• No results found

MAXIMIZING COLLECTIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "MAXIMIZING COLLECTIONS"

Copied!
25
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

MAXIMIZING COLLECTIONS

Janice Rutter, Director, Support Services, Merge Healthcare Jon Neal, Ph.D., Vice President, InstaMed

Mark Snow, Vice President, RevSpring (formerly PSC Info Group) Tracy Sanders, Project Manager, MEGAS-Alpha II

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

(2)

session objectives

Share opportunities and ideas for maximizing collections within financials system

Review and educate on engaging third party products to reduce FTE time and improve collections

Review and educate on creating metrics to drive collection improvements

(3)

Applying Best Practices

MAXIMIZING HEALTHCARE PAYMENTS

COLLECTIONS

(4)

Sources: http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2012/May/21/higher-health-care-prices-hospitals.aspx http://smequity.squarespace.com/storage/dcMEDPAY%20Powered%20by%2 0Cybersettle.pdf http://www.gallup.com/poll/152621/fewer-americans-employer-based-health-insurance.aspx http://www.patientcollect.net/app/ptms/why_practice;jsessionid=58B8C2E8F 9EFD6928E5253E05C8D2ACB

Healthcare

prices rose 5x

faster than

inflation from

’09 – ‘10

Since 2008,

employer-based health

insurance

decreased by

4.6%

The costs to

collect from a

patient are

twice as much

as collecting

from a payer

Up to 20%

of revenues are

lost due to

uncollected

patient bills &

unremitted

reimbursements

In 2010, bad

debt reached

$65 billion

(5)

10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 2009 2010 2011

Payer Responsibility for Billed Charges Payer Responsibility for Billed Charges (in Percentage) 20% 21% 18% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2009 2010 2011

Patient Responsibility for Allowed Charges Patient Responsibility for Allowed Charges (in Percentage) 26% 24% 21% Source:

InstaMed’s Trends in Healthcare Payments Annual Report: 2012

(6)

Patient confusion – 41% of patients do not have

confidence that their bill is accurate

Patients do not expect to make a payment when services are performed Not accepting preferred payment options

Source:

http://www.apexprint.com/how-to-improve-collections-from-self-pay-patients/

Top Three Drivers of Patient Nonpayment

74% of patients are able to pay their healthcare bills

Member ID not found/claim not on file Government-driven changes  MPPR  PQRS – incentives turn to payment penalties  RACs

According to the AMA, radiologists lose up to 5.5% of professional income daily due to incomplete documentation and under-coding Payers are driving claim denials and exceptions with automation Top Drivers of Payer Nonpayment

Claims processing errors cost $17 billion annually

(7)

Providers only collect 10-12% of self-pay patient payments

Passive mindset in collecting patient payments at point of service (POS)

Patients are not billed in a timely manner

Patients do not understand their statements

Sources:

McKinsey and American Medical Association

Too many and not enough time to follow up on unpaid claims

Prevent effective follow-up on front end rejections

Paper claims take too long to pay Costs associated with filing

appeals

It is humanly impossible to know over 400,000 edits (NCD/LCD, CCI, etc.)

Claims are ‘underpaid’ based on coding errors

Delays from date of service to claim filing

Payer Patients

(8)

Screen patients for eligibility Set patient financial

expectations upfront

Outsource patient statements Reduce time to bill

Produce clear and concise statements to patients

Create a patient payment portal Accommodate patient payment preferences

Establish a payment plan Leverage system automation

Auto coder

Automated re-files

Utilize electronic claims

Leverage products to maximize coding compliance

Implement Claims Manager Analyze and eliminate errors

Expose and improve correcting and tracking front end rejection

Execute work queue strategy Follow up on unpaid claims Maximize FTE time on appeals

Payer Patients

(9)

Charge exceptions – decrease time to code

 Auto coder – Auto-coding, ICD9 codes, modifiers, add on codes

 Buckets for segregating charges/demo requiring adjustments

 Measure/reduce time to post /bill Claims – decrease time to payment

 Collaboration compass – take advantage of electronic availability – primary and secondary

 Paper – outsource – send with electronic

 Eliminate administrative costs

Claim review

 QA – adjustments

9

(10)

Consider an automated coding product

 Imports go directly to Review & Post

 Coding director controls costs and allows configuration for procedures to be manually coded

Consider Merge Clinical Edits – reduce claim denials

 LCD/NCD, CCI, PQRS, claim formats

 Edits apply based on setup

 Charges edited at time of posting and claim filing Analyze front/back end rejections and re-work

 Consider implementing Claims Manager

 Identify those that can be eliminated with process/procedure/training

 Identify those that can be eliminated with appropriate coding

10

(11)

Develop and perfect Work Queue Strategy, tactics and approach

 Monitor Operations Work in Progress

 Follow up on past due claims that pay within 15 days more timely

 Assign payers to specific users

 Build relationships

 Capitalize on repeat processes improving efficiency

Analyze work queue productivity

 Set goals for accomplishments

 Consider time devoted to insurance vs. patient

 Considering best return on time spent – Eliminate

leaving money on the table based on lack of follow-up

 Insurance past due  Appeals not re-filed

11

(12)

Merge Financials allows corrections to be made in both Charge Exceptions and Claim Review making it easy to correct in the

workflow process

 individual charge lines as they are committed to the data base

 At a claim level

Proprietary medical necessity data, Medicare LCD/NCD policies and commercial medical necessity edits for Aetna and Cigna are included achieving guidance for virtually all ICD-9/CPT code combinations

RVU sequencing is applied to ALL claims before the claim is produced

No file maintenance required – Content files are updated quarterly or as needed

12

(13)

Up-to-date PQRS edits ensure you comply and avoid payment

penalties

Edits will provide the coding edits that were not able to be caught by manual coding or by other

applications front end edits

Not all “front end” coding solutions (e.g., CodeRyte, A-Life, etc.) code everything, still requiring manual review by a coder and chances of errors occurring

13

CMS has designated 2013 as the reporting period for the 2015 PQRS payment penalty. Therefore, if CMS determines that an eligible

professional or group practice has not satisfactorily reported data on quality measures for the reporting period of January 1 through December 31 for purposes of the 2015 payment

penalty, then the fee schedule amount for services furnished by the

participating professional or group practice during 2015 would be 98.5% of the fee schedule amount that would otherwise apply to such services.

(14)

Code searches are performed

using “physician language” – Look up codes using the official name, common name, acronym, or site

 Links to additional codes

related to the current diagnosis are included

 Codes to ultimate specificity

 Designates applicable

modifiers by CPT/HCPCS code Integrated CCI edits and the ability to detect unbundled procedures

14

Eliminate coding errors with enhanced code searches Eliminate bundling/unbundling errors

Improve use of modifiers

(15)

Merge’s Patient Payment Portal, powered by InstaMed, provides a simple-to-use way to present statements electronically, collect patient payments, and post

payments back into Merge

15

(16)

Patient Payment Estimator combines eligibility checking with the InstaMed Patient Estimator module, to determine patient responsibility at the point of

service and automate collection of patient responsibility post claim adjudication

16

(17)

Best Practices:

 Increase ways for patients to pay. By increasing the number of ways to collect, and making it easier to collect, patients are more likely to pay, and will pay faster.

 Achieve Payment Assurance prior to the patient walking out the door. Set expectations up front and capture payment vehicles at the point of service.

17

(18)

outsource patient statements

Consider time spent on generating

statements vs. follow up on work queues Data analytics

Clear, concise, patient friendly billing Communications

One platform

 Print, digital, telephony, mobile

 Billing, eCommerce and marketing

 Targeted TransPromotional communications

 Integrated customer relationship management

Increase cash flow

Reduce administrative costs

Improve patient experience and satisfaction

(19)

Brilliant, vibrant documents get noticed

 Color increases payment response by up to 30%

 Color increases readership by 80%

 Information in color can be located 70% faster Personalized messaging

 Customize statements with targeted messages

 Enhance brand recognition TransPromo marketing

(20)

Dynamic Documents –

TransPromo marketing

Use color to highlight Amount Due

Multiple Payment Options and QR Code

(21)

Dynamic Documents –

Duplex

Billboard space for advertising

(22)

sample letters

(23)

Improve clean claims while reducing back end re-work

Improve payer collections Reduce days in AR

Promote FTE efficiencies

Increase patient collections 200% Reduce administrative costs

Reduce bad debt

Improve patient experience and satisfaction

23

(24)

Janice Rutter, Merge Healthcare [email protected]

(25)

References

Related documents

The total impact of stress on job among staff nurses in Raged hospital-Cairo in Egypt has been calculated using the mean and the standard deviation measures (N= 213,

The design of the study was specifically stated in the method and design section, the design used in this study was a descriptive qualitative design anchored with the

In this segment of the Study, the Researcher presents and compares the results of Nifty BeES and Nifty Index average daily returns and risks associated with that

The proposition covers the investigation of the round natural products, to pre-process the apple organic product pictures acquired by an advanced camera, In this

Farther more we introduce the 2 nd user and see that, The error in simple 2-PSK system increasing by much-more amount for the same Bandwidth and same channel setting, where

Target Attractiveness (AT): An estimate of the value of a target to an adversary. These terms are more difficult to estimate, particular with respect to cyber security.

21 Therefore, the additional experiment (Experiment 4) was performed to investigate the effect of bisulfite concentration in the TPN solution con- taining both lipid

Two hypotheses were stated and tested in the study, with the result showing that higher remuneration packages lead to higher workers‟ productivity, and also there significant