• No results found

Supplementary Material

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Supplementary Material"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

10.1071/FP20298_AC © CSIRO 2021

Supplementary Material: Functional Plant Biology, 2021, 48(5), 469–482.

Supplementary Material

Leaf gas exchange and bean quality fluctuations over the whole canopy vertical profile of Arabic coffee cultivated under elevated CO2

Miroslava RakocevicA,B,F, Eunice R. BatistaB, Ricardo A. A. PazianottoB, Maria B. S. ScholzC,

Guilherme A. R. SouzaA, Eliemar CampostriniA and José C. RamalhoD,E

ANorthern Rio de Janeiro State University – UENF, Plant Physiology Lab, Av. Alberto Lamego 2000,

28013-602 Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ, Brazil.

BEmbrapa Meio Ambiente, Rodovia SP 340 km 127.5, 13820-000 Jaguariúna-SP, Brazil.

CIAPAR, Department of Ecophysiology, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, km 375, PO Box 10030,

86047-902 Londrina-PR, Brazil.

DUniversity of Lisbon, School of Agriculture, Plant Stress and Biodiversity, Forest Research Center,

2784-505 Oeiras, Portugal.

EUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, GeoBioTec, 2829-516

Caparica, Portugal.

(2)

Fig. S1. (A) FACE dispositive with 12 rings, 6 with additional CO2 – e[CO2] (about 550 μL

CO2 L–1), and 6 with current air [CO2] – a[CO2], at 7 ha of C. arabica cv 'Catuaí Vermelho IAC

144' in 2011. View of the ring and canopy structure in April 2016 of one (B) e[CO2] and (C)

(3)

Fig. S2. Dynamics in: (a) average daily air maximum and minimum temperatures (°C) and estimated maximum vapor pressure deficit at midday (VPDmax, KPa), (b) daily rainfall (mm),

(c) daily CO2 under elevated (e[CO2]) and actual (a[CO2]) CO2 treatments (µL CO2 L–1)

registered inside the FACE octagons from January 2016 to May 2016. Only daylight injection

of CO2 was applied when plant CO2 assimilation occurred. Active and reduced coffee growth

seasons are indicated, as the periods of measurements.

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 VP D m ax (KP a) Tem per at ur e ( °C)

T min T max VPD max

a) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Ra in fa lls (m m ) Rain (mm) Reduced growth Active growth b) Measurements Measurements 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 1-Ja n-16 16 -J an -1 6 31 -J an -1 6 15 -F eb -1 6 01 -… 16 -… 31 -… 15 -A pr -1 6 30 -A pr -1 6 15 M ay -1 6 30 M ay -1 6 CO 2 (μ L CO 2 L -1) aCO2 eCO2 c)

(4)

Fig. S3. Leaf net photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (A, μmol m–2 s–1) estimated over the whole-canopy vertical profile of coffee plants (Layer 1 < 50 cm, Layer 2: 51–100 cm, Layer 3: 101–

150 cm, Layer 4 >151 cm) during berry expansion (a, c, e, g) and berry ripening (b, d, f, h).

Plants were cultivated under elevated (e[CO2]) or actual (a[CO2]) atmospheric CO2. Values

represent the mean ± s.e. (n = 8). P-values for the effects of [CO2] and diurnal periods ≤ 0.05

were considered significant and marked in bold. When different, lower case letters indicate

differences between CO2 levels. Upper case letters bellow the x-axis indicate significant

differences between diurnal periods. -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1) Layer 3

PCO2=0.0499; PDiurnal period= 0.0046

B A B a b a b b a c) -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1) Layer 4

Berry expansion a[CO2] e[CO2]

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.5801

a b a b b a A A A a) -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1)

PCO2= 0.2296; PDiurnal period= 0.0847

A A A Layer 2 a a aa a a e) -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1) Layer 3

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.0024

B A B a b a b a b d) -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1) Layer 2

PCO2= 0.2349; PDiurnal period<0.0001

B A B a a a a a a f) -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1)

Berry ripening a[CO2] e[CO2]

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period<0.0001

b a B A B b Layer 4 a b a b) -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1) Layer 1

PCO2= 0.3086; PDiurnal period= 0.0123

B A A g) -1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

A (µ mo l m -2s -1) Layer 1

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.2956

A A A h) -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5

Morning Midday Afternoon a

a a a aa -1.0

-0.5 0.0 0.5

Morning Midday Afternoon a a a a a a Diurnal Period

(5)

Fig. S4. Stomatal conductance (gs, mol m–2 s–1) estimated over the whole-canopy vertical profile of coffee plants (Layer 1 < 50 cm, Layer 2: 51–100 cm, Layer 3: 101–150 cm, Layer 4 >151

cm) during berry expansion (a, c, e, g) and berry ripening (b, d, f, h). Plants were cultivated

under elevated (e[CO2]) or actual (a[CO2]) air CO2. Values represent the mean ± s.e. (n = 8).

P-values for the effects of [CO2] and diurnal periods ≤ 0.05 were considered significant and

marked in bold. When different, lower case letters indicate differences between CO2 levels.

Upper case letters bellow the x-axis indicate significant differences between diurnal periods.

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs (mo l m -2s -1) Layer 4

Berry expansion a[CO2]

e[CO2] PCO2 = 0.9672; PDiurnal period= 0.0026;

PCO2 x Diurnal period= 0.0140

a a b AB A B a a b a) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs (mo l m -2s -1) Layer 3

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.0019

ba B A B ba ba d) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs (mo l m -2s -1) Layer 3

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.0955

a b a b b a A A A c) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs (mo l m -2s -1) Layer 2

PCO2=0.0156; PDiurnal period= 0.6882

b a A A A b a b a e) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs (mo l m -2s -1) Layer 4

Berry ripening a[CO2]

e[CO2] PCO2=0.0046; PDiurnal period<0.0001

a b B A B a b a b b) 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06

Morning Midday Afternoon a b a b ba 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs (mo l m -2s -1) Layer 1

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.0838

b a b a b a A A A g) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs (mo l m -2s -1) Layer 2

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.2662

b a b a b a A A A f) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Morning Midday Afternoon

gs

(mo

l m

-2s -1)

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.999

a b Layer 1 a b b A A A h) a 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03

Morning Midday Afternoon a b a b b a 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03

Morning Midday Afternoon b a b a b a 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

Morning Midday Afternoon b

a

b b

a a

(6)

Fig. S5. Leaf transpiration (E, mmol μmol–1)estimated over the whole-canopy vertical profile of coffee plants (Layer 1 < 50 cm, Layer 2: 51–100 cm, Layer 3: 101–150 cm, Layer 4 >151

cm) during berry expansion (a, c, e, g) and berry ripening (b, d, f, h). Plants were cultivated

under elevated (e[CO2]) or actual (a[CO2]) air CO2. Values represent the mean ± s.e. (n = 8).

P-values for the effects of [CO2] and diurnal periods ≤ 0.05 were considered significant and

marked in bold. When different, lower case letters indicate differences between CO2 levels.

Upper case letters bellow the x-axis indicate significant differences between diurnal periods. 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 3

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.8068

b a b a b a A A A c) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 4

Berry expansion a[CO2]e[CO2]

b a

a

b aa

B A B

PCO2= 0.0002; PDiurnal period= 0.0017;

PCO2 x Diurnal period= 0.0016 a) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 3

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.0011

b a B A B b a b a d) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 4

Berry ripening a[CO2]e[CO2]

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.0001;

PCO2 x Diurnal period = 0.0309

b a b B A B a a b b) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 2

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.3219

a b b a b a A A A e) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 2

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.2237

A A A a b a b a b f) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 1

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.3376

b a a b a b A A A g) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

E (mmo l m -2s -1) Layer 1

PCO2<0.0001; PDiurnal period= 0.999

a

b ba ab

A A A

h)

(7)

Fig. S6. Water use efficiency (WUE, mol mol–1) estimated over the whole-canopy vertical profile of coffee plants (Layer 1 < 50 cm, Layer 2: 51–100 cm, Layer 3: 101–150 cm, Layer 4 >151

cm) during berry expansion (a, c, e, g) and berry ripening (b, d, f, h). Plants were cultivated

under elevated (e[CO2]) or actual (a[CO2]) air CO2. Values represent the mean ± s.e. (n = 8).

P-values for the effects of [CO2] and diurnal periods ≤ 0.05 were considered significant and

marked in bold. When different, lower case letters indicate differences between CO2 levels.

Upper case letters bellow the x-axis indicate significant differences between diurnal periods. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 3

PCO2= 0.0415; PDiurnal period =0.0180

a b B A B a b a b c) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 4

Berry expansion a[CO2]

e[CO2]

PCO2= 0.3910; PDiurnal period= 0.7608

a a A A A a a a a a) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 3

PCO2=0.0008; PDiurnal period= 0.4472

a b A A A b a b a d) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 2

PCO2=0.0146; PDiurnal period= 0.3610

a a b ab b A A A e) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 4

Berry ripening a[CO2]

e[CO2]

PCO2= 0.0284; PDiurnal period<0.0001

b b A B A b a a a b) 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 1

PCO2= 0.9776; PDiurnal period= 0.1342

a aa a A A A a a g) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 2

PCO2=0.0123; PDiurnal period= 0.0015

b a B A B b a b a f) 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0

Morning Midday Afternoon

W UE (mmo l mo l -1) Layer 1

PCO2= 0.1218; PDiurnal period= 0.2873

a a a a a a A A A h) Diurnal Period 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1

Morning Midday Afternoon a a a a a a 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Morning Midday Afternoon a

a a aa

References

Related documents

The core of the pipeline includes input of tumor mutation data, sequencing analysis of somatic mutations, tabulation of somatic var- iants, significance test of driver genes

S6 - Delivery South Korea-Japan range for a trip via Australia of 45/50 days, redelivery India, 5% commission total, laycan 5/10 days in advance.. Route S6 does NOT form part of

The purpose of this study was to develop a childhood eating disorder outcome scale associated with BMI-SDS. Inclusion criteria were: aged under 16 years, having ab- normal eating

The enzymatic activity of TETs was impaired in EBV(LMP1)-positive cell lines (NP460hTERT-EBV, HK1-EBV, and C666-1), and was restored in LMP1-knockdown cells (C666-1 shLMP1)

 If the patient’s family or bystanders request or demand resuscitation for a patient for whom the DNR Comfort Care Protocol has been activated, do not proceed with

Molina is inspired by Goethe’s Color Theory and the idea that on the border between light and darkness is where colors are born.. Goethe called these “border colors” and placed

This paper describes how the Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) Libraries (the Libraries) and Penn State’s central IT organization, Information Technology Services (ITS),

The breeding biology of tree frog, Polypedates teraiensis was studied during the breeding season at Mizoram University Campus.. It was found that sound produc- tion by