• No results found

How much streamflow is groundwater discharge? - a method for assessment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "How much streamflow is groundwater discharge? - a method for assessment"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

How much streamflow is groundwater

discharge?

- A method for assessment

Vince Bidwell

Lincoln Environmental

-

Pukemanga Working Group

(

NIWA, GNS, LandcareResearch,

AgResearch, Lincoln Environmental

)

(2)

Why do we want to know?

1. Water quality

(3)

Why do we want to know?

2. Water quantity

Groundwater discharge is the source of “baseflow” in streams

Baseflow is vital for stream ecology and human use

Temporal distribution of baseflow (e.g., recession rate) is

(4)

Model of groundwater discharge

Recharge ≤ Dmax Aquifer: conductivity k storativity S L B Groundwater discharge to surface water Surface drainage

Vadose zone response time T

2

SL kB

=

α

Soil-water balance model

(5)

Two questions to be addressed

and two model parameters to answer them

1. What proportion of catchment drainage becomes groundwater

discharge?

Defined by the maximum recharge rate Dmax

What is the temporal distribution of the groundwater

discharge?

Defined by the parameter α of a dynamic groundwater model that maintains a set of water storage states

These two parameters are optimised for best fit to the lower

(6)

Example 1: Toenepi Catchment, Waikato

Area = 15.1 km2

Slope: flat (89%), rolling (10%), steep (1%)

Elevation: 40 – 130 m (amsl)

Land use: dairy pasture

(7)

Toenepi Catchment: hourly data 24/11/02 – 23/11/03

Rainfall = 1081 mm; Streamflow = 273 mm 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60

Nov 2002 Jan 2003 Mar 2003 May 2003 Jul 2003 Sep 2003

Fl

ow

(mm/

h)

Observed streamflow

Predicted groundwater discharge

74%

(8)

Toenepi Catchment

Groundwater discharge dynamics

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

Jun 2003 Aug 2003 Oct 2003

Fl ow (mm/ h) Observed streamflow Predicted groundwater discharge

Rapid response Complex

(9)

Example 2: Pukemanga Catchment, Waikato

Area = 3 ha

Slope: hilly (17°- 20°) to steep (>30°)

Elevation: 72 – 146 m (amsl)

Land use: sheep pasture

(10)

Pukemanga Catchment: hourly data 1/4/98 – 31/3/99

Rainfall = 1706 mm; Streamflow = 1013 mm; Area = 1.43/3.0 ha

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0

Apr 1998 Jun 1998 Aug 1998 Oct 1998 Dec 1998 Jan 1999

Fl ow (mm/ h) Observed streamflow Predicted groundwater discharge 62% Dmax = 2.0 mm/h

(11)

Pukemanga Catchment

Groundwater discharge dynamics

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50

Apr 1998 Jun 1998 Aug 1998 Oct 1998 Dec 1998 Jan 1999

Fl ow (mm/ h) Observed streamflow Predicted groundwater discharge

(12)

Pukemanga Stream catchment is 48% of topographical area: hillslope “stream function” model

Wetland origin of Pukemanga Stream Extent of groundwater system

For Pukemanga Stream

“Deep” groundwater system draining to river

(13)

Sources of the other 38% of Pukemanga streamflow? - piezometric levels near the wetland (current research)

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00

Apr 2004 May 2004 Jun 2004

Fl ow (mm/ h) -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 P ie z ome tr ic l e v e l (c m be low gr ound) Observed streamflow

Predicted groundwater discharge Piezometric level ~1 m depth

(14)

Comparison of baseflow recession in response to a unit pulse recharge

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Days since unit pulse recharge

Relat ive g ro u n d w at er d isch ar g e Toenepi - 1510 ha Pukemanga - 3 ha

(15)

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Days since unit pulse recharge

Relat ive g ro u n d w at er d isch ar g e ( lo g ) Toenepi - 1510 ha Pukemanga - 3 ha

Comparison of baseflow recession (log scale)

α = 0.0096 /d α = 0.0278 /d kB α = SL2 __

(16)

Conclusions about quantity and quality

For both catchments, during the year of observations, more

than 60% of the total annual streamflow is groundwater discharge, from recharge at rates less than 2 mm/h

Quality of this groundwater discharge would be determined by

leaching of the soil profile and exposure to geochemical processes in the aquifer

Much of the remaining streamflow may be from drainage of

saturated near-surface zones, with quality determined mainly by leaching of the soil profile (current research)

(17)

Conclusions about groundwater discharge dynamics

Response of groundwater discharge to recharge entering the

groundwater surface is essentially instantaneous

More of the streamflow during drainage events can be ascribed

to groundwater recharge than predicted by some alternative baseflow separation methods

The complex behaviour of streamflow recession is described

by a single-parameter model, based on the theoretical

dynamics of groundwater flow, which preserves water storage states

References

Related documents

The summary groundwater recharge values obtained from chloride mass balance analysis represented in Table 4, a mean annual total of 980mm, 740mm, 1070 mm, 880mm

The purposes of this assessment are to provide an overview of present groundwater quality to determine spatial distribution of groundwater quality parameters such as total dissolved

Knowledge of the range of mean annual recharge values along the A-A’ flow line of the Bonifacio aquifer makes it possible to determine the groundwater travel time from any position

Figure 78: Perth County groundwater recharge rates and total water demand for three climate scenarios (a, b, c)

Groundwater discharge to drains is more than 60 percent of net annual recharge in the Peel-Harvey Area because of shallow water tables, and is less likely to change under

Therefore, the objectives of this study are: (a) to statistically detect trends and change-points in annual streamflow and sediment discharge in the middle reaches of the Yellow

Relating the spatial coverage of salt pans to the annual net groundwater evaporation of 39 mm ± 13 mm from continental salt pans leads to a total annual groundwater loss of 1.3 km 3

...77 Figure 4.8 Map of estimated mean annual actual (net) groundwater recharge (in mm) to shallow aquifers in Bangladesh using the water-table fluctuation method for three