• No results found

Why Construction Workers are Getting Electrocuted

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Why Construction Workers are Getting Electrocuted"

Copied!
27
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Why Construction

Workers are Getting

Electrocuted

Michael McCann, PhD, CIH

Director of Safety and Ergonomics

The Center to Protect Workers’ Rights

(2)

Causes of Death in Construction,

1992-98

Other Fires/explosions due to arc flashes

Contact with electric current Contact with objects and equipment Transportation incidents

Falls

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% % of deaths

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data 2,304 deaths 2,029 deaths 1,406 deaths 1,006 deaths 17 deaths 727 deaths Total deaths: 7,489

(3)

Types of Electrical Injury

Electrical Shock

Electrical Burns

Arc-Flash Burns

Arc Blast

Falls

Fire

(4)

Causes of Construction

Electrocutions, 1992-98

U n k n o w n c a u s e B u r i e d , u n d e r g r o u n d p o w e r l i n e s L i g h t n i n g E n e r g i z e d o b j e c t s A p p l i a n c e s a n d m a c h i n e r y L i g h t F i x t u r e s E l e c t r i c a l w i r i n g E l e c t r i c a l e q u i p m e n t O v e r h e a d p o w e r l i n e s 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 3 %4 % 1 %2 % 5 % 9 % 8 % 3 % 1 0 % 1 4 % 2 % 1 8 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 5 % 3 1 % 5 6 % E l e c t r i c a l W o r k e r s : 3 2 9 d e a t h s N o n - e l e c t r i c a l W o r k e r s : 6 7 7 d e a t h s % o f d e a t h s S o u r c e : U . S . B u r e a u o f L a b o r S t a t is t ic s d a t a

(5)

Over half of electrocutions

of electrical workers were

due to working on or near

live parts

(6)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, 1992-98

Electrocutions Among Electrical Workers

from Direct Contact with Electrical

Equipment, 1992-98

Electrical equipment (68 deaths)

¾ electrical control panels (16 deaths)

¾ switching gear (14 deaths)

¾ transformers (13 deaths)

¾ circuit breakers/fuse holders (8 deaths)

¾ junction boxes (5 deaths)

¾ other (12 deaths)

Electrical wiring (59 deaths)

Light fixtures (29 deaths)

¾ 3/4 building light fixtures

¾ others: airport runway lights neon signs,

street lights

(7)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, 1992-98

Other Causes of Electrocutions

of Electrical Workers , 1992-98

Contact with energized objects (29 deaths)

¾ accidentally cutting energized wires (10 deaths)

¾ energizing wires by contact with energized wires (7 deaths)

¾ deliberately cutting or stripping energized wires (5 deaths)

Contact with live parts of appliances and machinery

(11 deaths)

(8)

Contributing Factors to

Electrocutions of Electrical Workers

Lack of proper personal protective equipment

Lack of insulated tools

Working from aerial lifts (33 deaths)

Working in attics or above drop ceilings (16 deaths)

(9)

Over half of electrocutions

of non-electrical workers

were due to contact with

overhead

(10)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, 1992-98

Causes of Electrocutions Among

Non-Electrical Workers, 1992-98

Overhead power lines (376 deaths)

Electrical wiring (69 deaths)

Appliances/machinery/power tools (68 deaths)

air-conditioners (22 deaths) portable lights (11 deaths)

power tools (7 deaths – 5 involved electric drills) welding units (7 deaths)

other home appliances (6 deaths) pumps (5 deaths)

(11)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, 1992-98

More Causes of Electrocutions of

Non-Electrical Workers, 1992-98

Contact with energized objects (52 deaths)

¾ Metal ladders (11 deaths)

¾ Metal pipes (5 deaths)

¾ Accidentally cut live wire (5 deaths)

Electrical equipment (31 deaths)

¾ electrical control panels (10 deaths)

¾ transformers (5 deaths)

• Lightning (31 deaths)

• Buried, underground power lines (16 deaths)

• Light fixtures (10 deaths)

(12)

Contributing Factors to

Electrocutions of

Non-Electrical Workers

• Working under houses or in basement crawlspaces

(27 deaths)

• Contact with water (20 deaths)

• Defective extension or power cords (15 deaths)

• Working in attics or above

(13)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, 1992-98

Danger of “Low Voltage”

120/240 volts

¾

1/8 of all construction worker electrocutions

Total low voltage (600 volts or less)

¾

1/3 of electrical worker electrocutions

(14)

Electrical Injuries Requiring

Emergency Department Treatment

• Study of 3,359 Washington, DC construction workers

treated in George Washington University Emergency

Department between 11/1/90 and 12/31/98

• 61 (1.8%) of ED-treated injuries were electrical injuries

(15)

Electrical Injuries Requiring

Emergency Department Treatment

• ED-Treated Electrical Injuries

– 20% (12/61) of ED-treated electrical injuries required hospitalization (compared to 3.4% of all injuries)

– 66% (40/61) of ED-treated workers were electrical workers

• Types of Electrical Injury Requiring ED Treatment

– 60% (25/42) of electrical shock injuries involved electrical workers

– 79% (15/19) of arc flash injuries involved electrical workers

(16)

Causes of Electrical Injuries Requiring

Emergency Department Treatment

Unknown Power tools Energized objects Light Fixtures Electrical equipment Electrical wiring 5% 28% 5% 5% 7% 11% 10% 53% 5% 26% 45%

Arc Flash = 19 workers

Electrical Shock = 42 workers

Source: GWU Construction Workers Surveillance Program, 1992-98 % of workers

(17)

Falls from Ladders As a Result of

Electrical Injury

• 36% (15/42) of ED-treated electrical shock

injuries resulted in falls from ladders

• 5% (1/19) of ED-treated arc flash injuries

resulted in falls from ladders

(18)

Diagnoses from Emergency Department

Treatment of Electrical Injuries

Other (fractures, infections) Sprain/strain pain Contusions/Abrasions Lacerations Eye injury (including burns) Skin burn Electrical shock only

4% 4% 7% 11% 5% 9% 41% 2% 45% 33% 33%

Arc Flash = 22 diagnoses

Electrical Shock = 45 diagnoses

Source: GWU Construction Worker Surveillance Program, 1992-98 % of diagnoses

(19)

Controlling

Electrical

(20)

Precautions for Electricians

Get training as qualified person

“One familiar with the construction and operation of the

equipment and the hazards involved”

De-energize and lock out or tag out equipment

Isolate other exposed live parts

Use proper PPE & insulated tools

(21)

To De-Energize

or

(22)

Reasons for Working Live

De-energizing creates additional or greater hazards

¾

interruption of life-support systems

¾

deactivation of emergency alarm systems

¾

shutdown of ventilation equipment for hazardous locations

De-energizing is infeasible

¾

testing of live circuits

(23)

Barriers to Lockout/Tagout

Schedule pressure

Refusal of owner to allow power to be shut off

Peer pressure B especially new journeymen

Safety culture B AElectricians work live@

Lack of awareness of danger, especially low

voltage

Lack of training on lockout/tagout

(24)

Live Work Permit

Date and time covered by the permit

Why live work will be done

Who will perform the work

Tasks to be performed

Personal protective equipment to be worn

Other precautions

¾

insulated tools

¾

insulated barriers for nearby live parts

¾

warning signs

(25)

Precautions for

Non-Electricians

Get electrical safety training

Check for:

overhead power lines

buried, underground power lines

other live circuits

Make sure temporary wiring has GFCIs

Lock out/tag out equipment to be worked on

Only qualified persons may work on electrical

wiring and equipment

(26)

As You Work

In wet, damp, or hazardous locations use tools or

equipment designed and labeled for such areas

Keep metal ladders, pipes, etc. away from live

circuits or power lines

Make sure electric systems, machinery and power

tools are grounded or double insulated

Use extension cords marked for hard or extra-hard

usage

(27)

Further Information on

Construction Safety and Health

Electronic Library of Construction Safety and

Health (eLCOSH):

www.elcosh.org

The Center to Protect Workers’ Rights

www.cpwr.com

This presentation was funded by research grant U60 CCU 317202 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) through The Center to Protect Workers’ Rights, Silver Spring, Md. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIOSH.

References

Related documents

This study attempts to document the experiences of African American gay men to look at the ways in which racial identity interacts with sexual identity, to look at the ways that

As of 1994, 263 physi- cians have completed family practice training in Massachusetts, 31 graduates from the New England Memorial Hospital Program and 232 from the

Customer to pay any amount within ten (10) days after the amount is due and payable, b) abuse of the System or the equipment, c) dissolution, termination, discontinuance,

(1) Any person holding a valid hotel certificate shall, on payment of a processing fee of 1,000 rupees, make an application in writing to the Committee for a star rating certificate

D-FRI-Honeypot is tested against five different OS finger- printing tools Nmap, Xprobe2, NetScanTools Pro, SinFP3 and Nessus, with its prediction result for an attempted OS

Although MyPHRMachines cannot ensure that genome data is used ethically by the organization performing the initial DNA sequencing, it can be used to protect patient privacy in

Resume recovery feature of Stellar Phoenix Photo Recovery allows you to recover photos, audio and video files using saved scan information file or image file.. You can use the