• No results found

Selected LHCb results

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Selected LHCb results"

Copied!
62
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Heavy flavours and QCD Selected LHCb results

Sergey Barsuk, LAL Orsay

on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

: La nascita, la vita e la morte degli aromi pesanti a LHCb Outline

Heavy flavour production

Onia production / Open charm and beauty production / Exotics

 Lifetime-based studies

Heavy flavour hadron decays & CPV

Angle γ / BsBs mixing phase φ

s

/ New results on b-baryons /

/ Radiative penguines bsγ / Search for Bsμμ

(2)

Heavy flavours – excellent place to hunt for effects beyond

Standard Model

Strategic attack on SM by LHCb : examples of where LHCb can

contribute Hot channels for the near future:

 Bs  μ μ : Is there SUSY? BR ~ tan

6

β / m

4

A .

 Bs  J/ψφ et al. : Beyond-SM CPV?

 Bd  μ μ K* : Right-handed currents?

 γ (φ3) : Is the CKM matrix sufficient?

 y CP : Beyond-SM CPV in charm?

My goal is to show results / potential of LHCb in these areas …

 talks by Antonio Masiero and Marco Ciuchini

Introduction

(3)

Correlated bb production, second b in acceptance once the first b is in (flavour tagging)

 LHCb covers forward region: 1.9 < η < 4.9

 optimized for forward peaked HQ production at the LHC

 only ~4% of solid angle, but ~40% of HQ production cross section

LHCb design overview

 Bunch crossings at 40 MHz, can store < 3 kHz

Aim at reducing rate, while storing as many HQ as possible, two-stage trigger:

 Hardware-based L0 trigger employs moderate pT cuts, reduces rate to 800 kHz

Unique acceptance amongst LHC experiments:

can explore QCD in the forward region

 LHCb covers forward region: 1.9 < η < 4.9

 Busy events, O(200) particles/event

 Large cc and bb production cross section at LHC : with ALL c- and b-species produced,

e.g. 50k bb events/s

JINST 3:S08005,2008

(4)

250 mrad

10 mrad

Vertex reconstruction:

VELO

Trigger:

Muon Chambers Calorimeters RICHsPID:

Calorimeters Kinematics:

Magnet Tracker

Calorimeters

SystemMuon Tracking

RICH counters p/K/π Identification

VErtex LOcator

p p

LHCb detector – single-arm forward spectrometer 10-250 mrad (V), 10-300 mrad (H)

(5)

LHCb lifetime measurements using 36 pb-1 of 2010 data

1.638 0.011 1.525 0.009 1.525 0.009 1.477 0.046 1.391 0.038 PDG [ps]

LHCb [ps]

Vertex Locator (VELO) provides excellent proper time resolution of ~50 fs

VErtex LOcator: precision tracking and vertexing

LHCb-CONF-2011-001

VELO sensitive area gets 8 mm to the beam axis

(6)

Charged hadron identification: Cherenkov detectors Muon detector

π0

X→µµ

Particle identification

photon/electron/hadron PID:

calorimeter

(7)

LHCb collected ~37 pb-1 in 2010 and already >700 pb-1 in 2011. Goal for 2011: 1 fb-1

 LHC reached nominal peak luminosity of 2x1033 cm-2s-1 with number of bunches ~1300 from ~2600

LHCb recording >1pb-1/hour running at

L~3.3x1032 cm-2s-1 (higher, than nominal, 2x1032 cm-2s-1 ) in auto-leveling mode

 LHCb tested operation up to 4x1032 cm-2s-1

Visual average number of vertices now is higher µ ~1.4, compared to nominal µ =0.4

 Higher µ  higher track multiplicity, 1 PV gives 30 tracks/rapidity range,

dangerous for reconstruction

 dangerous background for D and B decay vertex reconstruction LHCb luminosity levelling

~30 pb-1 in 29 h in a single fill.

dL/dt ~ 100 pb-1/week possible !

LHCb operation

LHCb

(design)

ATLAS

CMS

(8)

Heavy flavour production: LHCb as a flavour factory

 Onia production: J/ψ, χ c , ϒ(1S), χ b

 Exotics: X(3872), X(4140)

 b-hadron production: inclusive production, B, Bs, Bc

 Exclusive charmonium production

(9)

Onia production: J/ψ and ϒ(1S)

LHCb-CONF-2011-016 Measurements getting more precise than theory, given polarisation will be measured.Mechanism of onia production: colour single model, octet model, evaporation model...?

Eur.Phys.J. C71 (2011) 1645

J/ψ prompt J/ψ from b

P.Artoisenet, M.Butenschon, B.A.Kniehl

ϒ(1S)

P.Artoisenet, J.M.Campbell, J.P.Lansberg, F.Maltoni, F.Tramonato

Adequate description of J/ψ production, while still big uncertainty for ϒ(1S) 32 pb-1

32 pb-1

5.2 pb-1 5.2 pb-1

(10)

χ c and χ b production using radiative decays χ c  J/ψ γ and χ b  ϒ(1S)γ

LHCb-CONF-2011-020 Challenge to resolve χc1 vs. χc2

σ(χc2)/σ(χc1)

NLONRQCD

LO colour singlet

First results for relative production of χc1 vs. χc2 are not well described by NLO NRQCD.

 χb0,1,2 can not be resolved

 No sign of χb(2P) reported by CDF

(PRL 84 (2000) 2094), though ϒ(1S) statistics ~30 times larger.

350 59 events 35 pb-1

35 pb-1

37 pb-1

(11)

LHCb preliminary 376 pb-1

B+X(3872)K+

Exotics: X(3872), observation, mass, x-section

Mass calibrated by scaling track momenta and constraining ϒ(1S),ψ(2S)μμ, DoKπ and KoS  ππ masses. Control channel: ψ(2S)J/ψ ππ.

With 2011 data perform:

 precise mass measurements

 angular studies [LHCb-PUB-2010-003]

in BX(3872)K to access JPC of X(3872)

LHCb-CONF-2011-021 LHCb-CONF-2011-043 Exotic, internal structure uncertain, possibly a DoD*o molecule.

Precise mass crucial Inclusive measurement, LHCb 2010 data, 35 pb-1

for 5 GeV/c < p

T

< 20 GeV/c, 2.5 < η < 4.5.

35 pb-1

(12)

LHCb preliminary 376 pb-1 B+J/ΨφK+

~360 decays (c.f. 115 for CDF

in 6 fb-1)

Background model is 3-body phase space convoluted with resolution

LHCb does not confirm presence of X(4140).

CDF observed a 5σ structure, X(4140),

X(4140)J/Ψ φ in B+J/ΨφK+ events [arXiv:1101.6058].

LHCb now has a large sample of these decays.

CDF ~6 fb-1

fit: 7 5 expected signal scaled from CDF:

39 9 6

Exotics: search for the X(4140)

LHCb-CONF-2011-045

LHCb preliminary 376 pb-1

(13)

b-hadron production studies:

b

-production with B+J/ΨK+

Measurements reasonably well described by theory (FONLL, MC@NLO)

b-hadron production

 Detached J/Ψ: σbb = (288 4 48) μb

 Dμ tags: σ2 < η < 4

bb = (75 5 13) μb σbb = (284 20 49) μb

 Fully reconstructed J/Ψ X states:

LHCb-CONF-2011-033 Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 14 Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1645

35 pb-1

(14)

LHCb measured fragmentation fractions: relative rates of B+, Bo, Bs, Λb ...

BsDs-π+ BoD-K+ Two complementary approaches:

1. Ratio of related hadronic decays, e.g. BoD-K+ and BsDs-π+

2. Semi-leptonic analysis with Do μX, D+ μX, Ds μX & Λc μX events and accounting for cross-

feeds [LHCb-CONF-2011-028]

[arXiv:1106.4436, sub. to PRL]

Consistent results for Bs/Bo fragmentation ratio, fs/fd, which thus can be combined:

<fs/ fd> LHCb = 0.267 fs/fd not a priori a ‘universal’ number,

but similar to LEP and Tevatron result.

+0.021 -0.020 LHCb-CONF-2011-034

b-hadron production

LHCb, 35 pb-1 LHCb, 35 pb-1

(15)

Relative B c + to B + meson production

Production of Bc+ is added by measuring it relative to B+,

in the fiducial region pT > 4 GeV/c, 2.5 < η < 4.5.

LHCb 2010 data: 32.5 pb-1

3476 62 events 43 13 events

Uncertainty is mainly statistical,

systematics dominated by the Bc+ lifetime measurement.

LHCb-CONF-2011-017

32.5 pb-1 32.5 pb-1

(16)

Usually proton collisions produce very many final state particles because the gluon is a coloured object. But if a colourless object is exchanged…..

Exclusive quarkonia production

 J/ψ and ψ’ exclusive production are interpreted as photon-pomeron fusion

or odderon-pomeron fusion;

 χc exclusive production is interpreted as double pomeron exchange;

 exclusive di-muons come from photon-photon fusion.

Clean signature:

No backward tracks (gap of 2 units of rapidity)

Precisely two forward muons

 No photons (for J/ψ and diphoton process)

 One photon (for χc analysis)

LHCb-CONF-2011-022

 Talk by Alain Martin

(17)

Use of backwards tracks, non-exclusive production

Backward Forward tracks

Primary vertex Muon

Backward tracks

Requiring a gap, there is evidence for central exclusive production decaying to two muons.

(18)

Estimated feeddown from χc

J/ψ and ψ’: number of photons ψ’ feeddown

J/ψ and ψ’: number of forward tracks

ψ’ J/ψ J/ψ

subtracted

J/ψ ψ’

Purity from forward track counting: fitting the background under the peak by using a straight line or exponential fit, yields purity estimate ~85%.

Exclusive production: signatures from J/ψ, ψ’ and χ c

LHCb 2010 data 3.1 0.6 pb-1

LHCb 2010 data 3.1 0.6 pb-1

χc

(19)

Fit elastic and inelastic components

Estimate purity below 900 MeV : 80 3%

Exclusive production: purity from dimuon pT spectrum

J/ ψ and ψ’ signals

Clean mass peaks of J/ψ and ψ’ resonances despite looking at prompt production in pp-

collisions at 7 TeV. Contribution from non-resonant background & misidentification is small

Events with no backward tracks, two forward tracks and no photon.

J/ψ Ψ’

LHCb 2010 data 3.1 0.6 pb-1

LHCb 2010 data 3.1 0.6 pb-1

(20)

Require two forward tracks and one

identified photon > 200 MeV. Even cleaner!

M(μμ) GeV/c2 M(μμγ) GeV/c2

Fit M(μμγ) to MC templates

for ψ’, χc0, χc1, χc2

All the three χc states needed to describe the observed spectrum !

Exclusive production: χ c states

LHCb 2010 data

3.1 0.6 pb-1 LHCb 2010 data

3.1 0.6 pb-1

(21)

Exclusive production: results

 Comparison theory-experiment requires major efforts from both parts.

 Reasonable precision for J/ψ and ψ’, systematics will be improved in 2011.

 Consistent* with Starlight, SuperChiC, Motyka & Watt [Phys. Rev. D 78, (2008) 014023] and Schaffer & Szcsurek [Phys.Rev. D76 (2007) 094014]

 Still no precise determination of individual χc0, χc1, χc2 production.

 Consistent* with SuperChiC, Harland-Lang et al. [arXiv:hep-ph/0909.4748].

 Does not agree to CDF 2009 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, (2009) 242001].

Most clean ratio of ψ’ to J/ψ production, corrected for BR(ψμμ), 0.20 0.03.

 Consistent with HERA and Tevatron results.

 Consistent* with Starlight and Schaffer & Szcsurek [Phys.Rev. D76 (2007) 094014. arXiv:hep-ph/0811.2488]

Contributions from all the 5 charmonium states (J/ψ, ψ’, χc0, χc1, χc2) is seen.

 New dedicated trigger line implemented now & statistics x 30  improvement in 2011 !

(22)

Charm studies: LHCb as LHCcC

 Mixing parameter y CP via lifetime comparison

 Search for CP violation via A Γ

 (Search for direct CP violation) Moved to backup

(23)

Mixing and CP violation in charm sector

Charm is abundant at LHC: 6.5 mb cross-section.

However need to reconstruct low pT decays.

Φ

|q/p|

SM

D*+Do (K+ K- +

195 pb-1 220 pb-1

Ds+K+ K- π+

D+K+ K- π+

Large samples of charm mesons are being reconstructed.

Presently ~700 pb

-1

collected.

D1,2 = p |Do

>

q |Do

>

x=∆m/Γ, y=∆Γ/2Γ

 Mixing in charm sector is non-zero at >5σ by HFAG, however no single measurement excludes 0.

 CPV in mixing (SM or NP) driven by mixing parameters x,y (~1%). CPV in D mixing in SM is negligible, but can be enhanced in many models. Existing constraints are weak.

Direct CPV best looked for in CSD, where gluonic penguins are significant.

(24)

Charm mixing parameter yCP :

Future improvement in sensitivity :

 Statistics x30 in 2011

 Improved treatment of background events

Measurement of the charm mixing parameter y

CP LHCb-CONF-2011-054

DoK-π+ DoK-K+

DoK-π+ DoK-K+ τDo=410.2 0.9 fs

 Contribution from BDX to prompt charm sample

 Correct lifetime bias

on the event-by-event basis

2010 data, 28 pb-1, flavour tagging using Do sample from D*Doπ decays.

LHCb preliminary 28 pb-1

LHCb preliminary 28 pb-1 Challenges in time-dependent

charm studies at LHC:

(25)

One of most important ways to search

CPV in charm mixing:

2010 data, 28 pb-1, flavour tagging using Do sample from D*Doπ decays.

Obtained event-by-event on data

HFAG 2011 average (without LHCb):

( 0.12 0.25 ) x 10-2

AΓ= (-0.59 0.59 0.21) x 10-2

Measurement of A Γ

LHCb-CONF-2011-046

Future improvement in sensitivity :

 Statistics x30 in 2011 Challenges in time-dependent charm studies

at LHC:

 Contribution from BDX to prompt charm sample

 Correct lifetime bias

on the event-by-event basis

(26)

Beauty studies: LHCb as LHCb

 Angle γ:

 Evidence of suppressed ‘ADS’ mode BDK

 Charged hadron ID and

Direct CP violation in charmless B-decays with eyes

 New results on b-baryons: Λ b  D o pK -

 Bs mixing phase φ s from B s  J/Ψφ and B s  J/Ψ f o (980)

 Rare decays:

 Radiative penguines bsγ

 (Forward-backward asymmetry in BK*ℓℓ) Moved to backup

 Search for Bsμμ

Touch rare effects and mostly bs transitions: penguine or box diagram,

NP diagrams can compete.

(27)

B  DK decays using common mode for Do & Do

 γ sensitive interference

 different rates for B+ & B- (CPV)

Maximize interference by using mode suppressed for Do & favoured for Do e.g. DoK+π- (DCS) , DoK+π- (CF) the ‘ADS’ method

[Atwood, Dunietz, Soni]

Total visible BR very small (~10-7).

The suppressed ‘ADS’ mode is needed to access γ.

Precision CKM studies: angle γ

Rb Rt 1

 The Rt side precision limited by theory (lattice calculations), while precision of γ limited by

experiment. Improve precision of angle γ to improve CKM triangle closure check

 Search for NP by comparing tree-mediated

processes (γ, Rb) to those involving loop diagrams (γ, β, Rt)

B  (K π ) K

2010

(28)

Signal seen with 4.0σ significance & hint of asymmetry, consistent with previous results

B  (K π ) K

Ratio to favoured mode:

HFAG average (without LHCb):

(1.6 0.3) x 10-2

B-(K+π-)K-

343 pb-1

Asymmetry: -0.58 0.21

B+(K-π+)K+

343 pb-1

Evidence for suppressed ADS mode

LHCb-CONF-2011-044

343 pb-1

HFAG average (without LHCb):

(29)

‘Bhh’ (h=π,K,p) at LHCb

Inclusive spectrum, ππ hypothesis

LHCb preliminary

Deploy RICH to decript ‘hh’ !

BoKπ Rely on good performance of trigger and RICH

Λbpπ Two-body charmless B decays: significant contribution of penguin diagrams, important for NP searches

Boππ

BsKK ΛbpK

(30)

BoK+π-

HFAG average (without LHCb):

Most precise single measurement and first 5σ observation of CPV at hadron machine:

CDF result:

0.17 First evidence of CPV in Bs decays:

B d,s  Kπ: direct CPV

LHCb-CONF-2011-042

In future perform time dependent study, particularly of BsKK:

BoK-π+

BsK+π- BsK-π+

320 pb-1 320 pb-1

320 pb-1 320 pb-1

(31)

ΛbDo-

ΛbDopK-

New measurements with b -baryons

LHCb-CONF-2011-036

ΞobDopK-

Cabibbo-suppressed decay ΛbDopK-, potentially powerful mode for measuring CKM angle γ.

Normalization channel: ΛbDo-.

 A signal with (stat+syst) significance of 2.6σ, consistent with ΞobDopK- decay.

Relative production rate x BR: Mass relative to Λb:

Ξob [Ξ+cπ-, Ξ+cΞ-π+π-, Ξ-Λπ-, Λpπ-] recently observed by CDF [arXiv:1107.4015].

M(Do-) MeV/c2 M(DopK-) MeV/c2

 First observation of

with significance of 6.3σ:

ΛbDopK-

(32)

 Phase is small in SM (box diagram) : 0.0363 0.0017 rad [CKMFitter]

 Deviations due to NP could be large

Precision CKM studies: Bs mixing phase φ s from B s  J/Ψφ

Time dependent analysis

 Time resolution measured using prompt J/Ψ background: στ = 50 fs

 LHCb measurement with 2010 data: 37 pb-1, 757 28 signal candidates

[LHCb-CONF-2011-006]

Tagging

 Need to tag initial flavour of the Bs

 Per event mistag calibrated on B+  J/Ψ K and Bd  D* μ νμ

 Dilution Dtag = 0.277 0.011 0.025

 Tagging power εD2 = (2.08 0.41)%

Angular analysis

 PVV decay: needs an angular analysis to resolve CP-even and CP-odd components

 Angular acceptance determined from MC

 Maximum deviation from uniform: 5%

(33)

φ s from B s  J/Ψφ

ΔΓs [rad]

Φs [rad]

~770 decays

SM

Φs [rad]

First evidence (4σ) of ΔΓs > 0 !

φ s J/Ψφ = 0.13 0.18 (stat) 0.07 (sys) rad

Γ s = 0.656 0.009 (stat) 0.008 (sys) ps -1 ΔΓ s = 0.123 0.029 (stat) 0.008 (sys) ps -1

337 pb-1 36 pb-1

(34)

φ s from B s  J/Ψ f o (980)

 First observation of BsJ/Ψ fo(980) (fo(980)ππ) by LHCb with 30 pb-1

[Phys. Letters B 698 (2011) 115]

confirmed by

Belle [Phys.Rev.Lett.106:121802,2011] and CDF [arXiv:http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3682]

 With 330 pb-1 LHCb extractsφs.

 The fo(980) looks pure scalar

 no angular analysis needed.

330 pb-1

LHCb preliminary 330 pb-1 LHCb preliminary 330 pb-1

Bs J/ψ fo(980) BoJ/ψK*BoJ/ψπ+π-

(35)

φ s from B s  J/Ψ f o (980) and B s  J/Ψφ

φ

sJ/Ψfo(980)

= -0.44 0.44 0.02 rad

φ

sJ/Ψφ+J/Ψfo

= 0.03 0.16 0.07 rad

Or, combining, BsJ/Ψφ and BsJ/Ψ fo(980) :

SM fit: 0.0363 0.0017 rad

BsJ/Ψφ BsJ/Ψ fo(980)

LHCb with 0.3 fb-1

already more sensitive, than CDF and D0 330 pb-1

(36)

Measure ratio of the branching fractions for BK*γ and Bsφγ

Expect: 1.0 0.2 from SM.

Radiative penguines: bsγ

Ali, Pecjak, Greub [Eur.Phys.J.C 55 (2008) 577]

LHCb-CONF-2011-055

 Test for NNLO QCD predictions

 Photons  Broader signal peak than typical B decay

 More work on backgrounds (B  Kππo etc)

However, largest Bsφγ sample

Bsφγ BK*γ 340 pb-1

340 pb-1

 Next: study time evolution and CP asymmetries

(37)

In SM, Bsμμ occurs only via loop diagrams, and is helicity suppressed:

BR(Bsμμ)SM = (3.2 0.2) x 10-9

[A.J.Buras, arXiv:1012.1447]

Can be strongly enhanced in NP models,

especially those with extended Higgs sector.

E.g. MSSM:

NUHM (= generalised version of CMSSM) [O. Buchmuller et al, arXiv:0907.5568]

BR(Bsμμ) - highly discriminatory

Recent CDF result with 7 fb-1:

[arXiv:1107.2304]

Search for Bsμμ

BR(Bsμμ) = (1.8 ) x 10-8

or < 4.0 x 10-8 @ 95% CL +1.1-0.9

LHCb 2010 data, 0.037 fb-1:

[PLB 699 (2011) 330]

BR(Bsμμ) < 5.6 x 10-8 @ 95% CL

Many previous measurements

 Talk by M.Kraemer

(38)

 Similar to 2010 analysis [PLB 699 (2011) 330]

 Select Bsμμ, using Boosted Decision Tree out of 9 kinematical and topological variables

 BDT tuned on MC, but calibrated on data:

Bhh, triggered on ‘other B’, and sidebands

 Calibrate invariant mass resolution (~25 MeV) on data (dimuon resonances & Bhh)

 Look on 6 x 4 grid of μ+μ- invariant mass vs. BDT output

 Normalize to: B+J/ΨK+, BsJ/Ψφ and BoKπ

 all give consistent results

Search for Bsμμ, LHCb 2011 data, 300 pb -1

LHCb-CONF-2011-037

300 pb-1

300 pb-1 300 pb-1

300 pb-1

(39)

Combinatorial background

Data

Bhh misid background 0.1 0.1

events in each of 4 BDT bins

Signal with SM BR

Search for B s  μμ, LHCb 2011 data, 300 pb -1

LHCb preliminary 300 pb-1 LHCb preliminary

300 pb-1 LHCb preliminary

300 pb-1

LHCb preliminary 300 pb-1

(40)

Compute limits using frequentist CLs method and LHCb combined result for fs/fd

expected: background only

observed

observed

Search for B s  μμ, LHCb limits

Expected limit assuming bkg only (95% CL) 1.0x10-8 3.1x10-9 Expected limit assuming bkg + SM signal (95% CL) 1.5x10-8

Observed limit (95% CL) 1.6x10-8 5.1x10-9

p-value of background only hypothesis 14% 79%

Observed limit, 2010+2011 (95% CL) 1.5x10-8

BR(Bsμ+μ-) BR(Bdμ+μ-) LHCb preliminary

300 pb-1 LHCb preliminary

300 pb-1 expected:

background and signal SM BR

(41)

A preliminary CMS (1.14 fb-1)-LHCb (0.34 fb-1) combination on BR(Bsμ+μ-) has been performed, again using the CLs approach,

& taking LHCb value of fs/fd as common input

CMS + LHCb preliminary

observed

Observed candidates in both experiments are consistent with the sum of backgrounds and SM signal  BR < 1.1 x 10-8 @ 95% CL.

This limit is 3.4 times the expected SM value.

-8

Search for B s  μμ, combining LHCb and CMS results

LHCb (0.34 fb-1) + CMS (1.14 fb-1) preliminary expected: background only

LHCb-CONF-2011-047 CMS PAS BPH 11-019

(42)

Hunting for physics Beyond Standard Model (“New Physics”) continues and

either we discover it within our lifetime scale

or …

(43)

… and New New Physics ==

Beyond New Physics discover on our own.

... or we have to ask for

help this time ...

(44)

Summary

LHCb is proving to be a heavy flavour factory

Production of quarkonia and open heavy flavour hadrons is being systematically studied

Charm cross section is large, huge D-meson samples collected, and first CPV studies with 2010 data look promising

Precision CKM angle γ studies are launched, hint on the ‘ADS’ asymmetry in BDK is observed

Most precise measurement of the direct CPV in BKπ

First evidence of the direct CPV in BsKπ

New data on the b-baryons

LHCb and CMS do not confirm the hint seen by TEVATRON for B

s

μμ, and set the limit, which is x 3.4 SM value

2011 data being analysed, many analyses still on 2010 data

Expect 1 fb

-1

in 2011, more in 2012, setting the scene for precision

rare effects studies

(45)

Backup

(46)

37 pb-1

2010

370k decays

 Compare with 43k events in BABAR, 80 fb-1 [PRD 71 (2005) 091101 (R)]

 Normalize D+ vs. D- to remove production asymmetries

 Use resonance motivated binning & uniform binning

 Look for statistically significant difference in D+ vs.

D- bin contents (based on PRD 80 (2009) 096006)

 Look for fake CPV in sidebands and control modes

Cabibbo favoured control modes (no CPV expected)

No fake CPV seen: data & method robust against biases

Same topology Ds+K+K-π+

10x more abundant D+K-π+π+

Direct CPV search

Paper in preparation Perform model independent binned CPV search

in singly Cabibbo suppressed D+K-K+π- events

(47)

BK*μμ

(48)

 b  l l s, very rare in the SM BR (B  l l K*) = (3.3 1.0) x 10-6

 Sensitive to Supersymmetry, any 2HDM, Fourth generation, Extra dimensions, Axions . . .

 Ideal place to look for new physics

b  l l s

(49)

Angular Distributions & A

FB

Many observables depending on q

2

= m

2μμ

c

4

(50)

[Krüger & Matias]

[Egede et al.] [Ali et al.]

Models probed

by A

FB

(q2) dependence

(51)

LHCb presents a result with 300 events with 309 pb-1: Largest sample in the world

[LHCb-CONF-2011-038]

Select events B0K*μ+μ- using Boosted Decision Tree from sample of 309 pb-1

 Veto decays in J/Ψ and Ψ(2S) (used as control of angular fits)

 Weight events according to η-1l,φ,θK,q2)

(52)

B0K*μ+μ-

Measure in 6 q2 bins:

extract dГ/dq2

SM: Bobeth et al., [arXiv:1105.0376]

(53)

Fit for θ

K

and θ

l

(54)

AFB in B0→K*μ+μ-in LHCb with 309 pb-1

Systematic uncertainties are small, and generally themselves statistics limited.

LHCb-CONF-2011-038

Data are consistent with SM at present sensitivity.

 Add other observables, e.g. AT(2), sensitive to RH currents

(55)
(56)

φ s from B s  J/Ψφ

(57)

φ s from B s  J/Ψφ

Tagging

Need to tag initial flavour of the Bs

Per event mistag calibrated on B+  J/Ψ K and Bd  D* μ νμ Dilution Dtag = 0.277 0.011 0.025

Tagging power εD2 = (2.08 0.41)%

Angular analysis

PVV decay: needs an angular analysis to resolve CP-even and CP-odd components

Angular acceptance determined from MC Maximum deviation from uniform: 5%

(58)

φ s from B s  J/Ψφ: fit projections

(59)

Miscellaneous

(60)

LHCb also measures the double J/ψ cross section:

[LHCb-CONF-2011-009], submitted to Phys.Lett.B 5.1 1.0 1.1 nb-1

Model: [hep-ph/0603175]

37.5 pb-1

Sensitivity to tetraquarks, built of c-quarks

Only statistical errors shown.

(61)

LHCb operation: luminosity limitations

(62)

J/ψ  μμ ψ(2S)  μμ

ψ(2S) / J/ψ

15% theo. uncertainty assumed

15% theo. uncertainty assumed

Deviation significance, [σ]

Exclusive production: results

References

Related documents

Threat – any condition that increases complexity of the operations and if not managed properly can decrease the safety margin. Error – a mistake that is made when threats

Figure 5.3: Unimodal estimates for the wind speed data at different bandwidths, using the method of adjustment curves. Each plot shows the pilot estimate (grey) and the

Based on the distribution of lichen species of the Lecanorales order by elements of flora it is noted that nemoral species (73) dominate due to the participation of

[1] Azadeh Safari, Saad Mekhilef, Simulation and Hardware Implementation of Incremental Conductance MPPT With Direct Control Method Using Cuk Converter, IEEE Transactions on

combinations (ICS/LABAs) are recommended for the treatment of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group C and D patients, that is, those at risk

Furthermore, we analyze how the precision of future measurements of the single- and double-virtual form factor impacts the precision of a data-driven estimate of this contribution

LAQGSM reproduces the energy dependence of the cross sections at high energy part of the fragmentation peaks, but underestimates the cross section in the low-energy part..

Beim Vergleich zwischen großen (3- bis 5-flächig) und kleinen (2-flächig) Füllungen, sowie dem Vergleich Prämolar versus Molar ergaben sich sowohl für Prompt L-Pop ® als auch