• No results found

Core Benchmarks: Transportation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Core Benchmarks: Transportation"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Hot Topic Report

Core Benchmarks: Transportation

Spotlight on Metrics for Truckload,

Less-Than-Truckload, and Parcel

Supply Chain Consortium

(2)

Table of Contents

Introduction

3

Truckload Metrics

5

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

14

Parcel Metrics

21

Report Authors

26

(3)

This report offers valuable insight into today’s shipping and transportation industry. The data on the following pages represent survey responses across several

industries including:

 Apparel and Footwear

 Department and Discount Stores

 Electronics

 Food and Beverage

 Home Products

 Industrial Commercial Manufacturers

 Personal Care

(4)

Manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) are all represented in the data, which has been formatted by quartile:

 Top Quartile = Leaders

 Second Quartile = Competitive Advantage

 Third Quartile = Competitive Disadvantage

 Fourth or Bottom Quartile = Opportunity

(5)
(6)

On-Time Pickup Percentage

(per the respondent company’s requirements)

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥99.0%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥97.6% and <99.0%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥90.0% and <97.6%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0%

Those leading the way in on-time pickup are capable of greater than 99.0%. The median value is 97.2%.

(7)

On-Time Delivery Percentage

(per customer requirements)

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥98.5%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥96.0% and <98.5%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥92.0% and <96.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <92.0%

The leaders in on-time delivery are capable of greater than 98.5%. The median value is 96.5%.

(8)

Orders Shipped Complete On-Time

(OSCOT) Percentage

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥99.0%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥96.0% and <99.0%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥93.0% and <96.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <93.0%

The leaders in OSCOT are capable of greater than 99.0%. The median value is 96.4%.

(9)

Orders Delivered Complete On-Time

(ODCOT) Percentage

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥98.5%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥95.0% and <98.5%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥90.0% and <95.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0%

The leaders in ODCOT are capable of greater than 98.5%. The median value is 95.0%.

(10)

Billing Error Rate Percentage

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≤0.1%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≤1.0% and >0.1%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≤4.0% and >1.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) >4.0%

The leaders in billing error rate are capable of less than 0.1%. The median value is 1.0%.

(11)

Claims Incidence Rate Percentage

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≤0.2%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≤1.0% and >0.2%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≤4.0% and >1.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) >4.0%

The leaders in claims incidence rate are capable of less than 0.2%. The median value is 0.9%.

(12)

Average Capacity Utilization Percentage

(if weighing out)

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥85.0%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥75.0% and <85.0%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥70.0% and <75.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <70.0%

The leaders in average capacity utilization (if weighing out) are capable of greater than 85.0%. The median value is 80.0%. Some extremely heavy products are

(13)

Average Capacity Utilization Percentage

(if cubing out)

Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥95.0%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥93.0% and <95.0%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥90.0% and <93.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0%

The leaders in average capacity utilization (if cubing out) are capable of greater than 95.0%. The median value is 93.5%. Large cube products or

(14)

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

(15)

On-Time Pickup Percentage

(per the respondent company’s requirements)

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥99.0%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥96.0% and <99.0%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥90.0% and <96.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <90.0%

The leaders in on-time pickup are capable of greater than 99.0%. The median value is 97.0%.

(16)

On-Time Delivery Percentage

(per customer requirements)

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥97.0%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥93.0% and <97.0%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥88.0% and <93.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <88.0%

The leaders in on-time delivery are capable of greater than 97.0%. The median value is 93.5%.

(17)

Orders Shipped Complete On-Time

(OSCOT) Percentage

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥99.9%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥97.0% and <99.9%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥92.0% and <97.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <92.0%

The leaders in OSCOT are capable of greater than 99.9%. The median value is 97.2%.

(18)

Orders Delivered Complete On-Time

(ODCOT) Percentage

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥97.9%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥94.0% and <97.9%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥89.0% and <94.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <89.0%

The leaders in ODCOT are capable of greater than 97.9%. The median value is 94.5%.

(19)

Billing Error Rate Percentage

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≤0.1%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≤2.0% and >0.1%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≤5.0% and >2.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) >5.0%

The leaders in billing error rate are capable of less than 0.1%. The median value is 2.0%.

(20)

Claims Incidence Rate Percentage

Less-Than-Truckload Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≤0.1%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≤1.0% and >0.1%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≤3.0% and >1.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) >3.0%

The leaders in claims incidence rate are capable of less than 0.1%. The median value is 0.9%.

(21)

Parcel Metrics

(22)

On-Time Pickup Percentage

(per the respondent company’s requirements)

Parcel Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥99.5%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥98.5% and <99.5%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥97.0% and <98.5%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <97.0%

The leaders in on-time pickup are capable of greater than 99.5%. The median value is 98.7%.

(23)

On-Time Delivery Percentage

(per customer requirements)

Parcel Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≥98.9%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≥98.0% and <98.9%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≥95.0% and <98.0%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) <95.0%

The leaders in on-time delivery are capable of greater than 98.9%. The median value is 98.1%.

(24)

Billing Error Rate Percentage

Parcel Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≤0.3%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≤1.6% and >0.3%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≤4.0% and >1.6%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) >4.0%

The leaders in billing error rate are capable of less than 0.3%. The median value is 1.5%.

(25)

Claims Incidence Rate Percentage

Parcel Metrics

Quartile Values

Leaders (top quartile) ≤0.2%

Competitive Advantage (second quartile) ≤1.4% and >0.2%

Competitive Disadvantage (third quartile) ≤2.0% and >1.4%

Opportunity (bottom quartile) >2.0%

The leaders in claims incidence rate are capable of less than 0.2%. The median value is 1.3%.

(26)

To learn more about benchmarking and best practices, additional resources are available to members through the Supply Chain Consortium: www.supplychainconsortium.com

Qualified companies may join the Supply Chain Consortium’s LinkedIn or Xing Group:

www.supplychainconsortium.com/rc/connections.asp

Bruce Tompkins

Executive Director

6870 Perry Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27616 (919) 855-5527 Office (919) 345-0479 Mobile PL Y CHA IN EX CELLENCE Chris Ferrell Director

6435 Hazeltine National Drive Suite 105 Orlando, FL 32822 (407) 362-0369 Office (919) 624-3947 Mobile PL Y CHA IN EX CELLENCE

Report Authors

References

Related documents

Just as occurred in the repeated note variation ( page 152 ) , the rocking &#34;chords&#34; of Variation #7 are not adjusted to the harmonic changes occurring in measure

The syndication’s value to the owner will be related to the NPV/DCF value, however, since there is an inefficient market for syndications, the value is going to be discounted at

While there is growing work in identifying and docu- menting information needs for public health practi- tioners [69], we propose that the next steps in formalizing this

Financial records: This should be all costs for care of members’ animal, reflects showing, activity and.. care records in a monthly format with a

zero-price line and the other lines, shown on Figure 8 (b) indicates the abatement that would be achieved by that CO2 price over the range of fuel price ratios. Those abatement

provide in support of their claim. Courts have generally held that claimants are under no legal obligation to provide this information to meet their requirement to file

Collar load plotted against recorded microstrain at individual gauge locations is shown in figure 7A, while load profile along the length of the cable at different collar loads

A debtor may never have personal liability on the debt secured by the mortgage. Such is the nature of a nonrecourse mortgage. It may occur, as in Johnson, with a chapter 7 discharge,