R E S E A R C H
Open Access
On generalized difference lacunary statistical
convergence in a paranormed space
Selma Altunda ˘g
**Correspondence: [email protected] Mathematics Department, Faculty of Arts and Science, Sakarya University, Sakarya, 54187, Turkey
Abstract
In this article, we introduce the concept of
m-lacunary statistical convergence and
m-lacunary strong convergence in a paranormed space. Also, we establish some
connections between these concepts.
1 Introduction
In order to extend convergence of sequences, the notion of statistical convergence was introduced by Fast [] and Steinhaus [] and several generalizations and applications of this concept have been investigated by various authors [, ]. This notion was studied in normed spaces by Kolk [], in locally convex Hausdorff topological spaces by Maddox [], in topological Hausdorff groups by Çakallı [] and in probabilistic normed space by Karakuş []. Recently, Alotaibi and Alroqi [] extended this notion in paranormed spaces. In this article, we study the concept of statistical convergence from difference sequence spaces which are defined over paranormed space.
2 Preliminaries and definitions
LetKbe a subset of the set of natural numbersN. Then the asymptotic density ofK de-noted byδ(K) =limnn|{k≤n:k∈K}|, where the vertical bars denote the cardinality of
the enclosed set in [].
A number sequencex= (xk) is said to be statistically convergent to the numberLif for
eachε> , the setK(ε) ={k≤n:|xk–L| ≥ε}has asymptotic density zero,i.e.,
lim
n
nk≤n:|xk–L| ≥ε= .
In this case we writest-limx=L. This concept was studied by [, ].
By a lacunaryθ= (kr);r= , , , . . . , wherek= , we shall mean an increasing sequence
of non-negative integers withkr–kr–→ ∞asr→ ∞. The intervals determined byθwill
be denoted byIr= (kr–,kr] andhr=kr–kr–. The ratiokkr–r will be denoted byqr.
The notion of difference sequence spaceX() was introduced by Kızmaz [] as follows:
X() =x= (xk) : (xk)∈X
forX=l∞,c,c, wherexk=xk–xk+for allk∈N.
The notion of difference sequence spaces was further generalized by Et and Çolak [] as follows:
Xm=x= (xk)∈w:
mxk
∈X
forX=l∞,candc, wherem∈N,mxk=m–xk–m–xk+,xk=xk.
The sequencexis said to bem-statistically convergent to the numberLprovided that for eachε> ,
lim
n
nk≤n: mx
k–L≥ε= .
The set of allm-statistically convergent sequences was denoted byS(m) in []. Furthermore, this notion was studied in [, ].
A paranorm is a function g :X−→Rdefined on a linear spaceX such that for all
x,y,z∈X,
(i) g(x) = ifx=θ; (ii) g(–x) =g(x);
(iii) g(x+y)≤g(x) +g(y);
(iv) If(αn)is a sequence of scalars withαn−→α(n−→ ∞) andxn,a∈Xwithxn−→a
(n−→ ∞) in the sense thatg(xn–a)−→(n−→ ∞), thenαnxn−→αa
(n−→ ∞), in the sense thatg(αnxn–αa)−→(n−→ ∞).
A paranormg for whichg(x) = impliesx=θ is called a total paranorm onXand the pair (X,g) is called a total paranormed space.
Note that each seminorm (norm)ponXis a paranorm (total) but converse need not be true.
The concept of paranorm is a generalization of absolute value []. A modulus functionf is a function from [,∞) to [,∞) such that
(i) f(x) = if and only if x= ; (ii) f(x+y)≤f(x) +f(y)for allx,y≥; (iii) f increasing;
(iv) f is continuous from at the right zero.
Since|f(x) –f(y)| ≤f(|x–y|), it follows from condition (iv) thatfis continuous on [,∞). Furthermore, we havef(nx)≤nf(x) for alln∈Nfrom condition (ii) and so
f(x) =f
nx n
≤nf
x n
.
Hence, for alln∈N,
nf(x)≤f
x n
.
A modulus may be bounded or unbounded. For example,f(x) =xpfor <p≤ is un-bounded, butf(x) =+xxis bounded. Ruckle [] used the idea of a modulus functionf to construct a class of FK spaces
L(f) = x= (xk) :
f|xk|
<∞
In [], the notion of statistical convergence was defined in a paranormed space.
Definition . A sequencex= (xk) is said to be statistically convergent to the numberL
in (X,g) if for eachε> ,
lim
n
nk≤n:g(xk–L)≥ε= .
In this case, we writeg(st)-limx=L. We denote the set of allg(st)-convergent sequences bySg[].
Definition . A sequencex= (xk) is said to be stronglyp-Cesaro summable ( <p<∞)
to the limitLin (X,g) if
lim
n
n n
j=
g(xj–L)
p
= ,
and we write it asxk−→L([C,g]p). In this case,Lis called the [C,g]p-limit ofx[].
In this article, we shall study the concept of m-lacunary statistical convergence,
m-lacunary strong convergence andm-lacunary strong convergence with respect to
a modulus function in a paranormed space.
3 Generalized difference statistical convergence in a paranormed space
Definition . A sequencex= (xk) is said to bem-statistically convergent to the number Lin (X,g) if for eachε> ,
lim
n
nk≤n:g
mxk–L
≥ε= .
In this case, we writeSg(m)-limx=L. We denote the set of allm-statistically
conver-gent sequences in (X,g) bySg(m).
Definition . Letθbe a lacunary sequence. A sequencex= (xk) is said to bem-lacunary
statistically convergent to the numberLin (X,g) if for eachε> ,
lim
r
hr
k∈Ir:g
mxk–L
≥ε= .
In this case, we writeSθ
g(m)-limx=L. We denote the set of allm-lacunary statistically
convergent sequences in (X,g) bySθ g(m).
Definition . A sequencex= (xk) is said to be strongly m-Cesaro summable to the
limitLin (X,g) if
lim
n
n n
k=
gmxk–L
= ,
Definition . A sequencex= (xk) is said to be stronglym-lacunary strongly summable
to the limitLin (X,g) if
lim
r
hr
k∈Ir
gmxk–L
= ,
and we write it asxk−→L(Ngθ(m)). In this caseLis called theNgθ(m)-limofx.
Theorem . Letθbe a lacunary sequence and(X,g)be a paranormed space.Then
(i) Ifxk−→L(Ngθ(m)),thenxk−→L(Sgθ(m))and the inclusion is strict;
(ii) If xis am-bounded sequence andx
k−→L(Sθg(m)),thenxk−→L(Ngθ(m));
(iii) l∞g (m)∩Sθ
g(m) =lg∞(m)∩Ngθ(m).
Proof (i) Ifε> andxk→L(Ngθ(m)), we can write
k∈Ir
gmxk–L
≥
k∈Ir g(mxk–L)≥ε
gmxk–L
≥εk∈Ir:g
mxk–L
≥ε,
which yields the result.
In order to prove that the inclusionNθ
g(m)⊂Sθg(m) is proper, letθ be given and
X=Nθ
(,hr) ={x= (xk) :| hr
k∈Irxk|
hr →,r→ ∞}with the paranormg(x) =|x|+
supr|h
r
k∈Irxk|
hr. Define x= (xk) to be hrhr at the first term inI
r for everyr≥, xk=hr(hr– hr–· · ·– (k– )hr) between the second term and ([
√
hr] + )th term inIr, xk=hr(hr– hr–· · ·– ([
√
hr])hr) at the ([ √
hr] + )th term inIrandxk= otherwise.
We see that
xk=
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
hrhr,hrhr, . . . ,hr[ √
hr]hr, at the first [ √
hr] integers inIr,
, otherwise.
and
g(xk) =
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
, , . . . , [√hr], at the first [ √
hr] integers inIr,
, otherwise.
Note thatxis not-bounded in (X,g). We have, for everyε> ,
hr
k∈Ir:g(xk)≥ε)=
[√hr]
hr →
asr→ ∞,i.e.,xk→(Sgθ()). On the other hand,
hr
k∈Ir
g(xk) =
hr
[√hr]([ √
hr] + )
→
= ;
(ii) Suppose thatxk→L(Sθg(m)) and sayg(mxk–L)≤Mfor allk. Givenε> , we get
hr
k∈Ir
gmxk–L
=
hr
k∈Ir g(mx
k–L)≥ε
gmxk–L
+
hr
k∈Ir g(mxk–L)<ε
gmxk–L
≤M hr
k∈Ir:g
mxk–L
≥ε+ε,
from which the result follows.
(iii) This is an immediate consequence of (i) and (ii).
Corollary . If xk→L(|σ|g(m)), then xk →L(Sg(m)). If x∈lg∞(m)and if xk → L(Sg(m)),then xk→L(|σ|g(m)).
Theorem . Let θ be a lacunary sequence and (X,g) be a paranormed space, then
Sθ
g(m) =Sg(m)if and only if <lim infrqr≤lim suprqr<∞.
Proof Suppose thatlim infqr> , then there exists aδ> such thatqr≥+δfor sufficiently
larger, which implies that
hr kr
≥ δ
+δ.
Ifxk→L(Sg(m)), then for everyε> and sufficiently larger, we have
kr
k≤kr:g
mxk–L
≥ε≥ kr
k∈Ir:g
mxk–L
≥ε
≥ δ
+δ
hr
k∈Ir:gmxk–L
≥ε,
which proves theSg(m)⊂Sθg(m).
Conversely, suppose that lim infqr = . Since θ is lacunary, we can select a
subse-quence (krj) of θ satisfying krj krj– < +
j and
krj–
kr(j–) >j, where rj ≥ rj–+ and X =
Nθ(,hr) = {x= (xk) :|hr
k∈Irxk|
hr →,r→ ∞} with the paranorm g(x) = |x| +
supr|h
r
k∈Irxk| hr.
Now define a sequence by
xk=
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
hr+k, k∈Ir(j),j= , , . . . ,
, otherwise.
We can see that
g(xk) =
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
, k∈Ir(j),j= , , . . . ,
, otherwise.
We can see thatx∈/Nθ
g(m), butx∈σg(m). Theorem .(ii) implies thatx∈/Sgθ(m),
but it follows from Corollary . thatx∈Sg(m). HenceSg(m)⊂Sθg(m) andSg(m)⊂ Sθ
g(m) implies thatlim infqr> .
To show for any lacunary sequenceθ,Sθ
g(m)⊂Sg(m) implieslim supqr<∞, the same
technique of Lemma of [] can be used. Now suppose thatlim supqr=∞. Consider the
same space defined above and the sequence defined by
xi=
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
hr+i, krj–<i≤krj–,j= , , . . . ,
, otherwise.
Then we get
g(xi) =
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
, krj–<i≤krj–,j= , , . . . ,
, otherwise.
Then x∈Nθ
g(m), butx∈/ σg(m). By Theorem .(i) we conclude thatx∈Sgθ(m),
but by Corollary . thatx∈/Sg(m). Hence,Sgθ(m)⊂Sg(m). This completes the proof.
Definition . Letfbe a modulus function. Then a sequencex= (xk) is lacunary strongly p-Cesaro summable toLwith respect tof in (X,g) if
lim
r
hr
kIr
fgmxk–L
pk
= .
In this case, we writexk→L(Ngθ(f,m,p)). If we takepk= for allk∈N, we sayxk→ L(Nθ
g(f,m)).
Lemma . Let f be a modulus function and let <δ< .Then for each x>δ we have f(x)≤f()δ–x[].
Theorem . Let f be a modulus function and (X,g) be a paranormed space. Then Nθ
g(m)⊂Ngθ(f,m).
Proof Letx∈Nθ
g(m). Then we haveτr=hrk∈Irg( mx
k–L)→ asr→ ∞for someL.
Letε> and chooseδ with <δ< such thatf(u) <εforuwith ≤u≤δ. Then we can write
hr
k∈Ir
fgmxk–L
=
hr
k∈Ir g(mxk–L)≤δ
fgmxk–L
+
hr
k∈Ir g(mx
k–L)>δ
fgmxk–L
≤ hr
(hrδ) +
hr
f()δ–hrτr
from Lemma .. Thereforex∈Nθ
Theorem . Let <infkpk≤pk≤supkpk<∞.Then Sθg(m) =Ngθ(f,m,p)if and only if f is bounded.
Proof Following the technique applied for establishing Theorem . of [], we can prove
the theorem.
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava.
The author would like to thank the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and for their helpful suggestions.
Received: 14 December 2012 Accepted: 6 May 2013 Published: 20 May 2013 References
1. Fast, H: Sur la convergence statistique. Colloq. Math.2, 241-244 (1951)
2. Steinhaus, H: Sur la convergence ordinaire et la convergence asymptotique. Colloq. Math.2, 73-74 (1951) 3. Fridy, JA: Lacunary statistical summability. J. Math. Anal. Appl.173, 497-504 (1993)
4. Mursaleen, M, Mohiuddine, SA: On lacunary statistical convergence with respect to the intuitionistic fuzzy normed space. J. Comput. Appl. Math.233(2), 142-149 (2009)
5. Kolk, E: The statistical convergence in Banach spaces. Tartu ülik. Toim.928, 41-52 (1991)
6. Maddox, IJ: Statistical convergence in a locally convex space. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.104, 141-145 (1988) 7. Çakallı, H: On statistical convergence in topological groups. Pure Appl. Math. Sci.43, 27-31 (1996)
8. Karaku¸s, S: Statistical convergence on probabilistic normed spaces. Math. Commun.12, 11-23 (2007) 9. Alotaibi, A, Alroqi, A: Statistical convergence in a paranormed space. J. Inequal. Appl. (2012).
doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-39
10. Freedman, AR, Sember, JJ: Densities and summability. Pac. J. Math.95, 293-305 (1981) 11. Fridy, JA: On statistical convergence. Analysis5, 301-313 (1985)
12. Connor, JS: The statistical and strongp-Cesaro convergence of sequences. Analysis8, 47-63 (1988) 13. Kızmaz, H: On certain sequence spaces. Can. Math. Bull.24(2), 169-176 (1981)
14. Et, M, Çolak, R: On some generalized difference sequence spaces. Soochow J. Math.21(4), 377-386 (1995) 15. Et, M, Nuray, F:m-statistical convergence. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.32(6), 961-969 (2001)
16. Et, M: Spaces of Cesaro difference sequences of orderrdefined by a modulus function in a locally convex space. Taiwan. J. Math.10(4), 865-879 (2006)
17. Et, M, Choudhary, B, Tripathy, BC: On some classes of sequences defined by sequences of Orlicz functions. Math. Inequal. Appl.9(2), 335-342 (2006)
18. Mursaleen, M: Elements of Metric Spaces. Anamaya Publishers, New Delhi (2005)
19. Ruckle, WH: FK spaces in which the sequence of coordinate vectors in bounded. Can. J. Math.25(5), 973-975 (1973) 20. Fridy, JA, Orhan, C: Lacunary statistical convergence. Pac. J. Math.160(1), 43-51 (1993)
21. Pehlivan, S, Fisher, B: Some sequence spaces defined by a modulus function. Math. Slovaca45(3), 275-280 (1995) 22. Tripathy, BC, Et, M: On generalized difference lacunary statistical convergence. Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai, Math.50(1),
119-130 (2005)
doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2013-256