• No results found

Research Administration Forum. Contracts

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Research Administration Forum. Contracts"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Research Administration Forum

Contracts

(2)

Learning Objectives

 To understand the changes from the new Uniform Guide.  To understand what services are provided by Research

Support Services in the area of contracts.

 To understand the difference between a subrecipient and

a contractor.

 To understand the process for issuing either a subaward

(3)

Research Support Services

 Sponsored Program Agreements/Contracts (incoming)  For contracts where the University will be the recipient of

the funds, initiate the agreement by submitting:

 an intent to submit to [email protected]  Internal budget

 Proposal summary form  Scope of work

 Basically, the same process as initiating a grant proposal.  Subawards (outgoing)

 For contracts where the University is the prime awardee and

(4)

Uniform Guide

The new Uniform Guide has replaced the

term vendor with contractor to remove

ambiguity between the different OMB

Circulars.

§200.22 Contract

§200.92 Subaward

§200.330 Subrecipient and contractor

determinations

(5)

Consistency

The University has adopted this guidance to determine the status of a subrecipient versus a contractor for all

sponsored projects, no matter the funding type (federal, state, or industry funding).

(6)

Subrecipients

A subaward is for the purpose of carrying out a portion of an award in which the prime recipient creates a relationship with the subrecipient.

(7)

Subrecipient Characteristics

Under UG §200.330, Subrecipient and

contractor determinations, an organization

is considered to be a subrecipient of an

award when the prime recipient:

 determines who is eligible to receive what Federal financial

assistance;

 has its performance measured against whether the objectives of

the program are met;

 has responsibility for programmatic decision making;  has responsibility for adherence to applicable program

compliance requirements; and

 uses the funds to carry out a program of the organization as

compared to providing goods or services for a program of the pass-through entity.

(8)

Other Subrecipient Characteristics

The organization is contributing to the

scholarly/scientific conduct of the project as

described in the statement of work for the

organization (programmatic involvement);

The conduct of the organization’s portion of the

project requires use of the discretion and unique

expertise of the organization.

The subrecipient’s principal investigator may be a

co-author on publications or may seek patent

protections for inventions.

Title to intellectual property created by

subrecipient is normally retained by the

subrecipient.

(9)

Contractors

A contract is for the purpose of obtaining goods and

services for the entity’s own use and creates a procurement relationship with the contractor.

(10)

Contractor Characteristics

 Under UG §200.330, Subrecipient and contractor

determinations, an organization is considered to be a contractor of an award when the entity receiving the funds:

 provides goods and services within normal business

operations;

 provides similar goods and services to many different

purchasers;

 normally operates in a competitive environment;  provides goods and services that are ancillary

(contribute) to the operation of the program; and

 is not subject to compliance requirements of the

(11)

Consultant

A ‘consultant’ is an expert advisor who is paid

for his/her time at a fixed rate of

compensation (hourly or daily and includes

travel, out-of-pocket expenses, and overhead)

specified in the consultant agreement.

A consultant may be an individual or a

company.

A consultant must use their own equipment

and materials.

Individuals who work full time and consult on

the side may not use the equipment or

facilities at their full time employer for

consulting purposes.

(12)

Uniform Guide §200.330

UG §200.330, Subrecipient and contractor

determinations, states that there may be unusual

circumstances or exceptions to the listed

characteristics.

In making the determination of whether a

subrecipient or contractor relationship exists, the

substance of the relationship is more important

than the form of the agreement.

It is not expected that all of the characteristics will

be present and judgment should be used in

determining whether an entity is a subrecipient or

contractor.

(13)

The Subaward Process

Step I: Initiate the Subaward Process

 The Office of Research Support Services (RSS) receives

an award notice from the sponsor.

 RSS will initiate the subaward agreement with the identified

subrecipient, based upon:

 Approval of Subaward by the Prime Sponsor  Detailed Budget

 Budget Justification

 Statement of Work

 Subaward Principal Investigator (PI) Identification  Subaward Contact Information

(14)

The Subaward Process

Step 2: Draft of the Subaward Agreement

 RSS will draft the subaward agreement to

incorporate/address:

 Required terms and conditions of:

o The State of Tennessee o The prime

 Subrecipient’s statement of work, budget and budget justification

 Required certifications and representations

(15)

The Subaward Process

Step 3: Negotiation of Terms and Conditions of the Subaward Agreement

 Upon completion of the initial draft, RSS will submit the

subaward agreement to the subrecipient.

 Subrecipient will review subaward agreement.

 Negotiation between subrecipient and RSS will occur, until

all terms and conditions of the agreement are acceptable by both parties.

(16)

The Subaward Process

Step 4: Execution of the Subaward

 Upon acceptance and completion of the final draft, the

subaward document is signed by the authorized representatives of:

 The University

 The Subrecipient

 When both parties have signed the agreement, it is

(17)

The Subaward Process

Step 5: Procurement of Subaward

 Upon execution of the agreement:

 RSS notifies applicable PI and department that subaward agreement has been executed.

 RSS requests applicable PI and department to:

 Initiate a requisition in TigerBuy

 Complete and submit to Procurement and copy to RSS the following forms:

1. Executed Agreement

2. Sole Source Justification Form

3. Contract Routing Form

 The Procurement Office issues the Purchase Order (PO)

(18)

The Subaward Process

Step 6: Subaward Invoicing Process

 Invoices received from the subrecipient are reviewed, approved

and submitted for payment by the PI.

Step 7: Subaward PO Closeout

 Procurement Office institutes Subaward PO Closeout based on

(19)

Contract Procurement Process

This includes agreements for personal, professional, and consultant services .

The contract procurement process follows the University contract services process found at:

(20)

Dual Service Agreements

 Faculty or staff receiving compensation from another

state agency or TBR for work performed outside normal duties (extra compensation) must have a dual service agreement with the procuring entity.

 This is not applicable to work performed within normal

duties (buy-out of effort); in which case, a services or consulting agreement is executed.

 It is the responsibility of the Faculty or Staff performing

work on a dual service to secure approval from their department Chair prior to accepting the assignment.

 Effective immediately, RSS will require a proposal

summary form (PSF), signed by the Chair and Dean for all dual service agreements.

(21)

References

Related documents

Quality: We measure quality (Q in our formal model) by observing the average number of citations received by a scientist for all the papers he or she published in a given

Passed time until complete analysis result was obtained with regard to 4 separate isolation and identification methods which are discussed under this study is as

The problems faced in the development of beef cattle SPR in Jember Regency are very diverse, including limited feed, availability of superior calves, low human resources of

Representatives from Murdoch University’s First Year Advisor (FYA) network and information technology (IT) staff have customised the software RightNow to suit the purpose

As part of some cluster deployments, the MediaCentral Platform Services 2.0 Installation and Configuration Guide provided instructions for replicating the cluster file caches

Model the current state of your supply-chain processes by configuring activities at process category level to represent current supply-chains, decomposing activities at

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current vac- cination status of the HCWs in all of the Departments different from the Department for the Health of Women and Children of one

A series of pile caps covering a range of dimensions have been tested to investigate pile cap shear   behaviour and the validity of the shear strength design formulae given in UK