• No results found

On the Number of Zeros of a Polynomial in a Given Domain

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On the Number of Zeros of a Polynomial in a Given Domain"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

www.ijsrp.org

On the Number of Zeros of a Polynomial in a Given

Domain

M. H. Gulzar

Department of Mathematics University of Kashmir, Srinagar 190006

Email: [email protected]

Abstract: In this paper we obtain bounds for the number of zeros of a polynomial in a given domain when the coefficients of the polynomial or their real or imaginary parts are restricted to certain conditions. Our results generalize some known results in the theory of the distribution of zeros of polynomials.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C10, 30C15

Keywords and phrases: Coefficient, Polynomial, Zero.

1. Introduction and Statement of Results In the literature we find a large number of published research papers

(e.g.[2,4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,19,20]) concerning the number of zeros of a polynomial in a circle.

S. K. Singh [18] proved the following result on the number of zeros of a polynomial:

Theorem A: Let

 

0

) (

j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n such that min0jn aj 1

andmax0jn ajan , then the number of zeros of P(z) in

k R

z  does not exceed

k R a

n n n

log

} )

1 log{(

2 

where

max{ 1 , 2 ,. 3 ,...}

n n

n n

n n

a a a a a a

R    .

For the class of polynomials with real coefficients, Q. G. Mohammad [14] proved the following result:

Theorem B: Let

 

0

) (

j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n such that

(2)

www.ijsrp.org

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

2 1

z does not exceed

0 log 2 log

1 1

a an

 .

Bidkham an d Dewan [3] generalized Theorem B in the following way:

Theorem C: Let

 

0

) (

j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n such that

anan1...ak1akak1...a1a0 0,

for some k,0kn.Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

2 1

z does not exceed

    

 

    

0 0

0 2

log 2 log

1

a

a a a a

an n k

.

Theorem D: Let

 

0

) (

j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with complex coefficients such that

for some real , , ,0 ,

2

argaj     jn and for some 0t 1,0kn,

n

n k

k k k

a t a

t a t a

t

a  ...  1 1 ...

1

0 .

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

2 1

z does not exceed

     

    

0 1

0 1

) 1 sin (cos

sin 2 cos 2

log 2 log

1

a t

a t a t a

t n

n n

j j j k

k    

.

Ebadian et al [6] generalized the above results by proving the following

results:

Theorem E: Let

 

0

) (

j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n such that

(3)

www.ijsrp.org

for some k, 0kn.Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

2

R z  ,

R>0, does not exceed

    

 

      

0 0 0

1

) (

) (

log 2 log

1

a

a a R a a R a R

an n k k n k n

for R1

and

    

 

      

0 0 0

1

) (

) (

log 2 log

1

a

a a R a a R a R

an n k n k n

for R1 .

Theorem F: Let

0 ) (

j j jz

a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with complex coefficients such that

for some real , , ,0 ,

2

argaj     jn

 

 and for some R0,0kn,

n

n k

k k k

a R a

R a R a

R

a01 ...  1 1 ... .

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

2

R

z  does not exceed

     

    

0

1

0 1

) 1 sin (cos

sin 2 cos 2

log 2 log

1

a R

a R a R R

a

R n

n n

j

j j k

k    

.

In this paper we give generalizations of Theorems E and F. More precisely we prove the following results:

Theorem 1: Let

 

0

) (

j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with Re(aj)j, Im(aj)j such

that for some k,,,0k1,0 1, 0n,

kn n1...1 1...0.

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

(4)

www.ijsrp.org

    

     

 

    

     

 

     

     

 

 

 

0

1

1

1

1 0

0 0 0 0

1

] 2

) (

[

] 2

) (

[

log log

1

a k

R

R a R a

c

n

j j n

n n n

n

j j n

n

 

  

 

    

 

     

for R1

and

    

     

 

    

     

 

     

     

 

 

 

0

1

1

1

1 0

0 0 0 0

1

] 2

) (

[

] 2

) (

[

log log

1

a k

R

R a R

a

c

n

j j n

n n n

n

j j n

n

 

  

 

    

 

     

for R1.

Remark 1: Taking k1, 1, c=2,Theorem 1 reduces to Theorem E if aj are real i.e. j 0,j.

For different values of the parameters k,,etc. we get many interesting results e.g. if we take

1

 , we get the following result:

Corollary 1: Let

 

0

) (

j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with Re(aj)j, Im(aj)j such

that for some k,0k 1,

kn n1...1 1...0,

n

 

0 . Then the number of zeros of P(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

(5)

www.ijsrp.org                                       

      0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 ] 2 ) ( [ ] 2 [ log log 1 a k R R a R a c n j j n n n n n j j n n                   

for R1

and                                       

      0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 ] 2 ) ( [ ] 2 [ log log 1 a k R R a R a c n j j n n n n n j j n n                  

for R1.

Taking k1, n in Theorem 1, we get the following result:

Corollary 2: Let

   0 ) ( j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with Re(aj)j, Im(aj)j such

that for some ,0 1,

n n1 ...0.

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

z does not exceed

           

  0 1 0 0 0 0 1

0 [ ( ) 2 ]

log log 1 a R a c n j j n n

n        

(6)

www.ijsrp.org

and

     

     

    

0

1 0

0 0 0

0 [ ( ) 2 ]

log log

1

a R

a

c

n

j j n

n       

for R1.

Taking  1, 0in Theorem 1, we get the following result:

Corollary 3: Let

0 ) (

j j jz

a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with Re(aj)j, Im(aj)j such

that for some k,0k1,

kn n1 ...a1 0,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

z does not exceed

     

    

 

0

1 0

0 1

0 [2 ( ) 2 ]

log log

1

a k R

a

c

n

j j n

n n

n      

for R1

and

     

    

0

1 0

0

0 [2 ( ) 2 ]

log log

1

a k

R a

c

n

j j n

n

n     

for R1.

(7)

www.ijsrp.org

Theorem 2: Let

   0 ) ( j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with Re(aj)j, Im(aj)j such

that for some k,0k 1,0 1,

kn n1...1 1...0,

n

 

0 , then the number of zeros of P(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

z does not exceed

                                        

      0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ] 2 ) ( [ ] 2 ) ( [ log log 1 a k R R a R a c n j j n n n n n j j n n                      

for R1

and                                         

      0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ] 2 ) ( [ ] 2 ) ( [ log log 1 a k R R a R a c n j j n n n n n j j n n                     

for R1.

Theorem 3: Let

   0 ) ( j j jz a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with complex coefficients such that

for some real , , ,0 ,

2

argaj     jn and for some R0,0n,0k 1,0 1,

n n a kR a R a R a R

a  ...   1 ...

(8)

www.ijsrp.org

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

z does not exceed

n n n

n n

j

j j

a R R

a k a R R

a R a R c

1 1

1

1 1

0

2 ) 1 sin (cos

sin 2 cos 2

{ 1 log[ log

1   

 

Ra0 (cossin1)2Ra0}].

Remark 2: For different values of the parameters k,,etc., we get many interesting results from Theorem 3 as in case of Theorem 1. For k1, 1, c=2,Theorem 3 reduces to Theorem F.

2.Lemmas

For the proofs of the above results we need the following results:

Lemma 1: If f(z) is analytic in zR,but not identically zero, f(0)0 and

n k

a

f( k)0, 1,2,..., , then

 

n

j j

i

a R f

d f

1 2

0 log (Re log (0) log

2

1 

 .

Lemma 1 is the famous Jensen’s theorem (see page 208 of [1]).

Lemma 2: If f(z) is analytic and f(z) M(r)in zr, then the number of zeros of f(z) in

c r z

(r>0,c>1)does not exceed

) 0 (

) ( log log

1

f r M c .

Lemma 2 is a simple deduction from Lemma 1.

Lemma 3: Let

0 ) (

j j jz

a z

P be a polynomial o f degree n with complex coefficients such that

for some real , , ,0 ,

2

argaj    jn and

, 0

,

1 j n

a

(9)

www.ijsrp.org

tajaj1 (tajaj1)cos(tajaj1)sin.

Lemma 3 is due to Govil and Rahman [7].

3.Proofs of Theorems

Proof of Theorem 1: Consider the polynomial

F(z) =(1-z)P(z)

(1z)(anznan1zn1 ...a1za0)

1 1 0 0

1

) (

... )

(a a z a a z a

z

a n

n n n

n      

 

 

 1

1

1 1

0 1

) (

] ) 1 ( ) [(

n

j

j j j n

n n

n n

nz a ka a k a z a a z

a

a a z a a a z

j

j j

j ) [( ) ( 1) ]

( 1 0 0

2

1    

 

 

 

For zR, we have, by using the hypothesis

 

 1

1 1 1

0 1

) (

] ) 1 ( ) [(

) (

n

j

j j j n

n n

n n

n R a k k R R

a z F

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

n

j

j j j j

j j

j R R R

1

1 0

0 1 1

1) [( ) (1 ) ] ( )

(       

.

Which gives

( ) [ ( ) 2 ]

1

1 0

1

 

n

j j n

n n n

n n

n R a R k

a z F

 

   

   

] 2

) (

[

1

1 0

0 0

0

      

 

j j

R

for R1

and

( ) [ ( ) 2 ]

1

1 0

1

 

n

j j n

n n n

n n

n R a R k

a z F

 

   

(10)

www.ijsrp.org

[ ( ) 2 ]

1

1 0

0 0

0

      

         

j j R

for R1.

Thus

1 [ { ( ) 2 }

) 0 (

)

( 1

1 0

1

0

 

n

j j n

n n n

n n

n R a R k

a a F

z F

 

   

   

[ ( ) 2 ]

1

1 0

0 0

0

      

 

j j

R

for R1

and

1 [ { ( ) 2 }

) 0 (

)

( 1

1 0

1

0

 

n

j j n

n n n

n n

n R a R k

a a F

z F

 

   

   

[ ( ) 2 ]

1

1 0

0 0

0

      

         

j j

R

for R1.

Hence , by Lemma 2,it follows that the number of zeros of F(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

z does not

exceed

    

     

 

    

     

 

     

     

 

 

 

0

1

1

1

1 0

0 0 0 0

1

] 2

) (

[

] 2

) (

[

log log

1

a k

R

R a R

a

c

n

j j n

n n n

n

j j n

n

 

  

 

    

 

     

for R1

(11)

www.ijsrp.org                                         

      0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ] 2 ) ( [ ] 2 ) ( [ log log 1 a k R R a R a c n j j n n n n n j j n n                     

for R1.

As the number of zeros of P(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

z does not exceed the

number of zeros of F(z) in  (R0,c1)

c R

z , the theorem follows.

Proof of Theorem 3: Consider the polynomial

F(z) =(R-z)P(z)

(Rz)(anznan1zn1 ...a1za0)

a z Ra Ra a z Ran an zn Ra a z

n n n n

n ( ) ( ) ... ( 1 0)

1 2 1 1

0

1       

       1 2 1 1 0 1 ) ( )] ( ) [(     n n n n n n n n n

nz Ra kRa a kRa Ra z Ra a z

a z a a a Ra z a Ra z a Ra z a Ra )] ( ) [( ) ( ... ) ( ) ( ... 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 1 1                      

For zR, we have

1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 )

(zan Rn RakRnankRanan RnRanan Rn

F , ) 1 ( ... ... 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 R a R a Ra R a Ra R a Ra R a Ra                      

which gives ,by using Lemma 3and the hypothesis

n n n n n n n n

n R Ra k R a a kRa a kRa R

a z

(12)

www.ijsrp.org

R a R

a a R

a a R R

a a R a

a R

R a

a R a

a R

R a

R a a

R a

R a

R a

a R

an n n n n

0 0

1

0 1 2

1 2 1

2

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

2 1

2

) 1 ( ] sin ) (

cos ) [(

] sin ) (

cos ) [(

... ]

sin ) (

cos ) [(

] sin ) (

cos ) [(

... ]

sin ) (

cos ) [(

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

n

n n

n R R a

a k a

R 1 cos 1(cos sin 1) 2 1

2       

    

 

  

 1

1 0

0(cos sin 1) 2 2 sin

n

j

j j

a R R

a R a

R   

n n n n

n

j

j j

a R R

a k a R R

a

R 1 1

1

1 1

2 ) 1 sin (cos

sin 2 cos

2  

   

 

Ra0 (cos sin 1)2Ra0 .

The rest of the proof can be completed on the same lines as in the proof of Theorem 1.

References

[1] L.V.Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd edition, Mc-Grawhill

[2] H.Alzer, Bounds for the zeros of polynomials,Complex Variables,

Theory Appl., 8(2001), 143-150.

[3]M.Bidkham and K.K. Dewan, On the zeros of a polynomial, Numerical

Methods and Approximation Theory,III , Nis (1987), 121-128.

[4]M.Dehmer, on the location of zeros of complex polynomials, Jipam,

4(2006), 1-13.

[5]M.Dehmer, Schranken fr die Nullstellen komplexwertiger Polynome, Die

Wurzel, 8 (2000), 182-185.

[6]A.Ebadian, M.Bidkham and M.Eshaghi Gordji, Number of zeros of a

(13)

www.ijsrp.org

No.4,531-536, Winter 2011.

[7] N.K.Govil and Q.I.Rahman, On the Enestrom-Kakeya Theorem, Tohoku

Math.J.,20 (1968) , 126-136.

[8]F.Heigl,Neuere Entwicklungen in der Geometrie der Polynome, Iber ,

Deutsch, Math-Verein, 65 (1962/63) , 97-142.

[9]P.Henrich , Applied and computational complex analysis, Volume I ,

Wiley Classics Library Edition, (1988).

[10]F. Kittaneh, Bounds for the zeros of polynomials from matrix

inequalities, Arch. Math , 81 (2003), 601-608.

[11]S.Lipka, ber die abgrenzu ng der Wurzeln von algebraischen

Gleichungen,Acta. Litt. Sci. (Szeged) , 3 (1927), 73-80.

[12] M.Marden , Geometry of Polynomials , Mathematical surveys, Amer.

Math. Soc. , Rhode Island , 3 (1966).

[13]Q.G.Mohammad, Location of the zeros of polynomials, Amer. Math.

Monthly , 74 (1967), 290-292.

[14] Q.G.Mohammad, On the zeros of polynomials, Amer. Math. Monthly ,

72 (1965), 631-633.

[15]Q.I.Rahman, On the zeros of a class of polynomials, Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci.

India , 22(1956), 137-139.

[16]Q.I.Rahman and G. Schmeisser, Analytic Theory of

Polynomials.Critical points, Zeros and Extremal Properties, Clarendon

Press, 2002.

(14)

www.ijsrp.org

Morav.,2 (1998), 91-96.

[18]S.K.Singh, On the zeros of a class of polynomials, Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci.

India, 19 (1953), 601-603.

[19]W.Specht, Die Lage der Nullstellen eines Polynoms, Mathematiche

Nachrichten , 15 (1956) , 353-371.

[20] E.C. Westerfield , A new bound for the zeros of polynomials , Amer.

Math. Monthly, 40 (1933) , 18-23. J. Inequal. Pure And Applied Math.,

References

Related documents

Before you give this tablet, make sure that you tell your pharmacist about ANY other medicines you might be giving your child at the same time, particularly the following: •

We call (ijkl a corank- ) nullity sequence. The lack of like terms to cancel out is a property of the Q-polynomial which we give next. By induction on the cardinality of E. It

Muhammad Dede Yusuf, RD Kusumanto, Yurni Oktarina, Tresna Dewi, and Pola Risma BLOB Analysis for Fruit Recognition and Detection The target grasping is made possible by

The polynomial function of Example 5 has two distinct real zeros, and its factored form contains two distinct linear factors and one irreducible quadratic factor. Theorem

The paper provides concrete examples of uses of smell and taste in learning activities to support engagement, and has implications for pedagogical design beyond special

Since the government could correct any flaws in the current reward for innovation without eliminating intellectual property (e.g., through a tax or subsidy to

However, by identifying the inspectors as street-level bureaucrats (Lipsky, 2010), we take a bottom-up perspective on policy. The four mechanisms described here involve

It was discovered that the level of p-ERK was increased in the SDHB -silenced cells compared to control (Figure 2C), indicating that in- hibition of SDHB expression promoted tumour