

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Annex E Vortex shedding. Critical wind velocity

St

n

b

v

St

n

b

v

o

i

i

crit

y

i

i

crit

=

=

2

,

,

,

,

(62)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 62

EUROCODES

(63)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 63

EUROCODES

(64)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 64

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Approach 1 versus approach 2

Approach 1: Vortex-resonance model

Approach 2: Spectral model

Turbulence is an active parameter only in approach 2

E1.5.1 General

(3)

Approach 2 allows for the consideration of different turbulence

intensities, which may differ due to meteorological conditions.

For regions where it is likely that it may become very cold and

stratified flow condition may occur (e.g. in coastal areas in Northern

Europe), approach 2 may be used.

(65)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 65

EUROCODES

(66)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 66

EUROCODES

(67)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 67

EUROCODES

(68)

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 68

EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Vortex shedding. Approach 1 or 2?

Approach 2 has a more accurate representation of the physical

phenomenon compared to approach 1

References

Related documents

In contrast to micro papers that focus on distance between headquarter and branches (Deng and Elyasini, 2008) or analyze the dynamics of either intrastate

Based on the review and analysis of CTS documents and processes, interviews with staff and clients, and the onsite visit completed by Tina Oliphant, Grameen Foundation certifies

Our goal is to understand which facets of trait mindfulness confer protection from rumination and stress-induced negative bias and whether those facets are effective through

From FEA results the Synchronous Reluctance Motor with sinusoidal rotor lamination shape in the axial direction has proved to tremendously drop the torque ripple

Based on the recommendations of the Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Master Plan approved by the Salida City Council, the previous Recreation Advisory Board (“RAB”)

Resume recovery feature of Stellar Phoenix Photo Recovery allows you to recover photos, audio and video files using saved scan information file or image file.. You can use the

As shown in Figure 7 A, Ck2-ASO treatment at 17  C led to a 23% reduction of diet- induced body weight gain as compared to control mice at 22  C, whereas CK2-ASO or mild cold