Herpes
Simplex:
A Possible
Cause
of Brain-Stem
Encephalitis
Patricia H. Ellison, M.D., and Peggy A. Hanson, M.D.
From the Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Albany Medical College of Union University, Albany,
New York
ABSTRACT. Herpes simplex virus was isolated from the tracheal aspirate of a 10-year-old boy presenting with acute onset of multiple cranial nerve palsies and a mild right hemiparesis. There was also an elevated herpes complement-fixation titer with decrease in the following weeks. Although the criteria for diagnosis of central nervous system infection by herpes virus have been debated, we propose that this represents a case of brain-stem encephalitis due to herpes simplex infection. The importance of early diagnosis and evaluation of therapy are emphasized by this case in which the patient recovered completely. Pediatrics, 59:240-243, 1977, HERPES VIRUS, ENCEPHALITIS, CRANIAL NERVE PALSIES.
Herpes
simplex
has
been
well
documnted
as
the
cause
of brain-stem
encephalitis
in only
two
patients
in
the
literature,
one
a 14-year-old
boy
who subsequently
died
and
the
other
a
48-year-old
man
who
recovered.’
Other
viruses
have
been
shown
to
cause
cranial
nerve
palsies,
especially
ocular
palsies.
The
designation
“brain
stem
encephalitis”
was
first
made
by
Bickerstaff
and
Cloake
in
1951.’
In
1959,
Bickerstaff
added
five
more
cases
to
the
series.’
Others
have
reported
similar
cases,
the
majority
presenting
in
adult
patients.58
A series
of eight
cases
in children
was
reported
by
Yalaz
and
Tinaztepe
in 1974.”
A case
which
has
significantly
influenced
the
diagnosis
of
brain-stem encephalitis
was
a child
with
evidence
of medullary
enlargement
and
subsequent
recov-ery reported in 1971.’#{176}
The
classical
course
is one
of
multiple
cranial
nerve
palsies
and
pyramidal
tract
involvement
in
a
gravely
ill
child
who
recovers
without
sequelae.
In few
of the
reported
cases has
the
etiologic
agent
been
demonstrated.
No
case
has
been
reported
of a child
with
herpes
simplex
brain
encephalitis
and
subsequent
recov-erv.
The
index
case
is an
example
of severe
neuro-logic
symptomatology
involving
the
brain
stem
with
subsequent
documentation
of herpes
simplex
infection
and
eventual
recovery.
This
case
is an
example of one of several manifestations of
central nervous system infection of
the
herpes
simplex virus,
alerting
physicians
to
attempt
an
early
diagnosis.
(Received March 29; revision accepted for publication June 4, 1976.)
Supported in part by the Eleanor Roosevelt Developmental Services of the New York State Department of Mental
Hygiene.
ADDRESS FOR REPRINTS: (P.H.E.) Department of
ARTICLES 241
CASE REPORT
A 10-year-old black boy
presented
to the emergency
room
with crossed eyes, difficulty reaching for objects, drooling, and difficulty with swallowing and coughing.
He had been in his usual state of good health until six days
‘
prior to admission, when he developed general malaise and low-grade fever. Three days prior to admission he was taken to a local clinic because of cervical adenopathy. In the next two days he vomited occasionally. He awakened at 5 AM Oflthe day of admission complaining of pain in the right leg, favoring the right side in walking, and with difficulty swallowing.
He was lethargic but readily arousable and able to follow simple commands. His temperature was 37.2 C; blood pressure, 135/90; pulse, 88 to 120 beats/mm, and respira-tion, 38 breaths/mm. The left pupil was smaller than the right. The fundi were unremarkable. Copious secretions were noted in the pharynx. Discrete, nontender palpable nodes were present in both anterior and posterior cervical areas. Neurological evaluation revealed absent left corneal reflex and weak left masseter function (V), inability to abduct the left eye (VI), inability to smile or frown on the left (VII), absent gag, poor swallowing and drooling (IX, X, XI), and
poor tongue
movement
on the
left (XII). Both horizontal andvertical nystagmus were noted with an occasional rotatory component. Reflexes were symmetrical and plantar re-sponses flexor. A mild decrease in strength was present in the
right arm and leg. On finger-to-nose testing there was mild
incoordination bilaterally, greater on the left. Mild truncal ataxia was
present
on
sitting. Sensation, vibration, and position senses were intact. Gait was not tested.A tracheostomy was performed on the day of admission because of an increasing respiratory rate, decreasing tidal volume, and difficulty in handling secretions. Dexametha-sone treatment was begun (4 mg intravenously every six hours).
Initial studies gave the following results: lumbar puncture: nonnal opening pressure, with 20 WBC, 18 lymphocytes, 1 polymorphonuclear leukocyte, and 1 monocyte/cu mm; with glucose, 108/100 ml; protein, 74/100 ml; CBC: hemo-globin, 13.8 gm/100
ml;
hematocrit, 41.4%; WBC, 6,600/cu mm with 64% polymorphonuclear leukocytes, 7% basophils, 18% lymphocytes, and 1 1% monocytes. Serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, and glucose were normal. Serum ammonia was 38 mg/ 100 ml. An EEC recorded some bilateral slowing in the delta frequency, predominantly in the parietal-occipital areas. Echoencephalography revealed a 2-mm left-to-right shift. A skull X-ray film was normal with the exception of a small calcified density in the right posterior lateral quadrant. Brain image and flow revealed a subtle increase in the posterior projection on immediate image suggestive of an inflammatory process. In the delayed images, no definite abnormal concentration was noted.Additional studies in the course of the illness revealed: cerebral angiography, no abnormalities; repeat EEC (after the seizures), persistent delta activity in the posterior
quadrants; repeat lumbar puncture on hospital day 8, 120 crenated RBC, no WBC, protein, 24 gm/100 ml; and glucose, 65 gm/100 ml (serum glucose 95 gm/100 ml).
On the day after admission a profound right hemiparesis was noted. Respiratory rate had increased to 50 to 60 breaths/mm. Two days after admission the cranial nerve palsies were similar to those at admission and the right hemiparesis had begun
to
improve. On the third day the fifth cranial nerve showed improvement and the respiratory rate had decreased to 36 breaths/mm. On the fourth day a series of generalized convulsions lasting two to three minutes wereobserved. These were controlled with intravenously admin-istered phenobarbital and diazepam. The cranial nerve palsies, right hemiparesis, and cerebellar findings continued to improve in the course of hospitalization. Steroid therapy was tapered and discontinued. The child was discharged after 17 days with residual left sixth and seventh cranial nerve palsies.
On the follow-up examination two weeks after discharge the child was alert, active, and responsive. The residual left sixth and seventh nerves facial palsies remained. The child laughed inappropriately and spontaneously throughout the examination. The mother reported that he also laughed frequently at home with no obvious stimulus. One month after discharge the school nurse called reporting that the child was vigorously attacking other children in such a
manner that the teachers feared for the safety of the children and were threatening immediate suspension from school. The child was placed on thioridazine (10 mg three times
daily) and crisis referral was made to the local mental health
unit. With the use of the thioridazine the child continued in
school without further incidents. On examination six weeks after discharge, he no longer complained of diplopia. He had good movement on the left side of the face. His behavior had continued to improve.
The laboratory data from the State Department of Health
returned after the child had been discharged from the
hospital. Serum from the fourth hospital day had a herpes simplex complement-fixation titer of 1:256. Serum from the eighth day had an identical titer of 1:256. Herpes simplex virus was isolated from the tracheal aspirate of the eighth day of hospitalization. Typing of the virus was not performed. The herpes simplex titer at three weeks was 1:64 and 1:32 at five weeks. Other serologic studies included complement fixation or hemagglutination inhibition assays for antibody to mumps, measles, lymphocytic choriomenin-gitis, California encephalitis-Lacrosse and New York State strains, Eastern equine encephalitis, Western equine enceph-alitis, St. Louis encephalitis, and Powassan viruses.
Tow-plasma, Blastoinyces, and Histoplasma titers were also
insig-nificant. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis for cryptocoecal antigen was nonreactive. Virus isolation was also attempted with samples of feces and cerebrospinal fluid in primary Cynomologus monkey kidney cells, diploid strain of human embryonic lung cells, newborn mice by intracerebral route, newborn mice by intraperitoneal route, and 12- to 15-gm mice by intracerebral route. No virus was isolated in these preparations.
In summary, a diagnosis of brain-stem encephalitis probably caused by herpes simplex virus was made on the basis of the significant serum titers and viral isolation.
DISCUSSION
The
differential
diagnosis
of brain-stem
signs
in
children
has
been
reviewed
by
Yalaz
and
Tinaz-tepe.9
The
most
frequent
diagnostic
dilemma
is to
distinguish between brain-stem encephalitis and
brain-stem
glioma.
In summarizing
his criteria
for
brain-stem
glioma,
Matson
selected
multiple
cranial
nerve
palsies,
truncal
ataxia,
pyramidal
tract
signs,
absence
of increased
intracranial
pres-sure,
low
CSF
protein,
and
contrast
studies
with
unequivocal
posterior
displacement
of
the
mid-line
aqueduct
of the
fourth
ventricle.h1 Bickerstaffemphasized
the
gradual
onset,
severe
lethargy,
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 8, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news
.
ophthalmoplegia
with
other
cranial
nerve
defi-cits,
and
minimal
long
tract
signs
in the
diagnosis
of brain-stem
encephalitis.
Review
of the
Bick-erstaff
cases
suggests
that
the
course
of some
of
the
cases
was
more
in keeping
with
the
C. Miller
Fisher’s
syndrome
of
ataxia,
areflexia,
and
ophthalmoplegia.12
Bickerstaff
suggested
that
lack
of cardiac
or
respiratory
involvement
could
serve
to distinguish
brain-stem
encephalitis
from
encephalomyeloradiculitis.
The
present
case
points
out
the
possibility
of
fairly
severe,
if
temporary, long tract and respiratory
involve-ment
in brain-stem
encephalitis.
The
case
reported
by
Schain
and
Wilson
has
made
the
pediatric
neurologist
reluctant
to
accept
fourth
ventricle
displacement
or
ponto-meckillary enlargement as reliable criteria for the
diagnosis
of brain-stem
glioma.”
They
reported
a
child
with
clinical
improvement
and
disappear-ance
of
medullary
enlargement
when
radiation
therapy
for
tumor
was
delayed
for
several
weeks.
In
the
present
case,
the
acute
course,
elevated
CSF’
protein,
normal
angiography,
and
rapid
improvement
confirmed
the
initial
diagnosis
of
brain-stem
encephalitis.
The
etiology
of
brain-stem
encephalitis
has
been
confirmed
in few
cases
in the
literature.
The
two
herpes
simplex
cases
were
reported
by Dayan
et
al.’
In
their
first
case,
a
14-year-old
with
lethargy and delirium, diplopia, slurred speech,
drooling,
choking,
and
failure
to recognize
family
members,
intravenous
idoxuridine
therapy
was
initiated
on
the
basis
of the
clinical
presentation
and
a focally
abnormal
EEG.
The
herpes
simplex
etiology was confirmed at autopsy. In the second
case
15%
f
the
mononuclear
cells
from
the
CSF
contained
herpes
simplex
antigens
and
20%
contained
IgG
or 1gM.
The
virus
was
also
isolated
from
the
CSF
although
this
information
was
not
available
early
in the
disease.
The
clinical
lesions
were
confined
largely
to the
brain
stem.
No
biop-sy was performed
and
the
patient
improved.
It
is possible
that
other
reported
cases
may
have
been
caused
by
the
herpes
simplex
virus.
Criteria
for
making
a diagnosis
of central
nervous
system
infection
secondary
to
herpes
simplex
have
been
subject
to
debate.
The
lumbar
punc-ture
and
CSF
analysis
have
been
noted
by Bellanti
et a!. to be
inadequate
to diagnose
encephalitis.”
In two
of their
patients,
no cells
were
found
in the
CSF.
The
protein
ranged
from
22
to 66 gm/100
ml
and
the
glucose
from
66
to
87
gm/
100
ml.
Several
authors
have
documented
the
difficulty
of
isolating
herpes
simplex
from
the
CSF.”’3
For
a time,
serologic
studies
were
used,
relying
on
titer
increases
in neutralizing
or
complement-fixing
antibodies.
With
increasing
use
of
brain
biopsy
and
isolation
of
the
virus
from
biopsy
material
or
immunofluorescence
with
herpes
antigen,
brain
biopsy
became
accepted
as
the
only
definitive
way
to
establish
the
diagnosis.’6
Criteria
for
biopsy
included
clinical
evidence
of
encephalitis,
abnormal
EEG,
CSF
sterile
for
bacteria,
fungi,
and
other
viruses,
and
abnormal
carotid
angiography.’T
More
recently
computer-ized
axial
tomography
has
been
used
instead
of
the
carotid
angiography.
Sarubbi
et
al.
#{149}have
emphasized the requirement of radiologic
evi-dence
of focal
abnormality
before
biopsy
in order
to maximize
biopsy
yield.’8
Electron
microscopy
of biopsy
material
with
demonstration
of
herpes-like
particles
has
also
been
used.’9
In such
cases
as
the
one
presented
here
neither
EEG
nor
radio-graphic
studies,
including
cerebral
angiography,
localized
a lesion
such
that
biopsy
could
even
be
considered.
Other
techniques
proposed
for
rapid
diagnosis
have
included
immunofluorescent
examinations
of the
CSF,21’
passive
hemagglutinating
antibody
determination in
CSF,2’
and
separate
analysis
of
serum
complement-requiring
and
non-comple-ment-requiring
neutralizing
1None
of
these
has
achieved
widespread
acceptance
as
a
reliable
technique.
The
urgency
of making
the
diagnosis
depends
largely
on
the
proposed
use
of
antiviral
agents.
Initial
reports
of therapeutic
success
with
idoxu-ridin&3’7”222’
have
been
followed
by
subse-quent
studies
noting
poor
clinical
response
and
serious
complications
of leukopenia
and
thrombo-cytopenia.24
Cytosine
arabinoside
was
also
initially
reported
to
be
effective252
with
later
reporting
of serious
side
effects.21’
In both
drugs
it
has
been
difficult
to select
a dose
high
enough
to
be
effective,
yet
low
enough
to minimize
immu-nologic
and
hematologic
toxicity.
A study
of adenine
arabinoside
is presently
in
process
after
initial
reports
of success
in treating
herpes
simplex
infections.”
The
drug
was
noted
to
have
little
hepatic,
renal,
or
hernatologic
toxicity.3’
A
combination
of
adenine
adenoside
and
herpes
simplex
antibody
preparation
is also
under investigation.
Illis
and
Merry
have
reviewed
the
use
of ACTH
and
corticosteroid
therapy,
noting
the
difficulty
in
selecting
appropriate
criteria
for
the
diagno-sis.22 Some have been reluctant to use steroids on
the
basis
that
steroids
would
enhance
viral
repli-cation
and
suppress
the
synthesis
and
action
of
interferon.12 Some have suggested giving
the
steroids after the stage of viremia when antibodies
were
already
formed.
The
steroids
may
be
effec-tive
in
reducing
the
edema
secondary
to
the
ARTICLES
243
indicated
a decrease
in
mortality
from
70%
to
44%
with
use
of
steroids
but
no
evidence
of
decrease
in morbidity.
Steroids
were
used
in
ourcase.
It
may
have
been
significant
that
antibody
titers
were
elevated
at the
time
steroid
therapy
was
initiated,
perhaps
making
this
an
appropriate
case
for
steroid
therapy.
The
child
responded
well
clini-cally,
but
this
may
have
been
a reflection
of the
natural
course
of the
disease.
Thus,
the
issue
of
drug
therapy
for
central
nervous
system
infection
secondary
to
herpes
simplex
has
not
been
resolved.
The
physician
awaits
the
results
of
double-blind,
controlled
studies in
order
to
choose
appropriate
therapy
with
due
awareness
of the
limitations
of presently
available
techniques
in
making
a
prompt
and
definitive
diagnosis.
Summary
A
10-year-old
black
boy
presented
with
niultiple cranial nerve palsies and
mild
right
hemiparesis.
Significantly
high
serum
titers
to
herpes
simplex
were
reported
with
a drop
in the
subsequent
weeks.
The
virus
was
also
isolated
from
the
tracheal
aspirate.
Two
other
cases
of
brain-sten
encephalitis
resulting
from
herpes
simplex virus have been reported in the literature.
Methods of brain biopsy useful in generalized
encephalitis are not useful
in
brain-stemenceph-alitis.
While
specific
antiviral
therapies
remain
controversial, double-blind, controlled studies
may
settle
this
issue
so that
rapid
diagnosis
and
prompt institution
of therapy
become
imperative.
The
physician
is alerted
to
the
presentation
of
brain-stem encephalitis as a manifestation of
central nervous system infection by the herpes
simplex virus.
REFERENCES
1. Dayan AD, et al: Brain stem encephalitis caused by
herpesvirus hominis. Br Med
J
4:405, 1972. 2. Ford FR: Diseases of the Nervous System in Infancy,Childhood and Adolescence, ed 6. Springfield,
Illi-nois, Charles C Thomas, 1973,
pp
419, 674, 694. 3. Bickerstaff ER, Cloake PCP: Mesencephalitis andrhomnbencephalitis. Br Med
J
2:77, 1951.4. Bickerstaff ER: Brain stein encephalitis-Further obser-vation: A grave syndrome with benign prognosis. Br
Med
J
1:1384, 1957.5. Dreifuss FE, et al: Brain-stem encephalitis. Va Med Mon 91:15, 1964.
6. Kavanaugh GJ, Goldstein NP: Acute idiopathic ,neten-cephalitis. Proc Staff Meeting Mayo Clin 33:53, 1958.
7. M#{246}llerF: Acute focal brain stem lesions with favorable course (“brainstem encephalitis”). Acta Neurol Scand 37:297, 1961.
8. Walker 511: Acute idiopathic bulbar encephalomyelitis. Am
J
Med 14:642, 1953.9. Yalaz K, Tinaztepe K: Brain stem encephalitis. Acta
Paediatr Scand 63:235, 1974.
10.
Schain RJ, Wilson G: Brainstem encephalitis with radiographic evidence of medullary enlargement. Neurology 21:537,. 1971.11.
Matson DD: Neurosurgery of Infancy and Childhood, ed 2. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C Thomas, 1969, pp 469-477.12. Elizan TS, et al: Syndrome of acute idiopathic ophthal-moplegia with ataxia and areflexia. Neurology
. 21:218, 1971.
13.
Bellanti JA: Herpes simplex encephalitis: Brain biopsy and treatment with 5-iodo-2’-deoxyuridine.J
Pedi-atr 72:266, 1975.14.
Lerner AM, et a!: Complement-requiring neutralizing antibodies in Herpesvirus hominis encephalitis.J
Immnunol 104:607, 1970.15. Gurwith MJ: Approach to diagnosis and treatment of Herpes simplex encephalitis. Calif Med 115:63, 1971.
16. Olson UC, et al: Herpes virus infections of the human central nervous system. N EngI
J
Med 277:1271, 1967.17. Nolan DC, et al: Herpesvirus hominis encephalitis in Michigan. N Engl
J
Med 282: 10, 1970.18. Sarubbi FA, et al: Herpesvirus honiinis encephalitis. Arch Neurol 29:268, 1973.
19. Rappel M, et a!: Diagnosis and treatment of Herpes encephalitis, a multidisciplinary approach.
J
Neurol Sci 12:443, 1971.20. Dayan AD, Stokes MI: Rapid diagnosis of encephalitis by iinmunofluorescent examination of cerebrospi-nal fluid cells. Lancet 1:177, 1973.
21. Lerner AM, et al: Passive hemagglutinating antibodies in cerebrospinal fluids in Herpes virus hominis encephalitis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 140:1460, 1972.
22. Illis US, Merry RTG: Treatment of Herpes simplex encephalitis. R Coll Physicians 7:34, 1972. 23. Nolan DC, et al: Idoxurine in Herpes simplex virus (type
I) encephalitis. Ann Intern Med 78:243, 1973. 24. Boston Interhospital Virus Study Group and the
NIAID-Sponsored Cooperative Antiviral Clinical Study: Failure of high dose 5-iodo-2’-deoxyuridine in the therapy of Herpes simplex virus encephalitis. N Engl
J
Med 292:599, 1975.25. Farris \VA, Blaw ME: Cytarabine treatment of Herpes simplex encephalitis. Arch Neurol 27:99, 1972.
26. Chow AW, et a!: Cytosine arabinoside therapy for
Herpes simplex encephalitis-clinical experience with six patients. Antimnicrob Agents Chemother 3:412, 1973.
27. Gilbert DN, et a!: Herpesvirus hominis type 1
encepha-litis treated with cytarabine, an unresolved prol)lem in encephalitis. Medicine 52:331, 1973.
28. Hryniuk W, et al: Cytarabine for Herpes virus infec-tions. JAMA 219:715, 1972.
29. Stevens DA, et a!: Adverse effect of cytosine arabinoside
on
disseminated zoster in a controlled trial. N EngIJ
Med 289:873, 1973.30. Ch’ien UT, Whitley RJ, Nahmias AJ, et al: Antiviral chemotherapy and neonatal herpes simplex infec-tion. Pediatrics 55:678, 1975.
31. Ch’ien UT, et al: Effect of adeimine arabinoside on severe
Herpesvirus hominis infections in man.
J
Infect Dis. 128:658, 1973.
32. Kilbourne ED, et al: Inhibition by cortisone of the synthesis and action of interferon. Nature 190:650, 1961.