• No results found

Possible ECHO Shelter Indicators (version 15/05/13) revised by EDB/MP & DH 13/06

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Possible ECHO Shelter Indicators (version 15/05/13) revised by EDB/MP & DH 13/06"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

KRI_Shelter_EN P a g e | 1 Sub-Sector/Key Results Indicator

Description

Key Result Indicators Trend & conditions Is a 'global aggregation' of

the indicator possible?

1. % of all implemented shelter and settlement solutions are agreed, after analysis of relevant options, and

undertaken with the population and relevant authorities in coordination with all responding agencies.

Baseline: ?

Target: ? [% of all implemented shelter and settlement solutions]

Indicator 1: Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N

A) Strategic Planning: Shelter and settlement strategies to meet the essential needs of all disaster affected population, contribute to their security, safety, health and well-being, and promote recovery and reconstruction where possible.

2. % of all implemented shelter and settlement solutions that are safe and adequate, and will remain so until more durable solutions are achieved.

Baseline: ?

Target: ? [% of all implemented shelter and settlement solutions]

Indicator 2 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

(2)

KRI_Shelter_EN P a g e | 2 3. % of shelter assisted populations that have been

consulted on and agreed to the location of their shelter and access to essential services.

Baseline: ?

Target: ? [% of shelter assisted populations]

Indicator 3 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N

4. % of settlement plans demonstrate that risks, including settlement on hazardous and/or disputed land, and other vulnerabilities have been identified and mitigated.

Baseline: ?

Target: ? [% of settlement plans]

Indicator 4 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N

B) Shelter & settlement

planning: The planning of return, host, transitional and/or camp settlements provides for the safe and secure occupation of shelter and use of essential

infrastructure.

5. % of settlement plans demonstrate that adverse environmental impacts have been minimised / mitigated, (standard: settlement plans include natural resources management plan).

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [% of settlement plans]

Indicator 5 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

(3)

KRI_Shelter_EN P a g e | 3 6. % of camp-type settlements which have been selected

respecting criteria for surface water drainage? (standard: site gradient between 2-5% - gentle slope)

Baseline: ?

Target: ? [% of camp-type settlements]

Indicator 6 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N

7. Number of persons living in camp-type settlements where surface allocation (including areas for household plots and infrastructure) is adequate (standard min. 45m2 per person)

Baseline: ?

Target: ? [absolute number of targeted persons]

Indicator 7 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

Y

8. % of camp-type settlements with firebreaks of 30 m for every 300 m of built-up area included in layout planning and where minimum distance between shelters ≥ 2 m

Baseline: ?

Target: ? [% of camp-type settlements]

Indicator 8 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

(4)

KRI_Shelter_EN P a g e | 4 9. Number of targeted persons who have access to shelters

solutions and materials which meet agreed technical and performance standards, including those prescribed by the Cluster, if activated.

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [absolute number of persons]

Indicator 9 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

Y

10. % of targeted persons with sufficient covered floor area per shelter (standard: min. 3.5 m2 per person or 4.5-5.5 m2 in cold climates).

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [% targeted persons]

Indicator 10 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N, unless we change % in number of persons

C) Access to adequate shelter providing protection from climate, while ensuring privacy, safety and healthy living conditions enabling essential household and livelihood activities to be undertaken.

11. % of targeted persons with access to legal advice on Housing, Land and Property (HLP) issues

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [% of targeted persons]

Indicator 11 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N, unless we change % in number of persons

(5)

KRI_Shelter_EN P a g e | 5 12. % of shelters constructed in accordance with local

building standards and regulations, and specifications developed by the Cluster, if activated

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [% of shelters]

Indicator 12 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N

13. % of shelters incorporating hazard mitigation measures according to risk analysis

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [% of shelters]

Indicator 13 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

Y

C) Shelter construction: Local and safe construction practices, materials and capacities are used wherever appropriate

maximising beneficiary involvement, local livelihood opportunities and incorporating targeted measures for highly vulnerable groups.

14. % of shelters solutions implemented using construction processes and sourcing of building materials

demonstrating that adverse environmental impacts have been minimised / mitigated

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [% of shelters solutions]

Indicator 14 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

(6)

KRI_Shelter_EN P a g e | 6 15. Number of the targeted persons who are involved in

construction activities

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [absolute number of people]

Indicator 15 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

Y

16. Number of persons engaged in local livelihood opportunities to support construction activities?

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [absolute number of people]

Indicator 16 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

Y

17. Number of highly vulnerable individuals provided with adequate shelter solutions

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [absolute number of people]

Indicator 17 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

(7)

KRI_Shelter_EN P a g e | 7 18. Number of targeted persons who have access to

culturally appropriate NFIs, and in accordance with specifications developed by the relevant Cluster(s), if activated?

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [absolute number of persons]

Indicator 18 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

Y

D) NFIs: Access to sufficient, adequate and culturally appropriate non-food items (NFIs), such as household items, clothing and bedding, cooking utensils and cooking facilities (stoves, fuel, etc.), tools for construction and lighting for

personal safety. 19. % of targeted persons who are satisfied with NFIs as measured through Post Distribution Monitoring (PDM).

Baseline: 0

Target: ? [% of targeted persons]

Indicator 19 Trend:

This value should increase. Condition:

Baseline value < Target value in the eSF

N, unless we change % in number of persons

which would make little sense

References

Related documents

Thus, the study on which this paper reports, investigated how out-of-school activities and family and community networks facilitated the generation of social

Th ere was a signifi cant interaction (P &lt; 0.05) of plant parts (PP) and plant popula- tion (POP) on NDF content, NDF digest- ibility and true digestibility of corn residue

The processor uses the knowledge of the task criticality to guide the prioritization of the memory requests inside the shared on-chip memory hierarchy.. The evaluation of PrioRAT

Informed by Realist review principles that emphasise the rele- vance of stakeholder priorities, the signi fi cance of theories that inform interventions and the processes that

These detrital-zircon age comparisons suggest that each basin was char- acterized by mostly proximal sediment sources during Albian– Cenomanian deposition, with Hornbrook

Two players, A and B, play the game of matching pennies: at each time n, each player has a penny and must secretly turn the penny to heads or tails.. The players then reveal

Thought to be quintessential to American musical culture, many forget the roots of such expressive traditions as jazz, blues, Hip Hop, R&amp;B, but more so of old time string

designations are not the optimum criteria on which to base a rural definition. Large counties, particularly in the Western United States, may dilute or mask rural population