• No results found

INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME Interventional procedure overview of

radical laparoscopic hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer Introduction

This overview has been prepared to assist members of IPAC advise on the safety and efficacy of an interventional procedure previously reviewed by SERNIP. It is based on a rapid survey of published literature, review of the procedure by specialist advisors and review of the content of the SERNIP file. It should not be regarded as a definitive assessment of the procedure.

Procedure name

Radical laparoscopic hysterectomy Specialty society

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Indication(s)

Stage I or IIA cervical cancer.

The stage of cervical cancer describes how far it has progressed at the time of diagnosis. Stage I cervical cancer is confined to the cervix. Stage IIA cervical cancer has spread to the top of the vagina, but not into the uterus. Cervical cancer that has progressed further than this generally treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but not with surgery.

Cervical cancer is relatively uncommon. In London Region in 1999, about 300 new cases were reported, giving an age-standardised incidence of 8 per 100,000 women per year (Source: Thames Cancer Registry).

Untreated cervical cancer is almost invariably fatal.

Summary of procedure

Radical hysterectomy involves surgical removal of the uterus, the supporting

ligaments and the upper vagina, together with removal of the pelvic lymph nodes and sometimes the para-aortic lymph nodes. Traditionally, radical hysterectomy is

performed through an incision in the abdomen. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is a minimally invasive procedure that may reduce length of hospital stay and improve post-operative recovery compared with abdominal surgery.

Literature review

Radical laparoscopic hysterectomy page 1 of 5

(2)

Appraisal criteria

We included studies that described radical laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer.

We excluded studies which described total (ie non radical) laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

List of studies found

We found no systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials or cohort studies.

We found two case series that included 20 or more women.1,2 The second study was published in French and we were unable to obtain the full text.2 Data have been extracted from the abstract only.

References to smaller case series including three or more women are provided in the annex.

(3)

Summary of key efficacy and safety findings

Authors, location, date, patients Key efficacy findings Key safety findings Key reliability and validity issues Spirtos1

Case series California USA Date 1994 to 1996

n=78 women with stage I cervical cancer, mean age 42, range 26 to 62)

Mean follow up 67 months, standard deviation 16 months, median and range not stated

‘Average’ operative time: 205 minutes (range 150 to 430 minutes)

‘Average’ length of stay: 3 days (range 1 to 7 days)

‘Average’ number of lymph nodes sampled (pelvic and aortic): 34 (range 19 to 68)

Recurrence: 8 women

Estimated 5-year disease free interval after treatment: 90%

Estimated 5-year survival: 94%

Intra-operative complications:

cystotomy: 3 women

blood transfusion: 1 woman

laparotomy required: 5 women Post operative complications:

uterovaginal fistula:1 woman

deep vein thrombosis: 1 woman

urinary tract infection: 1 woman

vaginal cuff abscess: 1 woman

abdominal wall haematoma: 1 woman

pelvic lymphocysts: 2 women

Uncontrolled case series

6 women also received radiotherapy and 1 woman received radiotherapy plus chemotherapy

Long follow up

Outcomes appropriate

Pomel2 Case series France

Date not stated, published in 1997 n=41 women, age not stated

stage IA: 12 women

stage IB: 24 women

stage IIA: 4 women

stage IIB: 1 woman Follow up 4 to 76 months

Mean duration of procedure: 270 minutes

Mean post operative stay: 7 days Recurrence in follow-up period: none

Blood transfusion: 1 woman

‘No major operative and postoperative complications’

Uncontrolled case series Abstract only available

Radical laparoscopic hysterectomy page 3 of 5

(4)

Validity and generalisability of the studies

We found two case series, both performed in settings appropriate to the UK. Follow up appears fairly long in the first study,1 and was long for some women in the second study.2

There were no women with Stage II cervical cancer in the first study, 1 and only 5 in the second study. 2

Bazian comments None.

Specialist advisor’s opinion / advisors’ opinions

Few gynaecological oncologists undertake this procedure regularly.

The requirement for radical hysterectomy has fallen considerably.

Radical laparoscopic hysterectomy requires extensive laparoscopic expertise.

Issues for consideration by IPAC None other than those discussed above.

(5)

Radical laparoscopic hysterectomy page 5 of 5

References

1. Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Ballon SC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: Surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (2):340-348

2. Pomel C, Canis M, Mage G, Dauplat J, Le Bouedec G, Raiga J, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, Bruhat MA. Laparoscopically extended hysterectomy for cervical cancer: technique, indications and results. Apropos of a series of 41 cases in Clermont (French). Chirurgie 1997; 122: 133-36

Annex: References to smaller case series

Reference Number of

study participants Kim DH, Moon JS. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy

for early, invasive cervical carcinoma. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1998; 5: 411-417

18

Nezhat CR, Nezhat FR, Burrell MO, Ramirez CE, Welander C, Carrodeguas J, Nezhat CH. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. Journal of

Gynecologic Surgery 1993; 9: 105-120

<18 relevant cases Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Pomel C, Wattiez A, Glowaczover E, Bruhat MA.

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics &

Gynaecology 1995; 9: 675-689.

15

Hsieh Y-Y, Lin W-C, Chang C-C, Yeh L-S, Hsu T-Y, Tsai H-D. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with low paraaortic, subaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: Results of short-term follow-up. Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician &

Gynecologist 1998; 43: 528-534

8

Ostrzenski A. A new laparoscopic abdominal radical hysterectomy: A pilot phase trial.

European Journal of Surgical Oncology 1996; 22: 602-606.

6

Overview prepared by:

Bazian Ltd November 2002

References

Related documents

The Finite Element Method has its advancement over other finite difference methods due to taken into consideration the irregular shape domain of problem.. The domain

The underlying reason to impose criminal liability on Haze in South Kalimantan to the Government officials is according to The Act Number 32 Year 2009 on The

The following themes were derived from the data: 1) High level of knowledge about healthy eating, 2) Fac- tors influencing food purchasing decisions include: cost of food

Result of this study suggests that Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) &amp; Pendular exercises module is effective in decreasing pain and

The countries with a current high labour burden have the possibility to decrease taxes for low income earners by increasing those which are less harmful to growth like consumption,

Across a field setting (three entrepreneurial pitch competitions in the United States) and two controlled experiments, we find that investors prefer entrepreneurial pitches presented

The surrender option values in the two states are fairly sensitive with respect to changes in the switching intensities in the regime-switching rational expectation model, while

• Did the Town maintain and prepare fi nancial records and reports that provide adequate information to monitor and evaluate the fi scal health of the Town’s water district funds..