• No results found

cm reform roadmap

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "cm reform roadmap"

Copied!
52
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Chief Minister’s

School Reforms Roadmap

(2)

School Reforms Roadmap

To improve quality, access and governance in education at school

level, the chief minister launched School Reforms Roadmap in April

2011.

Roadmap activities involve submission of monitoring report for

every district against various parameters which include staff

absenteeism, student attendance etc.

Data is submitted to a centralised database maintained by the

PMIU-PESRP, it is analysed and used for creating district-wise and

division-wise ranking on quarterly basis.

Programme Monitoring and

(3)

Goals for the Roadmap

Every child enrols in school

Every child is retained in school

Every child learns and makes progress

3

(4)

The Chief Minister is expecting

improvement in the following areas

Access

Quality

Governance

(5)

Approach

Identi

fic

ati

on o

f Para

meters

Select

io

n of

Targets

Result

Based

Ap

praisa

l

Out

put

& O

utco

me

Analy

sis

(6)

Follow up on Parameters

PMIU

6

Monthly

Quarterly

(7)
(8)

Quarterly Indicators

Governance

Access

Teacher Presence

Student Attendance

School and Student Cleanliness

Non-teaching Staff Presence

Functioning of school Facilities

District Review Committee Meetings

Curtailing illegal Fee

District Staff School Visits

Missing facilities & Up-gradation

funds utilization

FTBs

16

16

14

4

16

6

2

6

3

4

Quality

Teacher’s Guide

DTE Visits

DSD Assesment

2

4

4

(9)
(10)

Various Targets

PMIU

10

Uniform

90%

100%

Trajectory

(11)

I-Uniform Targets

1. Schools Inspected by EDO and his Staff

2. DRC Meetings

3. Timeliness of data

4. Curtailing Illegal collection

5. Missing Facilities & Up-gradation – funds utilization

6. Provision of FTBs

7. Teacher guide presence and use

(12)

District Specific Trajectory

(13)

II-District Specific Trajectory

1. Teachers’ Presence

2. Non-Teaching Staff Presence

3. Student Attendance

4. School Cleanliness

5. Functioning of School Facilities

6. Aggregate mean score of DSD exams

(14)

Teacher Presence – Trajectory

Q1’13 Q4’12

Q3’12 Q2’12

Q1’12 Q4’11

Q3’11 Q2’11

Baseline

Chart Title

89

88

87

86

85

84

83

88.0

88.0

88.0

87.5 87.0

86.3

84.1

(15)

Method

to

(16)

PMIU

16

SAHIWAL FAISALABAD MIANWALI RAJANPUR NANKANA SAHIB MULTAN KHUSHAB LAYYAH SIALKOT NAROWAL JHANG M.B.DIN CHINIOT OKARA PAKPATTAN GUJRAT BAHAWALNAGAR RAWALAPINDI RAHIMYAR KHAN BHAKKAR HAFIZABAD ATTOCK BAHAWALPUR CHAKWAL GUJRANWALA LODHRAN SHIEKHUPURA LAHORE JHELUM MUZAFFARGARH KASUR T.T.SINGH KHANEWAL SARGODHA D.G. KHAN VEHARI SAHIWAL FAISALABAD MIANWALI RAJANPUR NANKANA SAHIB MULTAN KHUSHAB LAYYAH SIALKOT NAROWAL JHANG M.B.DIN CHINIOT OKARA PAKPATTAN GUJRAT BAHAWALNAGAR RAWALAPINDI RAHIMYAR KHAN BHAKKAR HAFIZABAD ATTOCK BAHAWALPUR CHAKWAL GUJRANWALA LODHRAN SHIEKHUPURA LAHORE JHELUM MUZAFFARGARH KASUR T.T.SINGH KHANEWAL SARGODHA D.G. KHAN VEHARI 82.43 75.99 82.20 74.59 79.00 81.12 84.33 77.64 81.10 81.40 83.82 83.38 83.02 85.37 81.53 83.00 82.19 85.42 82.22 86.94 82.90 83.37 82.23 84.20 81.86 82.28 81.27 84.38 83.36 82.17 83.49 86.61 82.63 80.06 82.33 81.19 82.43 75.99 82.20 74.59 79.00 81.12 84.33 77.64 81.10 81.40 83.82 83.38 83.02 85.37 81.53 83.00 82.19 85.42 82.22 86.94 82.90 83.37 82.23 84.20 81.86 82.28 81.27 84.38 83.36 82.17 83.49 86.61 82.63 80.06 82.33 81.19 1.57 2.59 1.61 2.78 2.15 1.80 1.22 2.36 1.81 1.75 1.32 1.40 1.47 1.01 1.73 1.47 1.62 1.00 1.61 0.69 1.49 1.40 1.61 1.24 1.67 1.60 1.78 1.21 1.40 1.62 1.38 0.76 1.54 1.98 1.59 1.79 1.57 2.59 1.61 2.78 2.15 1.80 1.22 2.36 1.81 1.75 1.32 1.40 1.47 1.01 1.73 1.47 1.62 1.00 1.61 0.69 1.49 1.40 1.61 1.24 1.67 1.60 1.78 1.21 1.40 1.62 1.38 0.76 1.54 1.98 1.59 1.79 84.44 82.20 83.87 76.96 79.88 81.36 84.04 76.95 80.35 80.55 83.16 82.65 82.15 84.60 80.21 81.65 80.68 81.38 76.24 84.58 77.88 78.68 77.17 80.68 77.68 78.76 77.93 82.14 81.10 79.69 81.44 85.62 80.65 77.70 80.54 79.29 84.44 82.20 83.87 76.96 79.88 81.36 84.04 76.95 80.35 80.55 83.16 82.65 82.15 84.60 80.21 81.65 80.68 81.38 76.24 84.58 77.88 78.68 77.17 80.68 77.68 78.76 77.93 82.14 81.10 79.69 81.44 85.62 80.65 77.70 80.54 79.29 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 76.15 70.58 58.60 51.45 50.44 48.03 40.80 24.12 23.79 8.29 6.21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 76.15 70.58 58.60 51.45 50.44 48.03 40.80 24.12 23.79 8.29 6.21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80.86 73.40 80.59 71.81 76.85 79.32 83.11 75.29 79.30 79.65 82.50 81.98 81.55 84.36 79.80 81.53 80.58 84.42 80.61 86.25 81.41 81.97 80.62 82.96 80.19 80.68 79.49 83.18 81.96 80.55 82.11 85.86 81.09 78.08 80.74 79.40 80.86 73.40 80.59 71.81 76.85 79.32 83.11 75.29 79.30 79.65 82.50 81.98 81.55 84.36 79.80 81.53 80.58 84.42 80.61 86.25 81.41 81.97 80.62 82.96 80.19 80.68 79.49 83.18 81.96 80.55 82.11 85.86 81.09 78.08 80.74 79.40 3.58 8.80 3.28 5.15 3.02 2.04 0.93 1.66 1.06 0.90 0.66 0.67 0.60 0.24 0.41 0.12 0.10 (3.04) (4.37) (1.66) (3.53) (3.29) (3.44) (2.28) (2.51) (1.93) (1.56) (1.04) (0.85) (0.86) (0.67) (0.23) (0.45) (0.38) (0.20) (0.11) 3.58 8.80 3.28 5.15 3.02 2.04 0.93 1.66 1.06 0.90 0.66 0.67 0.60 0.24 0.41 0.12 0.10 (3.04) (4.37) (1.66) (3.53) (3.29) (3.44) (2.28) (2.51) (1.93) (1.56) (1.04) (0.85) (0.86) (0.67) (0.23) (0.45) (0.38) (0.20) (0.11)

District

(17)

Calculation for District

Specific Targets

Trajectory

Score

Comparative

Score

(18)

District Ranking

for

(19)

Activities

with

(20)

Curtailing Illegal Fee/Funds

Sep 2012

%

K

H

U

SH

A

B

B

A

H

A

W

A

LN

A

G

A

R

B

H

A

K

K

A

R

C

H

A

K

W

A

L

D

.G

. K

H

A

N

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

JH

A

N

G

K

A

SU

R

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

LA

H

O

R

E

LO

D

H

R

A

N

M

A

N

D

(21)

DRC Meetings

Jul to Sep 2012

%

A

tto

ck

B

ah

aw

aln

ag

ar

B

ah

aw

alp

ur

B

ha

kk

ar

C

ha

kw

al

C

hin

io

t

D

.G

.K

ha

n

Fa

isa

lab

ad

G

ujr

an

w

ala

G

ujr

H

at

afiz

ab

ad

Jh

an

Jh

g

elu

m

K

ha

ne

w

al

K

hu

sh

ab

La

ho

re

La

yy

ah

Lo

dh

ra

n

M

.B

.D

in

M

ian

w

ali

M

uz

aff

arg

arh

N

an

ka

na

S

ah

ib

O

ka

Pa

ra

kp

att

an

R

.Y

.K

ha

n

R

aja

np

ur

R

aw

alp

in

di

Sa

hiw

al

Sa

rg

od

ha

Sh

eik

hu

pu

ra

Sia

lko

T.T

t

.S

in

gh

Ve

(22)

Timeliness of data

Sep 2012

%

(23)

Provision of FTBs –

Sep 2012

%

JH

A

N

G

LO

D

H

R

A

N

M

A

N

D

I B

A

H

A

U

D

D

IN

O

K

A

R

A

JH

EL

U

M

B

H

A

K

K

A

R

M

U

LT

A

N

N

A

N

K

A

N

A

S

A

H

IB

C

H

A

K

W

A

L

C

H

IN

IO

T

PA

K

PA

TT

A

N

T.T

.S

IN

G

H

SA

R

G

O

D

H

A

R

A

W

A

LP

IN

D

I

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

B

A

H

A

W

A

LN

A

G

A

R

R

A

H

IM

YA

R

K

H

A

N

SA

H

IW

A

L

VE

H

A

R

I

G

U

JR

A

N

W

A

LA

M

IA

N

W

A

LI

K

H

U

SH

A

B

LA

H

O

R

E

K

A

SU

R

M

U

ZA

FF

A

R

G

A

R

H

R

A

JA

N

PU

R

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

LA

YY

A

H

SH

EIK

H

U

PU

R

A

A

TT

O

C

K

B

A

H

A

W

A

LP

U

R

H

A

FIZ

A

B

A

D

G

U

JR

A

T

N

A

R

O

W

A

L

D

.G

. K

H

(24)

Teacher Guide–

Sep 2012

%

JH

A

N

G

C

H

IN

IO

T

G

U

JR

A

N

W

A

LA

H

A

FIZ

A

B

A

D

K

H

U

SH

A

B

LO

D

H

R

A

N

M

A

N

D

I B

A

H

A

U

D

D

IN

SA

R

G

O

D

H

A

SIA

LK

O

T

VE

H

A

R

I

T.T

.S

IN

G

H

R

A

W

A

LP

IN

D

I

SA

H

IW

A

L

B

A

H

A

W

A

LN

A

G

A

R

O

K

A

R

A

PA

K

PA

TT

A

N

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

B

H

A

K

K

A

R

N

A

N

K

A

N

A

S

A

H

IB

R

A

H

IM

YA

R

K

H

A

N

JH

EL

U

M

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

G

U

JR

A

T

M

U

ZA

FF

A

R

G

A

R

H

A

TT

O

C

K

C

H

A

K

W

A

L

LA

YY

A

H

B

A

H

A

W

A

LP

U

R

M

U

LT

A

N

M

IA

N

W

A

LI

K

A

SU

R

N

A

R

O

W

A

L

D

.G

. K

H

(25)

Missing Facilities & Upgradation – Funds

Utilization

%

A

TT

O

C

K

B

A

H

A

W

A

LN

A

G

A

R

B

A

H

A

W

A

LP

U

R

B

H

A

K

K

A

R

C

H

A

K

W

A

L

C

H

IN

IO

T

D

.G

. K

H

A

N

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

G

U

JR

A

N

W

A

LA

G

U

JR

A

T

H

A

FIZ

A

B

A

D

JH

A

N

G

JH

EL

U

M

K

A

SU

R

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

K

H

U

SH

A

B

LA

H

O

R

E

LA

YY

A

H

LO

D

H

R

A

N

M

.B

.D

IN

M

IA

N

W

A

LI

M

U

LT

A

N

M

U

ZA

FF

A

R

G

A

R

H

N

A

N

K

A

N

A

S

A

H

IB

N

A

R

O

W

A

L

O

K

A

R

A

PA

K

PA

TT

A

N

R

A

H

IM

YA

R

K

H

A

N

R

A

JA

N

PU

R

R

A

W

A

LA

PIN

D

I

SA

H

IW

A

L

SA

R

G

O

D

H

A

SH

EIK

H

U

PU

R

A

SIA

LK

O

T

T.T

.S

IN

G

H

VE

H

A

R

I

-

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

Fun

ds n

ot y

et t

ran

sfer

(26)

Schools Inspected by EDO & his staff –

Sep’

2012

%

90% Target

B

H

A

K

K

A

R

C

H

IN

IO

T

D

.G

. K

H

A

N

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

G

U

JR

A

T

H

A

FIZ

A

B

A

D

JH

A

N

G

JH

EL

U

M

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

K

H

U

SH

A

B

LA

H

O

R

E

LA

YY

A

H

M

A

N

D

(27)

Activities

(28)

Teachers' Presence –

Sep 2012

SA

H

IW

A

L

C

H

IN

IO

T

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

LO

D

H

R

A

N

M

U

LT

A

N

B

A

H

A

W

A

LP

U

R

O

K

A

R

A

G

U

JR

A

T

D

.G

. K

H

(29)

Non-Teaching Staff Presence –

Sep 2012

SA

H

IW

A

L

LO

D

H

R

A

N

JH

EL

U

M

M

U

LT

A

N

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

SA

R

G

O

D

H

A

C

H

IN

IO

T

H

A

FIZ

A

B

A

D

M

A

N

D

I B

A

H

A

U

D

D

IN

D

.G

. K

H

(30)

Student-Attendance –

Sep 2012

JH

EL

U

M

T.T

.S

IN

G

H

SA

H

IW

A

L

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

M

A

N

D

I B

A

H

A

U

D

D

IN

R

A

W

A

LP

IN

D

I

LA

H

O

R

E

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

G

U

JR

A

T

A

TT

O

C

K

SA

R

G

O

D

H

A

SIA

LK

O

T

C

H

IN

IO

T

M

U

LT

A

N

VE

H

A

R

I

H

A

FIZ

A

B

A

D

G

U

JR

A

N

W

A

LA

JH

A

N

G

N

A

R

O

W

A

L

LO

D

H

R

A

N

LA

YY

A

H

PA

K

PA

TT

A

N

B

A

H

A

W

A

LP

U

R

M

U

ZA

FF

A

R

G

A

R

H

K

H

U

SH

A

B

O

K

A

R

A

B

A

H

A

W

A

LN

A

G

A

R

M

IA

N

W

A

LI

R

A

H

IM

YA

R

K

H

A

N

R

A

JA

N

PU

R

C

H

A

K

W

A

L

K

A

SU

SH

R

EIK

H

U

PU

R

A

N

A

N

K

A

N

A

S

A

H

IB

B

H

A

K

K

A

R

D

.G

. K

H

(31)

Schools' Cleanliness – Sep

2012

M

U

LT

A

N

SA

H

IW

A

L

M

.B

.D

IN

T.T

.S

IN

G

H

LA

H

O

R

E

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

JH

EL

U

M

G

U

JR

A

T

D

.G

. K

H

(32)

Functioning of Facilities –

Sep 2012

SA

R

G

O

D

H

A

M

A

N

D

I B

A

H

A

U

D

D

IN

VE

H

A

R

I

SA

H

IW

A

L

LA

H

O

R

E

G

U

JR

A

T

C

H

A

K

W

A

L

T.T

.S

IN

G

H

LO

D

H

R

A

N

JH

EL

U

M

FA

IS

A

LA

B

A

D

K

H

A

N

EW

A

L

PA

K

PA

TT

A

N

A

TT

O

C

K

M

U

LT

A

N

O

K

A

R

A

SIA

LK

O

T

C

H

IN

IO

T

R

A

W

A

LP

IN

D

I

G

U

JR

A

N

W

A

LA

K

A

SU

R

N

A

N

K

A

N

A

S

A

H

IB

JH

A

N

G

LA

YY

A

H

K

H

U

SH

A

B

SH

EIK

H

U

PU

R

A

B

A

H

A

W

A

LP

U

R

B

H

A

K

K

A

R

H

A

FIZ

A

B

A

D

N

A

R

O

W

A

L

B

A

H

A

W

A

LN

A

G

A

R

M

IA

N

W

A

LI

M

U

ZA

FF

A

R

G

A

R

H

R

A

H

IM

YA

R

K

H

A

N

D

.G

. K

H

(33)
(34)

Overall – District Ranking – Sep’12

%

SA

HIW

AL

M

.B

.D

IN

JH

EL

UM

FA

ISA

LA

BA

D

KH

AN

EW

AL

T.T

.SIN

GH

LA

HO

RE

CH

IN

IO

T

RA

W

AL

AP

IN

DI

VE

HA

RI

M

UL

TA

N

LO

DH

RA

N

SA

RG

O

DH

A

LA

YY

AH

GU

JR

AT

HA

FIZ

AB

AD

M

UZ

AF

FA

RG

AR

H

JH

AN

BA

G

HA

W

AL

PU

R

N

AR

O

W

A

L

O

KA

RA

PA

KP

AT

TA

N

SIA

LK

O

T

GU

JR

AN

W

AL

A

KH

U

SH

AB

M

IA

N

W

AL

I

N

AN

KA

N

A S

AH

IB

D.G

. K

HA

N

RA

JA

N

PU

R

SH

IEK

HU

PU

RA

BA

HA

W

AL

N

AG

AR

AT

TO

CK

BH

AK

KA

R

RA

HIM

YA

R K

HA

N

KA

(35)

Top 5 Districts

1- Sahiwal

2- M.B.Din

3- Jhelum

(36)

Lowest 5 Districts

32- Attock

33- Bhakkar

34- R.Y.Khan

35- Kasur

(37)

District Teachers' Presence Non-Teaching Staff Pres.

Student Attendance

School visits by Admn.

DRC Meetings

Timely backup

received Cleanliness

Functioning

Facilities Curtailing Illegal fee

Provisio n of FTBs

Teacher Guide usage SUM

SAHIWAL 15.55 3.90 15.29 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.89 5.88 2.00 3.97 2.00 74.48

M.B.DIN 15.08 3.81 15.24 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.87 5.90 2.00 4.00 2.00 73.90

JHELUM 15.22 3.86 15.43 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.59 5.80 2.00 4.00 1.97 73.88

FAISALABAD 15.07 3.78 15.24 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.81 5.79 2.00 3.94 1.98 73.61

KHANEWAL 15.37 3.83 15.17 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.39 5.79 2.00 3.98 1.97 73.50

T.T.SINGH 15.15 3.19 15.41 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.87 5.83 2.00 3.99 2.00 73.44

LAHORE 15.21 3.35 15.20 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.84 5.88 2.00 3.95 1.87 73.31

CHINIOT 15.47 3.81 15.08 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.09 5.72 2.00 3.99 2.00 73.17

RAWALAPINDI 15.11 3.43 15.22 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.03 5.70 2.00 3.98 2.00 72.46

VEHARI 14.17 3.72 15.05 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.03 5.89 2.00 3.97 2.00 71.83

MULTAN 15.29 3.83 15.06 16.00 4.00 1.00 2.90 5.75 2.00 4.00 1.95 71.79

LODHRAN 15.33 3.90 14.79 14.94 6.00 1.00 1.93 5.80 2.00 4.00 2.00 71.69

SARGODHA 13.63 3.82 15.15 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.14 5.90 2.00 3.98 2.00 71.62

LAYYAH 14.90 3.58 14.76 16.00 6.00 1.00 1.64 5.63 2.00 3.94 1.96 71.40

GUJRAT 15.23 1.68 15.17 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.41 5.87 1.94 3.91 1.97 71.19

HAFIZABAD 13.54 3.81 14.98 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.28 5.57 2.00 3.92 2.00 71.10

MUZAFFARGARH 15.04 2.41 14.60 16.00 6.00 1.00 1.77 5.52 2.00 3.95 1.96 70.25

JHANG 12.65 3.79 14.92 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.07 5.67 2.00 4.00 2.00 70.10

BAHAWALPUR 15.28 3.77 14.62 14.03 6.00 1.00 1.65 5.62 2.00 3.92 1.96 69.85

NAROWAL 15.08 3.75 14.86 16.00 4.00 1.00 1.61 5.57 2.00 3.90 1.94 69.71

OKARA 15.27 3.28 13.85 14.31 6.00 1.00 1.77 5.74 2.00 4.00 1.99 69.21

PAKPATTAN 12.79 2.27 14.67 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.25 5.78 2.00 3.99 1.99 68.73

SIALKOT 15.10 3.72 15.10 12.01 6.00 1.00 1.71 5.74 2.00 3.85 2.00 68.22

GUJRANWALA 14.85 1.61 14.95 12.21 6.00 1.00 1.77 5.69 2.00 3.97 2.00 66.05

KHUSHAB 8.14 3.09 14.56 16.00 6.00 1.00 1.97 5.62 2.00 3.96 2.00 64.34

MIANWALI 11.85 1.76 12.69 16.00 6.00 1.00 1.23 5.53 2.00 3.96 1.94 63.96

NANKANA SAHIB 15.08 3.60 6.64 16.00 6.00 1.00 1.85 5.68 2.00 3.99 1.98 63.82

D.G. KHAN 15.22 3.81 6.38 16.00 6.00 1.00 2.40 5.08 2.00 3.86 1.93 63.69

RAJANPUR 14.61 3.65 8.22 14.42 6.00 1.00 1.83 4.82 2.00 3.95 1.91 62.41

SHIEKHUPURA 14.90 2.80 6.99 16.00 6.00 1.00 1.41 5.62 2.00 3.93 1.75 62.41

BAHAWALNAGAR 11.06 2.89 13.19 12.63 6.00 1.00 1.34 5.54 2.00 3.98 1.99 61.63

ATTOCK 11.09 3.78 15.17 7.75 6.00 1.00 2.07 5.78 2.00 3.93 1.96 60.53

BHAKKAR 7.09 3.80 6.52 16.00 6.00 1.00 1.23 5.60 2.00 4.00 1.98 55.21

RAHIMYAR KHAN 11.96 2.77 10.29 7.43 6.00 - 2.02 5.49 2.00 3.98 1.97 53.91

KASUR 11.23 1.66 7.18 13.60 4.00 - 1.40 5.68 2.00 3.95 1.94 52.66

(38)

Overall – Division Ranking

%

FAISAL

ABAD

MULTAN

SAHI

WAL

GU-

JRAN

WALA

D.G.

KHAN

RAWALP

INDI

SAR-

GODHA

LAHORE BA-

HAWALP

UR

(39)

Division wise Ranking Comparison

%

FAISAL

ABAD

MULTAN

SAHI

WAL

GU-JRAN

WALA

D.G.

KHAN

RAWALP

INDI

SAR-GODHA

LAHORE

BA-HAWALP

UR

-

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

1

6

2

4

9

7

5

8

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

(40)

Illegal occupied schools

La

ho

Sh

re

eik

hu

pu

ra

R Y

Kh

an

T T

Sin

gh

Kh

an

ew

al

Ve

ha

Ra

ri

w

alp

in

di

Sa

hiw

al

M

ult

Ch

an

ak

w

al

Sia

lko

Bh

t

aw

alp

ur

Fa

isa

lab

ad

Ka

su

r

N

an

ka

na

Sa

hib

D G

Kh

an

Jh

elu

Gu

m

jra

nw

ala

M

B

D

in

Kh

us

ha

b

M

uz

aff

arg

arh

Bh

ak

ka

r

M

ian

w

ali

Ra

jan

pu

r

Att

oc

Gu

k

jra

N

t

aro

w

al

O

ka

ra

Lo

dh

ra

n

La

yy

ah

Ha

fiz

ab

ad

Sa

rg

od

ha

Jh

an

g

Pa

kp

att

an

Ch

in

io

Ba

t

ha

w

aln

ag

ar

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Total Illegal occupied schools

Under Litigation

(41)

Illegal occupied schools

La

ho

re

M

ult

an

Ra

w

alp

in

di

Ba

ha

w

alp

ur

Fa

isa

lab

ad

Gu

jra

nw

ala

Sa

hiw

al

D.G

.K

ha

n

Sa

rg

od

ha

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Total Illegal Occupied Schools

Schools under litigation

(42)

References

Related documents

In order to verify that the MOC-code-produced nozzles will reach the target flow Mach numbers, an inviscid CFD analysis was performed for each case on both the primary and secondary

Netafim's line of crop management technology (CMT) solutions includes state-of-the-art irrigation, Nutrigation™, and climate control & management systems. Suitable for

» Settlement Members must be able to offer CLS settlement services to their third party customers and submit payment instructions involving any Eligible Currency, including

Define oxidation number and calculate the oxidation state of underlined element.. What is

ISPS is used for Financials (General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Cost Accounting, Accounts Receivables, Fixed Assets), Materials Management, Funds/Grants Management, Human

Relationships between resistance characteristics of honey bees (Apis mellifera) against Varroa mites (Varroa destructor).. Martin BUCHEGGER 1 *, Ralph BUECHLER 2 , Birgit

En 1965, como consecuencia de excavaciones para la construcción de un parking subterráneo en la plaza de la catedral, fueron construcción de un parking subterráneo en