THE LIMITATIONS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTICE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
BEING
A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF A MASTER OF SCIENCE (M.Sc) DEGREE IN
PUBLIC RELATIONS MANAGEMENT
BY
ADISA OLATUNDE OYENIYI PG/M.SC/98/45413
DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING SCHOOL OF POST- GRADUATE STUDIES
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA ENUGU CAMPUS
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that ADISA OLATUNDE OYENIYI, a post-graduate student in the Department of Marketing with Registration Number PGM.Sc/9845413 has satisfactorily completed this research work, being a requirement for (the award of a Master‟s Degree in Public Relations Management.
The work embodied in this research is original in all details and has not been submitted in part or in full for other diploma or degree of this or any other University.
________________________ _________________________________
D.A. NNOLIM (Prof)
DR. (MRS) G.E. UGWUONAH
(PROJECT SUPERVISOR)
(HEAD OF DEPARTMENT)
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to:
God Almighty for the fullness of life and strength to accomplish this task
My father and mother for their love and encouragement. May the Lord Almighty grant all their heart desires, Amen!
Mr. J.A Olaifa whose support and encouragement I will never forget. And to all that made my educational accomplishment possible.
PREFACE
This is a Project report on the Limitations of Public Relations in Developing Countries –using Nigeria as a major unit of analysis. This project report is presented to the Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Nigeria in partial fulfillment of the academic requirement for the award of a Master of Science Degree (M.Sc) in Public Relations Management.
Conscious and frantic efforts have been made to ensure that this report is presented in such a simplistic fashion as to facilitate easy understanding and also contribute to the existing stock of human-knowledge in this fascinating area of study. However, the simple nature of this report does not compromise the standard. The scope of this study was designed to cover all the developing countries of the world, but owing to some unfavourable and unavoidable variables which made it rather impossible for the researcher to comb the entire population of the study, a representative sample had to be randomly selected. In this instance Nigeria was used.
This project report is divided into five interrelated chapters. The first chapter open the report with a general overview of the study while the second chapter focuses on the review of some literature that are closely or remotely related to this study. The third chapter deals with the
research design and methodology while the fourth chapter has to do with the presentation,
analysis and interpretation of the data collected. The fifth chapter, which incidentally happens to be the last but certainly by no means the least, highlights the research findings, recommendations and conclusion.
It is hoped that this project report will prove invaluable to other researchers, Public Relations practitioners and users of Public Relations techniques or strategies
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Glory be to the Lord my God whose ceaseless watch, wisdom and understanding saw me through this study. The researcher is sincerely grateful and appreciative of the service rendered by many people who contributed to the successful completion of this research work.
I acknowledge the wholesome efforts of my indefatigable supervisor, Professor Mrs., D.A. Nnolim, and the co-supervisor, Dr J.O. Nnabuko, a scholar per excellence, whose motherly advise was in no small measure, especially by going through the manuscript and making useful corrections and suggestions, without showing any sign of strain when Prof Nnolim was on sabbatical. I thank her immensely.
My thanks also go to Mr. And Mrs, W. Adisa, my parents who have toiled day and night to make me what I am today. And to my maternal grandparents for their ceaseless supports right from my infancy.
Also, I am greatly indebted in gratitude to my teacher, mentor and benefactor, Mr. J.A Olaifa (MNIPR) an excellent resource person and a Public Relations think tank. He is my oasis of knowledge, and my intellectual backbone. To summarize it all, he is a compendium of positive ideas. I have been following his steps without any regrets.
Encomium and a big respect also goes to Mrs. Toyosi Durowoju for her immense encouragement and benign gesture.
My profound thanks also go to (Senior colleagues and elderly friends) brother, Festus Akande, Henry Feyi Akinlala, Oladipo Taiwo, Omowale Domingo, Achobe Jacob, John Amobeda Urubusi Clifford, Olalekan Oyekola, Nath Anokwute, Akinbode Akin, Femi Elegbede, Remi Adetokun, Farry Fatosin., Akinyode Amuda and Oladele Asalejo
My acknowledgement will be incomplete if I fail to thank colleagues and friends: like Yinka Ojediran, Kayode Adebusuyi, Murdi Celestine, Bode Black, Boal Baruwa, Harcourt Horsefal, Gbenga Olufayo, Robert Anuforo, Saheed Gbadamosi, Segun Oluwoie, Gbenga Ajao, Tunde Azeez, Tunde Owolabi, Yemi Adetunji, Moruf Oluokun (Moble) and Joyce Aziga. I greatly treasure the contribution of my brothers and sister, Tosin Adisa, Korede Adisa, Tope Adisa, Kehinde Adisa, lyabo Adisa and to all individuals who contributed to the successful completion of this project.
I humbly overtly express my sincere and infinite gratitude to Mazi Roland Nnorom for his indefatigable contribution to this research, and also a big thank goes to Adedayo Alade for making this research a reality, infact his contribution is invaluable.
ABSTRACT
The study recognises that there are limitations to effective public relations practice in developing countries. There is grossly under utilization of the potent instrument of public relations.
The objectives of this study include:
To examine the limitations of public relations practice in developing countries.
To satisfy part of the academic requirements for the award of a Master‟s Degree in public relations
To provide an academic challenge to scholars in the area of public relations practice in developing countries.
To offer recommendations on what actions to be taken in addressing the identified limitations.
Due to inadequate resources and the need for effective coverage, Nigeria was used as the main unit of analysis, with a sample size of 350.
The research study made use of both primary and secondary data. Albeit, the bulk of the primary data was obtained via the random distribution of structured questionnaires with multiple -choice. The secondary data came from journals, books, past research studies unpublished works etceteras.
The questionnaire used comprised multiple choice, dichotomous and open-ended questions. The instrument was pretested and that resulted into minor changes in wordings and sequence to boost its and reliability. In this study, simple arithmetic percentage was used in the analysis of the data obtained with the questionnaire.
The results of this study revealed that developing countries are not effectively making use of Public Relations techniques/ strategies in their national development programmes.
Also the investigation shows that Public Relations as practiced is facing problems in developing countries and these problems are capable of hindering the effective practice of the profession.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page Certification III Dedication IV Acknowledgement V Abstract IX Table of Contents X CHAPTER ONE GENERAL OVERVIEW 1.1 Introduction 11.2 Statement of the Problems 2
1.3 Objectives of the study 4
1.4 Significance of the study 4
1.6 Scope and limitations of the study 5
1.7 References 7
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1 Evolution and Historical Development of Public Relations in Nigerian 8
2.1.2 Public Relations in Public and Private Sectors 10
2.2 Meaning of Public Relations 12
2.2.2 Functions of Public Relations 16
2..3 What Public Relations is not 17
2.4 Relationship between Public Relations and Marketing 18
2.5 Brief History of NIPR and FAPRA 20
2.6 Developing countries and their features 24
2.7 Role of Public Relations in developing countries 25
2.8 Factors inhibiting the Effective practice of Public Relations in developing countries 28
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Methodology 35
3.2 Structure of the instrument 36
3.3 Determination of sample size 36
3.4 References 38
CHAPTER FOUR
TABULATIONS, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONS OF DATA 39
4.1 Responses to questions in section “Al” of the questionnaire. 40
4.2 Responses to questions in section “Bl” of the questionnaire. References. 42
4.3 References 52
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY OF THE MAJOR FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND CONCLUSION 53
5.1 Summary of Research Findings 53
5.2 Recommendations. 54 5.3 Conclusion. 55
5.4 References Appendices Bibliography
LIST OF TABLES:
4.1 Questionnaire Distribution... 39
4.2 Sex Distribution of Respondents ...40
4.3 Age Distribution of Respondents ... 40
4.4 Marital Status of Respondents ... 41
4.5 Educational Qualification of Respondents ...41
4.6 Occupational Distribution of Respondents ...42
4.7 Respondents Responses as to whether there was awareness about the existence of public Relations Programmes...42
4.8 Respondents Rating of the Degree of Usage Regarding Public Relations Programmes... 43
4.9 Respondents Responses as to whether Public Relations Practice is Facing any Problem(s)... 44
4.10 Respondents Responses as to whether the Problems Facing Public Relations Practice could hinder the Effective Practice of the Professions... 45
CHAPTER ONE GENERAL OVERVIEW
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Development, with respect to countries can be examined from various perspectives, depending on the countries involved For instance, the meaning attached to it by the developed countries could be different from that of the developing or less-developed countries. This, therefore, suggests that there is not likely to be an all- embracing description or definition acceptable the world over.
However, Rogerian (1996) argued that “development is a widely participatory process of social changes in a society intended to bring about social and material advancement for the majority of people through their gaining of greater control over the environment” Similarly, it may not be easy to clearly separate a developing country from a less developed one due to their similarities in terms of features. Although while some believe that there is a distinction between the two others contend that such distinction is without a difference, thereby suggesting that they are one and the same. For purposes of this study, however, the two terminologies, that is, developing and less developed, shall be used interchangeably.
A developing country can be described as one that is still in the process of attaining an acceptable degree of sufficiency in terms of resources. But for any country to attain this height there are some development tools that should be employed, and one of such is Public Relations.
The relevance of public relations in achieving national growth and development in any society can hardly be over-emphasized due to due to its various techniques that are highly result- oriented.
Most developed countries of the world today have come to the realization of this submission and have made conscious efforts to make the best use of Public Relations techniques to their advantage.
Public Relations revolve round sound organized two-way communication and consistent information dissemination. Information is an aspect of communication and communication is equally a part of public relations. Information creates knowledge and knowledge helps in shaping opinion with a view to winning goodwill that could be built with the aid of Public Relations practices.
Ekpo (1993) argues that Public Relations as a profession is concerned with communicating policies and actions to special groups or the public at large.
Today governments all over the world have employed Public Relations to assist them in governance.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMS
Evidence indicates that developing countries now require public relations techniques as part of the tools necessary in efforts to achieve national development, especially in such areas as mobilization of the citizenry and their enlightenment with respect to the benefits of such a development.
However, some obstacles seem to be affecting the effective use of the available Public Relations techniques in this direction.
The following problems, among others have the tendency of inhibiting the flow of this study:
(a) Most people in developing countries seem to be ignorant regarding the relevance of public relations activities to their national development
(b) There tends to be a dearth of modern communication facilities necessary for the effective practice of public relations in developing countries
(c) Lack of adequate recognition and support from the government of most developing countries seem to be affecting the practice of public relations
(d) There seems to be insufficient promotional activities of the public relations profession by the different professional bodies charged with such responsibilities (e) Inadequate public relations practitioners in developing countries tends to inhibit
the practice of public relations in such countries
(f) Relatively low funding of public relations programmes in such countries is also having an adverse effect on the practice of the profession.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The study shall attempt to achieve the following objectives, among others:
1. To examine the factors hindering the effective practice of the public relations profession in developing countries.
2. To satisfy part of the academic requirements for the award of a Master‟s Degree in Public Relations.
3. To provide an academic challenge to scholars in the area of public relations practice in developing countries.
4. To offer recommendations on what actions to be taken in addressing the identified limitations
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This study is significant in the sense that it will provide useful information for the advancement of further studies in the area of public relations.
Also there is much data to provoke subsequent research and development of academic knowledge by way of books, journals, seminar paper, etceteras in this area of study.
Apart from the practical research experience which this study shall avail the researcher, it is also going to be a source of relevant information with respect to the limitations of public relations in developing Countries
The successful completion of this study shall serve as a useful reference for libraries.
Finally, the result of this study shall be a source of information for the general reader who want to probably improve his or her knowledge on issues revolving round the practice of public relations in developing countries.
1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What are the factors inhibiting the effective practice of public relations in developing countries?
2 How can public relations practice be enhanced in developing countries?
1.6 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
Actually, the scope of this study should have been designed to cover most developing countries but due to inadequate resources, the researcher had to use Nigeria as the main unit of analysis.
It is a statement of fact that the average Nigerian researcher is constantly faced with a gamut of interacting variables that tend to impede his/her efforts at promoting learning and improving the functional knowledge of people.
Consequent upon the foregoing, the researcher also had to contend with some problems which include the following:
1. Inadequate finance - This was perhaps the greatest problem the researcher
2. Time constraint - Due to the time limit attached to the submission of this project report, it was impossible for the researcher to cover wider grounds.
3. Indifferent Attitude of Respondents- Some of the respondents exhibited some form of lackadaisical attitude in completing the questionnaires and were reluctant to grant oral interviews. This seems to be a confirmation of an argument by Ene Essien (1979) that “the main problem associated with the collection of primary data in Nigeria is the reluctance of interviewees to respond to simple questions since such will not put a meal on their tables”. As a result of this, therefore, the researcher had to make conscious efforts to disabuse such respondents‟ unfounded prejudices in order to get them respond positively.
REFERENCE
1. NWOSU IKECHUKWU (1996) Public Relations Management, Principles, Issues
and Applications, Dominican Publishers Aba. Nigeria. P. 184
2. MOSES, EKPO (1993)” Inter-Governmental Public relations” in Public Relations for Local Governments in Nigeria. Talkback Publishers Limited. lagos. PI32.
CHAPTER TWO
2.1 EVOLUTION AND HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC -
RELATIONS IN NIGERIA.
Most professions trace their origin to America and Europe; and Public Relations is no exception. This profession is recognized as a major business function in this part of the world. To be precise, vigorous public relations practice in the United States of America and Britain dates back to the 19th Century. Perhaps this early start accounts for the sophistication the practice of the profession has reached in these countries. The seriousness with which they take Public Relations might be partly accountable for the developed state of their economies.
In the United States, the first publicity firm, the Publicity Bureau was founded by George Michael in 1900. However, Ivy Ledbetter Lee has the credit of pioneering PR in the U.S. This is probably because of his famous “Declaration of Principles”, the theme of which was that the public can no longer be ignored nor fooled in information management and dissemination. In Britain, Sir Stephen Tallent got the credit for organizing PR in 1926(Kingsley, 1993). The development of Public Relations in Nigeria is not divorced from the country‟s colonial past. Britain was our colonial master for a very long period of time. About mid-way into its forced administration of the country, strident voices rose from within the country against the consequences of colonial subjugation.
Nationalistic activities were boosted by the increased awareness of the citizenry engineered by the educated elites among whom were trade unionists.
Against a background of conscription into the colonial army for purpose of prosecuting the first and second world wars, deplorable standard of living occasioned by the decline in the prices of agricultural products, scarcity of essential goods, and the consequent high cost of living, social disenchantment and unpopularity of the government became a logical development.
In an attempt to check the growing disaffection against the government, the establishment of an information office was effected in 1940 with the main objective of disseminating war information. The office was also charged with the responsibility of sorting out matters connected with the newly established information office.
In 1944, the name of the office was changed to Public Relations office. This name was accepted by the people who in those days had some misgivings about the Information office because during the war years, the war Information office was unfortunately seen as a police informant or detective.
In 1947, after the adoption of the Richard constitution, the Public Relations office was changed to Public Relations Department. It was the only office of its kind in Nigeria in the then unitary government.
In 1957, a regional office was opened in Ibadan and in 1958, another regional office was opened in Enugu, with the expansion of the Public Relations Department of the government into the hinterlands, the Public Relations Department soon became a factor to be reckoned with in the development of good press relations.
2.1.2 PUBLIC RELATIONS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
The biggest challenge that faced the colonial government then was utter lack of acceptance and confidence by the populace. Because this general acceptance was not forthcoming, the colonial government sort to make a break through by engaging many Nigerians as Public Relations officers. Some of the earliest Nigerians who were recruited into the government‟s owned Public Relations department included Mr. Ayodele Lijadu, correspondent during world war II and Miss Milicent Douglas, of the then West African Pilot.
This was soon followed by another mass recruitment of Nigerians in 1948 as Assistant Publicity officers. The list included late Alhaji Ade Thanni, late Mr. Ogunyinka as well as Messrs Adewale Fashanu, A.Y Eke, P.E. N. Malafa. Other notable Nigerians who came into the profession later included Mr. Peter Enahoro, Mr. Cyprian O. Ekwensi and late Mr. Samuel Epelle. The last two became Directors- Federal Ministry of Information in succession. It is important to mention at this stage that the period under consideration was 1946 to 1951 during the introduction of both Richards and Macphersons constitutions.
Also of note was the fact that most of these Nigerians were journalists, who rose to become Press officers at the emergence of Public Relations Department, which later metamorphosed into the Federal Ministry of Information. The National Electric Power Authority (from Electricity corporation of Nigeria) was one of the first federal parastatals
to establish a Public Relations Bureau. And by 1959, NEPA‟S Public Relations Department had taken off in full swing.
Moreover, many other parastatals have since been trailing the blaze, blazed by NEPA.
The history and development of Public Relations in the Private sector in Nigeria can be traced to the United African company‟s activities towards the establishment of a Public Relations Department in 1949 on commencement of operations, its main functions were to inform businessman about business activities as well as to project UACN as a major Nigerian industrial, technical, and commercial company, deeply involved in the stability of the economic life and progress of Nigeria.
That therefore is how the company mobilises its publics and receives their goodwill, support and cooperation, which combine to create a favourable business environment.
Shell BP came up with her own Public Relations Department in 1969. The Public Relations activities of Shell embraced “all activities relating to relations between the company, on the Federation, Local communities, the press, commercial organizations educational institutions and the other sectors of the public”. Like UACN, Shell‟s objectives for fostering these relations were to ensure constant existence of unobstructed channels of communication with these publics, thus creating an atmosphere of understanding and cooperation.
2.2 MEANING OF PUBLIC RELATIONS
The task of defining Public Relations is an herculean one as there seems lo exists various definitions and interpretations of the profession or discipline,
Orraca-Tetteh (1986) was pushed to the point of saying that “perhaps the most baffling, challenging and yet frustrating aspect of Public Relations is simply how to define it. There are bewildering numbers of definitions of Public Relations put forward by different authors and Public Relations Association”.
Cutlip, Center and Broom (1994) defined Public relations as “the management function which evaluates public attitudes, identifies the policies and procedures of an individual or an organization to earn public understanding and acceptance”.
Hordes of practitioners had advanced series of definitions to capture the essence of Public Relations. Scholar and professional leader, Rex Harlow collected and analysed a total of 472 definitions written since early 1990‟s. He was able to identify and classify ideas in each. At the end of his analysis, he came up with this rather lengthy definition:
“Public relations is the distinctive management function which helps establish and maintain mutual of communication, understanding, acceptance and co-operation between organization and its publics, involves the management of problems or issues, helps management to keep informed on and responsive to public opinion defines and emphasizes the responsibility of management lo serve the public interest. It helps
management to keep abreast of and effectively utilize change, serving as an easy warning system to help anticipates trends, and uses research and sound ethical communication as its principal tools”.
Two other Universally accepted definitions of Public Relations that would be of benefit in this study are those of the British Institute of Public Relations (BIPR) and the International Public Relations Association (IPRA), the BIPR defines Public Relations as the deliberate, planned and sustained effort to establish and maintain mutual understanding between an organization and its publics”
The IPRA definition which is commonly referred to as the Mexican statement of 1978 states that “Public Relations is the art and social science of analysing trends, predicting their consequences, counselling organization leaders and implementing planned programmes of action which will serve both the organisation and the public interest”
All these myriad of definitions point to the fact that Public Relations is a big communication business, its activities revolve round communication that is knowledge creation through the dissemination of what could be regarded as ungarnished information.
It is common knowledge that Public Relations strives to establish, maintain and sustain mutual understanding or co-existence between an organisation and its varied public by building a solid platform for cordial relationship. This is perhaps why Sam Black (1989) said that public relations is a “Bridge builder”, while Lucien Malrat simply described it as “a strategy of confidence”.
Communication is very vital in the practice of public relations. Jnfact, it could be aptly regarded as potent instrument of effective Public Relations practice the world over. Buttressing this claim, Salu (1997) asserted that, “for a Public Relations practitioner, communication is the key to all that he does”.Also lending credence to this, Seitel (1989), said that the Public Relations practitioner is “a professional communicator.” Above all others, an organization must know how to communicate. And this knowledge sets the Public Relations practitioners apart from the others. It should however, be stated here that Public Relations practitioners do not just communicate or engage the services of the media for the fun of it. In Public Relations every communication activity is carried out with the interest of both the organization and the publics in mind
Salu (1997) disclosed that “there is no amount of communication, however, cleverly constructed, will long sustain public support for questionable cause, because contrary to the perceptions of some, Public Relations cannot generate support for policies and practices which in the long run, are contrary to the public interest”.
Communication in Public Relations is a two way information flow or process. In a typical Public Relations communication situation, both the communicator and the communicatee are important as both rely on each other for knowledge or information acquisition.
Public Relations practitioners communicate to sensitize the publics with a view to moulding or shaping public sentiments.
Abraham Lincoln of USA emphasized the power of public sentiment when he remarked that “Public sentiment is everything. He who moulds public sentiment goes deeper than he who executes or pronounces decisions. He makes statutes or decisions possible or impossible to execute”.
An organization is judged by its behaviour. Public Relations is about goodwill, image projection and reputation management. Public Relations activities are essential to every organization because understanding and satisfying the needs of the public are necessary for organizational growth and survival
2.2.2 FUNCTIONS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS
Public Relations perform a legion of functions in an organisation. But in this review, they would be tightly summarised under eight paragraph as follows:
Public Relations deals with the relationship between an organisation and its various constituent publics.
It carries out information and communication functions within and outside the organisation. This stresses the fact that public relations serves as a veritable information and communication bridge between an organisation and its various internal and external publics.
Public Relations discharges advisory or counseling functions in every organisation. In this regard, .Public Relations practitioners in organizations advise or counsel management on the importance of such issues as good performance, sensitivity to public interest and related matters (Nwosu; 1995).
Public Relations produces specific changes in awareness, opinions and behaviours inside the organization (Cuttip, Center and Broom; 1994)
In events marketing, Public Relations performs some vital roles in the areas of conceptualising, planning, executing and evaluating events for organisations or clients. This is gradually becoming a special area in Public Relations marketing consultancy.
Helps in adjusting those policies procedures and actions found to be in conflict with the public interest and organisational survival.
Public Relations also performs marketing support function. This has to do with such tasks as ensuring effective customer relations and understanding thereby helping to promote sales as one of the promotional tools of marketing.
It also performs the function of building and sustaining sound, productive, mutual relations with international Publics such as customers, diplomats, government, business organisations, non business organisations and others (Nwosu; 1995).
2.3 WHAT PUBLIC RELATIONS IS NOT
Ikechukwu Nwosu (1996) identified the following misconceptions about Public Relations practice:
Public Relations is not the act of telling lies about your organization client. Public Relations is based on truth and full information.
Public Relations is not abracadabra, magic, window dressing or presenting a wishy-washy product/ service/ Organisation/Personality in a way it/ he does not deserve. Public Relations is based on high performance, equality and credibility in terms of products, service, policies and practices.
Public Relations does not mean bribery or “Kola”. Public Relations is based on two- way communication which leads to mutual understanding, respect, goodwill and acceptance.
Public Relations is not arranging and providing girls for the Chief executive, his friends, board members, clients, etc. Public Relations is based on moral principles.
Public Relations is not organising parties and other social events. Public Relations is a top management function.
Public Relations is not the act of carrying a boss‟s bag or running errand for him, his wife children and relatives
Public relations is not merely employing a beautiful, always smiling but empty-headed girl to woo or seduce customers.
Public Relations is not propaganda, advertising or publicity. Sometimes, however, Public Relations uses the tools to achieve its objective.
2.4 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PUBLIC RELATIONS AND MARKETING
Public Relations is an organisation‟s communications with its various publics, such as customers, vendors, news media, employees, stockholders, government, and the general public. Many of these communication efforts have a marketing purpose, Boone, Kurtz(1990).
Marketing is mainly concerned with the identification of consumers‟ needs and the prompt supply of such needs. In most cases, these needs are created in the dynamic and this is where Public Relations is always dynamic which is where the organisation interacts with the public vice- versa. Going by this train of reasoning, some experts posited that,
stripped of all technicalities, marketing “could be simply defined as a transactional or symbiotic relationship between the seller and the buyer. And frankly speaking, such transaction, just like every form of relationship cannot transpire or be effective without effective communication.
Public Relations as a marketing support technique is well understood. Marketing is defined by the Chartered Institute of Marketing as the management process responsible for identifying, anticipating and satisfying, customer requirements profitably. Implicit in this definition is the need to create goodwill between the organisation offering the products and services and the purchasers (Roger, 1990)
From the above analysis, it is obvious that there is more to modern marketing than conceiving and developing a good product, fixing attractive price, and making it accessible -to target customer. What is ostensibly involved in modern marketing activities is no other than effective and steady communication with both present and potential customers.
This is where Public Relations input is paramount.
Scheive (1987) captured the current mood of the marketing environment through these words “In sum, Marketing must realize that the entire marketing mix operates as communication system. It communicates a position in the market place, an image that is usually differentiated from those of competing products. Each Marketing activity combines with the others to create this effect. At the same time, each individual marketing action is a communication in and of itself‟.
Public Relations efforts help in activating marketing, just as Jefkins (1985) disclosed that “there is a Public Relations element in every facet of marketing”. There are so many salient market education activities that marketing cannot single handedly perform except in concert with Public Relations. Like the area of dealer and customer relations, packaging, research, and the all important marketing mix. These areas benefit immensely from public relations ingenuity based on well designed Public Relations methods, Public Relations counseling and of course Public Relations research techniques.
Both marketing and Public Relations seek to gain and sustain the attention, interest, understanding, goodwill and patronage of an organisation‟s publics. In achieving these lofty objectives, both strive in various ways to project a good image of the organisation before these publics as an entity deserving recognition, respect and trust. Public Relations has a prime corporate role it can be used to support marketing in many areas by improving awareness, projecting credibility, competing competition, evaluating new marketing, creating direct sales leads, reinforcing the effectiveness of sales promotion and advertising, motivating the sales force, distributors/ wholesales/ services, building brand loyalty, dealing with consumer issues and in many other ways, Roger (1990).
2.5 BRIEF HISTORY OF N1PR AND FAPRA
In order to, hopefully, silence abusers of Public Relations and particularly to focus sharply on the real substance of Public Relations, Sam Epelle, initiated the
formation of a body that would “professional^ by think, plan, practice and live Public Relations in Nigeria”. That was in 1961.
By 1963, he had excited some colleagues who, with him, founded what was then known as the bublic Relations Association of Nigeria (PRAN).
Epelle, the initiator, became coordinator, chairman and eventually President of PRAN in Lagos. His friends later took PRAN to Enugu and Port Harcourt.
Osuji in Nkwocha, (1999) believes that in Nigeria, the need for Public Relations arose immediately after the second world war. At that time, there was need for effective information as a result of growing unpopularity of the then colonial government.
In 1972, the Public Relations Associations of Nigeria (PRAN) was renamed the Nigeria Institute of Public Relations ( NIPR).
Onah in Nwosu (1996) considers Public Relations as a respected profession in Nigeria and he views this from two levels: professionally and educationally.
At the level of professional practices for example, the Nigerian government has by the promulgation of Decree No. 16 of 1990, made the Nigerian Institute of Public Relations (NIPR) a chartered institute in which every qualified person must register before he/she can practice Public Relations in the country.
By this single act, Public Relations practice is no longer an all-comers affair. It is no longer open to quacks, “gate crashers” charlatans and professional pretenders of all types. It is only for the professionally trained or qualified,
experienced and registered experts or practitioners who know what Public Relations is all about.
At the educational or academic level, Nigeria is also leading by being the first African country to establish a full- fledged degree awarding programme in public Relations located at the Enugu Campus of the University of Nigeria. This programme (the M.Sc Degree programme) is already producing graduates and plans to eventually graduate from an academic programme to an academic department. Some other Universities in the country also plan to mount degree courses in Public Relations soon.
The Federation of African Public Relations Associations (FAPRA) was formed in 1975 in Nairobi, Republic of Kenya. FAPRA is a federation of national Public Relations organisations in African countries which are recognized by the Organisation of African Unity (O.A.U), now African Union (AU).
Membership is also open to individual. Public Relations Practitioners in all African countries. FAPRA is a clearinghouse for information on Public Relations in Africa.
The aims and objectives of FAPRA include:
• To set standard of Public Relations Practice in Africa through education and code of ethics
• To foster the establishment of national and sub-regional Public Relations organisations, so that the profession shall flourish in all parts of Africa.
• To promote unity and co-operation especially as a consultant body to the Organisation of African Unity and its various agencies.
• To publish bulletins and journals of Public Relations practice in Africa • To affiliate with all other similar international professional bodies.
The Federation of African Public Relations Associations ( FAPRA) is run by a Governing Council comprising a president, representing the African sub-regions of North, West, East and Southern African. Secretary- General, Treasurer, Public Relations Director, and the Programmes Director.
The Governing Council is elected bi-annually. FAPRA is funded through subscriptions from its individual and-national members as well as by levies imposed upon them by the council and donations. Pursuant to the achievement of its objectives, FAPRA continues to update the skills and professionalism of Public Relations practitioners in the continent. This it does through conferences, Seminars, lectures and similar events. Each Annual General Meeting and Delegates Conference represents FAPRA‟s efforts in that direction. FAPRA has also initiated the publication of a professional journal.-”Public Relations in Africa:” a package of scholarly presentation of articles by eminent personalities dealing with various key issues, which demand public relations attention and strategies.
2.6 DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND THEIR FEATURES
A developing economy is characterized by unfavourable trade terms, control by foreign interests, concentration on the extractive or export oriented sectors, neglect of the production of Capital goods/ finished products, lopsided dependency on export of a few primary products to a few developed countries (Nwosu, 1996)
Other characteristics include unemployment, chronic balance of payment deficits, great inequalities in incomes, cultural alienation, importation of high technology and dependency on developed countries for capital, manpower and similar critical economic factors”.
United Nations General Assembly sees under-developed or less-developed countries as having a per capital Gross National Product (GNP) of 100 dollars or less, where manufacturing accounts for only 10% or less. Adult literacy and life expectancy are considerably lower than in the advanced countries, level of materials and social well-being falls- far short of that enjoyed by the industrialized nations.
A developing economy can also be characterized by consumption orientation, ill developed financial institutions and structural defects.
The deteriorating state of the Nigerian economy caused by mismanagement and the general depression of the global economy, according to Babashola, Edet and Taylor, (1996), can have the following effects.
Personal Insecurity: Personal security is still not guaranteed in some areas as the high frequency of armed robbery and other activities show.
Inadequate Health facilities: Access to health facilities has become the privilege of the rich as the cost of prescription drugs has soared beyond the reach of the poor.
Lack of safe water: Safe water is still a major problem and the electrification of the rural area is still a dream. But even where there is “safe” water, in the urban areas, its portability is not guaranteed without boiling or filtering it, as the state of the pipes is all but safe.
Gross Insufficient Power Supply: Power failures in urban areas are not just a rare incident but, in the major urban conglomerates like Lagos, a permanent threat that the National Power Authority acronym is often translated as “Never Expect Power Always.”
The multiple social manifestations of poverty hinders meaningful development. Poverty manifests itself in prostitution, exposure to risks, corruption, robbery, street life, increased unemployment, living in squalors, high infant mortality, acute malnutrition, short life expectancy, human degradation, living in overcrowded and often poorly .ventilated homes.
2.7 ROLE OF PUBLIC RELATIONS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
No where to day is Public Relations more important than in developing nations because new political ideas, social services, industrial enterprises and commercial products need to be explained to increasingly literate populations, ( Jefkins; 1977)
There seems to be a high degree of consensus amongst communication experts that proper development of any nations is dependent on sound Public Relations communication techniques.
Development is described as a “dialectical, participation and people- oriented process that involves accumulation, mobilization and integration of human, material, information, knowledge and other resources in an inter-disciplinary, planned and systematized manner for the achievement of better quality life for rural and urban dwellers, (Nwosu; 1996).
In the same vein is Rogerian when he sees development as “a widely participatory process of social and material advancement for support and control over the environment”.
Thus, since development is believed to carry people along, Public Relations-effective two way communication techniques is essentially inevitable as a potent tool and a magic wand for effective mass mobilization, orientation and re-orientation.
Frank Jefkins popular “PR” transfer process regards the PR executive as that of working on the publics to change their hostility towards an organization to sympathy, Prejudice to acceptance,-apathy to interest and ignorance to knowledge.
It must be this fact that made the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) to assert in a 1982 official statement that “Public Relations helps our complex society to reach decision and function more effectively by contributing to mutual understanding among groups and institutions. It serves to bring private and public policies into harmony.
It is an open secret that Public Relations practice via its communication techniques can help douse encumbrances impinging on rural and national development. These encumbrances include; multifarious political, economic, managerial, leadership, social moral or ethical, ethnic and similar development - related problems.
Public Relations has played an immense role and it is still playing tremendous roles in dousing political apathy and suspicions. It also helps in promoting cordial leadership, followership - relationship and facilitating mutual trust and respect.
The previous trend of unhealthy Socio-political atmosphere, when development projects are conceived and started without involving the masses or populace is now reducing via effective two-way communication. Participatory approaches are now considered to be effective because of their ability to highly mobilize and involve the masses in development process (Sarveas and Mayo; 1984).
Public Relations is helping in the area of developing survival mechanisms to deal with the thorny problems of multi-lingualism, multiple dialects and varying non-verbal communication cues in dealing with communications across and even sometimes within national frontiers. This will help to address pluralistic values, cultures, beliefs and religions. Public Relations helps in erasing nebulous impression, build mutual trust, prevent misinformation, dis-information and ill-advised high-handed government or management policies, actions or inactions that utterly neglect the human factors in organizational or corporate survival, (Nwosu 1996). Intra-national conflicts rampant in
Africa are preventable/avoidable with the magic wand of Public Relations practice. And fortunately Public Relations is playing substantial role in this regard.
Also in the industries and government ministries, effective Public Relations practice is helping to prevent disruptive, industrial unrest based on prejudice, ignorance, ill-feelings, mistrust, poor communication, poor motivation and negative attitudes.
Effective Public Relations communication techniques should be geared to achieve the following for developing nations, general awareness creation, re-shaping of opinion, positive attitude, winning empathy and garnering, massive support required for national development. In such circumstances, Public Relations provides such services as answering important public questions, providing counselling and guidance on a continuing basis on community activities, fund raising and social welfare programmes.
Finally since Public Relations always attempts to overcome hostility, misinformation or apathy, today, government all over the world seem to employ Public Relations strategies to assist them in governance. Many developing countries are pluralist or multi-community societies and in this regard Public Relations helps in promoting mutual understanding, that brings about peace.
2.8 FACTORS INHIBITING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC
RELATIONS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
It cannot be gainsaid that Public Relations pervades virtually all fields of human endeavours, but despite this pervasiveness some factors seem to retard its dominance or
growth in developing countries. Nwosu (1996) once opined that Public Relations is worse in terms of professional growth and development. It is usually given secondary attention.
On the same train of thought is Akinyemi (1993), he agrees that Public Relations practice is being impinged and bedeviled by a myriad of problems.
Some of these inhibiting factors are identified below.
Practitioners and management frequently disagree as to its function and objectives. Public Relations practitioners complain that management did not inform them on important matters or consult them in policy-making plans and significant Public Relations aspects.
Unfortunately, this seems to also be the situation or practice in some private sector establishments or companies where the Public Relations officers have not been made the management insiders that they should be. This obviously affects such Public Relations officers or managers‟ performance. And of course there is no way one can expect such managers to contribute meaningfully (Nwosu, 1996)
Another inhibiting factor according to Achison (1999) is “the rapid growth of Public Relations which has attracted many inexperienced, unethical practitioners who tend to create false image of the activity, and detract the honest efforts of great majority of competent, ethical Public Relations people.
Onah (1996), described all these inexperienced and unethical practitioners as “quacks, gate-crashers, charlatans and professional pretenders of all types”. The status of Public Relations practitioners in the society is another factor because certain unethical
behaviours of the detractors make public critics regard the Public Relations people as manipulator people with deceptive persuasions. The inadequacy of New information and communication Technologies (NCTs) also plague effective practice. In modern Public Relations practice, traditional communication devices like files, index cards, paper pencils, pens, telephone, typewriter, new-letters, group and interpersonal forums or meeting are increasingly being replaced or supplemented by NCT input, storage and communication devices like intelligent typewriters, computer terminals, optical disk, intelligent circuitry, word processors, electronic mailing system, teleconferencing, computer conferencing, satellite, electronic fund transfer system and computer management information system, Nwosu(1996).
The present “cold war” and suspicious relationship between in-house Public Relations departments and consultancies is also another inhibiting factor.
Inadequate number of qualified or competent Public Relations practitioners also tends to militate against the effective practice of Public Relations. Another is education and training of practitioners in Nigeria for instance, the Nigeria Institute of Public Relations (NIPR) determines the nature and scope of knowledge required to practice the profession. “What such bodies usually prescribe are considered to be basic. A true professional or successful practitioner of Public Relations must therefore endeavour to go beyond this basic prescription.” Some practitioners are intellectually lazy and not upright in the course of discharging their professional duties. What they fail to realize is that the
body of knowledge and skills required to survive in Public Relations is rather wide and the industry‟s scope or area of coverage is always expanding.
In Nigeria and other developing countries where Public Relations management is relatively young, Public Relations programmes are under funded, thus, this inadequate funding has grossly affected the effective practice of the profession.
The present situation by which foreign Public Relations firms are contracted for Nigeria will not give room for Public Relations practice in Nigeria to grow into a powerful tool of rural and national development This shows inadequate support from government and its agencies, perhaps, we should think globally and act locally. It is believed that Nigerian Institute of Public Relations ( NIPR) is not doing enough in the areas of promoting the profession and warding off unscrupulous miscreants.
It is believed that at the end of every tunnel there is always light, little wonder when Onah in Nwosu (1996) runs thus:” Public Relations has grown from press agentary, publicity or a minute aspect of marketing, communication and management studies and practices, to a full- fledged discipline and profession. This is global trend. It is a trend which the developing countries are working hard to move along with. In Africa, Nigeria seems most determined to remain at the forefront of this effort towards the professionalization of Public Relations practice in all its ramification”
REFERENCES
1. Oyekan, J1bade (1993): “Nigerian Institute of Public relations 30 Years Growth” – In 30 years of Public Relations In Nigeria. NIPR - A Cap-David Production. P. 11
2. Cutlip Center And Broom (1994): Effective Public Relations, Englewood Cliff New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. P. 16.
3. Nwosu, Ikechukwu (1996). Public Relations Management, Principles Issues and Applications Dominican Publishers Aba, Nigeria. P. 5.
4. Black, Sam (1989), Introduction to Public Relations. London: The Modino Press Limited and the International Public Relations Associations (1PRA).
5. Salu, Adekunle (1994): Understanding Public Relations, A Cap-David production, Lagos P.7.‟
6. Nwosu, Ikechukwu (1995): “Marketing Communications: Introductory and Definitive Overview,” in Ikechukwu .E. Nwosu and Uchenna Ekwo (Eds), Mass Media and Marketing Communications. Enugu: Thought Communications Publishers.
7. Nwosu, Ikechukwu (1996) Public Relations Management, Principles, Issues and Applications: Dominican Publishers Aba, Nigeria P. 179.
8. Boone and Kurtz (1990): Contemporary Business, Holt, Rinehart and Winston Saunder College Publishing. P.474.
9. Aweneri, Festus (1999): In-Road Into Public Relations. FEST, Communications Lagos. P.25.
10. Roger, Haywood (1990): A11 About Public Relations: McGraw Hill Publishers, P. 156
11. Jefkins, Frank (1985) Introduction to marketing, Advertising and Public Relations, London: Macmillian Publishers. P32.
12. Roger, Haywood, Op.Cit. P. 158.
13. Nkwocha, Jossy (1999) Effective Media Relations Issues and Strategies. Zoom Lens Publishers Lagos. P27.
14. Oyeneye, Peter (1996). Concept and Principles of Public Relations Media Ciate ltd Lagos. P. 125.
15. Nwosu Ikechukwu, Op. (It P182-183)
16. Lecture Notes / Excerpts on Mass Communication and National Development. M.sc (Public Relations) Programme University of Nigeria. Enugu campus 1998.
17. Babasola Edet And TAYLOR (1998) Managing Development in Nigeria: UNDP Publishers, Lagos, P. 12.
18. Babasola, Chinsman (1996): Human Development Report. UNDP Publishers Lagos, P.18.
19. Ajit, Dasgupta (1974) Economic Theory and Developing Countries, Macmillian Press Ltd. London.
20. Jefkins, Frank (1977): “The Credibility Factors” Public Relations (Journal of the NIPR) Vol. 1, No.2, January - June.
21. Sarveas And Mayo (1994): Approaches to Development Commission: An Orientation and Resources Kit. Paris and New York: UNESCO/UNFPA.
22. Nwosu Ikechukwu, Op, Cit. P. 184. 23. Jossy Nkwocha Op. Cit. P.24. 24. Nwosu Ikechukwu, Op. Cit.P
25. Ak1nyemi. BJ.. (1993) “The Challenges of Public Relations in 1990s” - In 30 Years of Public Relations in Nigeria. NIPR -m A Cap-David Production P. 116.
26. Nwosu Ikechukwu, Op. Cit P.165
27. Lecture Notes/Excerpts on Public Relations and National Development, M.Sc. (Public Relations) Programme, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, 1999.
28. Onah . J.o. (1996) “FORWARD” in Bcechukwu Nwosu. Public Relations Management. Principles, Issues and Application: Dominican Publishers Aba Nigeria. P.V1.
29. Nwosu Ikechukwu Op. Cit P.2I9. 30. Ibid P.222.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY:
This chapter focuses on the procedure adopted in effectively carrying out the research work with particular emphasis on the determination of the study size from the estimated population of the study, the sources and instruments of data collection as well as the design and distribution of questionnaires.
3.1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
For the purpose of better understanding of the research topic and in view of the importance attached to the study, descriptive research is used. This is to enable us carry thorough investigation and adequate exploration, in addition, it helps us to unravel the essential elements and assess the validity of pursuing certain areas of inquiry.
In this descriptive research, exploratory proved the best tool especially considered against the backdrop of surveying the public opinion on the limitations of Public Relations in developing countries.
The primary data for the study came mainly through questionnaires and personal interviews were conducted where appropriate, while the secondary data were obtained from unpublished materials, Journals and relevant articles on Public Relations and developing countries
3.2 STRUCTURE OF THE INSTRUMENT
In designing the questionnaire, care was taken to ensure that the respondents feel free with answers they give. This was made possible by the fact that disclosing their identity was optional. Multiple choice, dichotomous and open ended questions were used and in the open-ended questions, they had the opportunities to make necessary comments as to the reasons for their action and in some cases, they were required to make suggestions where necessary.
3.3 DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE
No researcher can afford to cover the entire population of interest, especially where the population is large and not well defined. Therefore, researchers are usually forced to examine only a fraction of the population because of some constraints. The fraction to be used for the study is known as the sample, and it should be a true representative of the entire population.
In order to determine an appropriate sample size, a pre-testing had to be done with a total of one hundred (100) questionnaires. At the end of the exercise the positive response was 65% while the negative response was 35%. These were used to determine the sample size of approximately 350 at a confidence level of 95% and error limit of 50%. The following statistical formular was applied to determine the sample size for the study
n = (Z)2 x P x Q e2
Where:
n =The sample size
Z = the desired level of confidence (1.96) P - percentage of positive response (65%) Q = percentage of negative response (35%) E = Limit of tolerance standard error (5%)
After substituting for the notations above, the researcher obtained an approximated sample size of 350, as follows.
n = (1.96)2x 65x35 25 = 3.8416 x 65 x 35 25 = 34915 350
REFERENCES
1. SOMMER AND ROCHERT (1980) A Practical Guide to Behavioural Research, Tools and Techniques N.Y. Oxford University press, Inc. 1980.
2. STOCK J.P. (1987) Strategic Logistics Management 2nd Edition, New Dambart D.M.N.Y ;
3. WILLIAM .P. (1970) Reasoning With Statistics. 2”d Edition, San Franscisco, Holt Rinechart And Winston.
4. NUOROM ROLAND “Appraisal of Consumer Loyalty to Branded Malt Drinks in
Enugu Urban”. An Unpublished MBA (Marketing) Thesis, University of Nigeria, 2000.
CHAPTER FOUR
TABULATIONS, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONS OF DATA.
This chapter deals with the tabulation, analysis and interpretations of the data obtained through the questionnaires administered on respondents and interviews conducted. A total of 350 questionnaires were distributed out of which 287 were returned, representing about 82%. The number of questionnaire found to be valid and reliable for analysis stood at 268, representing about 93.38% of the total questionnaires returned.
Table 4.1 QUESTIONNAIRE DISTRIBUTION\
Region Questionnaires distribution Questionnaires returned Valid Questionnaires South west 70 61 60 South west 70 64 62 South south 70 58 54 North 70 51 43 Middle Belt 70 53 49 Total 350 287 268
4.1 RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS IN SECTION ‘A’ OF THE QUESTIONNAIRES
TABLE 4 .2 RESPONDENTS SEX DISTRIBUTION
Sex No of Respondent Percentage
Male 197 73.50
Female 171 26.50
Total 268 100.00
As indicated in table 4.2, there were a total of 197 (73150%) males while the females were 71 (26.50%) in number.
Table 4.3 AGE DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS
Age Group(years) No of Respondents Percentage
15-20 8 2.99 21-30 72 26.87 31-40 86 32.09 41-50 65 24.25 5 1& Above 37 13.80 Total 268 100.00
Table 4.3 shows that 8(2.99%) of the respondents were between 15 and 20 years old, 72(26.87%) were between 31 and 40 years old while 65(24.25%) and 37(13.80%) of them were between 41&50 yrs. and 51 years or above, respectively.
Table 4.4 MARITAL STATUS OF RESPONDENTS
Marital Status No of Respondents percentage
Single 91 33.96
Married 177 66.04
Total 268 100.00
The above table shows that single respondents were 91(33.96%)while the number of married respondents stood at 177(66.04%)
Table 4.5 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS
Educational Attainment No of Respondents Percentage
WASC/CPCE /SSCE 19 7.09 NCE /OND 45 16.79 HND / BSC 147 54.85 Masters Degree /Ph. D 24 8.96 Other Qualifications 33 12.31 Total 268 100.00
The data in table 4.4 shows that majority of the respondents and HND/BSC and there were a total of 147 of them representing about 54.85% while only 19 (7.09%) had either WASC, GCE or SSCE.
Table 4.6 OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS
Occupation No of Respondents Percentage
Student 11 4.10 Civil Servant 102 38.06 PR. Practitioners 26 9.71 Applicant 58 21.64 Others 71 26.49 Total 268 100.00
In the area of occupation, 11 representing 4.10% were students, while 102 (38.06%) were civil servants and 26(9.71%) constituted Public Relations practitioners while 58(21.64%) were applicants, 71(26.49%) represented others
Table 4.7 RESPONDENTS RESPONSES- AS TO WHETHER THERE IS AWARENESS ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTICE.
Responses No of Respondents Percentage
No - 0.00
Total 268 100.00
All the 268 respondents said that they were aware of the existence of Public Relations practice.
Table 4.8 RESPONDENTS RATING OF THE DEGREE OF USAGE REGARDING PUBLIC RELATIONS PROGRAMMES.
Rating No of Respondents Percentage
Very high 9 3.36
Fairly high 34 12.69
Low 198 73.88
Don‟t know 27 10.07
Total 268 100.00
In table 4.8, most of the respondents, 198(73.88%) said the degree of usage regarding Public Relations programs was low, 9(3.36%) of them said the usage was very high, 34(12.69%) were of the opinion that the usage was fairly high while 27(10.07%) did not know the degree of usage.
Table 4.9 RESPONDENTS RESPONSES AS TO WHETHER PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTICE IS FACING ANY PROBLEM
Responses No of Respondent Percentage
Yes 39 14.55
No - 0.00
Don‟t know 212 79.11
Neutral 17 6.34
Total 268 100.00
Table 4.9 indicates that 39 (14.55%) of the respondents believed that public relations practice is facing problems; 212(79.11%) said they did not know while 17 (6.34%) remained neutral.
TABLE 4.10 RESPONDENTS RESPONSES AS TO WHETHER THESE PROBLEMS FACING PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTICE COULD HINDER THE EFFECTIVE PRACTICE OF THE PROFESSION.
Responses Respondents Percentage
Yes 39 14.55
No 0 0.00
Don‟t Know 212 79.11
Neutral 17 6.34
Total 268 100.00
Table 4.10 shows that a total of 39 (14.55) of the respondents believed that the problems facing Public Relations could hinder its effective practice. Two hundred and twelve (79.11 %) did not know while 17(6.345) were neutral on the issue.
TABLE 4.11: IS THE GOVERNMENT OF YOUR COUNTRY GIVING ADEQUATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT TO THE PUBLIC RELATIONS PROFESSION.
Responses No of Respondents Percentage
Yes 53 19.78
No 204 76.12
Total 268 100.0
Table 4.11 shows that while 53 (19.78%) of the respondents were of the opinion that the got was giving adequate support to the Public Relation profession, 204 (76.12%) said there was no support from the government. Eleven (4.10%) did not know.
Table 4.12: ARE THERE ADEQUATE COMMUNICATION FACILITIES FOR EFFECTIVE PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTICE IN THE COUNTRY?
Responses No of Respondents Percentage
Yes 87 32.46
No 168 62.69
Don‟t know 13 4.85
Total 268 100.00
From Table 4.12 168 representing 62.69% of the population expressed the opinion that communications facilities for effective public relations practice are inadequate compared to what is obtainable in the so-called developed countries. But 87, being 32.46 had the opposite view, while 13 (4.85%) did not know if there were adequate communications facilities or not.
Table 4.13 RESPONDENTS RESPONSES AS TO THE LEVEL OF FUNDING REGARDING PUBLIC RELATIONS PROGRAMMES.
Responses No of Respondent Percentage
Low 209 77.98
High 22 8.21
Don‟t know 37 13.811
Total 268 100.00
An analysis of table 4.13 indicates that 209 (77.98 %) of the respondents believed that public relations programmes are under- funded while 22 (8.21% ) believed otherwise. Thirty-sever constituting 13.81% could not categorically make any assessment.
Table 4.14 ON WHETHER THERE IS ENOUGH QUALIFIED PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTITIONERS IN THE COUNTRY.
Responses No of Respondent Percentage
Low 47 17.54
High 199 74.25
Don‟t know 22 8.21
Table 4.14 indicates that 199 (74.25%) of the respondents claimed that public relations practitioners were not enough, 47 (17.54%) had the opposite opinion while 22 (8.21%) said they did not know.
Table 4.15: RESPONDENTS RESPONSE ON WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEARTH OF QUALIFIED PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTITIONERS
Responses No of Respondents Percentage
Inadequate education and training 207 77.24 Lack of motivation 22 8.21 Ignorance 34 12.69 others 5 1.86 Total 268 100.00
Most of the respondents believed that inadequate education and training contribute to the dearth of public relations practitioners. This is followed by ignorance, lack of motivation and other factors in that order.