• No results found

Validation of Basis Science Advanced Sleep Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Validation of Basis Science Advanced Sleep Analysis"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Validation of

Basis Science

Advanced Sleep Analysis

Estimation of Sleep Stages and Sleep Duration

Sarin Patel

Biosignals Algorithms Engineer1

Leslie Ruoff

Sleep Core Director2

Tareq Ahmed

Senior Software Engineer1

Tejash Unadkat

Director of Product1

Jonathan Lee

Director of Research1

1 Basis Science, San Francisco, CA, 2 University of California, San Francisco /San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center/

Northern California Institute of Research and Education

Abstract

Basis Science launched Advanced Sleep Analysis in January 2014 and became the first wrist-based tracker to detect

REM, deep (slow wave), and light Non-REM sleep stages. Advanced Sleep Analysis combines sleep stage, toss-and-turn, sleep duration metrics, and more to provide users with a comprehensive view of their sleep.

To further develop and validate the sleep staging and sleep duration components of Advanced Sleep Analysis, Basis is partnering with sleep researchers at the Stress and Health Research Program, a joint venture between the

University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SFVAMC), and the

Northern California Institute of Research and Education (NCIRE). None of the institutions were compensated in any form for these studies.

These researchers conducted sleep studies known as polysomnography, the gold standard for examining sleep, in order to evaluate the Basis sleep algorithm’s estimation of sleep duration and sleep staging. Preliminary results from these ongoing studies are described in this report. Sleep duration and sleep staging detected via the Basis Band were compared to polysomnography (PSG) data scored by sleep technologists. The Advanced Sleep Analysis algorithm demonstrated excellent agreement with polysomnography data for sleep duration (4.3% mean difference) and sleep staging (r = 0.92).

(2)

Introduction

During sleep, the body cycles between different sleep states in order to recover mentally and physically. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is theorized to be essential for strengthening memories, boosting mood, and consolidating

information learned during the day[1],[2]. During deep sleep, your body repairs muscles and tissues, stimulates growth

and development, and boosts your immune system[3],[4],[5]. Light sleep allows the body to transition to either deep or

REM sleep[6].

Polysomnography (PSG), a comprehensive sleep study measuring several physiological signals, is the gold standard for measuring these sleep states. PSG studies are typically used by clinicians to evaluate sleep quality in those with suspected sleep disorders or by researchers in both normal subjects, or patients with sleep disorders. During PSG studies, an array of sensors is attached to the patient, measuring activity in the brain, eye, muscles, and heart. These signals are then analyzed and interpreted by a sleep technologist, who creates an in-depth report of the patient’s night sleep, including time spent in each sleep state.

The Basis Band’s sensors measure heart rate, motion, temperature, and perspiration. Through combinations of multiple sensors, the Basis sleep algorithm is able to measure physiological correlates of sleep stages, and thereby estimate times each user was in light, REM or deep sleep. These measurements are not possible with sensors that only detect motion (actigraphs). To ensure the accuracy of the sleep algorithm, Basis partnered with clinical sleep researchers who performed studies comparing the Basis sleep algorithm with PSG data. Excellent agreement was observed between Basis and PSG estimation of sleep duration and sleep states. Results from the initial phase of this study are described in this report, with additional studies ongoing.

Methodology

To further develop and validate the sleep duration estimation and sleep staging of our Advanced Sleep Analysis, Basis partnered with The Stress and Health Research Program, a joint venture between the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SFVAMC), and the Northern California Institute of Research and Education (NCIRE). Prior to work with SFVAMC, Basis developed, trained and validated the Advanced Sleep Analysis algorithm on data from over 600 sleep events from studies at Basis. For initial external validation of the algorithm, sleep studies, known as polysomnography (PSG), were performed at SFVAMC on 12 subjects for one or two nights per subject for a total of 19 subject-nights. Basis B1 Bands were worn concurrently during these studies. PSG data were scored by registered sleep technologists at SFVAMC. Analysis of sleep duration and sleep stage percentages comparing the Basis sleep algorithm to PSG were performed at Basis.

(3)

PSG Duration(minutes) Basis Duration (minutes) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Light REM Deep

PSG Percentage of Sleep Event(%)

Basis Percentage of Sleep E

vent (% ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Light REM Deep

Results & Discussion

Excellent correlation (r = 0.92) was observed for duration and percentage of night sleep spent in each state between the Basis sleep algorithm estimation and the PSG (see Figures 1 and 2). The results were highly statistically significant (p < 0.01). The agreement observed between Basis and the scored PSG data is especially encouraging considering even trained sleep scorers routinely disagree in their assessments of sleep stages. In a study of over 2,500 trained sleep scorers recently published in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, inter-scorer agreement was

observed to be approximately 83%[7].

Given this inherent variability in scoring, complete agreement between the PSG and Basis is unlikely, and the Basis sleep algorithm performance should be considered very good.

See Figure 3 for example hypnograms overlaying sleep stages estimated by the Basis sleep algorithm and PSG. As shown in the hypnograms, the algorithm shows good agreement with PSG for timing of sleep stages.

Detection of Sleep Stages

Comparison of PSG and Basis estimation of sleep stage duration. Figure 1

Comparison of PSG and Basis estimation of sleep stage as a percentage of total sleep time. Figure 2

(4)

Midnight 1:12 am 2:24 am 3:36 am 4:48 am 6:00 am 7:12 am Deep Light REM

Example Hypnogram #1

Basis PSG 10:19 pm 11:31 pm 12:43 am 1:55 am 3:07 am 4:19 am 5:31 am 6:43 am Deep Light REM

Example Hypnogram #2

Basis PSG

Example hypnograms overlaying PSG and Basis estimated sleep stage during sleep event. Figure 3

(5)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Basis PSG 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Subject—Night

Measured Sleep Duration

(hours)

The Basis sleep algorithm estimation of sleep duration matched closely with PSG-measured sleep duration (see Figure 4). On average, the Basis estimation of duration was 4.3% different from the PSG*. A difference in duration of 10% or less was observed in 89% of nights.

* Percentage difference calculated as the absolute value of the difference between PSG and Basis, divided by PSG

Estimation Of Sleep Duration

Comparison of PSG and Basis estimation of total sleep duration. Figure 4

The Basis sleep algorithm demonstrated excellent agreement with polysomnography (PSG) data for both sleep duration and sleep state estimation. Preliminary results are promising and demonstrate that the Basis Band provides a level of sleep analysis previously unavailable outside a sleep laboratory.

The authors wish to acknowledge and thank Dr. Thomas Neylan and the staff of The Stress and Health Research Program at the San Francisco VA Medical Center for their support and advice throughout these studies

Summary

(6)

1. Diekelmann, S. & Born, J. The memory function of sleep. Nature Rev Neurosci. 11, 114-126 (2010).

2. Cartwright, R., Luten, A., Young, M., Mercer, P. & Bears, M. Role of REM sleep and dream affect in overnight mood

regulation: a study of normal volunteers. Psychiatry Res. 81, 1-8 (1998).

3. Kamdar, B., Needham, D. & Collop, N. Sleep Deprivation in Critical Illness: Its Role in Physical and Psychological

Recovery. J Intensive Care Med. 27, 97-111 (2012).

4. Veldhuis, J.D. & Iranmanesh, A. Physiological regulation of the human growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth

factor type I (IGF-I) axis: predominant impact of age, obesity, gonadal function, and sleep. Sleep. 19, S221-224 (1996).

5. Cardinali, D. & Esquifino, A. Sleep and the Immune System. Curr Immunol Rev. 8, 50-62 (2012)

6. Kishi, A. et. al. NREM Sleep Stage Transitions Control Ultradian REM Sleep Rhythm. Sleep. 34, 1423-1432 (2011).

7. Rosenberg, R.S. & Van Hout S. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine inter-scorer reliability program: sleep stage

scoring. J Clin Sleep Med. 9, 81-87 (2013)

References

Related documents

[11], the thermodynamic consistency test of experimental solubility of NH3 (ammonia) in different ionic liquids using Peng-Robinson Kwak and Mansoori equation of state and van

Considering the control re- quirements that are characteristic of this topology and its applications, several variations of the algorithm are stud- ied and compared to classical

The results of the model research yield the priority of making KMS prototype, such as: background of dominant white website, dominant black base font, preferably

We examined gender differences with respect to lymphocyte subsets and with respect to HIV RNA copy number and disease progression (for patients with perinatally acquired HIV)

(2) to determine the relationship between each methods. The study wasconducted using cross sectional design. Patients were followed-up for 6 months and adherences

Obviously, other mechanisms led to the expansion of the Globular Amphora culture in a northward direction. Only a part of its range of characteristics occurs in this zone,