• No results found

Georgia Food Processing Program HOW THE STATE OPERATES AGREEMENTS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Georgia Food Processing Program HOW THE STATE OPERATES AGREEMENTS"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Georgia Food Processing Program

1

HOW THE STATE OPERATES AGREEMENTS

Food Distribution Unit (FDU)

 Administers state food processing program

 Participates in USDA National Processing Agreement (NPA) Program

 Considers approval of processors based on proof of marketability in the state

 End Product sales to distributors for school purchases

 Letter of intent from eligible Recipient Agencies (RAs)

 Bid awards

 Establishes 5 year State Participation Agreement (SPA) with commercial food Processors under NPA

 Effective July 1 or January 1 or later

 Approves Processor value pass through (VPT) System

 Approves end products listed on Processor’s Summary End Product Data Schedule (SEPDS); posts on Portal

 Reviews processing requisitions, determines truckloads, places orders with USDA

 Audits Processor monthly performance report (MPR) to ensure compliance, proper allocation, reimbursements to RAs

(2)

Georgia Food Processing Program

2

VALUE PASS THROUGH (VPT) SYSTEM

 VPT is the Processor’s selected method used to return full value of the USDA food contained in the end product to the eligible purchasing RA

 RAs receive end products based on the Processor’s selected VPT method that is acceptable in the State  GA allows the following Value Pass Through methods:

 Refund to Recipient Agency

 Fee for Service – Billed by Processor  Fee for Service – Billed by Distributor  Net Price Through Distributor (NOI)

REFUND - INDIRECT RELATIONSHIP: PROCESSOR → DISTRIBUTOR → RA → PROCESSOR

 Processor sells end products to commercial distributor at the commercial/gross price

 RA purchases approved end products from commercial distributor

 Distributor invoices RA gross price plus markup  RA submits refund application and any required

(3)

Georgia Food Processing Program

3

from the end of delivery purchase for value of USDA food contained in end product

 RA submits refund application and any required

supporting documentation to processor on quarterly basis if total refund is $25 or less during the quarter

 Processors issues rebate check to RA within 30 days of receipt of refund application or on quarterly basis for refunds $25 or less during the quarter

FEE-FOR-SERVICE - BILLED BY PROCESSOR: DIRECT RELATIONSHIP: PROCESSOR →RA

 Processor converts USDA food into approved and specified end product

 Processor delivers approved and specified end product to RA or RA designee

 RA must receive end product:

 own school storage facility, OR

 state contracted commercial distributor that serves warehouse region

 Processor directly bills RA a “fee-for-service” – cost of ingredients (minus commodity value), labor, packaging , overhead, other incurred costs

(4)

Georgia Food Processing Program

4

 RA pays Processor when delivered and received by

designated location (see Guidance Language for Payment of Processing Fees)

 State contracted distributor bills RA for storage and delivery fee, “Item E” for processed end product

 RA should follow proper receiving procedures

FEE-FOR-SERVICE – BILLED BY DISTRIBUTOR: INDIRECT RELATIONSHIP: PROCESSOR

→DISTRIBUTOR → RA

 Processor converts USDA food into approved and specified end product

 Processor sells approved end product to Distributor

 Distributor can only sell to RA with USDA food allocation  Distributor bills RA total case price: processor’s

fee-for-service

+

distributor fee  RA pays Distributor

(5)

Georgia Food Processing Program

5

NET OFF INVOICE (NOI)–INDIRECT RELATIONSHIP: PROCESSOR → DISTRIBUTOR → RA

 Extended pilot until SY 2012

 Processor sells end products to distributor for sale to anyone

 Distributor sells to RA with USDA food allocation

 Distributor provides discount for USDA food value on invoice

 Distributor reports sales to verification company

 Processor refunds distributor for value of USDA food after sales verification

DISTRIBUTOR

RA PROCESSOR

(6)

Georgia Food Processing Program

6

FACTORS FOR RA CONSIDERATION MENU PLANNING

 It all begins with the menu

WAYS TO SPEND COMMODITY ENTITLEMENT  Direct Delivery

 DOD

 Processing Diversion

DETERMINE COST EFFECTIVENESS

 Calculate Rebate , Fee for Service, NOI, Delivery fees PROCURE PROCESSED USDA FOODS

 2 ways to bid

 Formal - Use when purchases exceed your district’s/state’s purchasing threshold

• Competitive Sealed Bidding

• Competitive Proposals (competitive negotiation)  Informal - Use when purchases will not exceed your

district’s/state’s purchasing threshold • Phone quotes

(7)

Georgia Food Processing Program

7

KNOW YOUR SPENDING LIMITS  How much entitlement do you want to allocate to

processing?

 What is your district or state spending threshold?  Always use the most restrictive regulation

KNOW YOUR TIME LIMITS

 When do I order USDA foods for the next year?  Bid early to avoid delivery delays

HOW TO PLACE ORDERS

 Select Processing Diversion under product catalog  Select USDA food and add to cart

 Except B672 Veg Oil Bulk; ordered on state level  Check out

 Select processor in drop down box

 Select Morgan Produce if Processor unknown-Notify FDU as soon as possible

 Insert quantity-pounds or cases  Update to get value

(8)

Georgia Food Processing Program

8

MORGAN PRODUCE ORDERS

HOW THE STATE HANDLES

 Morgan Produce is a dummy account used to hold orders and deduct entitlement; therefore, orders are not bid until approved processor is identified

 Declines all orders under Morgan Produce, except full truckload

 Put requests from declined orders in spreadsheet to calculate truckloads

 Orders full truckload under the state level in Morgan Produce with late delivery period

 RAs sends written documentation of selected processor, USDA food(s), quantity to FDU

 FDU requests USDA to change destination for requests at least half of truckload or full truck

 Transfers to order(s) with sufficient unallocated pounds  Requests USDA to change destination, delivery period  Delivery period will be after 11/15 delivery period

(9)

Georgia Food Processing Program

9

RECEIPT OF PROCESSED END PRODUCT UNDER FEE FOR SERVICE BILLED BY PROCESSOR

RA RESPONSIBILITY

 Designate delivery to school storage facility or state contracted distributor that serves region (i.e., ACC; Cooperative Purchasing, U.S. Foodservice, Williams)  Ensure correct end product, quantity received by

designated delivery agent

 Pay processor within required timeframe (see Guidance Language for Payment of Processing Fees)

 Follow recordkeeping procedures: USDA Processed Foods Instructions, posted in the School Nutrition Portal under Legacy Reports

References

Related documents

All except the 6 coupled wheels were fitted with axle boxes that had sprung ball type lubrication points and suitable means of getting the oil to the bronze sleeves.. The tender

The MOE and the Teacher Education Division (BPG) also need to re-structure the pre-service teachers training and provide more in-service courses for history teachers in relation

Keywords: open access; open-source software; digital divide; information and communication tech- nologies; developing countries; Sub Saharan Africa; information; digital

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Township Committee of the Township of White, that the contract for one (1) 2013 model 4 x 4 dump truck, body and attachments be and

CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, RONALD HENGES; CITY TREASURER, LESTER SEASONGOOD; CITY CLERK, LAVERNE COLLINS; ARCHITECTURAL AND CONFORMITY BOARD:. KENNETH WISCHMEYER, NOLAN STINSON,

A high growth rate and a relatively low death rate led to a higher tolerance index at phase d, indicating a better adaptive tolerance behavior of fungi in heavy metals.. In Figures

The data set contains the photometric parameters (hereinafter named as input features), as well as flags describing the nature of the objects (in machine learning methods, this flag

We proposed an effective communication framework between broker and virtual machine for assigning the task and fetching the results in optimum time and cost using Broker Virtual