Low Graduation Rate vs Default Rates
Accreditors
Institutional Programmatic - CAAHEP Students
Instructors
Low Graduation Rate vs Default Rates
The Government and the Department of
Education are concerned.
Students that withdrew still had a debt owed with
2010 Senate investigated 30 for-profit
colleges.
Federal financial aid over nine years doubled
from 12.2% to 24.8%
$5.4 billion to $32.2 billion in 2010.
Drop out rates are:
For-profit 50% - 70% vs 31% public colleges &
Degree sought, level of institution,
degree completed, and time to degree Total (%) Public (%) Private not-for-profit (%) Private for-profit (%)
Degree- or certificate-seekers attending 2-year institutions and completing a degree or certificate
Graduation rate within 100% of normal program completion time
Graduation rate within 150% of normal program completion time
Graduation rate within 200% of normal program completion time
17.9 11.9 38.6 36.4
31.2 22 52.7 60.2
Regional Accreditation - six
Middle State Association of Colleges & Schools
▪ MSACS
New England Association of Schools & Colleges
▪ NEASC
North Central of Colleges & Schools
▪ NCCS
Northwest Association of Colleges & Schools
▪ NACS
Southern Association of Colleges & Schools
▪ SACS
Western Association of Schools & Colleges
National Accreditation - nine
Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and
Colleges (ACCSC)
Accrediting Council for Continuing Education and
Training (ACCET)
Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and
Schools (ACICS)
Association of Advanced Rabbinical and
Talmudic Schools (AARTS)
Council on Occupational Education (COE)
Distance Education Training Council (DETC)
National Accrediting Commission of Career
Arts and Sciences (NACCAS)
Transnational Association of Christian
State Regulatory Agencies
Exp. Texas Workforce Commission (TWC)
Specialized Accreditation
Known as programmatic accreditation
American Medical Association (AMA)
American Dental Association (ADA) National League Nursing (NLN)
Accrediting Bureau of Health Education Schools (ABHES) C0mmission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education
Many regional, national and state accreditors
want a retention from 65% – 69%.
Intrinsic Needs
Why does the student enroll into classes?
▪ Learn a skill
▪ Be competent in an area
▪ Acquire another set of skills
▪ Perfect a skill
▪ Succeed and do well
▪ Feel involved and interact with people
Satisfying these initial needs meets the goals for
some.
Extrinsic Needs
Maslow Hierarchy
▪ Basic: Psychological and survival
▪ Safety : Home & campus
▪ Belongingness : Acceptance and appreciation
▪ Ego-status: Gain status within the group
▪ Self-actualization: Driven to accomplish goals and
works within himself 0r herself. Becomes self-directed in their motivation
The students extrinsic needs to be met in order to
Fear of College
The 18 – 20 y/o’s
▪ Social failure in college – fitting in.
▪ Biggest issues for some lack of maturity & life experience.
Nontraditional students
▪ Maturity on their side
▪ Out of school for awhile.
▪ Career change.
Age
Average age career college students 28 y/o
Younger students bring a limited life experience &
immaturity
Older students bring vast knowledge of life
experience & maturity
Younger students can be considered no nothing vs older students as know it all's.
You are not a baby sitter.
Cultural Diversity
They come from many ethnic cultures,
backgrounds and behaviors
Some come with English language deficiencies Develop strategies in handling the different
personalities.
Use your college resources to help the student be successful in class.
Support Systems
External support
▪ Family and friends
Internal support
▪ College
Student Frustrations
Fall into four categories
▪ 1. Impersonal problems
▪ Parking too far or public transportation
▪ Offer solutions
2. People
▪ Financial Aid Office
▪ Admissions Office
▪ Counseling or Student Affairs
▪ Classmates
▪ Attend to their complaints immediately
▪ The students should see you as a neutral party
3. Rules
▪ Adult learners tend to question the rules
▪ Need to make sense
▪ No control of college rules but you have control of classroom rules.
4. Limitations
▪ Number of books
▪ Computer availability
▪ Few lab supplies
▪ Student break rooms
▪ Vending machine selection ▪ Smoking areas
▪ Restroom issues
▪ Ensure books and lab supplies are available
▪ Schedule the computer room
Disabilities
Range from physical disabilities to those with
cognitive disabilities.
Physical disabilities can participate with certain environmental changes to the campus.
Cognitive disabilities can range from learning disabilities such as
▪ Reading – Dyslexia
▪ Writing – Dysgraphia
Disabilities (cont.)
In the last 10 – 15 years many students that have
had support from their high schools.
They will be able to tell you what modification and
adaptations work best for them.
For those that did not have the support federal
law was pass to provide an Individual Educational Plan
Set the Stage for Learning
Physical comfort Security
Acceptance Self-respect
The Road to Success
Tell them how to succeed in the course Help students set goals
Hold high but realistic expectations for your
students
Recognition and rewards Avoid intense competition
Motivation
Offering expertise Having empathy Show enthusiasm Demonstrate clarity
Diversified the class to the needs of the students Personalized in a manner that recognizes the
Motivation through Retention
Semantic
▪ Long term memory
▪ Learned over a life time
Episodic
▪ Things that happen in our lives
Moving from Episodic to Semantic
▪ Use mnemonic’s
▪ 12 Cranial Nerves
On Old Olympus' Towering Top A Fin And German Viewed Some Hop
▪ Aorta vs Vena Cava – right side or left side
Both a-o-r-t-a and r-i-g-h-t have 5 letters;
Motivating through Transference
Want the student to retain the material in long
term memory.
Repeat at least 45 times and/or for 30 consecutive
days.
Once the student gets comfortable they achieve
Be involved with your student.
Show you care.
Be proactive.
Be the magnet.
Cuseo, Joe, ( 2015), “The Big Picture”, Key Causes of Student Attrition & Key Components of a Comprehensive Student
Retention Plan, Marymount College.
Editorial Board, (2014), Editorial: Bottom Line First, Students Second at Some For-Profit Colleges, St Louis Post-Dispatch. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS),
(2010), Graduation Rates 200 component, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Lewin, Tamar, (2010), Report finds Low Graduation Rapes at For-Profit Colleges, The NY Times.