• No results found

RAPID RESPONSE PROGRAM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "RAPID RESPONSE PROGRAM"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

RAPID RESPONSE PROGRAM

Presented by:

Dwayne Terry

Business Development

(2)

CONTENTS

Organizational Structure

Vision and Mission

Capabilities

Performance

Operations

GTL Duties

COR Duties

(3)

Logistics and Readiness Center

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703-5000

Rapid Response Project Office

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703-5000

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Communications-Electronics Life Cycle Management Command

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703-5000

(4)
(5)
(6)

FUNCTIONAL OFFICE

STRUCTURE

(7)

R2 CONTRACT HISTORY

R2CSR awarded July 1998, three large business Prime Contractors,

expired July 2004.

CR2 awarded January 2003, five large and three small business

Primes, 1st year of the 2

nd

Option Period, less than 38 months

Period of Performance remain assuming exercise of final option.

R2 Third Generation (R2-3G), Industry Day held April 25, 2007,

projected award timeframe Spring of FY08

.

(8)

VISION AND MISSION

MISSION

Provide unique and flexible acquisition and technical expertise, capable of rapidly implementing quality solutions through a lean process, that satisfies

customer mission requirements across the entire spectrum of federal agencies.

VISION

Be the LEADER in acquisition, delivering customized best value contractual solutions to and for every platform and theater in the WORLD.

(9)

R2 DESCRIPTION

R2 is the proponent for and manager of a multiple award task order (MATO) contract.

The R2 MATO contract consists of eight Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity ID/IQ contracts.

The R2 contracts were awarded via full and open competition in January 2003, and have an 8-year period of performance, and an aggregate potential ceiling value of $23.2B.

The eight R2 contracts can be used by any federal agency to procure services.

MATO Contract ID/IQ Contracts $23.2B Ceiling Eight Contracts

(10)

FUNDAMENTAL SUCCESS

PRINCIPLES

Customer Centric

Entrepreneurial mindset – Exceptional Customer Service

Performance driven Innovative and flexible Automated

Reimbursable

(11)

R2 CAPABILITIES

Full Service Support – from preparation of requisite

contracting documentation to task order close-out

Multi-discipline support

(Engineering, Acquisition, Fiscal) Dedicated external support (i.e., Legal, Acquisition Center, DCMA) Proven streamlined processes

and procedures COR Support

Post Award Administration Monthly Program Reviews

Low Administrative Support Cost

R2 Project Office Provides:

Quality Support Low C osts 24/7 Access

(12)

R2 CAPABILITIES

(CONTINUED)

Broad Scope of Work

Eight Best in Class Contractors and over

400 subcontractors

Can accommodate FFP and/or T&M type

contracts

149 Labor Categories with Competitively

Pre-Negotiated Labor Rates

The R2 Contract Provides:

Scope Broad

(13)

THE R2 APPEAL

• R2 lets you say goodbye to:

'

Costly and long source selection process

'

Stressful negotiations

'

Long procurement lead time

'

Protests

(14)

R2 ADVANTAGES

Utilizes Performance Based Contracting

methodology; requirements express need and

“not how to”; reduces paperwork, and drives innovation

Streamlined processes allows for best value award

R2 accommodates flexible periods of performance; service and incidental hardware requirements, accomplished through T&M and or FFP

Streamlined Processes Reduce Paperwork Best Value Flexible

(15)

Established GFR Process

Provides Security (DD254) Support Services Provides SOFA/TESA Support Services

Real Time Access to Web-Enabled Database for Monitoring Task Order Status

Satisfied customers since 1998 Secur ity Suppo rt Servi ces Real Time Web-Enabled Database SOFA /TESA Supp ort Servi ces

R2 ADVANTAGES (CONT.)

Estab lishe d GFR Proc ess

(16)

R2 TASK AREAS

Bottom Line: If funded by Federal “dollars” virtually every type of technical and/or non-technical requirement can be put on contract to

include incidental production.

Broad Scope of

(17)

OVERVIEW OF R2 PROCESSES

Business Development Step 1.0 Acquisition Center Step 3.0 Pre-Award Step 2.0 Post Award Step 4.0 END R2 Project Office Level 0 7/11/2005

(18)

CR2 CONTRACT STATS

● JANUARY 2003 TO PRESENT:

9 Task Orders placed: 1,403

9 T.O. ceiling amount:~$ 12.9B

9 T.O. funded amount:~$ 7.6B

9 18% of Command’s obligations in FY07

Army Task Orders: 693 Ft. Monmouth Task Orders: 360 Army OIF/OEF Task Orders $396M: 25 Ft. Monmouth OIF/OEF Task Orders $65M: 14

Task Orders awarded January 2003 to present:

(19)

DOCUMENT APPROVALS

INCUMBENT UPON GTL

• Determination & Findings (applies to most

non-Army customers)

• Service Contract Act Approval (applies to most

Army customers)

• Joint Contracting Command concurrence

(applies to tasks where the work is to be

performed in Iraq and/or Afghanistan)

• Business Case (applies when the proposed

period of performance exceeds 24 months)

• COR Certification On-line Course-CLC106

(20)

PRE-AWARD

PROCESS

(21)

THE 19-DAY

PRE-AWARD PROCESS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18

19

7 calendar days are allotted to the R2 office and the Acquisition Center to review documentation and award of task order.

7 calendar days are allotted to the R2 office and the Acquisition Center to review documentation and award of task order.

5 calendar days are allotted for the requiring activity to perform and submit a technical evaluation.

5 calendar days are allotted for the requiring activity to perform and submit a technical evaluation.

7 calendar days are allotted for the contractors to submit proposals.

7 calendar days are allotted for the contractors to submit proposals.

Upon solicitation:

(22)

GTL DUTIES – PRE-AWARD

GTL completes an on-line Registration form on the R2 web site and submits the form to R2. GTL prepares and submits appropriate documentation, which describes the proposed Task, to R2. R2 uses documenta-tion to solicit bids (TEPs) from R2 contractors.

GTL evaluates each TEP submitted by each contractor and recommends the proposal that best meets the evaluation criteria established by the GTL. GTL sends the evaluation to R2.

Phase 1 - Pre-Award Activities

Step 1: Registration Step 2: Documentation Step 3: Evaluation

(23)

PRACTICAL TIPS

• PWS

– Use Template

– Straight-forward, Clear and Concise

– Avoid: redundancy, “as directed”

– Focus more on what you want the Contractor to do versus what

the Government will do

– Requirements should be explicit enough to be priced

• DD254, If required, submit as early as possible

• IGCE, Use template

• Tech-Evaluation; make certain that it supports your best

value selection

• Observe cut-off dates for end of fiscal year task order

awards and modifications

• Respond to information requests and questions in a

timely fashion

(24)
(25)

POST-AWARD ADVANTAGE

R2 Provides life cycle customer oriented Task Order support that mimics pre-award 19 cycle for modifications.

Specialized and dedicated Post Award team.

GTL is central to the Task Order management.

GTL manages the technical performance; R2 provides program management of the T.O.

CR2 conducts monthly program reviews with contractors to review status of each Task Order.

GTL reviews Monthly Status Reports and Vouchers Electronically.

GTL can monitor T.O status via secure web-enabled database.

Life Cycle Task Order

(26)

GTL DUTIES - POST AWARD

GTL attends Kick-off Meeting within 30 days of award date. At this meeting the GTL and contractor discuss and resolve outstanding issues.

GTL monitors and assesses progress and determines if

changes to project scope or funding is required. If change is required, GTL also makes formal change request and awaits approval by KO.

When the Period of Performance has expired, GTL completes final pro-ject review, verifies that all contractual obligations have been met, and sends confirmation e-mail to R2. Step 4: Kick-off Meeting Step 5: Task Execution Step 6: Task Close-out

(27)

GTL LIMITATIONS

GTL is not empowered to award, agree to or sign

any contract modification or obligate payment of

money by the Government

GTL can not take any action which may affect

contract or task order schedules, funds or scope

The Contracting Officer must make all contractual

agreements, commitments or modifications, which

involve price, quantity, quality, delivery schedules or

other terms and conditions of the contract/task order

(28)

RAPID RESPONSE PROJECT

OFFICE COR’S

The R2 Office assigns a COR for each Prime Contract

In rare cases, the customer may request the Contracting

Officer to appoint an additional customer COR for a specific

task order

OCONUS

Other Issues

CORs must meet FAR and local policy requirements for

appointment

(29)

COR RESPONSIBILITIES

Monitor and verify contractor performance in accordance with the contract terms, conditions and specifications.

Perform, inspections as necessary in connection with the technical requirements, terms, conditions and specifications.

Provide acceptance for the Government of services performed under the contract, with verification by the GTL.

Submit monthly COR report to the Contracting Officer on basic contract.

Chair monthly Program Reviews.

(30)

COR RESPONSIBILITIES

(CONT’D)

Notify the contractor of deficiencies observed during surveillance and direct appropriate action to effect correction

Prepare Past Performance Reports

Sign Common Access Card (CAC) applications Review Monthly Vouchers

Review Monthly Status Reports Sign Letters of Accreditation (LOA)

(31)

SUMMARY

Full service support from knowledgeable Acquisition,

Engineering, Small Business, and Legal Subject Matter Experts Broad Statement of Work

Low Administrative Support Cost

Real time access to web-enabled database for monitoring Task Order status; document repository

Firm Fixed Price and Time & Material Task Orders Proven successful track record since 1998

(32)

GETTING STARTED

¾

Please Register Your Task Order Request at the R2

Website:

https://r2csr.monmouth.army.mil

¾

For further information and great customer service

please contact any of the following individuals:

- Dwayne Terry, (732) 427-8027

- Lilian Clarke, (732) 532-2289

(33)

From the

From the

R2 Project Officer

R2 Project Officer

https://r2csr.monmouth.army.mil

https://r2csr.monmouth.army.mil

(34)

References

Related documents

An analysis of the economic contribution of the software industry examined the effect of software activity on the Lebanese economy by measuring it in terms of output and value

If the roll is equal to or higher then the model's shooting skill then it hits and wounds as described in close combat.. If the roll was lower then the model's shooting skill then

UPnP Control Point (DLNA) Device Discovery HTTP Server (DLNA, Chormecast, AirPlay Photo/Video) RTSP Server (AirPlay Audio) Streaming Server.. Figure 11: Simplified

 HCC is developing in 85% in cirrhosis hepatis Chronic liver damage Hepatocita regeneration Cirrhosis Genetic changes

I examined the research question for the study for a statistically significant relationship between PARCC exam outcomes and exposure to arts integration experiences among 3rd

Conversely, 43.7% of all respondents who misused prescription drugs met criteria for alcohol dependence, problem gambling, and (or) had used illicit drugs in the past year..

In this chapter, we faced the question of whether it is possible to estimate at the same time the task being performed (reach a target position) and the signal model (binary

Those materials (including user manuals, training materials, guides, product descriptions, technical manuals, product specifications, supporting materials and Updates) detailing the