INDR 202
ENGINEERING ECONOMICS
CHAPTER 6
ANNUAL-EQUIVALENCE ANALYSIS
SPRING 2015
INSTRUCTOR: BORA ÇEKYAY
ANNUAL-EQUIVALENCE ANALYSIS
2
Annual-Equivalent Worth
Annual-Worth Analysis
ANNUAL-EQUIVALENT WORTH
3
𝐴𝐸 𝑖 = 𝑃𝑊 𝑖 𝐴|𝑃, 𝑖, 𝑁
Single project:
Accept if
𝐴𝐸 𝑖 > 0
, reject if
𝐴𝐸 𝑖 < 0
,
remain indifferent otherwise.
Mutually exclusive revenue projects:
Select the project
with largest
𝐴𝐸 𝑖
.
EXAMPLE 1: ANNUAL-EQUIVALENT WORTH
4
$189.43
0
$46.07
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
𝑖 = 12%
$100 $50
$80 $120 $70
0
2 3 4 5 6 1
$120 $120
$189.43
0
EXAMPLE 2: ANNUAL-EQUIVALENT WORTH
5
$500
$700 $800
$400 $400
$800
$1,000 $1,000
$500
EXAMPLE 2: ANNUAL-EQUIVALENT WORTH
6REPEATING CYCLE
$500 $700 $800 $400 $400 $1,000 $500 $700 $800 $400 $400 $1,000ONE CYCLE
𝑃𝑊 10% = $1,155.68
𝐴𝐸 10% = $304.87
TWO CYCLES
𝑃𝑊 10% = $1,873.27
ANNUAL-EQUIVALENT COST
7
CAPITAL
COSTS
OPERATING
COSTS
+
Annua
l-E
qu
iv
al
en
t
Co
ANNUAL-EQUIVALENT COST
8
CAPITAL-RECOVERY COST
𝑪𝑹 𝒊
annual equivalent of capital (ownership) costs from
purchasing assets used in production & service –
typically nonrecurring (one-time) costs
EQUIVALENT ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS
CAPITAL-RECOVERY COST
9
Components of capital cost:
initial cost
𝐼
&
salvage value
𝑆
0 1 2 3 N
𝐶𝑅 𝑖
0
N
𝐼
𝑆
𝐶𝑅 𝑖 = 𝐼 𝐴|𝑃, 𝑖, 𝑁 − 𝑆 𝐴|𝐹, 𝑖, 𝑁
EXAMPLE 3: CAPITAL-RECOVERY COST
10
0 1 2 3 4 5
𝐶𝑅 20%
0
5
𝐼 = $200,000
𝑆 = $50,000
𝐶𝑅 20% = $150,000 𝐴|𝑃, 20%, 5 + $50,000 20%
𝐶𝑅 20% = $60,157
EXAMPLE 4: COST OF OWNING A VEHICLE
11
% VALUE RETAINED AFTER
Price 2 YRS 3 YRS 4 YRS 5 YRS
2010 BMW M3 $58,400 70% 60% 51% 43%
2010 Hyundai-
EXAMPLE 4: COST OF OWNING A VEHICLE
12
𝐶𝑅 6% = $33,288 𝐴|𝑃, 6%, 5 + $25,112 6%
𝐶𝑅 6% = $9,409
$58,400
$25,112
EXAMPLE 4: COST OF OWNING A VEHICLE
13
𝐶𝑅 6%
Price 2 YRS 3 YRS 4 YRS 5 YRS
2010 BMW M3 $58,400 $12,009 $10,842 $10,045 $9,409
2010 Hyundai-
Accent GLS $14,365 $5,046 $4,020 $3,357 $2,951
ANNUAL-WORTH ANALYSIS
14
ANALYSIS OF LIFE-CYCLE COST
CALCULATION OF UNIT COST (PROFIT)
EXAMPLE 5: JUSTIFYING AN INVESTMENT
15
𝐼 = $20,000
,
𝐴 = $4,400
,
𝑆 = $4,000
,
𝑁 = 5
,
𝑖 = 10%
$20,000 0
1 2 3 4 5 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400
$8,400
𝑃𝑊 10% = −$836.88
EXAMPLE 5: JUSTIFYING AN INVESTMENT
16
$20,000 0
1 2 3 4 5
$4,000
CAPITAL COSTS
0 1 2 3 4 5
$4,400 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400
ANNUAL REVENUES
EXAMPLE 6: WORTH PER UNIT TIME
17 $75,000 $24,400 $27,340 $55,760 01 2 3
Yearly Operating Hours
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 2,000 2,000 2,000
𝑃𝑊 15% = $3,553
𝐴𝐸 15% = $3,553 𝐴|𝑃, 15%, 3 = $1,556
Savings per machine hour:
$C,DDEF,GGG
= $0.78/ℎ𝑟
EXAMPLE 6: WORTH PER UNIT TIME
18
$75,000
$24,400 $27,340
$55,760
0
1 2 3
Yearly Operating Hours
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 1,500 2,500 2,000
𝐴𝐸 15% = $1,556
𝐶
: annual-equivalent savings per machine hour
$1,556
= [1,500𝐶 𝑃|𝐹, 15%, 1 + 2,500𝐶 𝑃|𝐹, 15%, 2 + 2,000𝐶 𝑃|𝐹, 15%, 3 ] 𝐴|𝑃, 15%, 3
EXAMPLE 7: Break-even Unit Revenue
19
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 Depreciation $2,879 $1,776 $1,545 Scheduled maintenance 100 153 220
Insurance 635 635 635 Registration & taxes 78 57 50
Total ownership cost $3,693 $2,621 $2,450 Nonscheduled repairs 35 85 200
Replacement tires 35 30 27
Accessories 15 13 12
Gasoline & taxes 688 650 522
Oil 80 100 100
Parking & tolls 135 125 110
EXAMPLE 7: Break-even Unit Revenue
20
Total costs $4,680 $3,624 $3,421 Expected miles driven 14,500 13,000 11,500
𝐴𝐸𝐶 6% = 𝑃𝑊 6% 𝐴|𝑃, 6%, 3 = $3,933/𝑦𝑟
𝑋
: revenue per mile
Present-worth of total revenue:
1,000𝑋 14.5 𝑃|𝐹, 6%, 1 + 13 𝑃|𝐹, 6%, 2
+ $11.5 𝑃|𝐹, 6%, 3
𝐴𝐸 6% = $13,058𝑋/𝑦𝑟
Break-even:
$3,933/𝑦𝑟 = $13,058𝑋/𝑦𝑟
EXAMPLE 7: Break-even Unit Revenue
21
Annual-equivalent cost of owning & operating
LOSS
Annual-worth of rerevenue Break-even revenue rate $0.3012GAIN
4000 3000 2000 10000 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
Revenue rate per mile ($)
MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS
22
OUTSOURCING DECISIONS
TO BUY
TO PRODUCE
CAPITAL
MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS
23
Identify planning horizon & required annual quantity
.
Determine unit cost of outsourcing.
Compute unit cost of producing.
a. Identify production costs (capital & resources). b.Estimate net cash flows over planning horizon. c. Compute annual equivalent cost of producing.
d.Divide annual equivalent cost by required annual quantity.
EXAMPLE 8: MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS
24
A manufacturer needs 120K units of a part every year for 5 years.
Producing the part requires specialized tools that cost $2.2M & have salvage value $120K at the end of 5 years. The unit production cost
after buying the equipment is $26.30.
A supplier offers to provide the part for $35/unit for annual orders over 100K units.
EXAMPLE 8: MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS
25
Annual-equivalent cost of buying:
𝐴𝐸𝐶 12% = $35 120,000 = $4.2𝑀/𝑦𝑟
Annual-equivalent cost of producing:
𝐶𝑅 12% = $2.2𝑀 − $120𝐾 𝐴|𝑃, 12%, 5 + $120𝐾 12%
𝐶𝑅 12% = $591,412
𝑂𝐶 12% = $26.30 120,000 = $3,156,000
𝐴𝐸𝐶 12% = $3,747,412
EXAMPLE 8: MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS
26
Unit cost of buying:
$35/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡
Unit cost of producing:
𝐴𝐸𝐶 12% = $3,747,412
$3,747,412
120,000
= $31.23/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡
Producing the part saves the company $3.77 per unit.
EXAMPLE 9: PROJECTS WITH EQUAL LIVES
27
Standard Motor
Premium Motor
Size
25 HP
25 HP
Cost
$13,000
$15,600
Life
20 years
20 years
Salvage
$0
$0
Output
18.65 kW
18.65 kW
Efficiency
89.5%
93%
Energy cost
$0.07/kWh
$0.07/kWh
EXAMPLE 9: PROJECTS WITH EQUAL LIVES
28
Standard Motor
Premium Motor
Cost
$13,000
$15,600
𝐶𝑅 13%
$1,851
$2,221
Output
18.65 kW
18.65 kW
Efficiency
89.5%
93%
Input
20.838 kW
20.054 kW
Operating hours
3,120
3,120
Total input
65,018/yr
62,568/yr
Energy cost
$0.07/kWh
$0.07/kWh
EXAMPLE 9: PROJECTS WITH EQUAL LIVES
29
Standard Motor
Premium Motor
𝐶𝑅 13%
$1,851
$2,221
Annual operating cost
$4,551
$4,380
𝐴𝐸𝐶 13%
$6,402
$6,601
Cost per kWh
$0.1100
$0.1134
EXAMPLE 9: PROJECTS WITH EQUAL LIVES
30
LIFE-CYCLE-COST ANALYSIS
Switching from standard to premium motor:
Incremental capital cost:
$2,221 − $1,851 = $370
Incremental energy savings:
$4,551 − $4,380 = $171
A sum of 3,120 annual operating hours implies a
LOSS
EXAMPLE 9: PROJECTS WITH EQUAL LIVES
31
𝑋
: annual operating hours
Incremental capital cost:
$2,221 − $1,851 = $370
Incremental energy savings:
reduction in
Output
Efficiency
Operating
Hours
Energy
Cost
20.838
𝑋 0.07 − 20.054
𝑋 0.07 = $0.05488𝑋
Break-even:
$0.05488𝑋 = $370
EXAMPLE 9: PROJECTS WITH EQUAL LIVES
32
Standard
PROJECTS WITH UNEQUAL LIVES
33
Annual-worth analysis offers computational advantages
over present-worth analysis when:
Ø
required service period is indefinite and
Ø
each alternative is replaced by identical asset with
same costs & performance.
EXAMPLE 10: PROJECTS WITH UNEQUAL LIVES
34
Project A
0 1 2 3
$12,500
$5,000 $5,000 $3,000
Project B
0 1 2 3 4
$15,000
$4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $2,500
EXAMPLE 10: PROJECTS WITH UNEQUAL LIVES
35
Project A
0 1 2 3
$12,500
$5,000 $5,000 $3,000
FIRST CYCLE:
𝑃𝑊 15% = −$22,601
𝐴𝐸 15% = −$22,601 𝐴|𝑃, 15%, 3 =
−$9,899
4 REPLACEMENT CYCLES:
𝑃𝑊 15% = −$53,657
EXAMPLE 10: PROJECTS WITH UNEQUAL LIVES
36
FIRST CYCLE:
𝑃𝑊 15% = −$25,562
𝐴𝐸 15% = −$25,562 𝐴|𝑃, 15%, 4 =
−$8,954
3 REPLACEMENT CYCLES:
𝑃𝑊 15% = −$48,534
𝐴𝐸 15% = −$48,534 𝐴|𝑃, 15%, 12 =
−$8,954
Project B
0 1 2 3 4
$15,000
EXAMPLE 10: PROJECTS WITH UNEQUAL LIVES
SUMMARY
38
Annual-worth analysis
is based on annual-equivalent worth
(cost).
𝐴𝐸 𝑖 = 𝑃𝑊 𝑖 𝐴|𝑃, 𝑖, 𝑁
Capital-recovery cost
is the annual-equivalent cost of capital.
𝐶𝑅 𝑖 = 𝐼 − 𝑆 𝐴|𝑃, 𝑖, 𝑁 + 𝑖𝑆
Advantages of annual-worth analysis:
Ø Annual-equivalent worth is more common in financial reports. Ø Pricing items requires calculating unit costs.