• No results found

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Title Telephone System Upgrade

LRFP Number 105.13.01

Project Manager Gregory Dixon

Submittal Deadline June 7, 2013 5:00 pm

Award Announcement June 21, 2013

Submit Proposals to:

Gregory Dixon, PWSRCAC Financial Manager

Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council 3709 Spenard Road, Suite 100

Anchorage, AK 99503

or deliver in person by 5:00 pm on June 7, 2013.

To verify receipt of proposal, proposer must contact Gregory Dixon before the submittal deadline.

Proposal submission requirements:

To assure consideration, three copies of your proposal must be received by Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) by the deadline. Proposals received after the deadline may be considered but only if they can be accommodated by PWSRCAC’s review process. Additional information provided after the deadline may also be considered but only if such information can be accommodated by the review process.

(2)

Inquiries regarding this request for proposals shall be directed to the project manager named above via email to: dixon.gregory@pwsrcac.org.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

The Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) is inviting proposals to purchase a telephone system for its Anchorage office. The final work product of this effort will be the installation of an upgraded telephone system, a training session on the system’s use and a contract for ongoing service and maintenance.

ABOUT PWSRCAC

MISSION STATEMENT: Citizens promoting environmentally safe operation of the Alyeska terminal and associated tankers.

PWSRCAC was formed following the Exxon Valdez oil spill to advise Alyeska Pipeline Service Company and the public on issues related to oil spill prevention and response and mitigating the environmental impacts of terminal and tanker operations. PWSRCAC also advises oil shippers, regulatory agencies and elected officials on these issues.

PWSRCAC's membership comprises communities affected by the Exxon Valdez oil spill and interest groups with a stake in safe oil transportation in the region. PWSRCAC's 19 member organizations are communities and boroughs impacted by the 1989 Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, as well as Native, commercial fishing, aquaculture, recreation, tourism and environmental representatives.

PWSRCAC was chartered as a non-profit corporation by the State of Alaska on December 26, 1989. PWSRCAC is funded under a contract with Alyeska, and is certified as the alternative voluntary advisory group for Prince William Sound under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA90).

Please note: All of PWSRCAC's products and the products resulting from contracts are considered public information. Proposals and work plans may be distributed throughout the organization for review and comment. Proprietary information should not be submitted in any proposal.

PWSRCAC will not knowingly reveal the contents of a proposal that is not subsequently accepted for contract; however, PWSRCAC accepts no liability should such contents inadvertently be

(3)

1. PROJECT INTRODUCTION

PWSRCAC currently uses a digital NEC Electra Elite IPK multiline telephone system consisting of one administrative console, fourteen desk telephones and two analog

Polycom sound stations. We wish to replace or upgrade the existing system to allow more compatibility with office computers and our email system.

GOALS and DELIVERABLES

We expect to complete the selection and installation of an office-wide telephone system by or about June 30, 2013.

DESCRIPTION of REQUESTED WORK

Technical requirements include but are not limited to:

1. Automated attendant to answer or forward calls when administrative console is unattended by staff

2. Voice messaging/customized messages for storage of voice messages from callers

3. Speed dial numbers programmed for all PWSRCAC staff and other frequently called numbers

4. Programming for automatic redial of last number called 5. Call hold/park/transfer/pickup

6. Microphone/speaker/internal paging/conference capabilities on each phone 7. Display on each phone of other lines in use

8. Display of date, time, caller, caller # and elapsed time of calls on each phone 9. System administrator training for configuring new users, features, etc.

10.Options for additional services that will enhance the functionality of the phone system (for example, interfacing with Office 365/Exchange email system) 11.Other common features used in a business environment

12.Maintenance of equipment and service needs

Schedule and Completion Date

Award Announcement: June 21, 2013 Work to be completed by June 30, 2013

(4)

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

PWSRCAC Costs. PWSRCAC is not liable for any costs incurred by the proposer during the proposal preparation.

Single Point of Contact. The contractor will designate one person as the project manager and point of contact with PWSRCAC.

Subcontracts. Proposers may subcontract minor portions of the contract. However, the proposer must have the major elements of expertise in house and demonstrate the ability to manage the subcontractor.

Final Payment. A portion of the total payment to the contractor will be withheld until all requirements are met. No interest will be paid on any withheld payments

3. REQUIRED PROPOSAL CONTENTS

Any submitted proposal shall include the following as appropriate to the requirements of the scope of work:

Cover Sheet

 Name, address, telephone number and facsimile number of proposer.

 RFP Title and Number

 Cost of Proposal

Table of Contents. May include a list of Tables and Figures if appropriate.

Introduction. Thissection shall include the RFP title and number, brief general discussion of the proposed project. Technical terms shall be clearly defined and a list of pertinent enclosures included.

Goals and Deliverables. Describe how the proposer intends to provide the deliverables of the work requested, as listed above.

(5)

Project Duration and Work Schedule. Describe the schedule in which the proposed work will be completed.

Budget. Include information about the total costs (cited in U.S. Dollars), professional fees, expenses and contingencies, hardware costs and installation fees.

4. SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION PROCESS

A. Evaluation Criteria. Proposals will be evaluated based on, but not limited to, the following:

1) Proposal Format. Does the proposal follow the requested format?

2) Proposed Scope of Work. Does the proposal clearly address the requested scope of work?

3) Technical Approach. Is the proposed approach to the scope of work technically feasible?

4) Schedule. Is the proposed schedule for completion of the scope of work in accordance with the requested project duration and schedule?

5) Deliverables. Are the proposed deliverables in accordance with the deliverables requested in the scope of work?

6) Budget and Cost Justification. Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested?

B. Contract Award. The successful proposal will be the one that, in PWSRCAC sole opinion, best meets the needs as outlined in this RFP. In the event that PWSRCAC determines that no proposal completely meets all of the needs as outlined in the RFP, PWSRCAC shall have the option not to accept any proposal or enter into any contract whatsoever. In the alternative, PWSRCAC may select the proposal or proposals that, in its sole view, most nearly conform to its needs as outlined in this RFP; and then negotiate directly with that contractor to refine the proposal to achieve a contract that fully satisfies PWSRCAC needs.

References

Related documents

Mid-market Sales at The Hartford moderated the discussions with Jim Robison, Principal of White Oak Advisors; Phil Callahan, Managing Director, Investment

The Military Sports Wages Grant (MSWG) is provided to unit Fitness and Sports Directors by CFMWS/CPSP to provide funding for hiring additional staff in support of the

Not only it lessens the supply of child labour by raising non-child labour (adult wage) income of the poor families but also lowers the demand for child

Given the drawbacks within [1] [6] and [7] Popa et al. [22] decided to attack the problem from another direction. Instead of attempting to create another OPE scheme, of which

The current situation for oceanic traffic on the OTS shows that aircraft often follow routes which are not optimal in terms of flow management from an overall ATC point of view [3],

KIPP Chapter 19 The Effect of Shock Pressure and Temperature on theM. Deformation Microstructure of

Benefits are not provided for services or materials arising from: Orthoptic or vision training, subnormal vision aids and any associated supplemental testing; Aniseikonic lenses;

In a recent market analysis, IDC estimated that “dependent” access points – where most network management and other functions are dependent on a centralized controller such as the