• No results found

Benchmarking results from Indian data centers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Benchmarking results from Indian data centers"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Benchmarking results from Indian data centers

Madhav Kamath. A

Energy Efficiency Finance Lead

USAID ECO-III Project

Data Center Energy Efficiency

(2)
(3)

A benchmark is …

a point of reference for measurement

THE RANGE OF USES INCLUDES:

!  Comparing with typical examples

where do we fit?

!  Comparing with best practice

are we doing well?

!  Setting a challenge

can we do

better?

!  Setting targets

we plan to

achieve …

!  Avoiding exaggeration

are our targets realistic?

!  Follow-through reality checks

is the design drifting off?

!  Providing feedback

did we meet our goals?

!  Providing insights

if not, why not, what can we learn?

IT IS NOT an end in itself, e.g. “meeting the benchmark”

BUT a means of developing understanding

(4)

What does Benchmarking do?

Benchmarking

!  Serves as an excellent baseline "report card”

!  Identifies specific problem areas and eliminates guesswork

!  Helps to prioritize improvement opportunities

!  Makes it easier to increase performance expectations and "raise

the bar"

(5)

Benefits of Benchmarking

!  Designers, Owners and Users

–  Designers /ESCOs – Building

performance targets for new and

existing data centers

–  Owners/Users – Measure the

performance of their data centers

–  Building portfolio managers can

compare the performance of individual

facilities to others

!  Data Center Developers and

Operators

–  Helps to assess the potential savings

–  Use of appropriate products and

technologies

!  Policy Makers

(6)

Facility Data

ID

!

Data

!

ID

!

Data

!

General Data Center Data

!

Data Center Energy Data

!

dB1

!

Data Center Area (electrically active) (m2)

!

dE1

!

Total Electrical Energy Use (kWh)

!

dB2

!

Data Center Location

!

dE2

!

IT Electrical Energy Use (kWh)

!

dB3

!

Data Center Type

!

dE3

!

HVAC Electrical Energy Use (kWh)

!

dB4

!

Year of Construction

!

dE4

!

Total Fuel Energy Use (kWh)

!

Cooling

!

dE5

!

Total District Steam Energy Use (kWh)

!

dC1

!

Average Cooling System Power Consumption (kW)

!

dE6

!

Total District Chilled Water Energy Use (kWh)

!

dC2

!

Average Cooling Load (tons)

!

Air Management

!

dC3

!

Installed Chiller Capacity (w/o backup) (tons)

!

dA1

!

Supply Air Temperature (°C)

!

dC4

!

Peak Chiller Load (tons)

!

dA2

!

Return Air Temperature (°C)

!

dC5

!

Air Economizer Hours (full cooling) (hours)

!

dA3

!

Supply Air Relative Humidity (%)

!

dC6

!

Water Economizer Hours (full cooling) (hours)

!

dA4

!

Return Air Relative Humidity (%)

!

Electrical Power Chain

!

dA5

!

Rack Inlet Mean Temperature (°C)

!

dP1

!

UPS Peak Load (kW)

!

dA6

!

Rack Outlet Mean Temperature (°C)

!

dP2

!

UPS Load Capacity (kW)

!

dA7

!

Total Fan Power (Supply and Return) (W)

!

dP3

!

UPS Input Power (kW)

!

dA8

!

Total Fan Airflow rate (Supply and Return) (m3/

s)

!

dP4

!

UPS Output Power (kW)

!

(7)

Benchmarking Metrics

ID! Name

!

Unit

!

Overall Data Center Performance Metrics

!

B1! Data Center Infrastructure Efficiency (DCiE)

!

-

!

B2! Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE)

!

-

!

B3! HVAC System Effectiveness

!

-

!

Air Management Metrics

!

A1! Temperature Range

!

°C

!

A2! Humidity Range

!

%

!

A3! Return Temperature Index

!

%

!

A4! Airflow Efficiency

!

W/m3/sec

!

Cooling Metrics

!

C1! Cooling System Efficiency

!

kW/ton

!

C2! Cooling System Sizing Factor

!

-

!

C3! Air Economizer Utilization Factor

!

%

!

C4! Water Economizer Utilization Factor

!

%

!

Electrical Power Chain Metrics

!

(8)

Data Center Benchmarking

PUE

DCiE

Level of Efficiency

3.0

33%

Very Inefficient

2.5

40%

Inefficient

2.0

50%

Average

1.5

67%

Efficient

1.2

83%

Very Efficient

PUE = Total Facility Power/ IT Equipment

Power

DCiE = IT Equipment Power/ Total Facility

Power

Power Usage

Effectiveness

Data Center

Infrastructure

Efficiency

(9)

Data Center Benchmarking - PUE

"#""! "#$"! %#""! %#$"! &#""! &#$"! '#""! '#$"!

%! &! '! (! $! )! *! +! ,! %"! %%! %&! %'! %(! %$! %)! %*! %+! %,! &"! &%! &&! &'! &(! &$! &)! &*! &+! &,! '"! '%!

(10)

Data Center Benchmarking - PUE

"#""! "#$"! %#""! %#$"! &#""! &#$"! '#""! '#$"!

%! &! '! (! $! )! *! +! ,! %"! %%! %&! %'! %(! %$! %)! %*! %+! %,! &"! &%! &&! &'! &(! &$! &)! &*! &+! &,! '"! '%!

(11)

"/! %"/! &"/! '"/! ("/! $"/! )"/! *"/! +"/! ,"/! %""/!

%! &! '! (! $! )! *! +! ,! %"! %%! %&! %'! %(! %$! %)! %*! %+! %,! &"! &%! &&! &'! &(! &$! &)! &*! &+! &,! '"! '%!

4':;<2& $=( &"> :) /'$ !"#"$%&'#&($'<?=&($

!"#"$%&'#&($&':;<2&$=(&">:)/'$

01234! 5637148796! :;<=! >?!

7%

35%

Data Center End-use breakdown

(12)

"#""! "#$"! %#""! %#$"! &#""! &#$"! '#""! '#$"! (#""!

%! &! '! (! $! )! *! +! ,! %"! %%! %&! %'! %(! %$! %)! %*! %+! %,! &"! &%! &&! &'! &(! &$! &)! &*! &+! &,! '"! '%!

,-$0 )/ &( +@A BC $.) / &( $ !"#"$%&'#&($,!$ @ABC$DE2#&?$45&%67&'&22$

(13)

Conclusion

!  Energy Benchmarking can be effective in helping to

identify better performing designs and strategies. As

new Strategies are implemented, energy

benchmarking will enable comparison of

performance

!  India needs robust benchmarking numbers

(14)

!  LBNL / USDOE

!  USAID India

!  NASSCOM

!  Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE)

!  Data Contributors: APC, Hewlett Packard, Intel, Maruti,

Texas Instruments

(15)

References

Related documents

cortisol and cortisone levels are associated with breast milk dioxin concentrations in Vietnamese women. An innovative LC-MS/MS- based method for determination CYP17

Patented Non-Synchronous Interconnection Technology Enables An Always Islanded Microgrid with the Ability to Plug and Play Multiple Distributed Energy Resources and to

In all model-based statistical inference, the likelihood function is of central importance, since it expresses the probability of the observed data under a particular statistical

Further potential limitations of geographically concentrated livestock production include (1) a possible intensification of animal health problems for cattle living in

THE ECOSYSTEM STRATEGIES OF BORN GLOBALS: A case study of two Finnish game firms as participants of global business ecosystems.. International Business

To test if the LMWC layer could reduce phagocytic uptake of particles despite the apparent protein binding, *PLGA- pD- LMWC MPs and control *MPs (2–3 mm in diameter), with

These best practices include: improved air management, emphasizing control and isolation of hot and cold air streams; right- sizing central plants and ventilation systems to

• Growing energy use in data centers • Oracle’s drive in energy efficiency • Drivers for efficiency in data centers.. • Efficiency opportunities in the cooling chain in data