• No results found

Recent Changes in Execucomp: FAS 123 New reporting requirements

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Recent Changes in Execucomp: FAS 123 New reporting requirements"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Recent

 

Changes

 

in

 

Execucomp:

(2)

Objective

Learn

 

about

 

New

 

ExecuComp content

 

and

 

structure

 

due

 

to

 

the

 

new

 

FASB123

 

reporting

 

requirements.

– The changes affect companies with fiscal year end  after Dec 2005. 

Hence, for year 2006 not all companies have already reported in the 

(3)

On

 

ExecuComp

• Universe: 2,872 companies both active or inactive. S&P 1500 plus companies removed from the index but still trading. 

• Data is collected from each company annual proxy DEF14A, which must be 

filed 120 days after the company’s fiscal year end. 

• How many executives? 

Up to 9, though most companies only report 5.

• How are they identified? 

EXECID is permanent id for each executive through out her career. CO_PER_ROL identifies executive/company combination.

• Data on executives:

– Individual characteristics: title, age, gender, date became/left as CEO.

– Compensation: Salary, Bonus, Restricted Stock Awards, Option Awards, Non‐

Equity Incentive Plan, Deferred Compensation, Pension Plan.  – Shares Owned.

(4)

New

 

Reporting

 

Requirements

 

FAS

 

123

• FAS 123 (R) :

Equity based compensation has to be expensed and be reflected in the financial 

statements based on fair value of the awards.

Companies with fiscal year end  after Dec 2005 have to adjust to new rules.

All data available in the past continues to be available; NO info has been purged.

• DEF14A (SEC doc) is organized in 6 new tables: 

1. Summary Compensation: discloses salary, bonus, stock awards, option awards, change 

in pension value other compensation. Option exercises and Stock vested.

2. Plan Based Table: contains details on option awards, restricted stock awards,  and 

estimated payouts for equity and non‐equity incentive plans.

3. Outstanding awards Table: information on unexercised options, stock that has not 

vested and equity incentive plan awards outstanding.

4. Deferred Compensation Table: reports the executive or company contributions, 

earnings and withdrawals and account balances for the deferral programs.

5. Pension Benefits Table: information regarding each plan of the company that provides 

payments in connection with retirement. 

6. Directors compensation Table: fees, stock and options awards, non‐equity incentive 

(5)

ExecuComp Structure

 

for

 

2006

 

fiscal

 

year

• For year 2006, Execucomp data is delivered in 6 main tables, mapping the 

“original” tables in the SEC doc.

1. AnnComp: summary compensation data + other.

2. PlanBasedAwards: Contains data on awarded options and stock grants 

during the filled fiscal year.

3. OutstandingAwards: Describes the outstanding stock options and unvested 

stock awards held by officers as of the end of fiscal year.

4. DeferredComp: contains deferred compensation.

5. Pension: contains all details on pension benefits.

6. DirectorComp: contains new details on the director compensation.

• Prior to 2006,  the reporting of stock option grants and long incentive 

plans are in the following two tables – the data goes up to 2005. 

1. Stgrttab: Stock Options Grants. 

(6)

ExecuComp in

 

WRDS

The

 

web

query

 

now

 

presents

 

the

 

data

 

in

 

several

 

queries:

™ Aggregate compensation items: salary, bonus, total options…

™ Disaggregate compensation items: 

– Individual options and preferred stock granted and outstanding.

– Individual deferred plans.

– Individual pension plans.

– Directors compensation.

Datasets

 

in

 

WRDS

 

Unix:

 

/wrds/comp/sasdata/execcomp/

All sets provided by Compustat are available, plus the aggregate file 

(7)

Two

 

Main

 

Questions

1. How are the main aggregated compensation items affected? 

2. Stock‐based compensation: how to identify a unique row. Difference 

between the aggregated and disaggregated data for restricted stock 

(8)

1.

 

Old

 

Compensation

 

Items

Pre

 

FAS

 

123:

  

The variables TDC1TDC2 were the two most 

encompassing compensation measures. There is continuity with these 

measures but the definition has changed slightly.

– Using the 1992 format: TDC1= Salary +Bonus+ Other Annual + Total Value Restricted Stock granted + Total Value Stock Options granted + 

Long‐Term Incentive Payouts + All Other Total  

– Using the 2006 format: TDC1= Salary + Bonus + Non‐Equity Incentive 

Plan Compensation + Grant‐Date Fair Value Stock Awards + Grant‐

date fair Value of Option Awards + Deferred Compensation + Other 

(9)

1.

 

New

 

Compensation

 

Items:

 

FAS

 

123(R)

• New compensation items are reported by companies. Hence only 

available from 2006 onwards. 

TOTAL_SEC, Total Compensation as Reported to SEC: Salary, Bonus, Stock 

Awards, Option Awards, Non Equity Incentives, Pension and Deferred 

Compensation Changes, Other Comp. 

¾ Cost recorded by the company on its income statement.

Total_ALT1:  same definition as TOTAL_SEC  except that stock & options are valued using grant‐date fair value .

¾ Compensation as of grant date.

Total_ALT2: same definition as TOTAL_SEC except that stock & options are 

valued using stock vesting (SHRS_VEST_VAL) and value realized from option 

exercise (OPT_EXER_VAL).

(10)

2.

 

Stock

based

 

Compensation

 

Items

Firms may grant options and restricted stock several times a year. Hence, 

this type of compensation is delivered at an aggregated or disaggregated 

level.

• Aggregated variables:  1 record per (firm, co_per_rol, year)

• Disaggregated variables: produce several records for (firm, co_per_rol, 

year). Need to add ID variable.

¾ Before FAS 123: GRNTNUM allows to identify each option grant.

¾ FAS 123 : Plan Based Awards table contains all disaggregated data. 

GRNTNUM applies to all types of awards reported in the table: i.e. 

shares , equity and non‐equity incentive plan awards and options. 

(11)

2.

 

Stock

based

 

Compensation:

 

Options

Stock options awarded during the fiscal year 

¾ OPTION_AWARDS_BLK_VALUE (before FAS 123)

¾ OPTION_AWARDS_FV (FAS 123, i.e. data from 2006 onwards) At company level?

Companies do not report all stock options awarded to all employees. From the DEF14A filling can only be computed for executives.

Options exercised during the fiscal year:

– OPT_EXER_NUM  & OPT_EXER_VAL

Options outstanding:

– OPT_UNEX_EXER_EST_VAL: Estimated value of in the money 

unexercised vested options.  (OPT_UNEX_EXER_NUM)

– OPT_UNEX_UNEXER_EST_VAL : Estimated value of in the money 

(12)

Aggregated

 

and

 

Individual

 

Options

 

Data

 

– Before

 

FAS

 

123

 

Data from 1992‐2005 plus few companies still reporting old format for 2006 fiscal 

year. 

Available via Web‐query. All data items in Execcomp.  

CO_PER_R OL SALARY OPTION_AWA RDS_NUM OPTION_AWA RDS_BLK_VAL UE OPTION_AW ARDS_RPT_ VALUE GRNTN UM NUMSECU

R BLKSHVAL EXEC_LNAME YEAR 28409 375 106.251 293.073 66.227 1 66.667 157.584 Jaworski 2006 28409 375 106.251 293.073 66.227 2 39.584 135.489 Jaworski 2006 30178 365.28 173.334 401.205 291.137 1 73.334 164.831 Whiting 2006 30178 365.28 173.334 401.205 291.137 2 100 236.374 Whiting 2006 32109 265.035 56.25 130.28 94.413 1 40 85.078 Deranleau 2006 32109 265.035 56.25 130.28 94.413 2 12.25 32.618 Deranleau 2006 32109 265.035 56.25 130.28 94.413 3 4 12.584 Deranleau 2006 32110 263.333 510.417 1217.435 1036.274 1 160.417 360.566 Grewal 2006 32110 263.333 510.417 1217.435 1036.274 2 350 856.869 Grewal 2006

Aggregated Options data Individual Option data

OPTION_AWARDS_NUM: Total number of stock options awarded during the year, as detailed in Plan Based awards. OPTION_AWARDS_BLK_VALUE: Aggregate value of stock options granted during the year –valued  using S&P Black‐Scholes Methodology. Applies to 1992 reporting format only. (OPTION_AWARDS_FV  for FASB123 reporting)

OPTION_AWARDS_RPT_VALUE: Aggregate value for all options granted during fiscal year as valued by company. Applies to 1992 

reporting forma t only.

GNTNUM: Grant Number Identifier (Stgrttab).

NUMSECUR: Number of securities in the option grant. Applies to 1992 only.  (Stgrttab).  

BLKSHVAL: Value of the option grant using the S&P modified Black‐Scholes Method. Applies to 1992 reporting format only 

(13)

Aggregated

 

and

 

Individual

 

Options

 

Data

 

– FAS

 

123

 

Data for 2006 fiscal year only.  Aggregated data available through Web‐query. 

Individual option data in Planbasedawards dataset. 

Date Approved by Compensation

Committee

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (a)

Al l Other Option Awards: Number of Securiti es Underlying Options (#) Exercise or Base Pri ce of Option Awards ($/SH) (b) Closing Market Price on Grant Date Grant Date Fai r Value of Stock and Opti on Awards Name Grant Date Target (#) Maximum (#) H. McGraw III 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 25,140 50, 280 $ 2,906,687 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 196,058 $ 57.81 $ 57.51 $ 2,950,673 3/23/06 04/24/ 02 277,637 (c) $ 56.43 $ 56.64 $ 3,555,001 3/23/06 04/28/ 04 167,004 (c) $ 56.43 $ 56.64 $ 2,138,402 R. J. Bahash 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 12,233 24, 466 $ 1,414,379 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 46,990 $ 57.81 $ 57.51 $ 707,200 D. Sharma 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 7,551 15, 102 $ 873,047 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 29,003 $ 57.81 $ 57.51 $ 436,495 3/16/06 12/04/ 02 31,771 (c) $ 58.83 $ 59.05 $ 423,225 D. L. Murphy 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 7,551 15, 102 $ 873,047 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 29,003 $ 57.81 $ 57.51 $ 436,495 3/14/06 04/30/ 03 17,799 (c) $ 55.84 $ 56.42 $ 225,857 K. M. Vittor 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 6,872 13, 744 $ 794,541 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 26,395 $ 57.81 $ 57.51 $ 397,245 B. D. Marcus 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 3,460 6, 920 $ 400,045 4/3/06 12/07/ 05 13,289 $ 57.81 $ 57.51 $ 199,999  

GRNT_NUM: Identifies entry in table. Hence it can refer to any Equity and non‐equity plan! No longer count for 

number of options grants. 

When OPTS_GRT > 0, then entry corresponds to option grant. 

OPTS_GRT: Number of stock options granted 

Fair_Value: Grant date Fair value of stock and option Awards. 

SUM(OPTS_GRT)=  OPTIONS_AWARDS_NUM    Total number of stock options awarded during the year.

SUM(FAIR_VALUE)= OPTIONS_AWARDS_FV       Aggregate value of stock options granted during the year.

Details on individual options granted are reported in  Plan Based Awards table.

(14)

2.

 

Stock

 

Based

 

Compensation:

 

Restricted

 

Stock

Restricted Stock awarded during the fiscal year

¾ RSTKGRNT (before FAS 123, only applies for 1992 format)

¾ STOCK_AWARDS_FV (FAS 123, i.e. data from 2006 onwards)

Stock vested during the fiscal year:

– SHRS_VEST_NUM  & SHRS_VEST_VAL

Restricted Stock Outstanding :

– STOCK_UNVEST_VAL : Aggregate market value of restricted shares 

held by executive (STOCK_UNVEST_NUM)

References

Related documents

That this HR participant stood out amongst the Australian participants for the way she described her role and approach to employment laws may suggest the influence of the type of

Of the three case studies, Cortez exemplifies the gateway community which services the tourist population, Durango shows evidence of the more recent interest of tourism due to its

Discrimination with Partial Observability and no Lying Cost) When the behavior of consumers can only be par- tially monitored and when consumer can alter their behav- ior at no cost

Through the project implementation, get the conclusion that a successful Lean Six Sigma project needs below elements: take the customer as a starting point,

It helps dry and irritated skin and can be used in lotions, creams, body butters, massage oils, lip products, bath oils, and soaps.. Apricot kernel oil isn’t expensive, so it’s

Taken together, these results demonstrated (1) azobenzene- based potassium channel blockers are capable of restoring light- dependent firing activity to retinal ganglion cells of

When complainants manifested that they would present one witness to identify the documents on record, respondent branded the request as 'misplaced.' He even

Moore’s Law is a historically-reliable rule that the world’s maximum computing power doubles approximately every two years, meaning computer hardware advancement, like general human