• No results found

B R U C E K. L I N, M P H B E C O M I N G A M O M / C O M E N Z A N D O B I E N T R A I N I N G J A N U A R Y 1 4, P M

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "B R U C E K. L I N, M P H B E C O M I N G A M O M / C O M E N Z A N D O B I E N T R A I N I N G J A N U A R Y 1 4, P M"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

B R U C E K . L I N , M P H

B E C O M I N G A M O M / C O M E N Z A N D O B I E N T R A I N I N G

J A N U A R Y 1 4 , 2 0 1 3 3 4 5 P M

Understanding the Importance

of Your Family Health History

(2)

Disclosures

 Currently consulting with HughesRiskApps

(3)

Objectives

 Explain the key components of family health history

 Describe the importance of family health history to quality preconception/prenatal care

barriers to obtaining needed information in clinical settings

“Red flags”

Risk assessment and management guidelines

 Describe strategies for timely collection of necessary information for clinical care

FmHx collection tools

 Discuss strategies to test the usability/ impact of new

approaches

(4)

What is a Family Health History?

…a written or graphic

record of the diseases and

health conditions present

in a family.

(5)

Family History

Help diagnose

Build rapport with patients How to treat

patient

Value of Family Health History

Promote risk

assessment

(6)

Parts of a Family Health History

 Different ways to organize and display (e.g. pedigree)

 Critical elements

Easily updated and accurate

Allow detection and interpretation of patterns

Promote communication

 Three generations

Proband and historian

First, second and sometimes third degree relatives, & bloodline

Affected and unaffected relatives

Source: National Coalition Health Professional Education in Genetics

(7)

Recording a Family Health History

Me

Sister Brother

Mom

Dad Maternal

Uncle Maternal

Aunt Maternal

Grandmother Maternal

Grandfather

Paternal Uncle

Paternal Cousin

Paternal Grandfather

Paternal Grandmother

My generation Parents’

generation Grandparents’

generation

(8)

Red Flags

1. Family history of known or suspected genetic condition

2. Multiple affected family members with same or related disorders

3. Earlier age at onset of disease than expected 4. Developmental delays or mental retardation 5. Diagnosis in less-often-affected sex

6. Multifocal or bilateral occurrence in paired organs

(9)

Red Flags

7. One or more major malformations

8. Disease in the absence of risk factors or after preventive measures

9. Abnormalities in growth (growth retardation, asymmetric growth, excessive growth

10. Recurrent pregnancy losses (2+)

11. Consanguinity (blood relationship of parents)

12. Ethnic predisposition to certain genetic disorders

(10)

Red Flags

Cystic Fibrosis

European Ashkenazi Jewish

Sickle Cell Disease

African Asian Indian Middle East Mediterranean

Beta-

thalassemia

Mediterranean Asian Middle Eastern Hispanic Caribbean

Tay-Sachs disease

Ashkenazi Jewish French Canadian Cajun Pennsylvania Dutch

Alpha- thalassemia

SE Asian African Caribbean

Canavan disease Familial

Dysautonomia Mucolipidosis IV Niemann-Pick disease Type A Fanconi anemia group C

Bloom Syndrome Gaucher disease

Ashkenazi Jewish

(11)

Risk Assessment & Management Guidelines

During Prenatal or Preconception Period

(12)

Thinking About Your Own Family Health

History

(13)

Risk Assessment & Management Guidelines

During Prenatal or Preconception Period

(14)

Risk Assessment & Management Guidelines During Prenatal or Preconception Period

Source: Jack BD et. al. 2008 The clinical content of

preconception care: an overview and preparation of this

supplement. AJOG; S266

(15)

Preterm Birth and Family Health History

 Preterm birth a common, complex problem

 Preterm birth runs in families

Women born preterm are more likely to deliver preterm

• About 20% of women who deliver preterm

subsequently have another preterm birth (with the same partner)

 Can family health history be used as screening tool for health promotion and prevention?

Sources: Chapter 5: Medical and Pregnancy Conditions Associated with Preterm Birth. In Preterm Birth: Causes Consequences and Prevention. 2007 National

Academy Press; Crider KS et. al. Genetic variation associated with preterm birth: A

HuGE review. 2005 Gen Med: 7; pp583-604

(16)

Resources

 Online sites for consumers

March of Dimes www.marchofdimes.com

Genetic Alliance www.geneticalliance.org

Centers for Di

 U.S. Surgeon General

http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/

 Finding a genetic counselor

National Society of Genetic Counselor www.nsgc.org

(17)

Family History Collection Tools

(18)

Family History Collection Tools

• Who: Provider

elicited vs patient- entered information

• Format: Paper

based vs electronic

• When: Prior to the visit vs in the clinic

Graphic sources: Doctor and patient, TheNounProject

(19)

Paper forms

(20)

Age Vital Status Cancer status Age diagnosis Ethnicity/Religion

Genetic testing

Does this patient need genetic testing?

(21)

FirstPAGE: Prenatal Assessment Genetic

Evaluation

(22)

Electronic Health Records

 What are EHRs?

 EHRs is not the same as health information

technology

(23)

EPIC- IN dummy 8/30/12

(24)

GE Centricity- IN 9/19/11

(25)

What problem list looks like

(26)

Specialty EHR: Mid sized company

(27)

EHR≠Health Information Technology: Gaps in family history in the EHR

 Structured data

Core data set for family history

Genetic test results

 Interoperability

Patient data entry (changing)

 Usability

 Clinical Decision Support (CDS)

Risk Algorithms/Guidelines

Pedigree drawing

Latest classification of variants

 Documentation

Slide courtesy of Kevin Hughes, MD

(28)

Helping busy doctors and nurses: Clinical Decision Support

 “Clinical decision support (CDS) systems provide clinicians, staff, patients, and other individuals with knowledge and person-specific information,

intelligently filtered and presented at appropriate times, to enhance health and health care.”

Source: Berner ES. Clinical decision support systems: State of the Art. AHRQ Publication No. 09-0069-EF. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

June 2009.

(29)

EHR: Paper + extra work + memory

Patient completes paper

form

Reviews data using memory Staff enters

data into the

EHR Genetic

Consultation

Slide courtesy of Kevin Hughes, MD

(30)

Value Proposition: Less work + CDS=Higher Quality

Patient enters data into Tablet PC

Reviews Report &

Pedigree

Reviews suggested management

Patient and professional educational materials

Clinical Decision Support

Genetic

Consultation

Slide courtesy of Kevin Hughes, MD

(31)

Quality Improvement

 Consistently providing the best care to all patients

 Process vs Performance measures

 Outcomes?

usability, acceptability, satisfaction

Knowledge, confidence

Improved health as a result of intervention

(32)

Case Study: Summative Evaluation Design

Source of Data Outcome Method

Administrators Approach to integrating tool

Challenges with implementation

Level of effort and resources needed for integration

Interview

Patients Time required for patients to use tool

Patient satisfaction with tool Post-tool survey

Providers

Knowledge

Confidence using family history

Satisfaction using tool, including efficiency

Perceived usefulness of tool

Pre-tool survey Post-tool survey

Provider behavior

Provider practices regarding guidelines for:

• discussion, counseling, education;

• referrals to specialists; and

• screening tests offered and ordered

Chart audits

(33)

Clinical Trial: Is the Information Given By a Patient to a Computer Accurate?

 Murray MF et. al. 2013 “..within primary care

practices, valid patient-entered FHH information can be obtained electronically at high rates than…

standard provider-entered data…”

Source: Murray MF et al. Comparing Electronic Health Record Portals to Obtain

Patient-Entered Family Health History in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2013

Apr 16. [Epub ahead of print]

(34)

Acknowledgements

Curriculum reviewer:

A portion of this slide set is adapted from „Family Health History For Prenatal

Providers‟, funded through grant # U33MC12786 from the Health Resources and

Services Administration

References

Related documents

Individual Place- ment and Support (IPS) is an evidence-based practice within this approach. The aim of IPS is to provide indi- vidual job support to help people with

This study has profiled an increased expression of miR- 21, miR-200c, and miR-205 in the gracilis muscle follow- ing ischemic injury and identified four potential target genes

Conclusion: This validation of the Radboud Skills Questionnaire demonstrates that this German version is a simple and accurate instrument to assess and quantify disabilities

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN MEMPHIS.. Research

Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P: Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the

ited access to English language-based communication, infre- quent contact with clinicians familiar with their language and culture, and the challenging experience of working with

Results: The proteomic approach revealed significantly increased expression of carbonic anhydrase I (CA1) in the synovial membrane of patients with AS as compared with the RA and

The present study was conducted to test the hypotheses that patients with right- or left-sided TKA show a signifi- cant increase in BRT from pre-operative (pre-op, 1 day before