Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Elizabeth Holland
Travis Broome, MPH, MBA
Jason McNamara
Learning Objectives
1.Updates on the Medicare & Medicaid EHR
Incentive Programs
2.Understand the stage timeline and how the
stages impact implementation decisions
Medicare & Medicaid EHR
Incentives Program
Created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Where are we now?
• Medicaid launched in January 2011, started making payments for adopting/implementing/upgrading (AIU) soon after
• Today 49 states and 2 territories have Medicaid EHR incentive programs in place (Puerto Rico and Mariana Islands)
• Medicare opened registration in Jan 2011, opened attestation in April 2011 and started paying in May 2011
As of Jan 31, 2013
15.05%
84.95%
Registered Eligible Hospitals
As of Jan 31, 2013
30.13%
48.08%
21.79%
Registered Eligible Professionals
527,200 Total EPs
Registered Medicare EPs (253,477)
Payment Summary
Paid hospitals
26.82%
73.18%
Paid Eligible Professionals
60.74%
23.26%
13.89%
2.11%
Paid Eligible Professionals
527,200 Total EPs
Medicare-only Eligible Professionals
Could be eligible for both Medicare & Medicaid
incentives
Medicaid-only Eligible Professionals
Hospitals only eligible for Medicare incentive
Could be eligible for both Medicare & Medicaid
(most hospitals)
Everyone starts in Stage 1
When do
I
start Stage 2?
1
st
Year
of MU
2 years
Stage 2
24
Avoiding 2015 Payment Adjustments
•
Demonstrate meaningful use to CMS or Texas by:
Hospitals subtract 3 months
Hospitals Subtract 3 Months
Apply to CMS for a hardship exemption by:
July 1, 2014
Meaningful EHR User in 2011
or 2012
Never been a Meaningful
EHR User
End EHR reporting period by
Impact of Certification
Q: What Certified EHR Technology do I need in 2014?
A: EHR Technology certified to the 2014 Criteria
covering the “base” EHR plus all objectives I intend to
attest for in 2014.
Q: Does it matter if I am in Stage 1 or 2?
A: No
Q: Can I use 2014 Certified EHR Technology to satisfy
Stage 1 in 2013?
MU and Implementation
•
Put each objective in the context of the goal
•
Is it measurable?
•
How can usability and workflow be better?
26Why does CPOE
improve quality, safety
Always looking to the future
•
Stage 2 moves 9 of the 10 menu measures from Stage 1 to core
•
Of the 23 objectives in Stage 2 only 5 are completely new for Stage
2
28
Eligible Professionals
15 core objectives
5 of 10 menu objectives
20 total objectives
Eligible Professionals
17 core objectives
3 of 6 menu objectives
20 total objectives
Eligible Hospitals &
CAHs
14 core objectives
5 of 10 menu objectives
19 total objectives
• Lab Results
• Patient Lists
• Patient Education
• Summary of Care Records
• Medication Reconciliation
• Immunizations
• Patient Reminders
• Online Patient Information
EP
• Lab Results
• Patient Lists
• Patient Education
• Summary of Care Records
• Medication Reconciliation
• Immunizations
• Public health lab results
• Syndromic surveillance
• Secure Messaging
• Family Health History
• Imaging Results
• Registry Reporting
• Progress Notes
EP
• Online Patient Information
• Family Health History
• Imaging Results
• Registry Reporting
• Progress Notes
• E-Prescribing
• eMAR
• Electronic lab results
Current Stage 1 Measure
Age Limits= Age 2 for Blood Pressure & Height/ Weight
New Stage 1 Measure
Age Limits=
Age 3 for Blood Pressure, No age limit for Height/
Weight 30 Exclusion= All three elements not relevant to scope of practice Exclusion= Blood pressure to be separated from height /weight
Current Stage 1 Measure
One test of electronic
transmission of key clinical information
Stage 1 Measure Removed
Requirement removed effective
2013
32
33
Current Stage 1 Objective
Objective= Provide patients with e-copy of health information upon request Provide electronic access to health information
New
Stage1
Objective
33 Objective= Provide patients the ability to view online, download and transmit their health information
• The measure of the new objective is 50% of patients are provided access to their information; there is no requirement that 5% of patients do access their information for Stage 1.
Clinical Quality Measures
CQM Requirements Stage of Meaningful Use
CQM Requirements Year
36
Changes to CQMs Reporting
Prior to 2014 EPs Report 6 out of 44 CQMs • 3 core or alt. core • 3 menuBeginning in 2014
EPs Report 9 out of 64 CQMsSelected CQMs must cover at least 3 of the 6 NQS domains Recommended core CQMs: 9 for adult populations
9 for pediatric populations
37
Category Data Level Payer Level Submission Type Reporting Schema
EPs in 1st Year of Demonstrating MU*
Aggregate
All payer Attestation Submit 9 CQMs from EP measures table (includes adult and pediatric recommended core CQMs), covering at least 3 domains
EPs Beyond the 1st Year of Demonstrating Meaningful Use
Option 1 Aggregate All payer Electronic Submit 9 CQMs from EP measures table (includes adult and pediatric recommended core CQMs), covering at least 3 domains
Option 2 Patient Medicare Electronic Satisfy requirements of PQRS EHR Reporting Option using CEHRT
Group Reporting (only EPs Beyond the 1st Year of Demonstrating Meaningful Use)**
EPs in an ACO (Medicare Shared Savings Program or Pioneer ACOs)
Patient Medicare Electronic Satisfy requirements of Medicare Shared Savings Program of Pioneer ACOs using CEHRT
EPs satisfactorily reporting via PQRS group reporting options
Patient Medicare Electronic Satisfy requirements of PQRS group reporting options using CEHRT
*Attestation is required for EPs in their 1st year of demonstrating MU because it is the only reporting method that
would allow them to meet the submission deadline of October 1 to avoid a payment adjustment.
**Groups with EPs in their 1st year of demonstrating MU can report as a group, however the individual EP(s) who
are in their 1st year must attest to their CQM results by October 1 to avoid a payment adjustment.
38
Category Data Level Payer Level Submission Type Reporting Schema
Eligible Hospitals in 1st Year of Demonstrating MU* Aggregate
All payer Attestation Submit 16 CQMs from Eligible Hospital/CAH measures table, covering at least 3 domains
Eligible Hospitals/CAHs Beyond the 1st Year of Demonstrating Meaningful Use
Option 1 Aggregate All payer Electronic Submit 16 CQMs from Eligible Hospital/CAH measures table, covering at least 3 domains
Option 2 Patient All payer (sample)
Electronic Submit 16 CQMs from Eligible Hospital/CAH measures table, covering at least 3 domains
Manner similar to the 2012 Medicare EHR Incentive Program Electronic Reporting Pilot
Eligible Hospitals reporting for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program
*Attestation is required for Eligible Hospitals in their 1st year of demonstrating MU because it is the only reporting
Resources
• CMS Program Website www.cms.gov/EHRincentiveprograms • ONC Program Website www.healthit.gov
• Details on the Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives/Measures
• EPs:
http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/EP-MU-TOC.pdf
• Hospitals:
http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/Hosp_CAH_MU-TOC.pdf
• How much are the incentives?
• http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Basics.html
• Is my EHR certified?
• http://oncchpl.force.com/ehrcert?q=CHPL
• I advise others on meaningful use for a living/I develop certified EHRs
How are EPs doing on Stage 1 improving care?
Objective Performance Threshold 50% Interval Exclusion Deferral
CPOE 84% 30% 99.1%–74.3% 19% N/A
Electronic
Prescribing 79% 40% 92.6%–68.8% 23% N/A
Maintain Problem
List 96% 80% 100%–94.6% N/A N/A
Maintain
Medication List 97% 80% 100%–96.2% N/A N/A
Maintain
Medication Allergy List
96% 80% 99.8%–94.8% N/A N/A
Record
Demographics 91% 50% 99.6%–85.7% N/A N/A
Record Vital Signs 91% 50% 98.6%–86.1% 8% N/A
Record Smoking
Status 90% 50% 98.7%–84.7% 0.5% N/A
Drug Formulary
Checks N/A N/A N/A 14% 16%
Incorporate Lab
Results 91% 40% 100%–89.1% 4% 38%
Patient Lists N/A N/A N/A N/A 25%
Send Reminders to
How are EPs doing on Stage 1 Patient Engagement?
Objective Performance Threshold Interval 50% Exclusion Deferral
How are EPs doing on Stage 1 Care Coordination?
Objective Performance Threshold 50% Interval Exclusion Deferral
Medication
Reconciliation 89% 50% 99.9%–83.5% 3% 56%
Summary of Care at
Medicaid Eligibility Expansion
Patient Encounters
• The definition of what constitutes a Medicaid patient encounter has changed. The rule includes encounters for anyone enrolled in a Medicaid program,
including Medicaid expansion encounters (except stand-alone Title 21), and those with zero-pay claims
44
•
Patient Volume - Medicaid Encounters:
•Previously under Stage 1 rule:
• Service rendered on any one day where Medicaid paid for all or part of the service or Medicaid paid the co-pays, cost-sharing, or premiums
•Changed in Stage 2 rule (applicable to all stages):
• Service rendered on any one day to a Medicaid-enrolled individual, regardless of payment liability
45
•
Zero-pay claims include:
• Claim denied because the Medicaid beneficiary has maxed out the service limit • Claim denied because the service wasn’t covered under the State’s Medicaid
program
• Claim paid at $0 because another payer’s payment exceeded the Medicaid payment
• Claim denied because claim wasn’t submitted timely
46
•
CHIP encounters in patient volume calculation
•Previously under Stage 1 rule:
• Only CHIP encounters for patients in Title 19 Medicaid expansion programs •Under Stage 2 rule (applicable to all stages):
• CHIP encounters for patients in Title 19 and Title 21 Medicaid expansion programs
47
•
90-day Reporting Period for Patient Volume
•Under Stage 1 rule, Medicaid patient volume for providers calculated across 90-day
period in last calendar year (for EPs) or Federal fiscal year (for hospitals)
•Under Stage 2 rule (applicable to all stages), States also have option to allow
providers to calculate Medicaid patient volume across 90-day period in last 12 months preceding provider’s attestation
•Also applies to needy individual patient volume •Applies to patient panel methodology
•
Children’s Hospitals
•Medicaid made approximately 12 additional children’s hospitals eligible that have
not been able to participate to date, despite meeting all other eligibility criteria, because they do not have a CMS Certification Number since they do not bill Medicare.
49
•
Hospital Incentive Calculation - discharge-related amount:
•
Hospitals that began participating before FFY 2013 use
discharge data from hospital fiscal year that ends during FFY
prior to hospital fiscal year that services as the first payment
year
•
Hospitals that begin participating in FFY 2013 or later use
50
•
Adopt, Implement, or Upgrade (AIU) - starting in 2014:
•
To align our polices with ONC EHR Certification Standards we
modified our definition of Adopt, Implement or Upgrade.
•
Providers can no longer attest to AIU with any Certified EHR
Technology.
•
Providers who attest to AIU in 2014 are required to secure Certified
EHR Technology that can bring them to Meaningful Use in the
TITLE SESSION # DATE TIME ROOM SPEAKERS Stage 1: CMS EHR Incentive
Programs 23 Monday, March 4 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM New Orleans Theater C
•Elizabeth Holland, CMS •Travis Broome, CMS •Jason McNamara, CMS
Stage 2: CMS EHR Incentive
Programs 62 Tuesday, March 5 9:45 AM - 10:45 AM New Orleans Theater C
•Elizabeth Holland, CMS •Robert Anthony, CMS •Jason McNamara, CMS •Steven Posnack, ONC
CMS Town Hall:
CMS and eHealth: Building the Future
81 Tuesday, March 5 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM New Orleans Theater C
•Robert Tagalicod, CMS •Kate Goodrich, CMS •Elizabeth Holland, CMS
• Christine Stahlecker, CMS
•Maribel Franey, CMS
ICD-10 and Administrative
Simplification 131 Wednesday, March 6 8:30 AM - 9:30 AM Room 294
• Christine Stahlecker, CMS
•Matthew Albright, CMS •Kari Gaare, CMS •Denesecia Green, CMS
Views from the CMS
Administrator 138 Wednesday, March 6 9:45 AM - 10:45 AM New Orleans Theater C •Marilyn Tavenner, CMS CMS Quality Measurement 178 Thursday, March 7 11:15 AM - 12:15 PM New Orleans Theater C
•Maria Michaels, CMS •Deborah Kraus, CMS •Maria Harr, CMS