• No results found

Inequalities and boundedness for commutators related to integral operator with general kernel

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Inequalities and boundedness for commutators related to integral operator with general kernel"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Inequalities and boundedness for

commutators related to integral operator

with general kernel

Jiasheng Zeng

*

*Correspondence: [email protected] College of Mathematics, Hunan University of Commerce, Changsha, 410205, P.R. China

Abstract

In this paper, we establish the sharp maximal function inequalities for the

commutators related to some integral operator with general kernel and theBMOand Lipschitz functions. As an application, we obtain the boundedness of the

commutators on Lebesgue, Morrey and Triebel-Lizorkin space. The operator includes Littlewood-Paley operators, Marcinkiewicz operators and Bochner-Riesz operator.

MSC: 42B20; 42B25

Keywords: commutator; Littlewood-Paley operator; Marcinkiewicz operator; Bochner-Riesz operator; sharp maximal function; Morrey space; Triebel-Lizorkin space;

BMO; Lipschitz function

1 Introduction and preliminaries

As the development of singular integral operators (see [–]), their commutators have been well studied (see [–]). In [–], the authors prove that the commutators generated by the singular integral operators andBMOfunctions are bounded onLp(Rn) for  <p<. Chanillo (see []) proves a similar result when singular integral operators are replaced by the fractional integral operators. In [–], the boundedness for the commutators gener-ated by the singular integral operators and Lipschitz functions on Triebel-Lizorkin and Lp(Rn) ( <p<) spaces are obtained. In [], some singular integral operators with gen-eral kernel are introduced, and the boundedness for the operators and their commutators generated byBMOand Lipschitz functions are obtained (see [, ]). The purpose of this paper is to prove the sharp maximal function inequalities for the commutator associated

with some integral operator with general kernel and theBMOand Lipschitz functions. As

an application, we obtain the boundedness of the commutator on Lebesgue, Morrey and Triebel-Lizorkin space. The operator includes Littlewood-Paley operators, Marcinkiewicz operators and Bochner-Riesz operator.

First, let us introduce some notations. Throughout this paper,Qwill denote a cube of Rnwith sides parallel to the axes. For any locally integrable functionf, the sharp maximal function off is defined by

M#(f)(x) =sup

Qx  |Q|

Q

f(y) –fQdy;

(2)

here, and in what follows,fQ=|Q|–

Qf(x)dx. It is well known that (see [, ])

M#(f)(x)≈sup

Qx

inf

cC  |Q|

Q

f(y) –cdy.

We say that f belongs to BMO(Rn) if M#(f) belongs to L(Rn) and define fBMO =

M#(f)L. It has been known that (see [])

ffkQBMO≤CkfBMO.

Let

M(f)(x) =sup

Qx  |Q|

Q

f(y)dy.

Forη> , let(f)(x) =M(|f|η)/η(x).

For  <η<  and ≤r<∞, set

,r(f)(x) =sup Qx

 |Q|–/n

Q

f(y)rdy /r

.

TheApweight is defined by (see [])

Ap=

wLlocRn :sup

Q

 |Q|

Q w(x)dx

 |Q|

Q

w(x)–/(p–)dx p–

<∞

,

 <p<∞,

and

A=wLplocRn :M(w)(x)Cw(x), a.e..

Forβ>  andp> , letF˙,∞(Rn) be the weighted homogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space (see []).

Forβ> , the Lipschitz spaceLipβ(Rn) is the space of functionsf such that

fLipβ= sup

x,yRn x=y

|f(x) –f(y)| |xy|β <∞.

In this paper, we will study some integral operators as follows (see []).

Definition  LetFt(x,y) be defined onRn×Rn×[, +∞) andbbe a locally integrable function onRn, set

Ft(f)(x) =

RnFt(x,y)f(y)dy

and

Ftb(f)(x) =

Rn

b(x) –b(y) Ft(x,y)f(y)dy

(3)

LetHbe the Banach spaceH={h:h<∞}. For each fixedxRn, we viewF

t(f)(x) and Fb

t(f)(x) as the mappings from [, +∞) toH. Set

T(f)(x) =Ft(f)(x),

whichTis bounded onL(Rn). The commutator related toFb

t is defined by

Tb(f)(x) =Ftb(f)(x)

and forFtwe find that there is a sequence of positive constant numbers{Ck}such that for anyk≥,

|yz|<|xy|

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,z)+Ft(y,x) –Ft(z,x) dxC

and

k|zy|≤|xy|<k+|zy|

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,z)+Ft(y,x) –Ft(z,x) qdy /q

Ck

k|zy| –n/q,

where  <q<  and /q+ /q= .

Definition  Letϕ be a positive, increasing function onR+ and there exists a constant D>  such that

ϕ(t)≤(t) fort≥.

Letf be a locally integrable function onRn. Set, for η<nand p<n/η,

fLp,η,ϕ= sup

xRn,d>

ϕ(d)–/n

Q(x,d)

f(y)pdy /p

,

whereQ(x,d) ={yRn:|xy|<d}. The generalized fractional Morrey space is defined by

Lp,η,ϕRn =fLlocRn :fLp,η,ϕ<∞.

We writeLp,η,ϕ(Rn) =Lp,ϕ(Rn) ifη= , which is the generalized Morrey space. Ifϕ(d) =dδ,

δ> , thenLp,ϕ(Rn) =Lp,δ(Rn), which is the classical Morrey spaces (see [, ]). Ifϕ(d) = , thenLp,ϕ(Rn,w) =Lp(Rn), which is the Lebesgue spaces.

(4)

It is well known that commutators are of great interest in harmonic analysis and have been widely studied by many authors (see [, ]). In [], Pérez and Trujillo-Gonzalez prove a sharp estimate for the multilinear commutator. The main purpose of this paper is to prove the sharp maximal inequalities for the commutator. As the application, we obtain

theLp-norm inequality, Morrey and Triebel-Lizorkin spaces boundedness for the

com-mutator.

2 Theorems

We shall prove the following theorems.

Theorem  Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{Ck} ∈l,  <β< , qs<∞and b∈Lipβ(Rn).Then there exists a constant C>  such that,for any f C∞(Rn)andx˜Rn,

M#Tb(f) (x)˜ ≤CbLipβ

,s(f)(x) +˜ ,s

T(f) (x)˜ .

Theorem  Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{Ck} ∈l,  <

β< ,qs<∞and b∈Lipβ(Rn).Then there exists a constant C> such that,for any fC∞(Rn)andx˜Rn,

sup

Q˜x

inf

cRn  |Q|+β/n

Q

Tb(f)(x) –cdxCbLipβ

Ms(f)(x) +˜ Ms

T(f) (x)˜ .

Theorem  Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{kCk} ∈l,qs<and bBMO(Rn).Then there exists a constant C> such that,for any fC

 (Rn)and ˜

xRn,

M#Tb(f) (x)˜ ≤CbBMOMs(f)(x) +˜ Ms

T(f) (x)˜ .

Theorem  Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{Ck} ∈l,  <β<

min(,n/q),q<p<n/β, /r= /p–β/n and b∈Lipβ(Rn).Then Tbis bounded from Lp(Rn) to Lr(Rn).

Theorem  Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{Ck} ∈l,  <D<n,  <β<min(,n/q),q<p<n/β, /r= /pβ/n and bLip

β(Rn).Then Tbis bounded

from Lp,β,ϕ(Rn)to Lr,ϕ(Rn).

Theorem  Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{Ck} ∈l,  <

β<min(,n/q),q<p<n/β, /r= /p–β/n and b∈Lipβ(Rn).Then Tbis bounded from Lp(Rn)toF˙β,∞

r (Rn).

Theorem  Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{kCk} ∈land bBMO(Rn).Then Tbis bounded on Lp(Rn)for qp<.

3 Proofs of theorems

(5)

Lemma (see []) Let T be the integral operator as Definition,the sequence{Ck} ∈l. Then T is bounded on Lp(Rn)for <p<.

Lemma (see []) For <β< and <p<∞,we have

fF˙β,

p

sup

Q·

 |Q|+β/n

Q

f(x) –fQdx Lp

≈sup

Q·

inf

c  |Q|+β/n

Q

f(x) –cdx Lp

.

Lemma (see []) Let <p<∞and wr<Ar.Then,for any smooth function f for which the left-hand side is finite,

RnM(f)(x)

pw(x)dxC

RnM

#

(f)(x)pw(x)dx.

Lemma (see []) Suppose that <η<n,  <s<p<n/ηand/q= /p–η/n.Then

,s(f)LqCfLp.

Lemma  Let <p<∞,  <D< n.Then,for any smooth function f for which the left-hand side is finite,

M(f)Lp,ϕ≤CM #

(f)Lp,ϕ.

Proof For any cubeQ=Q(x,d) inRn, we knowM(χQ)∈Afor any cubeQ=Q(x,d) by []. Noticing thatM(χQ)≤ andM(χQ)(x)≤dn/(|xx|–d)nifxQc, by Lemma , we have, forfLp,ϕ(Rn),

Q

M(f)(x)pdx=

Rn

M(f)(x)pχQ(x)dx

RnM(f)(x) pM(χ

Q)(x)dx

C

RnM

#(f)(x)pM(χ Q)(x)dx

=C

Q

M#(f)(x)pM(χQ)(x)dx

+

k=

k+Q\kQ

M#(f)(x)pM(χQ)(x)dx

C

Q

M#(f)(x)pdx+

k=

k+Q\kQM

#

(f)(x)p |Q| |k+Q|dx

C

Q

M#(f)(x)pdx+

k=

k+QM #

(f)(x)p–kndy

CM#(f)pLp,ϕ ∞

k=

(6)

CM#(f)pLp,ϕ ∞

k=

–nD kϕ(d)

CM#(f)pLpϕ(d),

thus

ϕ(d)

Q

M(f)(x)pdx /p

C

ϕ(d)

Q

M#(f)(x)pdx /p

and

M(f)Lp,ϕ≤CM#(f)Lp,ϕ.

This finishes the proof.

Lemma  Let T be the integral operator as Definition , ≤η<n,  < D< n and ≤p<∞.Then

T(f)

Lp,η,ϕ≤CfLp,η,ϕ.

Lemma  Let <D< n,  <η<n, s<p<n/ηand/q= /pη/n.Then

,s(f)Lq,ϕ≤CfLp,η,ϕ.

The proofs of the two lemmas are similar to that of Lemma  by Lemmas  and , we omit the details.

Proof of Theorem It suffices to prove forfC∞(Rn) and some constantC, the following inequality holds:

 |Q|

Q

Tb(f)(x) –CdxCbLipβ

,s(f)(x) +˜ ,s

T(f) (x)˜ .

Fix a cubeQ=Q(x,d) andx˜∈Q. Write, forf=Qandf=(Q)c,

Ftb(f)(x) =b(x) –bQ Ft(f)(x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x).

Then

 |Q|

Q

Ftb(f)(x) –Ft

(bQb)f (x)dx

|Q|

Q

b(x) –bQ Ft(f)(x)dx+  |Q|

Q Ft

(b–bQ)f (x)dx

+ 

|Q|

Q Ft

(b–bQ)f (x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x)dx

(7)

ForI, by Hölder’s inequality and Lemma , we obtain

I≤ C |Q|xsup∈Q

b(x) –bQ|Q|–/s

Q

T(f)(x)sdx /s

C|Q|–/sbLipβ|Q|β/n|Q|/sβ/n

 |Q|–/n

Q

T(f)(x)sdx /s

CbLipβ,s

T(f) (x).˜

ForI, by the boundedness ofT, we get

I≤

 |Q|

Rn

T(b–bQ)f (x) s dx /sC  |Q|

Rn

b(x) –bQ f(x)sdx /s

C|Q|–/s|Q|β/n||Q|/sβ/n

 |Q|–/n

Q

f(x)sdx /s

CbLipβ,s(f)(x).˜

ForI, recalling thats>q, we have

I≤ 

|Q|

Q

(Q)c

b(y) –bQf(y)Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)dy dx

≤ 

|Q| Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)b(y) –bk+Qf(y)dy dx

+ 

|Q| Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)bk+QbQf(y)dy dx

C

|Q| Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)qdy /q

× sup

y∈k+Q

b(y) –bk+Q

k+Q

f(y)qdy /q

dx

+ C

|Q|

Q

k=

|bk+QbQ|

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)qdy /q

×

k+Q

f(y)qdy /q dxCk= Ck

kdn/qk+/nbLipβk+Q/q

–/s

k+Q/sβ/n

×

 |k+Q|–/n

k+Q

f(y)sdy /s

+C

k=

bLipβkQ

β/n Ck

(8)

×

 |k+Q|–/n

k+Q

f(y)sdy /s

CbLipβ,s(f)(x)˜

k= Ck

CbLipβ,s(f)(x).˜

This completes the proof of Theorem .

Proof of Theorem It suffices to prove forfC∞ (Rn) and some constantC, the following inequality holds:

 |Q|+β/n

Q

Tb(f)(x) –CdxCbLipβ

Ms(f)(x) +˜ Ms

T(f) (x)˜ .

Fix a cubeQ=Q(x,d) andx˜∈Q. Write, forf=Qandf=(Q)c,

Ftb(f)(x) =b(x) –bQ Ft(f)(x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x).

Then

 |Q|+β/n

Q

Ftb(f)(x) –Ft

(bQb)f (x)dx

≤ 

|Q|+β/n

Q

b(x) –bQ Ft(f)(x)dx+  |Q|+β/n

Q Ft

(b–bQ)f (x)dx

+ 

|Q|+β/n

Q Ft

(b–bQ)f (x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x)dx

=II+II+II.

By using the same argument as in the proof of Theorem , we get

IIC

|Q|+β/n sup x∈Q

b(x) –bQ|Q|–/s

Q

T(f)(x)sdx /s

CbLipβ|Q|β/n|Q|–/s|Q|/sβ/n

 |Q|

Q

T(f)(x)sdx /s

CbLipβMs

T(f) (x),˜

II≤ 

|Q|+β/n|Q| –/s

Rn

T(b–bQ)f (x)sdx /s

| C

Q|+β/n|Q| –/s

Rn

b(x) –bQ f(x) s

dx /s

| C

Q|+β/n|Q|

–/s|Q|β/n|Q|/s

 |Q|

Q

f(x)sdx /s

CbLipβMs(f)(x),˜

II≤  |Q|+β/n

Q

(Q)c

(9)

≤  |Q|+β/n

Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)b(y) –bk+Qf(y)dy dx

+ 

|Q|+β/n Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)bk+QbQf(y)dy dx

C

|Q|+β/n Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y) q

dy /q

× sup

y∈k+Q

b(y) –bk+Q

k+Q

f(y)qdy /q

dx

+ C

|Q|+β/n

Q

k=

|bk+QbQ|

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y) q

dy /q

×

k+Q

f(y)qdy /q

dx

C|Q|–β/n

k= Ck

kdn/qk+/nbLipβk+Q

/q

×

 |k+Q|

k+Q

f(y)sdy /s

+C|Q|–β/n

k=

bLipβkQ

β/n Ck

kdn/qk+Q/q

×

 |k+Q|

k+Q

f(x)sdx /s

CbLipβMs(f)(x)˜

k= kβCk

CbLipβMs(f)(x).˜

This completes the proof of Theorem .

Proof of Theorem It suffices to prove forfC∞ (Rn) and some constantC, the following inequality holds:

 |Q|

Q

Tb(f)(x) –CdxCbBMOMs(f)(x) +˜ Ms

T(f) (x)˜ .

Fix a cubeQ=Q(x,d) andx˜∈Q. Write, forf=Qandf=(Q)c,

Ftb(f)(x) =b(x) –bQ Ft(f)(x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x).

Then

 |Q|

Q

Ftb(f)(x) –Ft

(bQb)f (x)dx

|Q|

Q

b(x) –bQ Ft(f)(x)dx+  |Q|

Q Ft

(10)

+  |Q|

Q Ft

(b–bQ)f (x) –Ft

(b–bQ)f (x)dx

=III+III+III.

ForIII, by Hölder’s inequality, we get

III

 |Q|

Q

b(x) –bQ s

dx /s

 |Q|

Q

T(f)(x)sdx /s

CbBMOMs

T(f) (x).˜

ForIII, choose  <r<s, by Hölder’s inequality and the boundedness ofT, we obtain

III

 |Q|

Rn

T(b–bQ)f (x) r

dx /r

C|Q|–/r

Rn

(b–bQ)f(x)rdx /r

C|Q|–/r

Q

b(x) –bQsr/(sr)dx

(sr)/sr

Q

f(x)sdx /s

CbBMO

 |Q|

Q

f(x)sdx /s

CbBMOMs(f)(x).˜

ForIII, recalling thats>q, taking  <p<∞,  <r<swith /p+ /q+ /r= , by Hölder’s inequality, we obtain

III≤  |Q|

Q

(Q)c

b(y) –bQf(y)Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)dy dx

|Q| Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y)b(y) –bQf(y)dy dx

|Q| Qk=

kd≤|yx|<k+d

Ft(x,y) –Ft(x,y) q

dy /q

×

k+Q

b(x) –bQ p

dx

/p

k+Q

f(y)rdy /r dxCk=

kkd n/q

kd≤|yx|<k+d

K(x,y) –K(x,y)qdy /q

× bBMO

 |k+Q|

k+Q

f(y)sdy /s

CbBMOMs(f)(x)˜

k= kCk

CbBMOMs(f)(x).˜

(11)

Proof of Theorem Chooseq<s<pin Theorem , we have, by Lemmas , , and ,

Tb(f)

LrM

Tb(f) LrCM#

Tb(f) Lr

CbLipβ,s

T(f) Lr+,s(f)Lr

CbLipβT(f)Lp+fLpCbLipβfLp.

This completes the proof of Theorem .

Proof of Theorem Chooseq<s<pin Theorem , we have, by Lemmas -,

Tb(f)Lr,ϕ≤M

Tb(f) Lr,ϕ≤CM #

Tb(f) Lr

CbLipβ,s

T(f) Lr,ϕ+,s(f)Lr

CbLipβT(f)Lp,β,ϕ+fLp,β,ϕ ≤CbLipβfLp,ϕ.

This completes the proof of Theorem .

Proof Theorem Chooseq<s<pin Theorem . By using Lemma , we obtain

Tb(f)F˙β,

rC

sup

Q·

 |Q|+β/n

Q

Tb(f)(x) –T(bQb)f (x)dx Lr

CbLipβMs

T(f) Lr+Ms(f)Lr

CbLipβT(f)Lp+fLpCbLipβfLp.

This completes the proof of the theorem.

Proof of Theorem Chooseqs<pin Theorem , we have

Tb(f)LpM

Tb(f) LpCM

#

Tb(f) Lp

CbBMOMs

T(f) Lp+Ms(f)Lp

CbBMOT(f)Lp+fLpCbBMOfLp.

This completes the proof of the theorem.

4 Applications

In this section we shall apply Theorems - of the paper to some particular operators such as the Littlewood-Paley operators, Marcinkiewicz operator and Bochner-Riesz operator.

Application  Littlewood-Paley operators.

(12)

() R(x)dx= ,

() |ψ(x)| ≤C( +|x|)–(n+),

() |ψ(x+y) –ψ(x)| ≤C|y|ε( +|x|)–(n++ε)when|y|<|x|. We denote (x) ={(y,t)Rn+

+ :|xy|<t}and the characteristic function of (x) by

χ (x). The Littlewood-Paley commutators are defined by

gψb(f)(x) =

Fb

t(f)(x) dt

t /

,

Sbψ(f)(x) =

(x)

Ftb(f)(x,y)dy dt tn+

/ ,

and

gμb(f)(x) =

Rn++

t t+|xy|

nμ

Ftb(f)(x,y)dy dt tn+

/ ,

where

Ftb(f)(x) =

Rn

b(x) –b(y) ψt(x–y)f(y)dy,

Ftb(f)(x,y) =

Rn

b(x) –b(z) f(z)ψt(y–z)dz

andψt(x) =t(x/t) fort> . SetFt(f)(y) =fψt(y). We also define

(f)(x) =

Ft(f)(x) dt

t /

,

(f)(x) =

(x)

Ft(f)(y) dy dt

tn+ /

and

(f)(x) =

Rn++

t t+|xy|

nμ

Ft(f)(y) dy dt

tn+ /

,

which are the Littlewood-Paley operators (see []). LetHbe the space

H=

h:h=

h(t)dt/t /

<∞

or

H=

h:h=

Rn++

h(y,t)dy dt/tn+ /

<∞

,

then, for each fixedxRn,Fb

t(f)(x) andFtb(f)(x,y) may be viewed as the mapping from [, +∞) toH, and it is clear that

(13)

Sbψ(f)(x) =χ (x)Ftb(f)(x,y), (f)(x) =χ (x)Ft(f)(y)

and

gμb(f)(x) =

t+|xty|nμ/Ftb(f)(x,y), (f)(x) =

t+|xty|nμ/Ft(f)(y) .

It is easily to see thatgψb,Sbψ, andgμbsatisfy the conditions of Theorems - (see [–]),

thus Theorems - hold forgb

ψ,Sbψ, andgμb.

Application  Marcinkiewicz operators.

Fixedλ>max(, n/(n+ )) and  <γ ≤. Letbe homogeneous of degree zero onRn withSn–(x)(x) = . Assume that∈Lipγ(Sn–). The Marcinkiewicz commutators

are defined by

μb(f)(x) =

Ftb(f)(x)dt t

/ ,

μbS(f)(x) =

(x)

Ftb(f)(x,y)dy dt tn+

/ ,

and

μbλ(f)(x) =

Rn++

t t+|xy|

nλ

Ftb(f)(x,y)dy dt tn+

/ ,

where

Ftb(f)(x) =

|xy|≤t

b(x) –b(y) (x–y) |xy|n–f(y)dy

and

Ftb(f)(x,y) =

|yz|≤t

b(x) –b(z) (y–z) |yz|n–f(z)dz.

Set

Ft(f)(x) =

|xy|≤t

(x–y) |xy|n–f(y)dy.

We also define

μ(f)(x) =

Ft(f)(x) dt t

/ ,

μS(f)(x) =

(x)

Ft(f)(y) dy dt

tn+ /

,

and

μλ(f)(x) =

Rn++

t t+|xy|

nλ

Ft(f)(y) dy dt

tn+ /

(14)

which are the Marcinkiewicz operators (see []). LetHbe the space

H=

h:h=

h(t)

dt/t /

<∞

or

H=

h:h=

Rn++

h(y,t)dy dt/tn+ /

<∞

.

Then it is clear that

μb(f)(x) =Fb

t(f)(x), μ(f)(x) =Ft(f)(x),

μbS(f)(x) =χ (x)Ftb(f)(x,y), μS(f)(x) =χ (x)Ft(f)(y),

and

μbλ(f)(x) =

t t+|xy|

nλ/

Ftb(f)(x,y), μλ(f)(x) =

t+|xty|nλ/Ft(f)(y) .

It is easy to see thatμb,μbS, andμbλsatisfy the conditions of Theorems - (see [–]), thus Theorems - hold forμb,μbS, andμbλ.

Application  Bochner-Riesz operator.

Letδ> (n– )/,

t(fˆ)(ξ) = ( –t|ξ|)δf(ξ) andBδt(z) =tnBδ(z/t) fort> . Set

Fδb,t(f)(x) =

Rn

b(x) –b(y) t(x–y)f(y)dy.

The maximal Bochner-Riesz commutator is defined by

Bbδ,(f)(x) =sup

t>

Bbδ,t(f)(x).

We also define

,∗(f)(x) =sup

t>

t(f)(x),

which is the maximal Bochner-Riesz operator (see []). LetHbe the spaceH={h:h=

supt>|h(t)|<∞}, then

Bbδ,(f)(x) =Bbδ,t(f)(x),

∗(f)(x) =Bδt(f)(x).

It is easy to see thatBb

δ,∗ satisfies the conditions of Theorems - (see []), thus

Theo-rems - hold forBb

δ,∗.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

(15)

References

1. Garcia-Cuerva, J, Rubio de Francia, JL: Weighted Norm Inequalities and Related Topics. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 16. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1985)

2. Stein, EM: Harmonic Analysis: Real Variable Methods, Orthogonality and Oscillatory Integrals. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)

3. Torchinsky, A: Real Variable Methods in Harmonic Analysis. Pure and Applied Math., vol. 123. Academic Press, New York (1986)

4. Coifman, RR, Rochberg, R, Weiss, G: Factorization theorems for Hardy spaces in several variables. Ann. Math.103, 611-635 (1976)

5. Pérez, C: Endpoint estimate for commutators of singular integral operators. J. Funct. Anal.128, 163-185 (1995) 6. Pérez, C, Trujillo-Gonzalez, R: Sharp weighted estimates for multilinear commutators. J. Lond. Math. Soc.65, 672-692

(2002)

7. Di Fazio, G, Ragusa, MA: Interior estimates in Morrey spaces for strong solutions to nondivergence form equations with discontinuous coefficients. J. Funct. Anal.112, 241-256 (1993)

8. Chanillo, S: A note on commutators. Indiana Univ. Math. J.31, 7-16 (1982)

9. Chen, WG: Besov estimates for a class of multilinear singular integrals. Acta Math. Sin.16, 613-626 (2000) 10. Janson, S: Mean oscillation and commutators of singular integral operators. Ark. Math.16, 263-270 (1978) 11. Paluszynski, M: Characterization of the Besov spaces via the commutator operator of Coifman, Rochberg and Weiss.

Indiana Univ. Math. J.44, 1-17 (1995)

12. Chang, DC, Li, JF, Xiao, J: Weighted scale estimates for Calderón-Zygmund type operators. Contemp. Math.446, 61-70 (2007)

13. Lin, Y: Sharp maximal function estimates for Calderón-Zygmund type operators and commutators. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. A Chin. Ed.31, 206-215 (2011)

14. Peetre, J: On convolution operators leavingLp-spaces invariant. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.72, 295-304 (1966) 15. Peetre, J: On the theory ofLp-spaces. J. Funct. Anal.4, 71-87 (1969)

16. Chiarenza, F, Frasca, M: Morrey spaces and Hardy-Littlewood maximal function. Rend. Mat.7, 273-279 (1987) 17. Di Fazio, G, Ragusa, MA: Commutators and Morrey spaces. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., A (7)5, 323-332 (1991) 18. Liu, LZ: Interior estimates in Morrey spaces for solutions of elliptic equations and weighted boundedness for

commutators of singular integral operators. Acta Math. Sci.25(1), 89-94 (2005)

19. Mizuhara, T: Boundedness of some classical operators on generalized Morrey spaces. In: Harmonic Analysis. ICM-90 Satellite Conference Proceedings (Sendai, 1990), pp. 183-189 (1991)

20. Coifman, RR, Rochberg, R: Another characterization of BMO. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.79, 249-254 (1980) 21. Liu, LZ: The continuity of commutators on Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory49, 65-76 (2004) 22. Liu, LZ: Triebel-Lizorkin space estimates for multilinear operators of sublinear operators. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math.

Sci.113, 379-393 (2003)

23. Liu, LZ: Boundedness for multilinear Littlewood-Paley operators on Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. Methods Appl. Anal.10(4), 603-614 (2004)

24. Torchinsky, A, Wang, S: A note on the Marcinkiewicz integral. Colloq. Math.60(61), 235-243 (1990) 25. Lu, SZ: Four Lectures on RealHpSpaces. World Scientific, River Edge (1995)

10.1186/1029-242X-2014-172

References

Related documents

The urgency of the actions of the Mental Health Professionals together with the parents of those with ADHD was identified to ensure the promotion of the Health of the

Literature survey has indicated that there are no analytical methods for estimation of Esomeprazole single component by UV-Visible Spectrophotometry but there are

Kerala is the south Indian state with a high burden of cardiovascular disease (Kutty V.R et al, 1993) and there is no significant difference in the prevalence of

It remains possible, however, that early oogenesis is a temperature-sensitive period for mitochondrial quality that later manifests as reduced embryonic hatch rate, consistent

Primary data on post-harvest handling, storage &amp; gaps, increment in yield and yield loss, marketing, income, access to agricultural inputs, food shortage and

Current available anticonvulsant drugs are able to efficiently control epileptic seizures in about 50% of the patients; another 25% may show improvement whereas the

human biological systems at the molecular level, using engineered nanodevices and nanostructures’’. National Institutes of Health announced a 4-year program for nanoscience

The mobile phase is considered to have acceptable stability if aged mobile phase produces equivalent chromatography and if impurity results at the limit of quantitation are