Treating Clostridium difficile
infection (CDI)
the second time around
Ciarán P. Kelly, MD
Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
.
The “difficult” Clostridium
Objectives:
•
CDI - More difficult than ever
•
Who gets recurrent CDI?
•
How do we manage recurrent CDI?
•
What’s new in CDI therapy?
Difficulties with CDI
–
Increasing disease incidence
–
Increasing disease severity
–
Low cure rate (<70%)
– 10% of patients don’t respond to 10-14 days of treatment
– 4% of patients die from CDI
– 25% have recurrence
Antibiotic therapy
Disturbed colonic microflora
(loss of colonization resistance)
C. difficile exposure & colonization
Toxin A & Toxin B Diarrhea & colitis
Pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile
infection (CDI)
C. difficile toxin-induced
Pseudomembranous colitis
C. difficile toxins induce a marked acute
Antimicrobials Predisposing to CDI
Very Commonly Related Less Commonly Related Uncommonly Related Clindamycin Ampicillin Amoxicillin Cephalosporins Fluoroquinolones Other penicillins Sulfonamides Trimethoprim Cotrimoxazole Macrolides Aminoglycosides Bacitracin Metronidazole Teicoplanin Rifampin Chloramphenicol Tetracyclines Carbapenems Daptomycin Tigecycline Bouza E, et al. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90:1141-1163.CDI case 28 (10%) CDI case 28 (10%) 271 enrolled 271 enrolled Hospital-acquired 47 (17%) Hospital-acquired 47 (17%) Colonized at Admission 37 (14%) Colonized at Admission 37 (14%) CDI case 19 (7%) CDI case 19 (7%) Carrier 19 (7%) Carrier 19 (7%) Carrier 18 (7%) Carrier 18 (7%)
Nosocomial C. difficile infection
& asymptomatic carriage are common
Hospital patients (Acute medical ward)
LOS > 2 days Receiving antibiotic
Hospital patients (Acute medical ward)
LOS > 2 days Receiving antibiotic
Kyne et al N Engl J Med 2000;342:390
Colonized by C. difficile 84 (31%) Colonized by C. difficile 84 (31%)
Asymptomatic carriers of C. difficile
have high serum IgG anti-toxin A
Adm ission Colon izatio n Disc harg e Ig G a n ti -t o x in A 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Cases Non-colonized Carriers 3 day s afte r C olon izatio n Adm ission Colon izatio n Disc harg e Ig G a n ti -t o x in A 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Cases Non-colonized Carriers 3 day s afte r C olon izatio n P=0.06 P=0.002 P=0.001 P=0.005
McDonald LC, et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:409-415, and unpublished CDC data.
Rates of CDI Tripled in US Hospitals
between 2000 and 2005
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year D is c h a rg e s p e r 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 p o p u la ti o n x x x x x x x x x x Any diagnosis Primary diagnosis x ~x2 ~x3C. difficile-related deaths
have increased in the US
Redelings et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1417-1419.
416% increase from 1999 to 2004 In 2004 CDI-related deaths:
××××4 those attributed to MRSA infection
××××6 those attributed to all other intestinal IDs combined
5.7 7.3 8.2 12.2 16.1 23.7 0 5 10 15 20 25 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Clostridium difficile
Deaths increase in 2005
C. difficile-Related Deaths
Are Also Increasing in the UK
MRSA=methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Death certificates mentioning C. difficile and recording C. difficile as the underlying cause of death (England and Wales). Source: UK Office of National Statistics.
Redelings et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1417-1419.
UK deaths 2006:
• CDAD – 6,480 • MRSA – 1,652 UK death certifications
US deaths (age adjusted): 1999 – 5.7 per million
2003 vs 2002: x 4 CDI cases x 20 CDI deaths > 80% NAP1 strain >64 yr
Total
<17 yr 18-64 yrCDI outbreak in Estrie
(Quebec)
Epidemic Strain
•
Strain typed BI/NAP1/027
1,2•
Is highly resistant to fluoroquinolones
2,4•
Binary toxin genes are present
•
Produces large quantities of toxins A and B
1,3•
Has a tcdC gene deletion
11. Warny M, et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1079-1084. 2. Hubert B, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:238-244. 3. CDC Fact Sheet. July 2005.
4. McDonald LC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2433-2441.
Adapted from McDonald LC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2433-2441; with permission.
Recurrent C. difficile diarrhea
Common (~25% of treated patients) Mechanisms of recurrence:
NOT due to resistance to metronidazole or vancomycin
Metronidazole or vancomycin therapy
perpetuate loss of colonization resistance
Either:
“Relapse” - Persisting infection
“Re-infection” - New inoculum
different strain in ~50% of recurrent CDAD cases
Recurrent C. difficile diarrhea
(contd)
Risk factors:
Age > 65 years
Severe underlying illness
Concommitant antibiotic use
Prior recurrent CDAD
~ 20% risk after first CDAD episode ~ 40% risk after first recurrence
> 60% risk after 2 or more recurrences
Lack of protective immunity
Risk factors:
Age > 65 years = 1 point
Severe illness
(Horn’s Index) = 1 point
Concommitant
antibiotic use = 1 point
Score Recurrent CDI
in validation cohort
0 0%
1 17%
2 31%
3 67%
Prospective derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for recurrent C. difficile infection
Gastroenterology 2009;136:1206-14
Hu MY, Katchar K, Kyne L, Maroo S, Tummala S, Dreisbach V, Xu H, Leffler DA, Kelly CP.
Concomitant antibiotics (CAs) to treat other infections in 59% of patients during CDI treatment.
Lower initial response rate with CAs
86.1% with CAs vs 98.4% without (P=<.001) Higher recurrence rate with CAs
23.9% with CAs vs 8.1% without (P=<.001) Lower “global cure” rate with CAs
59.8% with CAs vs 90.3% without (P=<.001).
AGA Institute Late-Breaking Abstract Session: May 4, 2010, 2:15 PM
Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) in Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Confirms Superiority of
Fidaxomicin over Vancomycin
Treatment of First Episode of CDI
•
Mild CDI
– Discontinue other antibacterial agents if possible – Request stool testing
– Monitor course of disease
•
Moderate or persisting CDI
(or patients who mustcontinue antibacterial therapy)
As for mild plus:
– Oral metronidazole
• 500 mg TID for 10–14 days or
• 250 mg QID for 10–14 days
Gerding DN, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995;16:459-477. Poutanen SM, Simor AE. Can Med Assoc J. 2004;171:51-58.
Vancomycin is more effective than
metronidazole in treating severe CDI
≥ 2 points = SEVERE 1 point: Age: > 60 years Temp: > 101°F [38.3°C] Albumin: < 2.5 mg/dL WBC > 15,000 cells/mm3 2 points: PMC at colonoscopy ICU patient
Zar et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:302-7
98% 90% 97% 76% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Mild / Moderate Severe Vancomycin Metronidazole Response P=0.4 P=0.02 Prospective, RCT (172 enrolled, 150 completed) Vancomycin 125 mg QID x 10d vs Metronidazole 250 mg QID x 10d Stratified for disease severity
Management of Severe CDI
• Early recognition
– Initiate therapy as soon as diagnosis is suspected
• Oral vancomycin (125 mg QID for 10 to 14 days) as initial
treatment
• If patient is unable to tolerate oral medication – iv metronidazole
– consider intracolonic vancomycin instillation (by enema)
• 0.5–1 g vancomycin (IV formulation) in 100 – 200 mL normal saline via rectal (or Foley) catheter
• Clamp for 60 minutes
• Repeat every 4–12 hours
Gerding DN, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995;16:459-477. Zar FA, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:302-307. Louie T, et al. 47th Annual ICAAC Meeting, 2007, Abstract k-425-a. Apisarnthanarak A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:690-696.
Markers of Severe CDI
• Severe diarrhea (> 10 BM/day)
• Marked leukocytosis
– >15,000 assoc. severe CDI
– >25,000 assoc. increased fatality
• Rising serum creatinine • Falling serum albumin
• Colonic thickening on CT scan • Ascites on CT scan
• Pseudomembranes on endoscopy • Hemodynamic instability
• Severe abdominal distension, pain
≥ 2 points = SEVERE 1 point: Age: > 60 years Temp: > 101°F [38.3°C] Albumin: < 2.5 mg/dL WBC > 15,000 cells/mm3 2 points: PMC at colonoscopy ICU patient
Zar et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007
≥ 2 points = SEVERE 1 point: Age: > 60 years Temp: > 101°F [38.3°C] Albumin: < 2.5 mg/dL WBC > 15,000 cells/mm3 2 points: PMC at colonoscopy ICU patient
Colonic distension and small bowel ileus
in fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis
Severe / fulminant CDI maypresent as an acute abdomen and/or mimic acute colonic
pseudo-obstruction
Abdominal pain & distension
• Little or no diarrhea
Sigmoidoscopic appearance of
severe CDI with PMC
Immediate bedside diagnosis in severe, complicated CDI
Guides surgical management
Perforation rare - death usually results from SIDS
Management of fulminant or refractory CDI
• Vancomycin 500 mg qid po • If ileus: – Metronidazole 500 mg iv tid plus – Vancomycin 500 mg qid via n/g tube or by enema• If progressive or refractory:
– Early surgery evaluation/consultation
– Consider IVIG 400 mg/kg
– Monitor for progression
• WBC > 20,000
• Creatinine >1.5 baseline • Rising lactate (5.0)
An approach to treating
recurrent CDI
•
First recurrence:
- Treat based on disease severity
- Metronidazole or Vancomycin x10-14 days
•
Second recurrence:
– Oral vancomycin taper & pulsed dosing
Treatment of Multiple Recurrent CDAD
Non-randomized study*
* Placebo/antibiotic cohort from 2 clinical trials of Saccharomyces boulardii as adjunctive treatment.
† Includes vancomycin and rifampin (n=3) and vancomycin and metronidazole (n=3). ‡ Includes high dose (2 g/day), taper, or pulse dosing.
McFarland LV, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002:97:1769-1775.
Vancomycin N Recurrence, n (%) P-Value
Medium dose (1g to <2 g/day) 14 10 (71) Low dose (<1 g/day) 48 26 (54) High dose (≥ 2 g/day) 21 9 (43)
Tapering dose 29 9 (31) 0.01
Pulse dosing 7 1 (14) 0.02
Other † 6 2 (33) All 125 57 (46)
Metronidazole N Recurrence, n (%)
Low dose (≤ 1 g/day) 29 13 (45) Medium dose (1.5 g/day) 5 2 (40) Other ‡ 4 1 (25)
All 38 16 (42)
An approach to treating recurrent CDI
• First recurrence:
- Metronidazole or Vancomycin x10-14 days
• Second recurrence:
– Oral vancomycin taper & pulsed dosing
• Third recurrence
– Vancomycin 125 mg qid for 14 days followed by Rifaximin 400 mg twice daily for 14 days
• Subsequent recurrences
– Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (400 mg/kg & repeat after 3 weeks)
– Vancomycin plus Probiotic?
• Lactobacillus spp, Saccharomyces boulardii • Fecal transplantation / bacteriotherapy
Kelly NEJM 2008
Rx Vancomycin Taper & Pulsed dosing: Week 1 125 mg qid Week 2 125 mg bid Week 3 125 mg daily Week 4 125 mg qod Week 5-6 125 mg q3d
Rx Vancomycin Taper & Pulsed dosing: Week 1 125 mg qid Week 2 125 mg bid Week 3 125 mg daily Week 4 125 mg qod Week 5-6 125 mg q3d
New treatment approaches for
Recurrent C. difficile associated diarrhea
Antibiotic therapy C. difficile colonization Toxin production Diarrhea Recurrent diarrhea Probiotics ProbioticsS. boulardii for prevention of CDI:
Inconsistent study results
A. McFarland. JAMA. 1994;271:1913-8.
B. Surawicz et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1012-7.
24% 19% 65% 35% 47% 44% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1st episode CDI (A) Recurrent CDI (A) Recurrent CDI (B) Placebo S. boulardii P=0.04 P=0.04
Sb
500 mg bid x 4 weeksNew treatment approaches for
Recurrent C. difficile associated diarrhea
Antibiotic therapy C. difficile colonization Toxin production Diarrhea Recurrent diarrhea Probiotics Probiotics Antibiotics Antibiotics8% 10% 13% 24% 0% 10% 20% 30% Treatment Failure Recurrence Fidaxomicin Vanco P = NS P = 0.004
Fidaxomicin in CDI
Minimal absorption from human GI tract
“Selective” anti-C. difficile antibiotic
Preserves colonization resistance??
629 adults with CDI treated for 10 days with: 200 mg OPT-80 bid 78% “Cured” * 125 mg vancomycin qid 67% “Cured” * * P=0.006 * P=0.006
New treatment approaches for
Recurrent C. difficile associated diarrhea
Antibiotic therapy C. difficile colonization Toxin production Diarrhea Recurrent diarrhea Probiotics Probiotics Toxin binder Toxin binder Antibiotics AntibioticsHigh serum IgG anti-toxin A levels are associated
with a lower risk for recurrent C. difficile diarrhea
Serum IgG anti-toxin A Day 12 <0.48 0.48-0.73 0.74-1.28 >1.28 R e c u rr e n t C . d if fi c il e d ia rr h e a ( % ) 0 25 50 75 100
Serum IgG anti-toxin A Day 12 <0.48 0.48-0.73 0.74-1.28 >1.28 R e c u rr e n t C . d if fi c il e d ia rr h e a ( % ) 0 25 50 75 100 For a level < 1.29 Odds ratio = 48 (95% CI, 3.5 - 663) For a level < 1.29 Odds ratio = 48 (95% CI, 3.5 - 663)
New treatment approaches for
Recurrent C. difficile associated diarrhea
Antibiotic therapy C. difficile colonization Toxin production Diarrhea Recurrent diarrhea Protection Anti-toxin immune response memory primary Active Immunization: Toxoid vaccine Active Immunization: Toxoid vaccine Passive: IVIG, HuMAbs, Hyperimmune globulin Passive: IVIG, HuMAbs, Hyperimmune globulin Probiotics Probiotics Toxin binder Toxin binder Antibiotics AntibioticsIntravenous immunoglobulin therapy
for recurrent C. difficile diarrhea
Adult Pediatric Pre-IVIG Post-IVIG
Healthy controls Children with recurrent
C. difficile diarrhea S e ru m Ig G a n ti -t o x in A (O p ti c a l D e n s it y u n it s ) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 P = 0.03 P = 0.01
Leung DY, Kelly CP et al J Pediatr 1993
25% 7%
R
e
c
u
rr
e
n
t
C
D
I
A C. difficile Toxoid Vaccine (Toxoids A and B)
Induces High Serum IgG Anti-Toxin A Response
Aboudola S, et al. Infect Immun. 2003;71:1608-1610.
Take home:
C. difficile: more difficult than ever
More prevalent
More severe (↑morbidity & ↑mortality)
NAP-1 “epidemic” strain widely prevalent in US
CDI management is changing:
Vancomycin 1st line for severe CDI
& possibly for multiple recurrent CDI (taper / pulse)