• No results found

A Note on Open Support of a Graph under Addition I

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A Note on Open Support of a Graph under Addition I"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A Note on Open Support of a Graph under

Addition I

1S. Balamurugan , 2M. Anitha , 3P. Aristotle , 4C. Karnan 1

PG Department of Mathematics,

Government Arts College, Melur - 625 106, Tamilnadu, India.

2

Department of Mathematics

Syed Ammal Arts and Science College, Ramanathapuram, Tamilnadu, India.

3

Department of Mathematics,

SACS MAVMM Engineering College, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India.

4

Department of Mathematics

The Optimus Public School, Erode - 638 455

Abstract

In this paper we defined an open support of a vertex 𝑣 under addition and open support of a graph G under addition. We calculate the open support for some standard graphs.

AMS Subject Code: 05C07

Keywords: Vertex Degree, Open Support of a Vertex, Open Support of a Graph

I. INTRODUCTION

In this work we consider finite, undirected, simple graphs 𝐺 = (𝑉, 𝐸) with 𝑛 vertices and 𝑚 edges. The neighbourhood of a vertex 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉(𝐺) is the set 𝑁𝐺(𝑣) of all the vertices adjacent to 𝑣 in 𝐺. For a set

𝑋 ⊆ 𝑉(𝐺), the open neighbourhood𝑁𝐺(𝑋) is defined to be ∪𝑣∈𝑋𝑁𝐺(𝑣) and the closed neighbourhood 𝑁𝐺[𝑋] =

𝑁𝐺(𝑋) ∪ 𝑋. The degree of a vertex 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉(𝐺) is the number of edges of 𝐺 incident with 𝑣 and is denoted by

𝑑𝑒𝑔𝐺(𝑣) or 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣). The maximum and the minimum degrees of the vertices of 𝐺 are respectively denoted by

Δ(𝐺) and 𝛿(𝐺). A vertex of a degree 0 in 𝐺 is called an isolated vertex and a vertex of degree 1 is called a

pendent vertex or an end vertex of 𝐺. A vertex of a graph 𝐺 is said to be a vertex of full degree if it is adjacent to all other vertices in 𝐺. A graph 𝐺 is said to be regular of degree 𝑟 if every vertex of 𝐺 has degree 𝑟. Such graphs are called r-regular graphs.

A open support of a vertex, v under addition is defined by 𝑢∈𝑁(𝑣)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑢) and it is denoted by

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣). A open support of a graph, G under addition is defined by 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣) and it is denoted by

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺).

II. DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLE

Definition 2.1. Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A open support of a vertex, v under addition is defined by 𝑢∈𝑁(𝑣)𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑢) and it is denoted by 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣).

Definition 2.2. Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A open support of a graph, G under addition is defined by

𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣) and it is denoted by 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺).

Example 2.3

In the graph 𝐺, 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣1) = 3; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣2) = 2; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣3) = 3; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣4) = 2; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣5) = 5; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣6) =

2; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣7) = 2; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣8) = 3;

Also, s𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣1) = 10; 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣2) = 6; 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣3) = 9; 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣4) = 8; 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣5) = 13; 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣6) =

(2)

III. RESULTS

Theorem 3.1.Let 𝐺 = 𝑃𝑛(𝑛 > 1). Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑃𝑛) = 4𝑛 − 6.

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝑃𝑛 be a path with 𝑛 vertices. Let 𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛} and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣1) = 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑛) = 1;

𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 2 for all 𝑖 = 2,3, … , 𝑛 − 1. Then

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣1) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣1)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣2)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣1) = 2

Similarly,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛) = 2.

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣2) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣2)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣1) + 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣3)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣2) = 3

Similarly,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛−1) = 3.

For each 𝑖 = 3,4, … , 𝑛 − 2,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖−1) + 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖+1)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 4.

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣1) + 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣2) + 𝑛−2𝑖=3 ‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) + 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛−1) + 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛)

= 2 + 3 + 𝑛−2‍

𝑖=3 (4) + 3 + 2

= 10 + 4(𝑛 − 4) 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 4𝑛 − 6.

Theorem 3.2 Let 𝐺 = 𝐶𝑛. Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐶𝑛) = 4𝑛.

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐶𝑛 be a cycle of order 𝑛. Let 𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛} and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 2 for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛.

Then

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 4.

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 4 + 4 + ⋯ + 4 (𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠) 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 4𝑛.

Theorem 3.3 Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑛. Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛 − 1)2.

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑛 be a complete graph with 𝑛 vertices. Let 𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛} and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑛 − 1 for all

𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛. Then

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍(𝑛 − 1)

= (𝑛 − 1)(𝑛 − 1) 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = (𝑛 − 1)2

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍(𝑛 − 1)2

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛 − 1)2

Theorem 3.4.Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑚,𝑛. Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑚𝑛(𝑚 + 𝑛).

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑚 ,𝑛 be a complete bipartite graph with the bipartition (𝑋, 𝑌) where 𝑋 = {𝑥1, 𝑥2, … , 𝑥𝑚} and

𝑌 = {𝑦1, 𝑦2, … , 𝑦𝑚}. Then 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑥𝑖) = 𝑛 for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑚 and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑦𝑗) = 𝑚 for all 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑛.

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑥𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑥𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑣∈𝑌‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑣∈𝑌‍𝑚

(3)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑦𝑗) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑦𝑗)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑣∈𝑋‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑣∈𝑋‍𝑛

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑦𝑗) = 𝑚𝑛,for all𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑛.

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑥∈𝑋‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑥) + 𝑦∈𝑌‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑦)

= 𝑥∈𝑋‍𝑚𝑛 + 𝑦∈𝑌‍𝑚𝑛

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑚𝑛(𝑚 + 𝑛)

Corollary 3.5.Let 𝐺 = 𝐾1,𝑛. Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛 + 1).

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐾1,𝑛 be a star graph. Put 𝑚 = 1 in theorem 3.4, we get 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛 + 1).

Theorem 3.6 Let 𝐺 = 𝑊𝑛(𝑛 ≥ 4). Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑊𝑛) = (𝑛 − 1)(𝑛 + 8).

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝑊𝑛 be a wheel of order 𝑛. Let 𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑣0, 𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛−1} and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣0) = 𝑛 − 1; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 3

for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛 − 1. Then

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣0) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣0)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 3 + 3 + ⋯ + 3 (𝑛 − 1 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠) = 3(𝑛 − 1)

For each 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛 − 1,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 3 + 3 + (𝑛 − 1) 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 5 + 𝑛.

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣0) + 𝑛−1𝑖=1 ‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖)

= 3(𝑛 − 1) + (𝑛 − 1)(5 + 𝑛) 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = (𝑛 − 1)(𝑛 + 8).

Theorem 3.7 Let 𝐺 = 𝐹𝑛(𝑛 ≥ 4). Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐹𝑛) = (𝑛 − 2)(𝑛 + 9).

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐹𝑛 be a fan of order 𝑛. Let 𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑣0, 𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛−1} and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣0) = 𝑛 − 1; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣1) =

𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑛−1) = 2;𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 3 for all 𝑖 = 2,3, … , 𝑛 − 2. Then

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣0) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣0)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣1+ 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣𝑛−1+ 𝑛−2𝑖=2 ‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖)

= 2 + 2 + 3(𝑛 − 3) = 3𝑛 − 5

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣1) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣1)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣0+ 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣2

= 𝑛 − 1 + 3 = 𝑛 + 2

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛−1) = 𝑛 + 2

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣2) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣2)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣0+ 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣1+ 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣3

= 𝑛 − 1 + 2 + 3 = 𝑛 + 4

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛−2) = 𝑛 + 4.

For each 𝑖 = 3,4, … , 𝑛 − 3,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣𝑖−1+ 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣𝑖+1+ 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑣0

= 3 + 3 + (𝑛 − 1) 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑛 + 5.

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣0) + 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣1) + 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛−1) + 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑛−2) + 𝑛−3𝑖=3 ‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖)

(4)

Theorem 3.8 Let 𝐺 = 𝐷𝑟,𝑠(2 ≤ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑠). Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑟(𝑟 + 1) + 𝑠(𝑠 + 1) − 2.

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐷𝑟,𝑠(2 ≤ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑠) be a double star with 𝑟 + 𝑠 vertices. Let

𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑟−1, 𝑢1, 𝑢2, … , 𝑢𝑠−1} such that 𝑥𝑣𝑖∈ 𝐸(𝐺) and 𝑦𝑢𝑗 ∈ 𝐸(𝐺) for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟 − 1

and 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠 − 1. Then 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑥) = 𝑟; 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑦) = 𝑠 and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑢𝑖) = 1 for all 𝑖, 𝑗.

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑥) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑥)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑦) + 𝑟−1‍

𝑖=1 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑥) = 𝑠 + 𝑟 − 1

Similarly,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑦) = 𝑠 + 𝑟 − 1.

and

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑥)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝 𝑣𝑖 = 𝑟,for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟 − 1

Similarly,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝 𝑢𝑗 = 𝑠,for all 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠 − 1

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑥) + 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑦) + 𝑟−1‍

𝑖=1 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) + 𝑠−1𝑗 =1‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑗)

= 𝑟 + 𝑠 − 1 + 𝑟 + 𝑠 − 1 + (𝑟 − 1)𝑟 + (𝑠 − 1)𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑟(𝑟 + 1) + 𝑠(𝑠 + 1) − 2.

Theorem 3.9 Let 𝐺 = 𝐶𝑛+(𝑛 ≥ 3). Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 10𝑛.

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐶𝑛+(𝑛 ≥ 3) be a corona with 2𝑛 vertices. Let 𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛, 𝑢1, 𝑢2, … , 𝑢𝑛} such that

𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 3 and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑢𝑖) = 1 for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛.

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑢𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖) = 3

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 7

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑛 ‍

𝑖=1𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) + 𝑛𝑖=1‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖)

= 3𝑛 + 7𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 10𝑛.

Theorem 3.10 Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑛+. Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛2+ 1).

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑛+ be a corona of order 2𝑛. Let 𝑉(𝐺) = {𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛, 𝑢1, 𝑢2, … , 𝑢𝑛} such that 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑛and

𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑢𝑖) = 1 for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛.

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑢𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖) = 𝑛

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑛(𝑛 − 1) + 1 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑛2− 𝑛 + 1

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑛 ‍

𝑖=1𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) + 𝑛𝑖=1‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖)

= 𝑛 ‍

𝑖=1𝑛2− 𝑛 + 1 + 𝑛

= 𝑛 ‍

𝑖=1𝑛2+ 1

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛2+ 1).

Theorem 3.11 Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑚(𝑎1, 𝑎2, … , 𝑎𝑚). Then 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛2+ 1).

Proof: Let 𝐺 = 𝐾𝑚(𝑎1, 𝑎2, … , 𝑎𝑚) be a multistar graph of order 𝑚 + 𝑎1+ 𝑎2+ ⋯ + 𝑎𝑚. Let 𝑉(𝐺) =

{𝑣1, 𝑣2, … , 𝑣𝑛, 𝑢1, 𝑢2, … , 𝑢𝑛} such that 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑛and 𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑢𝑖) = 1 for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛.

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑢𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

(5)

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑣∈𝑁(𝑣𝑖)‍𝑑𝑒𝑔(𝑣)

= 𝑛(𝑛 − 1) + 1 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) = 𝑛2− 𝑛 + 1

Now,

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑣∈𝑉(𝐺)‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣)

= 𝑛 ‍

𝑖=1𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑣𝑖) + 𝑛𝑖=1‍𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝑢𝑖)

= 𝑛 ‍

𝑖=1𝑛2− 𝑛 + 1 + 𝑛

= 𝑛 ‍

𝑖=1𝑛2+ 1

𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝(𝐺) = 𝑛(𝑛2+ 1).

REFERENCES

[1] M. Anitha, S. Balamurugan: Strong (Weak) Efficient Open Domination on Product Graphs, International Journal of Pure and

Applied Mathematics, (J.No. 23425), IISN 1311 - 8080, communicated.

[2] R. Balakrishnan, K. Ranganathan, A Textbook of Graph Theory, Springer,2011.

[3] S. Balamurugan, A study on chromatic strong domination in graphs, Ph.D Thesis, Madurai Kamaraj University, India 2008.

[4] J.A. Bondy, U.S.R. Murthy, Graph theory with Applications, North-Holland, 1982.

[5] F. Harary : Graph Theory, Addsion Wesley, Reading, Mass, (1972).

[6] T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi, P. J. Slater: Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Marcel Dekker, New York, (1998).

[7] C. Y. Ponnappan: Studies in Graph Theory Support Strong Domination in Graphs, Ph.D thesis, Madurai Kamaraj University

References

Related documents

According to EcoDistricts (2016), a food desert is a community with more than 20 percent of residents living below the poverty threshold and at least 33 percent of the population

While, incorporation of Fluocinonide – entrapped niosomes from gelling agents resulted in increase in permeated drug from gels through the dorsal rabbit skin

The author acknowledges the contributions of the enlisted men and officers who took part in the Louisiana Maneuvers of 1940 and 1941 and of the citizens and government of the state of

South African curriculum content area: data handling South African curriculum topic: 5.1 Probability Lesson title: Probability, Income Level, and HIV Grade level: 4th grade.

Transmission electron micrographs showing Pt@HNB NPPs after various types of surface modification. (a) As-synthesized,

Focus groups were employed for this research to collect rich, qualitative data from a chosen group of participants to help gain a better understanding of the stigma attached

Those countries in the developing world that have invested in health and education and have provided women access to family planning and reproductive health programs have

The topological spaces τ SV + and τ SV − on SC ( X ) which mentioned in above proposition are called a soft upper Vietoris topological space and a soft lower Vietoris topological