Elmhurst Community Prep

(1)

Elmhurst Community Prep

Every school in California is required by st at e law t o publish a School Account abilit y Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. T he SARC cont ains informat ion about t he condit ion and performance of each California public school. Under t he Local Cont rol Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educat ional agencies (LEAs) are required t o prepare a Local Cont rol Account abilit y Plan (LCAP), w hich describes how t hey int end t o meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, w it h specific act ivit ies t o address st at e and local priorit ies. Addit ionally, dat a report ed in an LCAP is t o be consist ent w it h dat a report ed in t he SARC.

For more informat ion about SARC requirement s, see t he California Depart ment of Educat ion (CDE) SARC W eb page at ht t p://w w w .cde.ca.gov/t a/ac/sa/.

View t his SARC online at t he school and/or LEA W eb sit es.

For more informat ion about t he LCFF or LCAP, see t he CDE LCFF W eb page at ht t p://w w w .cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.

For addit ional informat ion about t he school, parent s and communit y members should cont act t he school principal or t he dist rict office.

California Department of Education

School Accountability Report Card

Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year

Published During 2014-15

(2)

Last updated: 12/18/2014

About This School

Contact Information - Most Recent Year Contact Information - Most Recent Year

School

School Name Elmhurst Communit y Prep

St reet 1800 98t h Ave.

Cit y, St at e, Zip Oakland, Ca, 94603-2702

Phone Number 510-639-2888

Principal Kilian Bet lach, Principal

E-mail Address kilian.bet [email protected]

Count y-Dist rict - School (CDS) Code

01612590112789

Dist rict

Dist rict Name Oakland Unified

Phone Number (510) 434-7772

Web Sit e ht t p://w w w .ousd.k12.ca.us

Superint endent First Name

Ant w an

Superint endent Last Name

W ilson

E-mail Address ant w an.w [email protected]

School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year) School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)

About

Elmhurst Communit y Prep w as founded in 2006 as part of Oakland Unified’s small aut onomous schools movement . Locat ed on 98t h Avenue in Deep East Oakland, ECP serves 380; 58% Lat ino, 32% African America, and 5%Pacific Islander st udent s in grades 6 t hrough 8. W e believe a qualit y school must support st udent s bot h emot ionally and academically and w e are commit t ed t o do bot h at high levels. W e seek t o engage st udent s in rigorous academics and high-qualit y enrichment act ivit ies t hat prepare st udent s for college and career.

Descript ion and Mission St at ement

Our mission, grounded in our commit ment t o Social Just ice, is t o ensure all st udent s promot e from ECP on a posit ive life t raject ory, and prepared for A-G coursew ork in high school. No Mat t er W hat . T o achieve t his mission, w e base our w ork in four t heories of act ion: * High Expect at ions: St udent s w ill achieve at high levels w hen w e believe t hey can. * Collaborat ion: W e are more pow erful t oget her t han apart . * Posit ive School Cult ure: Grow ing up in t he east is hard; a support ive school can make it easier. * Family Involvement : Parent s are t he expert s on t heir child and w e w ork t oget her t o achieve success.

2013-14 SARC - Elmhurst Community Prep

(3)

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)

Grade Level Number of St udent s

Grade 6 128

Grade 7 124

Grade 8 113

T ot al Enrollment 365

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2013-14)

Group Percent of Tot al Enrollment

Black or African American 32.3

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0.0

Asian 1.9

Filipino 0.3

Hispanic or Lat ino 58.4

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander 5.2

W hit e 0.0

T w o or More Races 0.3

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged 90.7

English Learners 32.9

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies 14.0

Black or A frican A merican A merican Indian or A lask a Nativ e A sian

Filipino Hispanic or Latino

Nativ e Hawaiian or Pacific Islander W hite

Two or More Races

32%

58% 1%

5%

(4)

A. Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

T he SARC provides t he follow ing informat ion relevant t o t he Basic St at e Priorit y (Priorit y 1):

Degree t o w hich t eachers are appropriat ely assigned and fully credent ialed in t he subject area and for t he pupils t hey are t eaching;

Pupils have access t o st andards-aligned inst ruct ional mat erials; and School facilit ies are maint ained in good repair.

Not e: “Misassignment s” refers t o t he number of posit ions filled by t eachers w ho lack legal aut horizat ion t o t each t hat grade level, subject area, st udent group, et c.

* T ot al T eacher Misassignment s includes t he number of Misassignment s of T eachers of English Learners.

Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials

Teachers School Dist rict

2012- 13

2013- 14

2014- 15

W it h Full Credent ial 17 16 16 1722

W it hout Full Credent ial 2 3 1 158

T eachers T eaching Out side Subject Area of Compet ence (w it h full credent ial)

0 0 0 18

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5

Teachers with Full C redential Teachers without Full C redential

Teachers Teaching O utside Subject A rea of C ompetence

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Indicat or

2012- 13

2013- 14

2014- 15

Misassignment s of T eachers of English Learners

0 0 0

T ot al T eacher Misassignment s* 0 0 0

Vacant T eacher Posit ions 1 0 0

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments

Vacant Teacher Positions

(5)

Not e: High-povert y schools are defined as t hose schools w it h st udent eligibilit y of approximat ely 40 percent or more in t he free and reduced price meals program. Low - povert y schools are t hose w it h st udent eligibilit y of approximat ely 39 percent or less in t he free and reduced price meals program.

Y ear and mont h in w hich dat a w ere collect ed: Sept ember 2014

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14) Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)

Locat ion of Classes

Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subject s Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subject s Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

T his School 91 9

All Schools in Dist rict 93 7

High-Povert y Schools in Dist rict

93 8

Low -Povert y Schools in Dist rict

97 3

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year

Subject

Text books and Inst ruct ional Mat erials/year of Adopt ion

From Most Recent Adopt ion?

Percent St udent s Lacking Own Assigned Copy

Reading/Language Art s

Y ear Adopt ed: 2003

English 6:

Holt Lit erat ure and Language Art s St udent Edit ion:

Int roduct ion

English 6:

Holt Handbook: Int roduct ion (St udent 's Edit ion)

English 7:

Holt Lit erat ure and Language Art s St udent Edit ion: 1st Course

English 7:

Holt Handbook: Int roduct ion (1st Course St udent 's Edit ion)

English 8:

Holt Lit erat ure and Language Art s St udent Edit ion: 2nd Course

English 8:

Holt Handbook: 2nd Course (St udent 's Edit ion)

High Point Basics:

St udent T ext : Basics

High Point Basics:

St udent Pract ice Book: Basics - Reading

High Point Basics:

St udent Pract ice Book: Basics - Language

Y es 0.0

(6)

High Point Level A:

St udent T ext : Level A

High Point Level A:

St udent Pract ice Book: Level A

High Point Level B:

St udent T ext : Level B

High Point Level B:

St udent Pract ice Book: Level B

High Point Level C:

St udent T ext : Level C

High Point Level C:

St udent Pract ice Book: Level C

Mat hemat ics

Y ear Adopt ed: 2008-2009

Mat h 6:

CA Mat hemat ics: Course 1- Numbers t o Algebra

Mat h 7:

CA Pre- Algebra

Algebra I:

CA Mat hemat ics: Algebra 1

Geomet ry:

CA Geomet ry

Y es 0.0

Science

Science 6:

CPO Focus on Eart h T ext book

Science 7:

CPO Focus on Eart h T ext book

Science 8:

CPO Focus on Physical Science T ext book

Y es 0.0

Hist ory-Social Science

Y es 0.0

(7)

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year

Social St udies Grade 6:

Ancient Civilizat ions

Medieval t o Early Modern T imes

Unit ed St at es Hist ory

Foreign Language

Spanish A/B:

St udent Edit ion: Adelant e A & B

Spanish I:

St udent Edit ion En espanol!

French A/B:

St udent Edit ion: Bon Voyage

French I:

St udent Edit ion: Discovering French Bleu

Y es 0.0

Healt h Y es 0.0

Visual and Performing Art s

Y es 0.0

Science Lab Eqpmt (9- 12)

Science Lab Grade 6:

Focus on Eart h Equipment Kit

Focus on Life Equipment Kit

Focus on Physical Science Equipment Kit

Y es 0.0

Summary of Most Recent Sit e Inspect ion

All syst ems and st ruct ures are in good condit ion. Paving project in FY 2014.

(8)

School Facility Good Repair Status - Most Recent Year

School Facilit y Condit ions and Planned Improvement s (School Y ear 2014-15) - Dat a provided by Depart ment of Facilit ies on Oct ober 17, 2014 T his sit e is in good condit ion.

Overall Facility Rate - Most Recent Year

Repairs Needed

No repairs needed at t his t ime Rout ine maint enance as required.

Correct ive Act ions Taken or Planned

Service as scheduled.

Syst em Inspect ed Rat ing

Repair Needed and Act ion Taken or

Planned

Syst ems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sew er

Good

Int erior: Int erior Surfaces Good Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness,

Pest /Vermin Infest at ion

Good

Elect rical: Elect rical Good

Rest rooms/Fount ains: Rest rooms, Sinks/Fount ains

Good

Safet y: Fire Safet y, Hazardous Mat erials Good St ruct ural: St ruct ural Damage, Roofs Good Ext ernal: Playground/School Grounds,

W indow s/Doors/Gat es/Fences

Good

Overall Rat ing Good

(9)

B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

T he SARC provides t he follow ing informat ion relevant t o t he Pupil Achievement St at e Priorit y (Priorit y 4):

St at ew ide assessment s (i.e., California Assessment of St udent Performance and Progress and it s successor t he St andardized T est ing and Report ing Program);

T he Academic Performance Index; and

T he percent age of pupils w ho have successfully complet ed courses t hat sat isfy t he requirement s for ent rance t o t he Universit y of California and t he California St at e Universit y, or career t echnical educat ion sequences or programs of st udy.

Not e: Science assessment s include California St andards T est s (CST s), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alt ernat e Performance Assessment (CAPA).

Not e: Scores are not show n w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

Not e: Science assessment s include CST s, CMA, and CAPA in grades 5, 8, and 10.

Not e: Scores are not show n w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/ Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/ Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science – Three-Year Comparison

Students in Science – Three-Year Comparison

Subject

Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meet ing or exceeding t he st at e st andards)

School Dist rict St at e

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 58 57 39 49 48 49 60 59 60

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14)

2013-14)

Group Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

All St udent s in t he LEA 49

All St udent s at t he School 39

Male 40

Female 38

Black or African American 23

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Lat ino 48

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander W hit e

T w o or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged 42

English Learners 8

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies

St udent s Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services

(10)

Last updated: 12/11/2014 Not e: ST AR Program w as last administ ered in 2012–13. Percent ages are not calculat ed w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

Not e: For 2014 and subsequent years, t he st at ew ide and similar schools ranks w ill no longer be produced.

Not e: “N/D” means t hat no dat a w ere available t o t he CDE or LEA t o report . “B” means t he school did not have a valid API Base and t here is no Grow t h or t arget informat ion. “C” means t he school had significant demographic changes and t here is no Grow t h or t arget informat ion.

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison

Subject

Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meet ing or exceeding t he st at e st andards)

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

English-Language Art s 28% 35% 28% 45% 47% 45% 54% 56% 55%

Mat hemat ics 30% 26% 33% 46% 46% 44% 49% 50% 50%

Hist ory-Social Science 41% 36% 11% 32% 31% 33% 48% 49% 49%

Academic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year Comparison Academic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year Comparison

API Rank 2011 2012 2013

St at ew ide 1 1 1

Similar Schools 2 1 3

Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison

Group Act ual API Change 2011 Act ual API Change 2012 Act ual API Change 2013

All St udent s at t he School -4 3 1

Black or African American -42 -20 -4

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Lat ino 8 15 14

T w o or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged -9 -2 10

English Learners -5 14 0

Courses for University of California and/or California State University Admission Courses for University of California and/or California State University Admission

UC/CSU Course Measure Percent

2013-14 St udent s Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 1.4

2012-13 Graduat es W ho Complet ed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission

(11)

(12)

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

T he SARC provides t he follow ing informat ion relevant t o t he Ot her Pupil Out comes St at e Priorit y (Priorit y 8):

Pupil out comes in t he subject areas of English, mat hemat ics, and physical educat ion.

Not e: Percent ages are not calculat ed w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

California High School Exit Examination Results for All Grade Ten Students – Three-Year Comparison (if California High School Exit Examination Results for All Grade Ten Students – Three-Year Comparison (if applicable)

applicable)

Subject

Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

English-Language Art s N/A N/A N/A 43% 41% 36% 56% 57% 56%

Mat hemat ics N/A N/A N/A 48% 45% 40% 58% 60% 62%

English-Language Art s Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

Mat hemat ics Percent of St udent s Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

(13)

Last updated: 12/11/2014 Not e: Percent ages are not calculat ed w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

Not e: Percent ages are not calculat ed w hen t he number of st udent s t est ed is t en or less, eit her because t he number of st udent s in t his cat egory is t oo small for st at ist ical accuracy or t o prot ect st udent privacy.

California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) (if California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group (School Year 2013-14) (if applicable)

applicable)

Group

English-Language Art s Mat hemat ics

Percent Not Proficient

Percent Proficient

Percent Advanced

Percent Not Proficient

Percent Proficient

Percent Advanced

All St udent s in t he LEA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

All St udent s at t he School N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Black or African American N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Asian N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Filipino N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Hispanic or Lat ino N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Nat ive Haw aiian or Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

W hit e N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

T w o or More Races N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

English Learners N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

St udent s w it h Disabilit ies N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

St udent s Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)

Grade level

Percent of St udent s Meet ing Fit ness St andards

Four of Six St andards Five of Six St andards Six of Six St andards

5 N/A N/A N/A

7 25.4% 34.4% 24.6%

9 N/A N/A N/A

(14)

C. Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

T he SARC provides t he follow ing informat ion relevant t o t he Parent al Involvement St at e Priorit y (Priorit y 3):

Effort s t he school dist rict makes t o seek parent input in making decisions for t he school dist rict and each schoolsit e.

State Priority: Pupil Engagement

T he SARC provides t he follow ing informat ion relevant t o t he Pupil Engagement St at e Priorit y (Priorit y 5):

High school dropout rat es; and High school graduat ion rat es.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year

ECP’s Family Resource Cent er, locat ed in Room 27, helps families connect w it h t he school around t he academic support and achievement of our children. At t he beginning of t he year, every parent is invit ed t o a pot luck w it h t heir child’s advisor so t hat advisors can connect w it h families. In addit ion, w e ask every parent t o come in t hree t imes a year for St udent Led Conferences, a chance for each st udent t o show of t heir w ork and learning. W e also host regular family event s, such as Family Reading Night or Family Science Night . Parent s are also invit ed t o join our mont hly SSC commit t ee meet ings.

Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)

Indicat or

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Dropout Rat e

Graduat ion Rat e 58.35 58.96 62.78 77.14 78.87 80.44

Dropout /Graduat ion Rat e (Four-Year Cohort Rat e) Chart

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

Dropout Rate Graduation Rate

(15)

Completion of High School Graduation Requirements Completion of High School Graduation Requirements

Group

Graduat ing Class of 2013

All St udent s

Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Nat ive Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Lat ino

T w o or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvant aged English Learners

(16)

State Priority: School Climate

T he SARC provides t he follow ing informat ion relevant t o t he School Climat e St at e Priorit y (Priorit y 6):

Pupil suspension rat es;

Pupil expulsion rat es; and

Ot her local measures on t he sense of safet y.

Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions

Rat e 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Suspensions 12.20 11.30 4.70 7.50 5.60 4.80 5.70 5.10 4.40

Expulsions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10

Suspensions

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions

Expulsions

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12

School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions

(17)

School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year

T he school review ed, revised and submit t ed t o t he Board in 2013-14 an updat ed Safet y Plan t hat included: school sit e safet y programs, procedures for complying w it h school safet y law s, and Disast er/Emergency/Crisis Response procedures. W e have regular and ongoing fire drills and disast er drills t o ensure t hat all st udent s and st aff are w ell prepared in case of emergency. W e have also opened an Opport unit y Class and int roduced a T ruancy Program t o make cert ain t hat all st udent s are on campus and safe. As a result , at t endance has increased and suspensions decreased.

(18)

D. Other SARC Information

T he informat ion in t his sect ion is required t o be in t he SARC but is not included in t he st at e priorit ies for LCFF.

Not e: Cells w it h NA values do not require dat a.

* DW (det erminat ion w aiver) indicat es t hat t he PI st at us of t he school w as carried over from t he prior year in accordance w it h t he flexibilit y grant ed t hrough t he federal w aiver process.

Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14) Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)

AYP Crit eria School Dist rict

Made AY P Overall No

Met Part icipat ion Rat e - English-Language Art s No

Met Part icipat ion Rat e - Mat hemat ics Y es

Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Art s Y es

Met Percent Proficient - Mat hemat ics Y es

Met Graduat ion Rat e N/A

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)

Indicat or School Dist rict

Program Improvement St at us In PI In PI

First Y ear of Program Improvement 2008-2009

Y ear in Program Improvement * Y ear 5

Number of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A

Percent of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A %

(19)

* Number of classes indicat es how many classes fall int o each size cat egory (a range of t ot al st udent s per class).

* Number of classes indicat es how many classrooms fall int o each size cat egory (a range of t ot al st udent s per classroom). At t he secondary school level, t his informat ion is report ed by subject area rat her t han grade level.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Grade Level Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+

K 1 2 3 4 5

6 27.0 14 4 14 25.0 12 22 2

Ot her

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Subject Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+

English 37.3 1 8 1 24.0 4 6 26.0 1 8

Mat hemat ics 27.6 1 8 0 24.0 4 7 27.0 1 8 1

Science 27.6 1 8 0 24.0 4 6 26.0 1 8

Social Science 27.6 1 8 0 24.0 4 6 26.0 1 8

(20)

Last updated: 1/25/2015 Not e: Cells w it h N/A values do not require dat a.

* One Full T ime Equivalent (FT E) equals one st aff member w orking full t ime; one FT E could also represent t w o st aff members w ho each w ork 50 percent of full t ime.

Not e: Cells w it h N/A values do not require dat a.

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14) Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)

Tit le Number of FTE* Assigned t o School Average Number of St udent s per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development ) N/A

Library Media T eacher (librarian) N/A

Library Media Services St aff (paraprofessional) N/A

Psychologist N/A

Social W orker N/A

Nurse N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist N/A

Resource Specialist (non-t eaching) N/A

Ot her 8.0 N/A

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)

Level

Tot al Expendit ures Per Pupil

Expendit ures Per Pupil (Supplement al/Rest rict ed)

Expendit ures Per Pupil (Basic/Unrest rict ed)

Average Teacher Salary

School Sit e $9,638 $5,729 $3,909 $36,207

Dist rict N/A N/A $5,461 $55,086

Percent Difference – School Sit e and Dist rict

N/A N/A -0.28% -0.34%

St at e N/A N/A $4,690 $70,720

Percent Difference – School Sit e and St at e N/A N/A -0.17% -0.49%

(21)

Last updated: 12/13/2014 For det ailed informat ion on salaries, see t he CDE Cert ificat ed Salaries & Benefit s W eb page at ht t p://w w w .cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ .

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)

ECP is a recipient of T it le I, LEP, and School Improvement Grant funds. T hese funds are used t o:

Ext end t he school day for all st udent s, specifically t hrough Cit izen Schools

Provide addit ional support t o our st udent s t hrough t eachers on special assignment w ho w ork w it h small groups w it h st udent s t o provide bot h academic and socio-emot ional support

Support t eachers t o spend ext ra t ime w it h st udent s and in professional development Provide int ervent ion inst ruct ion t o our English Learners and emerging readers

Fund Family Resource Cent er st aff and supplies t hrough t he FamELi collaborat ive

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)

Cat egory Dist rict Amount St at e Average For Dist rict s In Same Cat egory

Beginning T eacher Salary $39,456 $41,761

Mid-Range T eacher Salary $54,328 $66,895

Highest T eacher Salary $70,934 $86,565

Average Principal Salary (Element ary) $84,669 $108,011

Average Principal Salary (Middle) $85,411 $113,058

Average Principal Salary (High) $86,249 $123,217

Superint endent Salary $265,000 $227,183

Percent of Budget for T eacher Salaries 30.0% 38.0%

Percent of Budget for Administ rat ive Salaries 9.0% 5.0%

Teacher Salary Chart

Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000

Principal Salary Chart

A v erage Principal Salary (Elementary )

A v erage Principal Salary (Middle)

A v erage Principal Salary (High) 0

20000 40000 60000 80000 100000

(22)

Last updated: 12/11/2014 Not e: Cells w it h N/A values do not require dat a.

*W here t here are st udent course enrollment s.

Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2013-14) Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2013-14)

Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of St udent s In AP Courses

Comput er Science N/A

English N/A

Fine and Performing Art s N/A

Foreign Language N/A

Mat hemat ics N/A

Science N/A

Social Science N/A

All Courses

(23)

Professional Development – Most Recent Three Years Professional Development – Most Recent Three Years

T his sect ion provides informat ion on t he annual number of school days dedicat ed t o st aff development for t he most recent t hree-year period. ECP has w orked t o develop a t rue Professional Learning Communit y. Our w eekly professional development focuses on implement ing and maint aining rigorous, grade-level t eaching and learning. W e do t his by w orking t hrough cycles of inquiry w here t eachers ident ify a st andards-based focus, creat e an assessment t hat measures t hat focus, brainst orm w it h colleagues how t o best t each t hat focus, and t hen analyze t he result s of t he assessment . W e are also focusing t his year on t hree research-based pract ices t o improve t eaching and learning: t he development of academic vocabulary, st udent w rit ing, and st udent engagement t echniques. In addit ion t o st aff professional development ret reat s before school in August , mid-year, and end of year, t here w eekly st aff development meet ings and t hree full school days during t he school year.