• No results found

Dealing with Medical Errors

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Dealing with Medical Errors"

Copied!
53
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Patient Safety Research Center www.fammed.buffalo.edu/safety

Dealing with Medical Errors

What should I say?

R Singh MB BChir MA (Cantab) MBA MD (SUNY)

Department of Family Medicine Associate Professor and

Associate Director, UB Patient Safety Research Center

Presented in 2010 by gurdev Singh, Director, UB Patient Safety research Center

(2)

Patient Safety Research Center www.fammed.buffalo.edu/safety

Dealing with Medical Errors

What should I say?

R Singh MB BChir MA (Cantab) MBA MD (SUNY)

Department of Family Medicine Associate Professor and

Associate Director, UB Patient Safety Research Center

‘Health’ Warning: This talk may raise

more questions than it answers !!

Presented in 2010 by gurdev Singh, Director, UB Patient Safety research Center

(3)

The Six ACGME Core Competencies

Patient Care

Professionalism Knowledge

Communication

Practice Based Learning

System Based Practice

Singh 07

Safety Transcends all Competencies

(4)

Safety is a fundamental Safety is a fundamental

system property.

system property.

Without safety there can Without safety there can

be no

be no quality quality of care of care

IOM IOM

Patient Safety Is

“freedom from accidental injury due to medical care

or medical error” © Gurdev Singh 2007

(5)

And then there are other adverse Events!!

US Hea

lthca re

The The

(US(US))

National Burden of National Burden of Systemic Systemic Errors in Errors in the Health Care

the Health Care

© Gurdev Singh 2007

1.5 Million/year

Incidents of Harm

2-5 Jumbo jets of the Health Care

Industry drop out of the sky every day

(Analogy after Leape: the Safety Guru of USA)

Singh 07

(6)

$5,635 2231

1886 2996

3003

$2903

Health Expend./Capita

1

6

3 5

4

Equity

2

3

6

2 1

5

Efficiency

4

5

3

2 1

6

Timeliness

4

4

6

2 1

5

Patient-centeredness

3

5

1

6 3

2

Effectiveness

4

1

6

3 2

5

Patient Safety

4

3 6

2 1

5 4

Overall Ranking

UK

USA

NZ GER

CAN AUS

International Rankings and National Health Expenditure

(Through Patient’s Lens)

Source: The Commonwealth Fund : 2006.

$7600

?

Singh 07

(7)

Congressional Budget Office Head, Peter Orszag: Times Nov 08

Our Goal

Singh 08

(8)

Congressional Budget Office Head, Peter Orszag: Times Nov 08

Our Goal

If this is not a MAJOR National Disaster my name is not gurdev

Singh 08

(9)

Singh: Jan 09

Singh 07

(10)

Singh: Jan 09

This constitutes nearly 50% of the surgical “Never Events”

Wrong body part : 30%

Wrong procedure : 16%

Wrong patient: 4% CMS press release 2006 (Minnesota Study)

COST About 20Billion/yr

Singh 07

(11)

March 7-13 March 7-13

Patient Safety Awareness Week

Singh 10

(12)

Fear Fear

Scherkenbach’s Cycle of Fear, 1991

R and G Singh

Currently we live in

(13)

Fear Fear

Kill the messenger

(denial; shift the blame)

Scherkenbach’s Cycle of Fear, 1991

R and G Singh

Currently we live in

(14)

Fear Fear

Kill the messenger

(denial; shift the blame)

Filter the data

(game the system)

Scherkenbach’s Cycle of Fear, 1991

R and G Singh

Currently we live in

(15)

Fear Fear

Kill the messenger

(denial; shift the blame)

Filter the data

(game the system)

Micromanage

(Barking up the wrong tree)

Scherkenbach’s Cycle of Fear, 1991

R and G Singh

Currently we live in

(16)

Fear Fear

Kill the messenger

(denial; shift the blame)

Filter the data

(game the system)

Micromanage

(Barking up the wrong tree)

Scherkenbach’s Cycle of Fear, 1991

R and G Singh

Currently we live in

(17)

Singh

“From January to May, I work for the government to pay for my income tax and from May to October to pay for my

malpractice insurance”

(18)

There are increasing calls There are increasing calls

for Error Disclosure from for Error Disclosure from

various directions various directions

with increasing disclosure with increasing disclosure

protection protection

Singh

(19)

Background

Current culture of blame and non-disclosureIdeal culture of safety with open disclosure

Ethical principles

What do patients want?

What do physicians think?

Risks and Benefits of Disclosure

A practical approach to disclosure

Conclusions

Overview

Singh 10

(20)

Background

1/3

• Errors are common

• Harm sometimes occurs – it is preventable

System problems are usually at the root

• Humans are often unfairly blamed

– To err is human

• Current culture is conducive to hiding errors to avoid repercussions

• When errors are hidden we cannot learn from them

Singh 10

(21)

Chart Test Log

Clerk Report

Doctor’s In-Box

Doctor

Lab Patient

Doctor

Patient Lab Slip

Specimen collection

Example: System for ordering labs and obtaining results (a small sub-system!)

To be filed

(22)

Background

2/3

• When errors are hidden we cannot learn from them

– We need to change the culture !!

• In a Culture of Safety:

– People are able to discuss errors openly without fear of repercussions

– Attention is focused on faulty systems rather than blaming individuals for all problems

– This includes disclosing errors to patients and families where appropriate

Singh 10

FearFear

Kill the messenger

(denial; shift the blame)

Filter the data

(game the system)

Micromanage

(Barking up the wrong tree)

Scherkenbach’s Cycle of Fear, 1991

R and G Singh

Currently we live in

(23)

Background

3/3

Disclosing errors to patients and families

How can we decide whether it is appropriate to disclose or not?

Singh 10

(24)

Ethical Principles

that can guide our disclosure decisions

*Beneficence

*Beneficence – – act in the best interests of act in the best interests of the patient

the patient

* * Nonmaleficence Nonmaleficence - - do no harm do no harm

*Patient Autonomy

*Patient Autonomy – – protect and foster a protect and foster a patient's free,

patient's free, uncoerced uncoerced choices choices

*Justice

*Justice – – fairness of healthcare in society fairness of healthcare in society

Singh 10

(25)

If it’s often the “right thing to do”

why not just do it?

Singh 10

(26)

Singh 10

(27)

Singh

“From January to May, I work for the government to pay for my income tax and from May to October to pay for my

malpractice insurance”

(28)

What do patients want?

1/3

Gallagher et al JAMA 2003 289(8)1001-7

Patients wanted disclosure of all harmful errors and information about:

*What happened

*Why the error happened

*How the error's consequences will be mitigated

*How recurrences will be prevented.

NOTE: they don’t want to know who’s fault it is

Patients also desired emotional support, saying that they would be less upset if the physician:

*Talked honestly

*Showed compassion

*Apologized

Qualitative study (13 focus groups of patients/physicians)

Singh 10

(29)

What do patients want?

2/

Schwappach Int J Qual H Care 2004 16(4):317-26

• Internet survey 1017 citizens of Germany

• In cases with a severe outcome, if the physician was:

– Honest – Empathic

– Accountable

• Then, there was a 59% decrease in support for strong sanctions (e.g., lawsuits) against the physician

Singh 10

(30)

What do patients want ?

3/3

Witman et al Arch Int Med 1996 156:2565-2569.

• 149 outpatients at an academic medicine clinic

• 98% wanted to be informed, even of a minor error

• For errors of various severities, patients reported that if they were informed of the error by the physician (vs. finding out from another source) then they were:

Error of Moderate Severity – Less likely to change doctors (60 vs. 92%)

– Less likely to report the physician (23 vs. 52%) – Less likely to file a lawsuit (12 vs. 20%)

Singh 10

(31)

Why do people sue?

1/2

• Of course, every case is different.

• Studies have shown that there is little, if any, correlation between quality of care and

likelihood of malpractice claims.

– Many suits are filed even when no lapse in quality has take place.

– In cases where medical negligence has taken place, only a small minority of patients or families file suit (perhaps as low as 3%)

• So, why do people sue??

Singh 10

(32)

Why do people sue?

2/2

Hickson et al JAMA 1992;268(11):1413-4

Interviewed 127 mothers who had sued due to perinatal injuries to their infants.

• Reasons for filing suit included:

– Advised to sue by knowledgeable acquaintance (33%)

– Recognized a cover-up (24%) – Needed money (24%)

– Needed information (20%)

– Wanted to protect others from harm (19%)

• Respondents believed that their physician(s):

– Tried to mislead them (48%) – Did not talk openly (32%)

– Did not listen (13%)

Singh 10

(33)

What do physicians think?

Gallagher et al JAMA 2003 289(8)1001-7

• Qualitative Study

• Physicians agreed that harmful errors should be disclosed but

– "choose their words carefully" when telling patients about errors.

– often avoided stating that an error occurred, why the error happened, or how recurrences would be prevented.

• Physicians were upset when errors occurred and expressed a desire to apologize but

worried that an apology might create legal liability.

Singh 10

(34)

Benefits to the Patient

*Opportunity to receive corrective treatment

*Opportunity to receive corrective treatment

*Helps them to make informed decisions

*Helps them to make informed decisions

*Promotes trust in the physician

*Promotes trust in the physician

*Alleviates worry

*Alleviates worry – why did that happen to me?why did that happen to me?

*Acknowledges fallibility

*Acknowledges fallibility – encourages patient to take greater encourages patient to take greater responsibility for their own care

responsibility for their own care

*Opportunity to receive fair compensation

*Opportunity to receive fair compensation

Benefits to the Physician Benefits to the Physician

May be less likely to be sued May be less likely to be sued

*If sued, the fact that you disclosed may help your case

*If sued, the fact that you disclosed may help your case

*May help alleviate stress

*May help alleviate stress

*Fulfills your moral obligation to tell the truth

*Fulfills your moral obligation to tell the truth

Benefits and Risks of Disclosure

1/2

Singh 10

(35)

Benefits and Risks of Disclosure

2/2

• Risks to the Patient

– Anxiety / Confusion (but pt’s in Gallagher’s study did not report this)

– Loss of trust in the system

These risks may justify non-disclosure of inconsequential errors

• Risks to the Physician

– Risk of being sued (if the patient wouldn’t otherwise know about the error)

– Risk of disciplinary action – Possible loss of reputation – Loss of patients

Singh 10

(36)

Joint Commission Requirement

(Endorsed by most Patient Safety and Risk Management organizations)

• As a requirement of Joint Commission

certification, hospitals must develop policies on disclosure of unanticipated outcomes to patients/families.

• Disclosure only required for unanticipated outcomes – ie when there is harm

• Don’t have to disclose an error if no harm results

• But:

– Does this meet the ethical standard?

– Who is to decide what harm is?...

Singh 10

(37)

Was there harm

• Differing perceptions of harm.

• Is it harm if –

– Treatment is delayed slightly?

– Hospital stay is prolonged?

– Patient undergoes unnecessary tests?

– Patient has to incur additional costs?

– Hospital or health plan has to incur additional costs?

• Harm may not be apparent until after discharge.

– Therefore the patient may need to be informed of warning signs for potential harm.

• These and other practical issues need

to be resolved

?

Singh 10

(38)

• As a student – do nothing by yourself !

• If you discover an error:

– Inform your supervisor(s)

– Discuss possible disclosure options – Ultimately the physician has to decide

whether to disclose and what to say

What should

I say?

Singh 10

(39)

• As a physician

– If no or mild harm

• Consider informing (weigh the risks and benefits)

– If significant harm

• Consult with risk management / malpractice carrier

• Consider informing (weigh the risks and benefits)

– If you decide to disclose:

• What should you say?

What should I say?

Singh 10

(40)

Singh 10

(41)

Singh 10

(42)

Error disclosure protocol:

1/6

Consider doing the following (in a timely fashion):

(after weighing up the risks and benefits)

1. Acknowledge the error 2. Apologize and empathize 3. Accept some responsibility

4. Commit to investigate & prevent 5. Set the tone

6. Address adverse consequences 7. Address any other concerns

8. Arrange follow-up

Singh 10

(43)

Error disclosure protocol:

2/6

1. Set the tone

in person

eye-level

private & respectful

consider participants

check comfort

allow time for the patient/family to react to what you say

listen

Singh 10

(44)

Error disclosure protocol:

3/6

2. Acknowledge the error

Be direct

Use words such as “error” or “mistake”

“I think you received the wrong medication by mistake”

“You are right - you were supposed to get the MRI today. Sounds like an error was made.”

Singh 10

(45)

Error disclosure protocol:

4/6

3. Apologize

and

empathize

“I’m sorry that this happened to you”

is not an admission of guilt it’s not a true apology either!

“I certainly understand your anger about the unnecessary delay in your discharge”

an expression of empathy

“I’m sorry I made a mistake”

is a true apology

however, it is an admission of guilt – may create legal liability in some states

may be premature (most harm is multi-factorial and involves system failures)

Singh 10

(46)

Error disclosure protocol:

5/6

4. Accept some responsibility

for the error and its consequences

If you are sure it was your error, consider saying so:

“It was my mistake. I forgotten to write the order.”

[Note that this can create legal liability]

If it is possible you may have contributed to the error, consider saying so:

“I’m not sure how this happened. I may have written the wrong order, or maybe it was illegible, or maybe someone else made a mistake in following the orders.”

Don’t be too sure about your personal responsibility

without some pause for reflection and supervision. Guilt can influence your words.

Singh 10

(47)

Error disclosure protocol:

6/6

5. Commit to investigate and prevent

Commit to investigate the error to find its causes

Commit to inform the patient of the findings

Commit to attempt to prevent the error from happening again

6. Address adverse consequences

Screen & work up as needed

Educate/advise patient as needed

7. Address any other concerns 8. Arrange Follow-up

Singh 10

(48)

Tips for

Tips for safe safe disclosure disclosure

Don Don ’ ’ t be evasive t be evasive

*Make yourself available

*Make yourself available

*Don’*Don’t say t say ““No commentNo comment”

Don Don ’ ’ t jump to conclusions prematurely t jump to conclusions prematurely – – some some questions require further investigation before questions require further investigation before

they can be answered. Say that you are not sure they can be answered. Say that you are not sure

rather than blaming someone else or denying rather than blaming someone else or denying

responsibility immediately.

responsibility immediately.

Don Don ’ ’ t use jargon t use jargon – – the patient may think you are the patient may think you are trying to confuse them.

trying to confuse them.

Don Don ’ ’ t promise something unless you can deliver. t promise something unless you can deliver.

Singh 10

(49)

Conclusions - Theory

• Ethical arguments in favor of full and honest

disclosure of all errors, regardless of harm caused, are widely recognized.

• JC requires that errors be disclosed if harm occurs.

• Most patients desire full disclosure and an apology.

• Fear of litigation makes many physicians feel uncomfortable disclosing information and

apologizing.

• The desire to find out what happened, and to

prevent recurrence are the cause of many lawsuits.

• Disclosure may decrease the risk of litigation since it helps to meet these needs – further studies are needed.

Singh 10

(50)

Conclusions

-

Practice

• Don’t despair (it’s not all doom and gloom!)

– Most errors have relatively mild effects

• as a physician, errors will happen in your practice but you can manage them effectively if you

communicate well with your patients

– For errors that cause serious harm

• you are not alone

• help is available

Singh 10

(51)

Final Thought

“Treat other people the way you would want to be treated.”

Singh 10

(52)

Thanks Thanks

and from

and from Ranjit Ranjit Singh Singh

Singh 10

(53)

Singh 10

References

Related documents

Proposition 2: manufacturers with simultaneous production of private labels and manufacturer's brands will consider as competitive priorities, in order of importance:

We use governance indices over the time period for 1999-2004 -- a period of rapid improvement in Russian corporate governance -- and verify that the link between an overall

The unit price for Conc Barrier Ending, Temp, Relocated includes the cost of moving temporary concrete barrier longitudinally on the same roadbed, or to another roadbed

In addition to and without limitation of any other limitation of liability of FairPoint or its affiliated companies set forth in an applicable contract or tariff,

Interest rates do fall upon impact of expansionary fiscal policy and rise above the steady state after 15 quarters while it falls and remains below the

Jerzy Merkisz, Marek Idzior, MACIEJ BAJERLEIN, Paweł Daszkiewicz, Paweł Stobnicki Analysis of the possibility of using rape seed oil in terms of supply and emission. of toxic

This paper has addressed three interrelated themes with the hope of contributing to a critical understanding of the dynamics in contemporary political economy in which the

The primary scheme shall provide communications-assisted, high-speed simultaneous tripping of all line terminals at speeds that will provide fault clearing times for system