JOURNALOFCLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Sept.1981, p. 313-317 0095-1137/81/090313-05$02.00/0
Serotyping Cryptococcus neoformans by
Immunofluorescence
WILLIAM KAPLAN,l SANDRA L. BRAGG,' STANLEY CRANE,' ANDDONALD G. AHEARN2
CentersforDiseaseControl, Atlanta, Georgia30333,'andDepartment of Biology, Georgia StateUniversity,
Atlanta,
Georgia
303032Received23 January 1981/Accepted 29 April 1981
Four serotypes of Cryptococcus neoformans designated A, B, C, and D are
currently recognized. Althoughanagglutinationtestismostoften usedtoserotype
C. neofornans in cultures, this testis notappropriate fortyping the fungus in
fixed tissues. A study to prepare fluorescent-antibody reagents for typing C. neofornansin cultures and to determine whetherthey can be used to type this
fungusinfixed tissueswascarriedout.Antiserato onestrainbelongingtoeach of the four serotypes were prepared in rabbits by intravenous injection ofwhole Fornalin-killed cryptococci.Each antiserum waslabeled with fluorescein
isothi-ocyanate and then adsorbed with cells of each of theheterologousserotypes.The adsorbed conjugates were then tested against six serotype A isolates and five
isolates of each of the other threeserotypes. Labeledserotype A or Dantiserum adsorbed with eitherB orCcellsstained theAandD, butnottheB orC,isolates. Labeledserotype Bantiserum adsorbed withAcellsstained theBandC, butnot
theA orD,isolates. Labeled A antiserum absorbed with D cells differentiated A
from D; labeledC antiserum absorbed with B cells differentiated C from B. Of the 21 test isolates, 17 could be serotyped in paraffin sections of tissues of
experimentallyinfected mice.
In1949, Evans dividedisolates of
Cryptococ-cus
neoformans
into threeserological
types,A,B,and C,onthe basis of theantigenic
makeup
oftheircapsules (3).
Inalaterstudy,Wilsonetal. (14)
distinguished
a fourth serotype whichwas designated type D. All four serotypes can causedisease; however,they differin their
geo-graphic distribution (1).
Serotype
A has acos-mopolitan distribution.
Serotype
D is commonin someparts ofEurope, but it is
infrequently
encountered inthe United States.Serotypes
Band Ccause
cryptococcosis
infrequently,
exceptin southem California. Recently, isolates of group BorC have been found tobeimportant
causesofthis disease in residents of southeastern Oklahoma
(11).
The four serotypes also differ intheir natural habitats (1).
Serotypes
A and Dare
commonly
foundin association withpigeon
droppings, whereasthe natural reservoir of se-rotypes BandC is unknown. These differences
indicate that serotyping ofC. neoformans
iso-lateswould be of value from anepidemiological
standpoint.
Agglutinationis thetechniquemostoftenused to serotype C. neoformans. This procedure is
suitablefor use withcultures,but not with fixed tissues or other clinical materials. It would be
desirable to be able to type C.
neoformnans
inhistological specimens, because the results
ob-tained from such analyses would be of epidemio-logicalandecological value. Also, recent findings suggestthat theserotype oftheisolatecausing cryptococcosis might have therapeutic implica-tions (D. K. Henderson, J. E. Edwards, Jr., W.
E. Dismukes, and J. E. Bennett, Abstr. Annu.
Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.
1981,
Fll,
p.315).
The
fluorescent-antibody (FA)
technique
hasbeenused
successfully
todetect andidentify
C.neoformans in fixed tissues (8,9)andincultures (7, 13), suggesting that theFAtechniquemight
also be suitable fortyping C. neoformans in such specimens. The present study was undertaken
todevelopFA reagentsfor serotyping this
fun-gusin culturesand todetermine theirvalue for carryingoutsuchananalysiswith fixedtissues.
MATERLA1S AND METHODS Cultures. Twenty-one isolates of C. neoformans, whoseserotypes had beenestablished bythe
aggluti-nationprocedure, werestudied.Six of these cultures (B551, B3166, B3168, B3169, B3170, and B3270)
be-longed to serotype A, five (B3171, B3172, B3173,
B3268, and
B327J)
belonged to serotype B, five(B3182, B3183,B3184,B3267, and B3269)belonged to serotypeC,andfive(B3176, B3177, B3178, B3179, and
B3266)belonged to serotype D. With the exception of
isolate B551, these cultureswere obtained from the
collectionmaintainedbythe Department of Biology,
Georgia State University, Atlanta. Isolate B551 was
obtained from the culture collection maintained by
313
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
the Mycology Division, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga.
Antisera.Theantigens used for the production of
antiserawerepreparedfrom four isolates of C. neofor-mansrepresenting each of the serotypes(B551, B3172, B3182, and B3179). These cultures were selected on the basis of smallness ofcapsule when compared with the otherisolates in theirrespective serologicalgroup when grown onSabourauddextrose agar slants for 72 h at 35°C. This criterion for selection was based on
earlier observationsthathighestserumantibody titers areobtainedwhenlightly encapsulatedC.neoformans
cellsareusedasimmunizationantigens (12). Antigens
used for immunizationwereprepared by growing cul-turesB551, B3172,and B3179 in Sabourauddextrose
broth. The inoculaforthese broth cultures consisted
of two loopfuls of surface growth from Sabouraud
dextrose agar slants incubated for96hat25°C. The
cultureswereshaken at 180rpmfor 72hwhilethey
wereincubatedat25°C.Culture B3182wasgrownon modified Sabourauddextrose agar,pH5.0,containing 2.9% NaCl for 72 h at35°C to reduce the size ofits
capsule (2).The inoculum consisted ofoneloopful of
growthon a Sabouraud dextroseagar slantthat had been incubated for96h at25°C. The cultureswere killed with Formalin (1.0%) and then washed three times with Formalin-treated (0.5%) physiological sa-line. Thewashed cellswereresuspendedin
Formalin-treated (0.3%) 0.01 Mphosphate-buffered saline, pH
7.4.Vaccineswerepreparedby adjustingthe suspen-sions of the B551, B3172, and B3179 cells to the
turbidity ofa no.10and thesuspensionofB3182 cells to the turbidityof a no. 8 McFarland nephelometer standard.
Four rabbits per immunization antigen were used
for theproductionof antiseratostrains B551(type A), B3172 (typeB),and B3179 (type D). However,seven
rabbitswereused for theproductionofantiserumto
strain B3182(typeC).Beforeimmunization,each
rab-bitwasbled and thepreimmunizationserum wasused as a control for its corresponding antiserum. Each
rabbitwasinjectedintravenouslywith 10 3-mldoses
of vaccinespreadoveraperiodof4weeks. Thevaccine wasadministered at3- or4-dayintervals. Starting 1 weekafter the 10th injection, the rabbits were bled onceeachweek for 5 weeks. Doses of1and2mlof the
vaccine were administeredintravenously during this
periodtomaintainthe titer.
Conjugation ofsera. Each preimmunization se-rum andantiserum was labeled with fluorescein
iso-thiocyanateataratioof3mg ofdyeper ml ofserum. The whole-serumconjugateswerepreparedasfollows. The dye wasdissolved in 0.1 M Na2HPO4 (1 mg of fluorescein isothiocyanateper ml ofbuffer).The
flu-oresceinisothiocyanatesolutionwasthen addedtothe serum, and the pH wasadjusted to 9.5 with 0.1 M
Na3PO4.The mixturewasthenallowedtostandfor3 hat roomtemperature. Unreacted fluorescein isothi-ocyanatewasremovedbygelfiltrationwithSephadex
G-25.Conjugateswerediluted with0.01M
phosphate-buffered salinecontaining1.0% bovineserumalbumin and Merthiolate (1:5,000) adjusted to pH 8.5 to 9.0. The titers of these conjugates were based on the volume ofconjugate relative to the volume of
unla-beled serum used to prepare the reagent. The conju-gates werestored at 4°C.
Testing of conjugates. Tests for the sensitivity and specificity of the conjugates were carried out on smears ofsuspensions of Formalin-killed C. neofor-mans cells that had been cultivated on Sabouraud dextrose agarat 37°C for 5 days. The ability of the conjugates to stain their respective immunization strain was the basis for selecting a conjugate of each serotype for detailed study. The conjugates selected were testedfor sensitivity with all strains of the same serotype as the immunization antigen. These conju-gates werethen tested for specificity with all strains belonging to the other serotypes. In all of these tests, reagentswere used at dilutions of 1:10, 1:40, 1:160, and 1:640.
Adsorptionprocedure.The cells used for adsorp-tions were prepared from cultures grown in brain heart
infusionbroth. The broths were inoculated with two loopfuls of growth from Sabouraud dextrose agar slants that had been incubated for 96 h at 25°C. The cultures were shaken for 72 to 96 h while they were incubated at250C.They were treated with Formalin (1.0%),washed twice in Formalin-treated (0.5%)
phys-iologicalsaline, and stored at 4°C in Formalin-treated
(0.5%)saline.Conjugates diluted at 1:10 were adsorbed with half volumes of packed cells at 37°C in a water bathfor2 h. Adsorptions were then continued over-night at 4°C. Each conjugate selected for detailed study was adsorbed with cells of the homologous im-munization strain and with cells of the other three heterologous strains. Adsorptions were repeated until staining of the adsorbing strain had been eliminated.
Staining procedure and visualization of
stainedpreparations. Theprocedure used to stain the preparations was the one described by Kaplan and Ivens (5).Allpreparations were examined with a Leitz
Ortholux II incident-light fluorescence microscope.
Criteriasimilar to those of Goldman (4) and Moody et al. (10) were used to rate the intensity of staining. Results were recorded as -, ± (no reaction), 1+, 2+, 3+,and4+(reaction).
RESULTS
Staining properties of unadsorbed la-beled sera. The lala-beledpreimmunization sera didnotstain theC.neoformans strains. Antisera obtained from all four rabbits immunized with the B551 antigen (serotype A), when labeled, intenselystained cells ofthehomologous strain. One conjugate, prepared from serum collected fromone of the rabbits8 weeks after immuni-zation wasbegun,gave thebrightest staining.It was selected for further study and was desig-nated A-1.
Antisera from onlyone oftherabbits immu-nized with the B3172antigen (serotype B),when labeled,brightly stainedthehomologous organ-ism. The conjugate prepared from serum col-lected 8 weeks after immunization had begun gavethe beststaining reactions.Itwasselected forfurtherstudyandwasdesignatedB-1.
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
Antisera obtained from onlyoneof theseven
rabbitsimmunized with theB3182 antigen (se-rotypeC), whenlabeled,stainedthehomologous strain. Theconjugate prepared fromserum
col-lected 5 weeks after immunization had begun appearedtogive the best stainingreactions. It
wasselected for furtherstudyanddesignated
C-7.
Antisera obtainedfrom allof the rabbits im-munized with the B3179 antigen (serotype D), whenlabeled, brightly stained the homologous strain. Theconjugate preparedfromserum col-lected 8 weeks after immunization had begun
gave the brightest staining. It was selected for furtherstudyandwasdesignatedD-4.The stain-ing properties of these fourconjugateswerethen
studied with allof the strainsbelongingtoeach of therespectiveserotypesand withthose ofthe heterologous serotypes. The staining titers ob-tainedarepresentedinTable1.
Staining properties of adsorbed labeled antisera. Portions of each ofthe labeled
anti-sera selected for further study were adsorbed
with cells of the homologous immunization strain andcross adsorbed withcells of each of
the three heterologous immunization strains. Thestainingpropertiesof each of the adsorbed
conjugateswerestudied withall21typedstrains. Thestainingreactions observedaresummarized
in Table2.
Use of adsorbed conjugates to serotype C. neoformans in paraffi sections of For-malin-fixed tissue.Groups of three micewere
experimentally infected with each of the 21
se-rotyped strains. Infections wereinduced by
in-traperitonealinjectionof0.5mlofsaline
suspen-sions of each culture that had beengrown on
Sabourauddextroseagarfor 96 h at25°C.These suspensions were prepared by dispersing the
surface growthfromoneagarslant in 5.0mlof physiological saline. Themiceweresacrificed 1 to2weekslater, and portions ofallorganswith visible lesions were fixed in 10.0% neutral
For-malin and then embedded inparaffin. Sections of these tissues were stained withhematoxylin
andeosinandby the Gomori
methenamine-sil-TABLE 1. Staining titers of selectedunadsorbed
fluorescein-labeled antiseratostrainsof C.
neoformansbelongingto serotypesA, B, C,and D Stainingtiteratoserotype:
Conjugate
A(6)b B (5) C(5) D (5)
A-1 160-640 160-640 40 5640
B-1 >640 5640 5640 5640
C-7 160-5640 >640 160-5640 40-640 D-4 160-640 40-160 40-160 >640
aReciprocalofdilution. 'Numberofstrains.
TABLE 2. Stainingproperties of adsorbed fluorescein-labeled C. neoformans antisera with homologous andheterologousserotypeantigens Staining reactiona of C. neofor-Conju- Adsorbingan- mansserotype:
gate tigen
A(6)b B(5) C(5) D(5)
A-1 SerotypeA - -
-cells
SerotypeB + - - +
cells
Serotype C + - - +
cells
Serotype D + -(4)b
-cells + (1)
B-1 SerotypeA - + +
-cells Serotype B
cells
Serotype C + + - +
cells
Serotype D + + +
-cells
C-7 SerotypeA - +(3) +
-cells -(2)
Serotype B - - +
-cells Serotype C
cells
Serotype D +(3) + +
cells -(2)
D-4 Serotype A
-cells
Serotype B + - - +
cells
Serotype C - - - +
cells Serotype D
cells
a
_,
Negative reaction; +, staining that ranged from1+to4+.
bNumber of strains.
vernitrate procedure. An examination of these
preparations disclosed the presence of
crypto-cocci in thelesions. Replicatesections were then testedwith selected adsorbedconjugatesto
de-termine whetherthese reagents could be used to serotype the cryptococci present. The
proce-dures usedtopreparethesectionsfor FA
stain-ing and tostain them were those described by KaplanandKraft(6).
The serotyping was carried out in two steps with fouradsorbedconjugates. Inthefirst step, thesections were tested with theA-1 conjugate
that had been adsorbed with B
cells
and also withtheB-1 conjugate that had beenadsorbedwith Acells. The purposeofthis first step was todeterminewhether the cryptococci belonged
toeitherserotype A or D or serotype B or C. In the second step, the sections were tested with theA-1conjugate that had been adsorbed with VOL.14,1981
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
316 KAPLAN ET AL.
D cellstoseparate A from D, if they had been foundinthe first step to belong togroupAorD, orwith the C-7 conjugateadsorbed withBcells
toseparate C fromB,ifthey had beenfoundin the first step to belong togroupBorC.
Inthispreliminarystudy, inallcases we were
able to determine whether the cryptococci in the fixedtissues belonged to eithergroup A
orDorgroupBorC.Withtheexceptionofone
serotype C strain,we were abletoseparatethe C strains from the B strains. In tissues, this particulartype Cstrain did not react with the C-7conjugatethathad beenadsorbedwith type B cells. It was also possible in most cases to
differentiatethetype Astrains fromthetypeD strains. In one case, however, a type A strain wasstained equivocallywith the A-1 conjugate that had been adsorbed with D cells; in two
casesinvolvingtype Dstrains,someof thefungal
cellsin the tissue sectionswereobservedto react
equivocallywith theadsorbed A-1conjugate. Use of adsorbed conjugates to serotype
C. neoformans cultures of unknown
sero-type. SixtyC. neoformanscultures ofunknown serotype were typed by tihc 'A technique. Of
these, 47were obtainedfromvarious
investiga-torsin theUnited States and 13wereobtained
fromforeignlaboratories.Thirty-fiveofthe cul-tures fromthe United States had beenisolated from clinical materials, five had been isolated from environmental samples, and thesourceof seven wasunknown. Sixofthe cultures submit-tedbyforeignlaboratorieswerefromIsrael,five
werefrom Colombia,andtwo werefrom Spain.
Theconjugatesusedfortypingwerethoseused with the sections of fixed tissues. As was done
with the tissue sections, thetypingwas carried
outin twosteps.
Thereagents andprocedure usedenabled us
to serotype all 60 cultures. A total of 41 were
foundtobetype A,2weretypeB,5weretype
C,and 12weretypeD.
DISCUSSION
The purposeof thisstudywastodevelop FA
reagentsforserotyping C.neoformans, andthis goalwas met. Byreciprocal cross staining and cross adsorption procedures, FAreagents were
producedthat, when used in appropriate
com-bination, make possible the serotyping of this
fungus. Wefoundthatlabeled antiserum to
se-rotype A orD,whenadsorbedwitheither Bor
C cells,differentiatedtypesA and D fromtypes B and C. Conversely, labeled antiserum to
se-rotypeB,whenadsorbedwithAcells,
differen-tiated B and Cfrom Aand D. Separationof A
from Dwasdone by using labeled antiserumto
A that had been adsorbed withDcells;
separa-tion of C from B was done by using labeled antiserum to C that had beenadsorbed with B
cells.
Serotyping bymeansof these reagentscanbe
carriedoutinone or twosteps.We
prefer
to use atwo-stepprocedure
because itsavesreagents. In thefirst step wedetermine whethertheiso-late belongstogroup AorDortogroup BorC.
In the second step the group is separatedinto itsrespectivecomponents.
In this study we did notencounter any diffi-culties inserotyping C.neoformansincultures. The staining results wereclear-cut and unequiv-ocal. Inpreliminary tests with sections of fixed tissues, wecould also readily establish whether theC.neoformans
cells
presentbelonged to the A or D or the B or C group. In some cases, however, it was not possible todifferentiate the components in these two groups. Further studies areneededtoresolve this problem.The agglutination procedure has been
suc-cessfully usedforserotyping C.neoformans
cells
fromcultures. Thus, the question can be raised as tothe needforimmunofluorescence to type
such
cells.
Immunofluorescence hasseveralim-portant advantages over agglutination. First,
contaminated cultures can be typed by the FA technique, whereas this may not be possible by
agglutination,withouttime-consuming purifica-tion procedures. Also, nonviable cultures with scantgrowth can be typed by the FA technique, whereas this might not be possible by aggluti-nation.
In mostlaboratoriesFAreagents areprepared from globulin fractions of sera. This is done to reducepresumednonspecific staining and to ob-tain more intense specific staining due to the
concentrationofantibodies.Inthepresent study whole-serum conjugates were used. Our decision tousesuch FA reagents wasbased upon the fact that they are easy toprepareand can be made in 1 day. Furthermore, we did not encounter nonspecific staining with these conjugates.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Bennett, J. E., K. J.Kwon-Chung,and D. H.Howard. 1977. Epidemiologic differences among serotypes of Cryptococcusneoformans.Am.J.Epidemiol. 105:582-586.
2.Dykstra,M.A., L. Friedman,and J. W.Murphy.1977. Capsulesize ofCryptococcusneoformans:control and relationshiptovirulence. Infect. Immun. 16:129-135. 3. Evans, E. E. 1949. Animmunologic comparisonoftwelve
strains of Cryptococcus neoformans (Torula histo-lytica).Proc.Soc.Exp.Biol. Med. 71:644-646.
4. Goldman, M. 1957. Staining Toxoplasmagondii with fluorescein-labelled antibody.II.A newserologic test
forantibodiestoToxoplasma baseduponinhibition of specific staining.J.Exp.Med.105:557-573.
5. Kaplan,W.,and M. S. Ivens. 1960. Fluorescentantibody staining ofSporotrichum schenckiiin culturesand
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
SEROTYPING C. NEOFORMANS BY 317
ical materials. J. Invest. Dermatol. 35:151-159. 6. Kaplan,W., and D. E. Kraft. 1969. Demonstration of
pathogenic fungiinformalin-fixed tissueby
immunoflu-orescence.Am. J.Clin. Pathol.52:420-421.
7. Kase,A.,and J. D. Marshall. 1960. Astudyof
Crypto-coccusneoformans bymeansof the fluorescent anti-body technique.Am. J.Clin. Pathol.34:52-56. 8. Marshall, J. D., L. Iverson, W. C. Eveland, and A.
Kase.1959.Comparisonoffluorescentantibody stain-ing andspecial histologic stains for the identification of Cryptococcusneoformans.Am.J. Pathol.35:684-685. 9. Marshall, J. D.,LIverson, W.C.Eveland, and A.
Kase.1961.Applicationand limitations of the
fluores-centantibody staininthespecific diagnosisof crypto-coccosis.Lab.Invest.10:719-728.
10. Moody,M.D.,M.Goldman, and B.M. Thomason. 1956.Staining bacterialsmearswithfluorescent
anti-body. I. General methods for Malleomyces pseudo-mallei. J. Bacteriol. 72:357-361.
11.Muchmore, H. G., E. N. Scott, F. G. Felton,andR. A. Fromtling. 1980. Cryptococcus neofonnansserotype
groupsencountered inOklahoma. Am. J. Epidemiol. 112:32-38.
12.Neill, J. M., I. Abrahams, and C. E. Kapros.1950.A
comparisonofthe immunogenicity of weakly
encapsu-lated and of strongly encapsuencapsu-lated strains of
Cryptococ-cusneoformans (Torula histolytica). J. Bacteriol.59:
263-275.
13. Pidcoe,V., and L. Kaufman.1968.Fluorescent-antibody
reagentfortheidentificationofCryptococcus
neofor-mans.Appl. Microbiol.16:271-275.
14. Wilson, D. E., J. E. Bennett, andJ.W.Bailey.1968. Serologic grouping of Cryptococcus neoformans.Proc. Soc.Exp. Biol. Med. 127:820-823.