• No results found

Vol 2014

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 2014"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

http://scienceasia.asia

_______________

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45.

Key words and phrases: Subordination, Hankel determinant, functions with positive real part, univalent functions and close to star functions.

©2014 Science Asia 1 / 13

SECOND HANKEL DETERMINANT FOR SUBCLASSES OF PASCU CLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

M. S. SAROA, GURMEET SINGH AND GAGANDEEP SINGH

Abstract: We define two subclasses of the class of Pascu functions. For any real 𝜇, we are interested in determining the upper bound of 2

2 4 3

a a −µa for an analytic function

( )

2 3

2 3 ...

f z = +z a z +a z +

(

z <1

)

belonging to these classes.

1. INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITION:

PRINCIPLES OF SUBORDINATION: Let f z

( )

and F z

( )

be two analytic functions in the unit disc { : 1}

E= z z < . Then, f z

( )

is said to be subordinate toF z

( )

in the unit disc E if there exists an analytic function w z

( )

in E satisfying the conditionw

( )

0 =0, w z

( )

<1 such that f z

( )

=F w z

( )

( )

and we write asf z

( )

F z

( )

. In particular if F z

( )

is univalent in D, the above definition is equivalent to f

( ) ( )

0 =F 0 and f E

( )

F E

( )

.

FUNCTIONS WITH POSITIVE REAL PART: Let Ƥ denotes the class of analytic functions of the form

(1.1)

( )

2

1 2

1 ...

P z = +p z p z+ +

with ReP z

( )

>0, z D.

Let Adenote the class of functions of the form (1.2)

( )

2

k k k

f z za z =

= +

which are analytic in the open unit disc D={ :z z <1}.

Sis the class of functions of the form (1.2) which are univalent. The Hankel determinant: ([9],[10])

Let

( )

0

n n n

f za z =

=

be analytic in D. For q≥1, the qth Hankel determinant is defined by

( )

1 12 1

1 2 2

... ... ...

n n n q

q n n n q

n q n q n q

a a a

H n a a a

a a a

+ + −

+ + +

+ − + + −

(2)

The Hankel determinant was studied by various authors including Hayman[3] and Ch. Pommerenke ([13],[14]). For q= 2 and n = 2 , the second Hankel determinant for the analytic function f z

( )

is defined by

( )

2 3

(

2

)

2 2 4 3

3 4

2 a a

H a a a

a a

= = −

0

R represents the class of functions f z

( )

A and satisfying the condition

(1.3) Re f z

( )

0, z

 

  >

 

 

z D.

0

R is a particular case of the class of close to star function defined by Reade[17]. The class R0 and its subclasses were vastly studied by several authors including Mac-Gregor[7].

Let Rbe the class of functions f z

( )

Aand satisfying (1.4) Ref z

( )

>0,z D.

The class R was introduced by Noshiro [11] and Warschawski[18] ( known as N-W class) and it was shown by them thatRis a class of univalent functions. The class Rand its subclasses were investigated by various authors including Goel and the author ([1], [2]). For α ≥0, R1

( )

α and R2

( )

α denote the classes of functions in Awhich satisfy, respectively, the conditions

(1.5) Re 1

(

) ( )

f z f z

( )

0, z

α α

 

 − + ′ >

 

 

z D

and

(1.6) Ref z

( )

zf z′′

( )

>0, z D.

The classes R1

( )

α and R2

( )

α were introduced by Pascu [12] and are called Pascu classes of

functions. It is obvious that f z

( )

R1

( )

α implies that zf z

( )

R2

( )

α .

We shall deal with the following classes

(1.7) 1

(

)

(

) ( )

( )

1

; , : 1 , 0, 1 1,

1

f z Az

R A B f A f z B A z D

z Bz

α = ∈  −α +α ′ + α ≥ − ≤ < ≤ ∈ 

 + 

 

and

(1.8) R2

(

α; ,A B

)

f A f z:

( )

αzf z

( )

11 AzBz,α 0, 1 B A 1,z D

  + 

′′

= + ≥ − ≤ < ≤ ∈

+

  

  .

(

)

1 ;1, 1

R α − ≡ R1

( )

α and R2

(

α − ≡;1, 1

)

R2

( )

α .R1

(

α; ,A B

)

is a subclass of R1

( )

α andR2

(

α; ,A B

)

is a

sublass of R2

( )

α . The classes R1

(

α; ,A B

)

and R2

(

α; ,A B

)

were studied by the

author[8].Througout the paper, we assume that α≥ − ≤0, 1 B A< ≤1 and z D∈ .

(3)

Lemma 2.1 [15]. Let P z

( )

Ƥ

( )

z , then

2

n

p (n=1,2,3,..)

Lemma 2.2 [5]. Let P z

( )

Ƥ

( )

z , then

(

)

2 2

2 1 1

2p = p + 4−p x,

(

)

(

)

(

)

2

3 2 2 2 2

3 1 1 1 1 1 1

4p = p +2p 4− p x p− 4−p x +2 4− p 1− x z

 

for some x and z with x ≤1,z ≤1 and p1∈  0,2.

3. MAIN RESULTS

Theorem 3.1: Let fR1

(

α; ,A B

)

, then

2

2 4 3

a a −µa

(3.1)

(3.2)

(3.3)

(3.4)

Proof. By definition of subordination,

(

1

) ( )

( )

1

( )

( )

1

f z Aw z

f z

z Bw z

α α ′ +

− + =

+ ,

Taking real parts,

(

) ( )

( )

1

( )

( )

Re 1 Re

1

f z Aw z

f z

z Bw z

α α

   +

 − + ′ =  

   + 

   

(

)

(

)(

)

{

}

(

)(

)(

) (

{

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

{

}

(

)(

)(

) (

{

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2

2

2

2 2

2 2

2

2

2 2

2

2

3 1 2 2 1 1 3

1 4 0;

1 2

2 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 3

3 1 2 4 1 1 3

1 4

1 2

2 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 3

3 1 2

0 ;

4 1 1 3

1 4

1

B if

A B

B A B

if

B A B

α µ α α µ

µ α

α α α α µ α α

α µ α α µ

α

α α α α µ α α

α µ

α α

µ

 

+ − + +

 

 − 

 

  + + + + − + + +

 

 

+ − + +

 

 

  +

 −   + + + + + + +

 

 

+ ≤ ≤

+ +

 − 

 

(

+

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

(

)(

)

)

(

)(

) (

)

{

}

(

)(

)(

) (

{

)(

) (

)

}

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2

2

2 2 2

2

2 2

2

3 1 2 3 1 2

;

4 1 1 3 2 1 1 3

2

2 1 1 3 3 1 2

1 4

1 2

2 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 1 2

3 1 2 . 2 1 1 3

if

B A B

if

α α

µ

α α α α

α

µ α α α µ

α

α α α µ α α α

α µ

α α

                  

+ +

≤ ≤

+ + + +

 

 

+ + +

 −  +

  

  + + + + + − + +

+

 ≥

 + +

(4)

≥11BrAr >11AB

− − (z r= )

which implies that

(3.5)

(

)

(

)

2

(

)

3

( )

2 3 4

1

1 B 1 a z 1 2 a z 1 3 a z ... P z

A B α α α

+ + + + + + + =

− .

Equating the coefficients in (3.5), we get

(3.6)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1 2

2 3

3 4

1

1 1

1 2 1

1 3 p B a

A B p B a

A B p B a

A B

α

α

α

= 

  −  +

 − 

 =

  

− +

 

= 

+

System (3.6) ensures that

(3.7)

( )

(

2

)

(

)

2

(

)(

)( )

2

2 4 3 1 2 1(4 )3 1 1 3 2 2

C α a a −µa = + α p p −µ +α + α p ,

(3.8)

( )

(

)(

)(

)

2

2

4 1 1 3 1 2

1 A B C

B

α =  −  +α + α + α

  .

Using Lemma 2.2 in (3.7), we obtain

( )

(

2

)

(

)

2 3

(

2

)

(

2

)

2

(

2

)

2

2 4 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 4 1 2 4 1 1

C α a a −µa = + α p p + pp x p− − p x + −p  − x z 

 

 

(

)(

)

2

(

2

)

2

1 1

1 1 3 p 4 p x

µ α α  

− + + + −

for some x and z with x ≤1 , z ≤1.

or

(3.9)

( )

(

2

)

(

)

2

(

)(

)

4

2 4 3 1 2 1 1 3 1

C α a a −µa = + α −µ +α + α p

 

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2 2

1 1

2

2 2 2

1 1

2 2 2

1 1

2 1 2 1 1 3 4

4 1 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3

2 1 2 4 1

p p x

p p x

p p x z

α µ α α

α µ α α µ α α

α

 

+ + − + +

 

 

− − + − + + + + +

 

 

+ + −  − 

Replacing p1by p∈[0,2] and applying triangular inequality to (3.9), we get

( )

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

2 4 2 2 2

2

2 2 2 2

2 4 3

2 2 2

1 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 4

4 1 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3

2 1 2 4 1 , 1

p p p

C a a a p p

p p x

α µ α α α µ α α δ

α µ α µ α α µ α α δ

α δ δ

+ + + + + + +

  

− ≤ + + − + + + + +

 

+ + − − = ≤



(5)

( )

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 4 2 2

2 2 2

2 2

2 2 2

2 4 2 2

2 2 2

2 2

2 4 3

1 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 4

2 1 2 1 1 3 4

4 1 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 2 1 2

0;

1 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 4

2 1 2 1 1 3 4

4 1 2

p p p

p p

p p p

if

p p p

p p

p

C a a a

α µ α α α

α µ α α δ

α µ α α µ α α α δ

µ

α µ α α α

α µ α α δ

α α µ  + + ++ +       + + − + + −     + − + − + + − + + − +   ≤  + + ++ +       + + − + + −   + − + − ≤

{

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)(

) (

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2 2 2

2

2 4 2 2

2 2 2

2 2

2 2 2

2

1 1 3 4 1 1 3 2 1 2

(1 2 )

0 ;

1 1 3

1 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 4

2 1 1 3 1 2 4

4 1 1 3 1 2 4 1 1 3 2 1 2

1 2

1 1 3

p p

if

p p p

p p

p p p

if

µ α α µ α α α δ

α µ

α α

µ α α α α

µ α α α δ

µ α α α µ α α α δ

α µ α α                + + + + + +     + ≤ ≤ + +  + + ++ +       + + + − + −     + − + + − + + + + − +   + ≥ + +                      

= F

( )

δ .

( )

0

F′ δ > and therefore F

( )

δ is increasing in [0,1]. F

( )

δ attains its maximum value atδ =1. (3.10) reduces to

( )

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

2 4 2 2 2

2

2 2

2 4 2 2 2

2

2 2 2

2 4 3

1 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 4

4 1 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 0;

1 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 4

(1

4 1 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 0

p p p

p p if

p p p

C a a a p p if

α µ α α α µ α α

α µ α α µ α α µ

α µ α α α µ α α

α µ α µ α α µ α α µ

+ + +++ + +           + − + − + + − + + ≤    + + +++ + +           − ≤ + − + + + + + + ≤ ≤    

(

)(

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)(

) (

)

}

(

)(

)

(

(

)(

)

)

2

2 4 2 2 2

2 2

2 2

2 ) ;

1 1 3

1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 4

1 2

4 1 1 3 1 2 4 1 1 3 ,

1 1 3

p p p

p p if

α

α α

µ α α α µ α α α

α

µ α α α µ α α µ

(6)

= G p

( )

, or

(3.11)

( )

2

2 4 3

C α a a −µamax G p

( )

, Case (i) µ ≤0

( )

(

)

2

(

)(

)

4

(

)

2

(

)(

)

2

(

)(

)

2 1 2 1 1 3 4 3 1 2 2 1 1 3 16 1 1 3

G p = −  + α −µ +α + α p +  + α − µ +α + α p − +α + α µ

   

( )

G p is maximum for

G p

( )

= −8 1 2

(

+ α

)

2µ

(

1+α

)(

1 3+ α

)

p3+8 3 1 2

(

+ α

)

22 1µ

(

+α

)(

1 3+ α

)

p=0

   

   

which implies that

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2

3 1 2 2 1 1 3

1 2 1 1 3

p

α µ α α

α µ α α

+ + +

 

 

=

+ + +

 

 

.

Putting the corresponding value of G p

( )

along with C

( )

α from (3.8) in (3.11), we get

(3.1)

Case (ii) 0

(

(1 2 )

)(

2

)

1 1 3

α µ

α α

+

≤ ≤

+ +

( )

(

)

2

(

)(

)

4

(

)

2

(

)(

)

2

(

)(

)

2 1 2 1 1 3 4 3 1 2 4 1 1 3 16 1 1 3

G p = −  + α −µ +α + α p +  + α − µ +α + α p + +α + α µ

   

Sub-case (a) 0

(

3(1 2 )

)(

2

)

4 1 1 3

α µ

α α

+ ≤ ≤

+ +

It is easy to see that G p

( )

is maximum at

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2

3 1 2 4 1 1 3

1 2 1 1 3

p α µ α α

α µ α α

+ + +

 

 

=

+ + +

 

 

.

Substituting the corresponding value of G p

( )

and the value of C

( )

α in (3.11), (3.2) follows

Sub-case (b)

(

3(1 2 )

)(

2

)

4 1 1 3

α µ

α α

+

≤ ≤

+ +

(

)(

)

2

(1 2 )

1 1 3

α

α α

+

+ +

( )

0

G p′ < and G p

( )

is maximum at p=0 In this sub-case maxG p

( )

=16 1

(

)(

1 3+ α µ

)

.

Case (iii)

(

(1 2 )

)(

2

)

1 1 3

α µ

α α

+ ≥

+ +

( )

(

)(

) (

)

2 4

(

)(

) (

)

2 2

(

)(

)

2 1 1 3 1 2 4 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 16 1 1 3

G p = − µ +α + α − + α p +  µ +α + α − + α p + +α + α µ

   

Sub-case (a)

(

(1 2 )

)(

2

)

1 1 3

α µ

α α

+

≤ ≤

+ +

(

)(

)

2

3(1 2 ) 2 1 1 3

α

α α

+

(7)

( )

0

G p′ < and maximum G p

( ) ( )

=G 0 =16 1

(

)(

1 3+ α µ

)

Combining the cases (ii)-(b) and (iii)-(a) we arrive at (3.3) Sub-case (b)

(

3(1 2 )

)(

2

)

2 1 1 3

α µ

α α

+ ≥

+ +

A simple calculus shows that G p

( )

is maximum at

(

)(

) (

)

(

)(

) (

)

2 2

2 1 1 3 3 1 2

1 1 3 1 2

p µ α α α

µ α α α

+ + +

 

 

=

+ + +

 

 

Substituting the corresponding value of G p

( )

and the value of C

( )

α in (3.11), (3.4) follows

Remark 3.1 Put A=1 and B= -1 in the theorem we get the estimates for the classR1

( )

α .

Taking A = 1, B = -1 and α =0 in the theorem we have Corollary 3.1 Iff R∈ 0, then

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2 2

2 4 3

2

3 2

4 , 0; 2 1

3 4 3

4 ,0 ;

4 2 1

3 3

4 , ;

4 2

2 3 3

4 , . 2

2 1

a a a

µ

µ µ µ

µ

µ µ

µ µ

µ µ

µ

µ µ µ

 −

  −

+ ≤ ≤

≤ 

≤ ≤ 

+

Letting A = 1,B = -1 and α =1 we get Corollary 3.2 If f R∈ , then

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2 2

2 4 3

2

27 16 4

0; 9 144 9 8

27 32 4 27

,0 ;

9 32

144 9 8

4 27, 27;;

9 32 16

16 27 4 27

, .

9 16

144 8 9 a a a

µ µ µ

µ

µ µ

µ µ

µ

µ µ

µ µ µ

µ

+ ≤ ≤

≤ 

≤ ≤ 

+

This results was proved by Janteng et al [4] Theorem 3.2 Let f R∈ 2

(

α; ,A B

)

, then

2

2 4 3

(8)

(3.12)

(3.13)

(3.14)

(3.15)

Proof. We have

( )

( )

1

( )

( )

1

Aw z f z zf z

Bw z

α +

′ + ′′ =

+

Taking real parts,

( )

( )

1

( )

( )

1 1

Re Re

1 1

1

Aw z Ar A

f z zf z

Br B

Bw z

α  +  − −

 ′ + ′′ =  ≥ >

  +

 

(z r= )

This implies that

(3.16)

(

)

(

)

2

(

)

3

( )

2 3 4

1

1 B 2 1 a z 3 1 2 a z 4 1 3 a z ... P z

A B α α α

 − 

+   + + + + + + =

 

Identifying the terms in (3.16), we get

(3.17)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1 2 2 3 3 4

1 2 1

1 3 1 2

1 4 1 3

p A B a B p A B a B p A B a B α α α  =    −  +   −   =    − +     =  +

System (3.17) yields (3.18)

( )

(

2

)

2 4 3

C α a a −µa =9

(

1 2+ α

) ( )

2p1 4p3 −8 1µ

(

)(

1 3+ α

)( )

2p2 2,

(

)

(

)(

)

{

}

(

)(

)(

) (

{

)

(

)(

) }

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

{

}

(

)(

)(

) (

{

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

27 1 2 16 1 1 3

1 4

9 1 2 144 1 1 3 1 2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3

0;

27 1 2 32 1 1 3

1 4

9 1 2 144 1 1 3 1 2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3

27 1 2

0 ;

32 1 1 3

1 B A B if B A B if B

α µ α α µ

α

α α α α µ α α

µ

α µ α α µ

α

α α α α µ α α

α µ α α   + − + +    −      + + + + − + + +   ≤   + − + +    −  +     + + + + − + + +   + ≤ ≤ + + −

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

(

)(

)

)

(

)(

)

(

)

{

}

(

)(

)(

)

{

(

)(

) (

)

}

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 9 1 2

27 1 2 27 1 2

; 32 1 1 3 16 1 1 3

16 1 1 3 27 1 2

1 4

9 1 2 144 1 1 3 1 2 8 1 1 3 9 1 2

27 1 2 . 16 1 1 3 A B if B A B if µ α α α µ

α α α α

µ α α α µ

α

α α α µ α α α

(9)

(3.19)

( )

(

)(

)(

)

2

2

288 1 1 3 1 2 1

A B C

B

α = −   +α + α + α 

 

 

By Lemma 2.2, (3.19) can be written as

(

)(

)

2

(

2

)

2

1 1

8 1µ α 1 3α p 4 p x

− + + + −

for some x and z with x ≤1,z ≤1. or

(3.20)

( )

(

2

)

2 4 3

C α a a −µa

(

)

2

(

)(

)

4 1

9 1 2α 8 1µ α 1 3α p

 

= + − + +

 

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

2 2 2

1 1

2 9 1 2 α 8 1µ α 1 3α p 4 p x

+ + − + +

 

(

2

)

{

(

)

2

(

)(

)

(

)(

)

}

2

1

4 p  9 1 2α 8 1µ α 1 3α 32 1µ α 1 3α x

− − + − + + + + +

 

(

)

2

(

2

)

2

1 1

18 1 2α p 4 p 1 x z

+ + −

  .

Replacing p1by p∈  0,2and applying triangular inequality to (3.20), we get

( )

2

2 4 3

C α a a −µa 9 1 2

(

+ α

)

28 1µ

(

+α

)(

1 3+ α

)

p4

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

2 2 2

2 9 1 2+ α −8 1µ +α 1 3+ α p 4− p δ

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)(

)

2

2 2 2

4 p  9 1 2α 8 1µ α 1 3α p 32 1µ α 1 3α δ

+ − + − + + + + +

 

+18 1 2

(

+ α

)

2p

(

4p2

)

1δ2

  . (δ = x ≤1)

which can be put in the form

( )

(

a a a

)

(

)

p

[

p p

(

p

)

x p

(

p

)

x

(

p

)

(

x

)

z

]

(10)

( )

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 4 2 2

2 2 2

2 2

2 2

2

2 4 2 2

2 2

2 4 3

9 1 2 8 1 1 3 18 1 2 4

2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3 4

9 1 2 8 1 1 3 32 1 1 3

4 0;

18 1 2

9 1 2 8 1 1 3 18 1 2 4

2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3

p p p

p p

p

p if

p

p p p

C a a a

α µ α α α

α µ α α δ

α µ α α µ α α

δ µ

α

α µ α α α

α µ α α

α µ

+ + ++ +

 

 

 

+ + − + +

 

+ + + + +

 

+ −

− + 

 

+ + ++ +

 

 

 

+  + − + +

− ≤

(

)

(

)

{

(

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)(

) (

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 4 2 2

2 2 2

2 2 2

2

4

9 1 2 8 1 1 3 32 1 1 3

4

18 1 2 9 1 2

0 ;

8 1 1 3

8 1 1 3 9 1 2 18 1 2 4

2 8 1 1 3 9 1 2 4

8 1 1 3 9 1 2 32 1 1 3

4

18 1 2

p p

p p

p

if

p p p

p p

p p

p

δ

α µ α α µ α α

δ α

α µ

α α

µ α α α α

µ α α α δ

µ α α α µ α α

α

− 

+ + + + + +

 

− + 

 

+ ≤ ≤

+ +

+ + ++ +

 

 

 

+ + + − +

 

+ + + + + +

− +

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2

9 1 2 . 8 1 1 3 if

δ

α µ

α α

                                    

 

 

 

+

+ +

= F

( )

δ

( )

0

F′ δ > which means that F

( )

δ is increasing in [0 , 1] and F

( )

δ

(11)

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)

(

)(

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

{

}

(

)

2 4 2 2 2

2

2 2

2 4 2 2 2

2

2 2

2

2 4 3

9 1 2 8 1 1 3 2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3 4

4 9 1 2 8 1 1 3 32 1 1 3 , 0;

9 1 2 8 1 1 3 2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3 4

(4 ) 9 1 2 8 1 1 3 32 1 1

p p p

p p if

p p p

p p

C a a a

α µ α α α µ α α

α µ α α µ α α µ

α µ α α α µ α α

α µ α α µ α

α µ

+ + +++ + +

   

   

 

+ − + − + + − + +

 

+ + +++ + +

   

   

+ − + − + + + +

− ≤

(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

{

(

)(

) (

)

}

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2

2 4 2 2 2

2

2 2

2

3 9 1 2

0 ;

8 1 1 3

8 1 1 3 9 1 2 2 8 1 1 3 9 1 2 4

4 8 1 1 3 9 1 2 32 1 1 3

9 1 2 . 8 1 1 3 if

p p p

p p

if

α

α µ

α α

µ α α α µ α α α

µ α α α µ α α

α µ

α α

         

 

+

 

 +

≤ ≤

+ +

  

   

+ + + + + + +

   

   

+ − + + − + + + +

  

+ 

≥ 

+ +



Or

(3.22)

( )

(

2

)

2 4 3

C α a a −µaG p

( )

. Case (i) µ ≤0

( )

(

)

2

(

)(

)

4

(

)

2

(

)(

)

2

2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3 4 27 1 2 16 1 1 3

G p = −  + α − µ +α + α p +  + α − µ +α + α p

   

(

)(

)

128 1 α 1 3α µ

+ + + .

( )

G p is maximum for

which gives

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2

27 1 2 16 1 1 3

9 1 2 8 1 1 3

p α µ α α

α µ α α

+ − + +

=

+ − + + .

Putting the corresponding value of G p

( )

along with the value of C

( )

α from (3.19) in (3.22),

we get (3.12).

Case (ii)

(

(

)(

)

)

2

9 1 2 0

8 1 1 3

α µ

α α

+ ≤ ≤

+ +

( )

(

)

2

(

)(

)

4

(

)

2

(

)(

)

2

2 9 1 2 8 1 1 3 4 27 1 2 32 1 1 3

G p = −  + α − µ +α + α p +  + α − µ +α + α p

   

(

)(

)

128 1 α 1 3α µ

+ + +

( )

=−8

[

9

(

1+2

)

2 −8

(

1+

)(

1+3

)

]

3 +8

[

27

(

1+2

)

2 −16

(

1+

)(

1+3

)

]

=0

p p p

(12)

Sub-case (a)

(

(

)(

)

)

2

27 1 2 0

32 1 1 3

α µ

α α

+ ≤ ≤

+ +

An elementary calculus shows that G p

( )

is maximum at

(

)

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

)

2 2

27 1 2 32 1 1 3

9 1 2 8 1 1 3

p α µ α α

α µ α α

+ − + +

=

+ − + + .

With the corresponding value of G p

( )

along with the value of C

( )

α in (3.22) , we arrive at

(3.13).

Sub-case (b)

(

(

)(

)

)

(

(

)(

)

)

2 2

27 1 2 9 1 2

32 1 1 3 8 1 1 3

α α

µ

α α α α

+ +

≤ ≤

+ + + +

G p

( )

<0 and G p

( )

is maximum at p=0 . maxG p

( ) ( )

=G 0 =128 1

(

)(

1 3+ α µ

)

.

Case (iii)

(

(

)(

)

)

2

9 1 2 8 1 1 3

α µ

α α

+ ≥

+ +

( )

(

)(

) (

)

2 4

(

)(

)

(

)

2 2

2 8 1 1 3 9 1 2 4 16 1 1 3 27 1 2

G p = −  µ +α + α − + α p +  µ +α + α − + α p

   

(

)(

)

128 1 α 1 3α µ

+ + + .

Sub-case (a)

(

(

)(

)

)

(

(

)(

)

)

2 2

9 1 2 27 1 2

8 1 1 3 16 1 1 3

α α

µ

α α α α

+ +

≤ ≤

+ + + +

( )

0

G p′ < and MaxG p

( ) ( )

=G 0 =128 1

(

)(

1 3+ α µ

)

.

Combining the cases (ii-b) and (iii-a), (3.14) follows.

Sub-case (b)

(

(

)(

)

)

2

27 1 2 16 1 1 3

α µ

α α

+ ≥

+ +

An easy calculation shows thatG p

( )

is maximum at

(

)(

)

(

)

(

)(

) (

)

2 2

16 1 1 3 27 1 2

8 1 1 3 9 1 2

p µ α α α

µ α α α

+ + − +

=

+ + − + .

Substituting the corresponding value of G p

( )

along with the value of C

( )

α in (3.22), we

obtain (3.15).

Remark 3.2 Putting A=1 and B= -1 in the theorem we get the estimates for the class R2

( )

α .

(13)

REFERENCES

[1] R.M.Goel and B.S.Mehrok, A subclass of univalent functions, Houston J. Math., 8(1982), 343-357.

[2] R.M.Goel and B.S.Mehrok, A subclass of univalent functions, J.Austral.Math.Soc. (Series A), 35(1983), 1-17.

[3] W.K. Hayman, Multivalent functions, Cambridge Tracts in math. and math-physics, No. 48 Cambridge university press, Cambridge (1958).

[4] A.Janteng , S.A.Halim and M.Darus, Estimates on the second Hankel functional for functions whose derivative has a positive real part, J. Quality Measurement and analysis, JQMA(1) (2008) 189-195.

[5] R.J.Libera and E.J.Zlotkiewics, Early coefficients of the inverse of a regular convex function, Proceeding Amer. Math.Soc., 85(1982) , 225-230.

[6] J.E. Littlewood , On inequalties in the theory of functions. Procc. London Math. Soc. 23 (1925) ,481-519 . [7] T.H. MacGregor, The radius of univalence of certain analytic functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1963) 514-520.

[8] B S Mehrok. Two subclasses of certain analytic functions (to appear) .

[9] J W Noonan and D K Thomas , Coefficient differences and Hankel Determinant of really p-val;ent functions , Proc. London Math Soc.[ 3],25 (1972), 503-524.

[10] J W Noonan and D K Thomas , On the second Hankel determinant of a really mean p-valent functions. Trans. American Math Society (223) 1976, 337-346.

[11] K.Noshiro, On the theory of schlicht functions,J. Fac. Soc. Hokkaido univ.Ser.1,2 (1934-1935), 129-155. [12] N N Pascu, Alpha- starlike functions, Bull. Uni Brasov CXIX, 1977.

[13] C H Pommerenke, On the coefficients and Hankel determinant of univalent functions, J. London math. Soc. 41, 1966, 111-122.

[14] C H Pommerenke , On the Hankel determinant of univalent functions, Mathematica 14 (C) , 1967, 108-112.

[15] C.H. Pommerenke , Univalent functions wadenheoch and Ruprech, Gotingen, 1975

[16] W.W. Rogosinski, On coefficients of subordinate functions, Proc. London Math. Zeith (1932), 92-123. [17] M O Reade, On close to convex univalent functions, Michhigan Math. J. 1955, 59-62.

[18] S.S.Warschawski, On the higher derivative at the boundary in conformal mapping, Tran. Amer. Math.Soc., 38(1935), 310-340.

References

Related documents

In examining the effectiveness of the PEERS® program, the SSIS-RS and the QPQ results demonstrated statistically significant improvements from pre-test to

According to HVHF by different ultrasound directing, all the patients were divided into two groups ((ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM), group A, n=51cases)) and

Among the other chitin pathway mutants tested (Table 3), the ace2 ⌬ mutant produced dark pigment at levels comparable to those of the control strain, while melanization was reduced

We performed epicardial left ventricular lead implantation via small chest incisions combining the interventional endocardial lead implantation for CRT in 4 patients with chronic

The adapted version began by gathering demographic data from the participant (gender, age, and ethnicity), followed by a section that asked subjective norms and attitudes about

articles supporting chiropractic science (which was subsequently published as the Chiropractic Archives Research Collection (CRAC)); delivering one of the few chiropractic papers

The left endpoint of each interval is used to determine the height of each rectangle when using left-endpoint rectangles and the right endpoint is used when using