• No results found

High speed railway principles

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "High speed railway principles"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

High speed railway principles

Ignacio Barrón de Angoiti, Director High Speed, International Railway Association (UIC) Professional Conference on High Speed In the World and in the Czech Republic Praha, 14 November 2007

Agenda

High Speed Rail principles

Some facts & figures about High Speed Impact in traffics

High Speed and the environment High Speed Rail is safety

The costs of the high speed

Concluding remarks

(2)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

High Speed Rail principles

High Speed Rail: Definitions and requirements

• “High Speed” signifies at least 250 km/h

• Operating at more than 200 km/h requires:

- special trains (train sets) - special dedicated lines - in cab signalling

• Upgraded existing lines and “classic” trains (locomotive + cars) enable to operate up to about 200 km/h

• We can also say “High Performances”

(3)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Understanding High Speed Rail

A High Speed Railway is a (very complex) system, comprised by state of the art:

- Infrastructure - Station emplacement - Rolling Stock - Operation rules

- Signalling systems - Marketing - Maintenance systems - Financing

- Management - …

HS performances for customers

- Commercial speed - Total time of travel - Frequency - Reliability

- Accessibility - Price

- Comfort - Safety

- “Freedom” - …

(4)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Time travel (hrs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Paris - Amsterdam

Paris - Brussels Paris - Marseille Paris - Stuttgart Köln - Frankfurt Madrid - Seville Madrid - Barcelone Rome - Milano Rome - Naples

█ Before HS After HS

Some examples of evolution of time travel

• Offers high capacity of transport - Up to 300,000 passengers per day - Reduce traffic congestion

• Helps economic development

• High Speed Rail promotes logical territory structure and helps contain urban sprawl

• Respects the environment:

- Efficient use of land (1/3 motorway) - Energy efficiency (x 9 planes / x 4 cars)

HS advantages for Society

(5)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

HS increases capacity

• Introduces more capacity in the transport system:

- New HS line capacity +

- Released capacity in classic lines

• But the capacity of new HS lines is very variable

• Many different commercial concepts of HS

(including services to customers, marketing, etc.)

• Many different types of operation (maximum speed, stops, etc.)

• Different ways to operate classic trains (in particular impact on freight traffic)

Different concept of HS

(6)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Density of population

Concepts:

«Corridor»

&

«Tunnel»

Some facts & figures about High Speed

(7)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Some figures about High Speed

World network (V > 250 km/h) = 9.430 km Almost 1.300 high speed trains set in operation World speed record (in 2007): 574,8 km/h Japan: In 42 years = 4 Billion passengers

Up to 360.000 pass./day in Tokyo-Osaka No fatalities during all this time at V > 200 km/h France: In Nov. 2006, passenger 1,3 Billion in TGV Europe: Average annual growing traffic 10 % (pass.-km) Korea: More than 100.000 passengers per day

(50 % rail traffic)

Evolution of maximum speed on rails

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

1955 1958 196 1

1964

1967 1970 197 3

1976 1979 1982 1985

1988 199 1

1994

1997 2000 2003 2006 Maximum speed in tests

Maximum speed in operation

Km/h

(8)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000

19 81 19 84

19 87 19 90

19 93 19 96

19 99 20 02

20 05 20 08

20 11 20 14

20 17 20 20

20 23 Average: 187 km / year

Average: 554 km / year

Km of High Speed Lines - Expectations in Europe

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000

19 64 19 68

19 72 19 76

19 80 19 84

19 88 19 92

19 96 20 00

20 04 20 08

20 12 20 16

20 20 20 24

Evolution of total World high speed network

km

(9)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Evolution of World high speed network

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000

196 4

196 8

197 2

197 6

198 0

1984 198

8 1992

199 6

2000 200

4 200

8 201

2 201

6 202

0 202

4

T otal

Europe Asia

km

High Speed Rolling Stock - Situation in the World

In June 2007, at the World level, 1.290 HS train sets in operation

(V > 250 km/h)

:

• Europe: 800

(1.355 HS train sets if V>200 km/h)

• Japan: 330

• Korea: 50

• China: 60

• China Taiwan: 30

• USA: 20

(10)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Forecasting evolution World high speed train sets

0 1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000

2 007 2 025

High Speed impact on traffics

(11)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Effects in modal split

Before Thalys After Thalys

24

50 61

43 7

8

2 5

Coach Plane Car Train

All modes

Paris - Brussels (320 km / 1h25min.)

Before AVE After AVE

33

84 67

16

Plane Train

Train / plane

Madrid - Seville (471 km / 2h15 min.)

Effects in modal split

(12)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

FSC 22%

LCC 7%

Eurostar 71%

Efect of “Low Cost” air companies

París – London (2h 40min.)

0 25 50 75 100

1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5

Rail market share (%) Paris - Brussels 310 km

Rome - Milan 560 km

Madrid - Seville 471 km

Paris - Lyons 430 km

Paris - Amsterdam 540 km

Rome - Bologna 358 km

Tokyo - Osaka 515 km

Stockholm - Gotenburg 455 km

Rail travel time (hours) Paris - London 494 km

Curve of the rail / air modal split

(distances between 300 and 600 km)

% HS

% Plane

(13)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

High Speed Traffic - Evolution in Europe

24,8 8,9

27,2 9,3

30,6 3,6 10,2

32,2 4,4 11,6

34,7 5,1 13,9

37,4 6,8 15,5

2,22,4

39,9 7,1 15,3

2,42,5

39,6 7,4 17,5

2,42,5

41,5 7,9 19,6 2,4 2,7

42,7 8,6 20,9

2,3 2,3

44,0 8,9 21,6 2,5 3,7

0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0

Billions PKm

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

CP 0,5 CD 0,1 SBB 0,3 NSB 0,1 NS 0,7 VR 0,3 SNCB 1,0 RENFE SJ DB FS SNCF

Total Europe Evolution % 42,3

13%

37,4 14%

48,6 15%

52,7 8%

59,4 13%

71,1 3%

68,7 4%

75,9 7%

79,7 4%

65,9 11%

84 6%

High Speed and the environment

(14)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Some ratios on land occupancy in Germany:

• High speed line Hanover - Würzburg 3,0 ha/km

• High speed line Mannheim - Stuttgart 4,0 ha/km

• Average 3,2 ha/km

• Average motorways 9,3 ha/km

Parallel layout with a motorway:

• Paris - Lyon 60 km

• Paris - Lille 135 km

• Cologne – Frankfurt 140 km

Land occupancy

HS Line Paris – Lille (TGV Nord)

Parallel layouts

(15)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

HS Line Cologne - Frankfurt Parallel layouts

HS Railway Motorway

Double track 2 x 3 lanes

25 m 75 m

12 trains per hour & direction 4.500 cars per hour & direction 666 passengers / train 1,7 passengers / car Capacity = 8.000 passengers / hour Capacity = 7.650 passengers / hour

Comparisons in land occupancy

(16)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

180 170

106 90

52,5

HST Fast train

Commuter train Regional

rain

54,1 39

20

Bus P. car Plane Pkm/Kep

Source: SNCF, ADEME, 1997 1 kwh = 0,086 Kep

Energy Efficiency - Passenger

Primary Energy and CO2 Emission

6 7 2,5

14

4

HS Trains Private cars Plane

Primary energy in litres of petrol per 100 passengers- km

Amount of carbon dioxid emissions per 100 passengers-km

17

(17)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

In a medium distance corridor (400 - 500 km) 10 flight per day represents the emission of 6.700 t. of CO2 per year to the atmosphere

CO2 emissions

48 20

38 87

0 25 50 75 100

Private car Bus Rail Air

Source: INFRAS/IWW 3/2000

Upstream process Urban effects Landscape Climate change Air pollution Noise Accidents

Without congestion Passenger Traffic 1995

Average External Costs

Euro / 1000 Pkm

(18)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

High Speed Rail is safety

Passengers killed per 1 billion Passenger-kilometres

1,54 1,63 1,87

2,33

1,50 1,43

1,09 1,29

1,11 1,00

0,83

0,65 0,69 0,98

1,18 1,24 1,39

1,10

0,79

0,65 0,92

0,56

0,47 0,40

0,38 0,36

0,42

0,22 0,38

0,30 0,70 0,51 1,99

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5

1970 1971

1972 1973

1974 1975

1976 1977

1978 1979

1980 1981

1982 1983

1984 1985

1986 1987

1988 1989

1990 1991

1992 1993

1994 1995

1996 1997

1998 1999

2000 2001

2002

High Speed Rail

Classic railways

Evolution of Railway Safety in EU

(19)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

The costs of High Speed

(20)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

• High Speed requires significant investment, including public funding

• Consequently, need detailed studies on traffic forecasting, costs and benefits

• Examine all impacts, positive and negative (including calculating costs of not doing it)

Funding/Calculating Costs

Minimum costs in Europe

Construction of 1 km of new HSL: 12 M €

Maintenance of 1 km of new HSL: 70.000 € / year Cost of an HS train (350 places): 20 M €

Maintenance of a HS train: 1 M € / year

(2 € / km - 500 000 km / train & year)

Magnitude Costs of HS systems

(21)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

• High Speed costs are generally paid with public funds (Japan, Europe, Korea)

• The trend is to share funds and responsibilities between different public entities (French TGV)

• In some cases, private funding can be attracted for part of total investment

• PPP (Spain – France link) or BOT (Taiwan) are two possibilities to combine public and private resources:

- Private obtains ROI

- Public ensures social benefits

Funding Costs

Definition of max. speed and performances

Standardisation Knowledge of High Speed Systems

& Elements Low Cost

High Speed Rail System

Financing Market

procedures

Key elements to reduce costs

(22)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Concluding remarks

• High Speed is an highly beneficial transport system for Society

• High Speed is a “complex system” and its

conception is not unique; it must be adapted to each case and each country

High Speed always needs public funds (at least, public guarantee)

Concluding remarks

(23)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

• World Congress in HS (“Eurailspeed”):

Next one The Netherlands, 17 – 18 Mars 2008

• “Training in HS Systems”:

Next one 16 to 21 June 2008

UIC High Speed activities

For more information, commentaries and proposals:

Iñaki Barrón de Angoiti

Director High Speed

Union Internationale des Chemins de fer (UIC) [email protected]

www.uic.asso.fr

(24)

High Speed – I. Barrón – Professional Conference - Praha, 14 November 2007

Thank you very much

for your attention

References

Related documents

Each of the prior runs is submitted for the Focused task and in addition filtered for the Relevant in Context task (runIDs with Ric affix); for relevant in context we grouped

All the physical character- istics of the particular skeleton being used (such as relative length and width of each section) will be re- tained while only the

The objectives of this study were to assess demographic characteristic for research participant and to assess the relationship between internet addiction,

As the students continue to be involved over the years, they will increase their knowledge of their education and hopefully be able to help develop their own

The following search terms were com- bined with each other: mental health outcomes (e.g., depression, anxiety, common mental disorders); and humanitarian populations or

This study addressed how caseload complexity, self-efficacy, and years of experience predict perceived quality of care and burnout in psychiatric caregivers who work with offenders

This project provided important information regarding whether using peer support in people with multiple sclerosis is effective in improving health related quality of life,

Rollout and operation of a demonstration system in a rural pilot grid region, specification of smart grid applications, data analysis Rollout and operation of a demonstration