• No results found

Capital, Costs, Contingency

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Capital, Costs, Contingency"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Capital, Costs, Contingency

Alex Wynaendts, CEO AEGON NV

AEGON Investor Day

(2)

Global financial turmoil

GDP growth expectations

1

(EUR million)

Total US credit market debt/GDP

2

(%)

„

US

350

2.0%

„

Eurozone

„

UK

300 250

1.0%

200

0.0%

150 100

-1.0%

Jun 08 Jul 08 Aug 08 Sep 08 Oct 08 Nov 08

Credit spread gapping

1

Equity markets

1

19 25 19 30 19 35 19 40 19 45 19 50 19 55 19 60 19 65 19 70 19 75 19 80 19 85 19 90 19 95 20 00 20 05

Average corporate bond yields (bps)

Indexed level (December 31, 2002=100)

S&P 500

AAA rating

AEX (Amsterdam)

AA rating

180 950

Baa rating

160 850 140 750 120 650 100 550 80

FTSE 100

60 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 450

1. Source: Consensus Economics Inc. 2008, Bloomberg, Moody’s, Carlyle Group (Ned Davis Research)

2. Total US credit market debt measured by the US Federal Reserve includes debt owed by domestic financial services firms, mortgages, corporate debt, federal government debt, small business debt, consumer debt, state and local government debt, and foreign debt

(3)

Insurance industry faces challenges globally

Financial markets

o

Volatility

o

Illiquidity

o

Closed capital

markets

Increased cost of capital &

less availability of capital

Regulators

o

Focus on capital

o

Take a more

conservative

stance

Increased required capital

Customers

o

Demand for

guarantees

o

Trust

Increased required capital

Need for

capital buffer

(4)

Current priorities

C

apital

C

osts

C

ontingency

The three C’s

4

AEGON Investor Day, London, November 24, 2008

(5)

Capital: improve capital efficiency

o

Implement more

o

Capital releases from back books

o

Reinsurance

o

Insurance linked securities

Optimize

capital

structure

Reduce

capital

intensity

o

Further reduce

o

Equity risk

o

Interest rate risk

o

Credit risk

Maximize

diversification

benefits

o

Manage portfolio of risks

o

Reset retention limits

(6)

Capital: proactive steps have been taken to increase capital buffer

o

Significant risk reductions implemented

-

Limited direct equity exposure

-

Interest rate risks lowered

-

Guarantees on products lowered

-

Hedging of guarantees

-

Asset and liability matching

o

Strong global risk management organization

o

Capital preservation and risk mitigation in Q308: EUR 729 million

(7)

Capital: ongoing acceleration of de-risking and capital release

Complete execution on identified capital preservation and risk mitigation

actions of EUR 600 - 800 million in Q4, including:

o

Lowering investment risk

New money

Existing portfolio

o

Risk transfer through reinsurance

Fixed annuities

Non-life catastrophic risk

o

Securitizations

Capital preservation and risk mitigation actions important

to enhance capital buffer

(8)

Contingency: strong capital position provides sufficient buffer

Pro-forma

September 30, 2008

post draw down

EUR 5.0 billion

(160%)

Insurance Group Directive

(IGD) surplus capital

EUR 8.0 billion

(195%)

EUR 312 million

S&P risk-based insurance

capital model excess

capital in operating units

above AA level

EUR 312 million

Additional capital buffer of

EUR 3 billion is sufficient

o

Insurance Group Directive surplus capital includes unrealized losses on bond portfolio

o

Excluding unrealized losses IGD ratio would be ~225% and ~260% pro-forma

(9)

Contingency: equity market sensitivity

Based on equity markets as of September 30, 2008

Estimated impact on earnings

(12 month period, EUR million)

40%

20%

Assumed

equity market

decline of

„

Direct

„

Fees

„

DAC

„

Guarantees

-700

-1,600

o

Lower fees

o

Reserve strengthening for VA guarantees

(old book before 2004; new VA is delta hedged)

o

DAC unlocking

*

* Acceleration of amortization of deferred acquisition costs

Estimated impact on capital

(EUR million)

40%

20%

Assumed

equity market

decline of

„

Direct

„

Fees

„

Guarantees

-900

-1,900

o

Direct exposure

o

Reserve strengthening for guarantees

o

Impact of first 20% decline can be absorbed

(10)

Costs: reduce operating expenses

o

Cost reduction measures:

o

More than EUR 150 million in AEGON’s major operating units in 2009

o

Key actions to achieve this include:

o

US: no wage increase in 2009 and restructuring

o

NL: restructuring, reduction in projects

o

UK: restructuring, cost containment

(11)

Execution of longer term strategic plan

o

Improve growth and returns from existing businesses:

-

Manage for profitability in the Netherlands:

-

3 clear priorities: profitability, distribution, culture change

-

Improve RoC by 100 basis points

o

Progress on global asset management

(12)

Resilient and well diversified business

US gross deposits (USD million)

US net deposits (USD million)

Individual savings & retirement

Individual savings & retirement

4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1,000

„

Variable annuities

0

„

Fixed annuities

„

Retail mutual funds

-1,000 -2,000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3

07 07 07 07 08 08 08 07 07 07 07 08 08 08

CEE standardized new life sales (EUR million)

CEE pensions asset under mgmt (EUR million)

Q1 07 Q2 07 Q3 07 Q4 07 Q1 08 Q2 08 Q3 08 Q1 07 Q2 07 Q3 07 Q4 07 Q1 08 Q2 08 Q3 08 0 10 20 30 40 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

„

Single premium

„

Recurring premium

(13)

The right strategy with the right current priorities

o C

apital:

Capital preservation and de-risking actions to continue through Q4 and

into 2009

o C

osts:

More than EUR 150 million savings actions

o C

ontingency:

Sufficient capital buffer to absorb market shocks

(14)

Q&A

(15)

For questions please contact Investor Relations

+31 70 344 8305

[email protected]

P.O. Box 85

2501 CB The Hague

The Netherlands

(16)

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements

The statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as defined in the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The following are words that identify such forward-looking statements: believe, estimate, target, intend, may, expect, anticipate, predict, project, counting on, plan, continue, want, forecast, should, would, is confident, will, and similar expressions as they relate to our company. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. We undertake

no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which merely reflect company expectations at the time of writing. Actual results may differ materially from expectations conveyed in forward-looking statements due to changes caused by various risks and uncertainties. Such risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to the following:

Š Changes in general economic conditions, particularly in the United States, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom;

Š Changes in the performance of financial markets, including emerging markets, such as with regard to:

- The frequency and severity of defaults by issuers in our fixed income investment portfolios; and

- The effects of corporate bankruptcies and/or accounting restatements on the financial markets and the resulting decline in the value of equity and debt securities we hold;

Š The frequency and severity of insured loss events;

Š Changes affecting mortality, morbidity and other factors that may impact the profitability of our insurance products;

Š Changes affecting interest rate levels and continuing low or rapidly changing interest rate levels;

Š Changes affecting currency exchange rates, in particular the EUR/USD and EUR/GBP exchange rates;

Š Increasing levels of competition in the United States, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and emerging markets;

Š Changes in laws and regulations, particularly those affecting our operations, the products we sell, and the attractiveness of certain products to our consumers;

Š Regulatory changes relating to the insurance industry in the jurisdictions in which we operate;

Š Acts of God, acts of terrorism, acts of war and pandemics;

Š Changes in the policies of central banks and/or governments;

Š Litigation or regulatory action that could require us to pay significant damages or change the way we do business;

Š Customer responsiveness to both new products and distribution channels;

Š Competitive, legal, regulatory, or tax changes that affect the distribution cost of or demand for our products;

Š Our failure to achieve anticipated levels of earnings or operational efficiencies as well as other cost saving initiatives; and

Š The impact our adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards may have on our reported financial results and financial condition.

Cautionary note regarding Regulation G (non-GAAP measure)

This presentation includes non-GAAP financial measures: net underlying earnings, operating earnings before tax, value of new business and embedded value. Value of new business and embedded value are not based on IFRS, which are used to prepare and report AEGON’s financial statements and should not be viewed as a substitute for IFRS financial measures. AEGON believes the non-GAAP measures shown herein, together with GAAP information, provides a meaningful measure for the investment community to evaluate AEGON’s business relative to the businesses of our peers.

References

Related documents

Meanwhile, the trade-off between debt and equity component of capital structure does significantly impact on the trade-off between profitability and the risk of

Equity market timing and capital structure: International evidence. Profitability and capital structure of the property and construction sectors in

Applying a Market Derived Capital Asset Pricing Model (MCPM) equity risk premium to estimate expected returns shows that investors should require a higher rate of return

Key words: Credit risk, capital structure, structural model, L´evy process, time changed models, equity derivative, implied volatility, credit spread, spread options..

TransCanada submitted that its currently-approved return, based on a deemed capital structure of 30% common equity and the rate of return on common equity (ROE) resulting from

In her study, growth rate, operating leverage, tangibility and debt service capacity were positively related to the capital structure whereas agency cost of

So financing manager wants to make capital structures (debt, equity) that are best for firm. The capital structure is important for better performance. Capital structure is

As proposed by the Board Staff the process to establish the cost of capital entails the determination of (i) the capital structure, (ii) the equity risk premium, (iii) return