PEDIATRIcs, August 1964
Experience
and Reason
Briefly
Recorded
‘ ..“Iii \I((li(iiic’ Omit mutmst u1y attentiomi not to I)huttmsit)lc theorizing i)umt to expcricmice amid r(ason togcthier. . . . I agree that theorizing is to lId’ approved, i)rovidle(l that it is based on facts, and
sstematicall make its deductions from-mi what is observed. . . . But conclusiomis c!rawmi from
UIiaidld’dl reason can hardly be serviceai)le; only thd)se drawn from-mi observed fact.” Hippocrates: Pr(cepts.
S
#{149}
#{149}(This heading (10(1 text seem appropriate for a section of short cmnmunications requiring onit, rapid editorial ret;iew (111(1 little, if iiiy, reVision. It is hoped that soc/i factual material may thus I)(’ pul)li.shed (llfllO.St (1.5 pioinptltj (it the opinions, coinmeiits, (111(1 criticisms tehicli will continue to
(1J)/)C(JT as Letters to time Editor.)
The
Folic
Acid
Content
of
Milk:
Revised
Figures
Based
on
an
Improved
Assay
Method
Previously published data imiolicate that milk
has
a low
folio
acid
comitent.
The
figcmres
of
1-2 tg -‘b of milk were obtaimied by
micro-biologic assay usimlg Streptococcus fecalis as
the
assay
organism.
Iii these
assas’s
ascorbic
acid
was mlc)t added to) the incubation medium to
Prtect
the
labile
folates
from
oxidative
de-structiomi.
Niore recemit sttmdliesi jimchicate that the
or-ganisrn Lac’to1,cilliis caso’i exhibits a niuch
greater growth response thami does
Strepto-coccus fecali.s to) the folic acid-active material
Presemit ill hummiiami serum and that this activity
correlates well with the status d)f fohic acid
nutrition iii these patiemits. It seems likely,
therefore, that the L. casei folate activity of
milk and other foodstuffs would give a
closer
approximatiomi of the content of fohic acid-active material that is of significance to human miutritiomi.Because milk is the most important and
often the sole source of nutrition for infants
in
the
first
few
mouths of life it wasfelt
that
the folate cd)ntemit of milk should be
re-evahm-ated
usin g Iresent assay methoc!s.METHODS
Folate activity was determimied
by
the
pro-cedure as o)tmtlined by
Herbert
using
the
aseptic
addition
niethod
andan
ascorbic
acid
concemitration of
1 gm100
ml
in the assaymec!ium.1
Because final readimigs are based on ti-me
timrbk!ity d)f the niixtures, the folbowimig steps
were
taken
to
correct
possible
inaccuracies
in
readimigs due to) the turbidity imparted by the
milk alone to the cultum’e media.
1. \Vith each flask containing milk and tb-me
assay
orgamiism a “mi-milk blank” was usedin
which no bacterial imimiocimlum was added.
Subtractimig this reading from that obtaimied
with the inmioculum gave a nieasure of tb-me
turl)idity
clue
to
the
milk
itself.
2. After imicubation,
the
flask
contents
were
centrifuged at 3,000 r.p.m. for 10 mi-minutes,the supernatamit aspirated amid ti-me sedimemit
(
consisting of bacterial growth) wasrecoil-stituted to the origimab volumne with fmeshi basal mei!ium prior to reaclimg.
Samples of cow’s milk, goat’s milk,
evapo-rated milk, and 13 proprietar milk
prepara-tions
were
assayed
by
ti-me foregoimig
nethod.
Each assay was performeol on a differemt can or bottle of the milk product. The samples
were freshly’ opemied before each test. Iii the case of the proprietary milks the contents
were reCo)mlStitJited with water according to
the recommendations of the mnamiufactumer.
Ahiquots of the same milk formula were
as-sayed! i)efore amid after atmtoclaving (210#{176} F. amci 20 lb presstmre for 30 minutes) iii the Milk Laboratory oif the Chik!ren’s Hospital.
All milks vhose folate contemit was less than
100
g
/1 were
assayed
on at beast
five
separate
occasions uSimig different samples.
i\4ilks
whose
folate content exceeded 100 .g I were
as-sayed at least twice for purposes of
TABLE I
. I roauct
Number of
kSamj)les’ issayea
(in
duplicate)
Po!ats (‘on/eat (ig/l)
.1. Before auk’elarmng . B. 4fter auloclari rig
Mean Range . Ascorbic . Acid (‘onlent (g/qt)5 .1 B -1 B
W’lmole (Ow’s niilk*
Evaporated mnilkt (;mmt’s niilkt Similac (powder) SMA (liquid) Lactuni (powder) i1odihmic (hiqumid) Breniil (powder)
Bakers Mo(lifie(1 (powder) Enfamiiil (liquid)
Meat Base (liquid)
Muhisoy (liquid) Sobee (powder) Sovalac (powder) Nutramigen (powder) Lofenalac (powder) 7 6 6 5 6 7 .5 5 2 5 5 4 2 2
89.5 51 .4
84 .7 47.8
10.7 18.7
61 46.6
18.8 15.8
63.5 31 .5
> lot) > 100
42 .‘2 40. 7
100 100
49.’2 35.5
50.4 41 .1
> 100 > 100 > 100 > 100 > 1(M) > 100 > 100 > 100
> 100 > 100
62100 21-100 65-100 8-86 7.-13 12--30.5 36-88 24-58 9-29 9.6-t3 31-1(5) 13-54 mnme 30-70 31-60 same 35-68 27-45 ‘2R-64 20.5-58 same same same same sumac 0 0 0 .50 50 0) 45 50 .50 50 40 30 50 0 30 30
EXPERIENCE
AND
REASON-BRIEFLY
RECORDED
275, 1100(1 Dairy Co., Bostomi, Massachusetts.
t
Carnation Milk Conipamiy, Los Angeles, California. I)asvn Dairy Imic., Castleton, New York (pasteurized).RESULTS
The
folate
comtent
of the
various
milk
prep-aratiolls is given imi
Table
I.
To
facilitate
in-terpretatiom
of
the
effect
of
autoclaving
in
relation to ascorbic acid contemit of the milks, published values for the latter are also listed.
COMMENT
The
“folate
content”
of
milk
determined
by the presemit assay represents the amount
of fohic acid-active material that preferentially supports growth of the organism L. casei.
Studies of humam sertmm suggest that the
major
source
of
this
activity
is
the
mono-glutamate,
N2-methyl
tetrahydrofolate.6
Whether the same compound comprises the
fohic
acid-active
material
of
milk
is
not
yet
known.
However,
in
view
of
the
close
corre-lation of L. casei
folate
activity
of serum
with
the
status
of fohic
acid
nutritiomi,
it seems likelythat
the
activity
present
in milk
is o)f biological
significance im the htmman. Umtil more is
known about the absorption and utilization
of ti-me folate compounds in milk (am-md other
foodstuffs) by the body, no statememit can
be
made
comiceniing
the
relationship
of
L.
caseifolate
activity
to
the
true
total
folate
comitemit
of milk biologically available to the himmami. This study has revealed the folate content
of
milk to be much higher than the earlierpublished
figtmres
of 1-2
&g/l.
The
meami values
for
the
milk
preparations
inthe
present
study
varied
from
10.7
.tg/l
to
over
100
sg/l.
A real
variation
was
found
among
different
samples of the same milk. This may be
re-lated
to
factors
such
as
the
folio
acid
content
of the cows
feed
or
the
methods
of
milk
processing am-md storage. No significant
corre-lation
was
found
between
the
lability
of folate
activity
with
autoclavimig
of
the
milk
amid
its
ascorbic acid content.
That
the
values
for
the
folate
content
of
milk obtaimied in the present study are of clinical significamice is suggested by the
fob-lowing
observatiomis:
1.
Megaloblastic
amiemia
is
a
well-recog-nized
consequence
of
excessive
comisumption
of
goat’s
milk,
am-md the
folate
content
of
the
latter
(mean
10.7
p.g/1)
was
the
lowest
of all
the milks tested.
2. Children who develop iromi-deficiency
276
INTESTINAL
BIOPSY
milk (with a poor imitake of solid foods) rarely show evidence of folic acid deficiemcy,7
sug-gesting
that
the
relatively
high
com-mtem-mtof
folate iii cow’s milk (89.5 ig 1) is sufficient to
meet needs of such children. (Studies of
otherss have confirmed the relatively high folate comitemit of cow’s milk.)
Until information is available concermiimg
the
minimal
folio
acid
reqtmirernent
of
the
normal infant, no further statememt can be
made
regarding
the
adequacy
of these
variotms
milks
irm satisfying
this
requiremiient.
Such
in-formation woulc! be of especial imnportance
during the first few momths of life heri milk
constitutes the major source of nutrition for
imifants. In this regard, Shojamiia amid Gross
found lower levels of sertmm folate activity iii prcmiiature imifants compared to full-term in-fants at 1-2 months of age.
No
significantdifferemice imi hemoglobin level was found
be-bveei-m the tWo groups of infants. The full
significamice of this iii relatiom to the folate
content
of
milk
must
await
further
observa-tioms concermiimig the absorption, utilizatiom,
amd meec!s O)f folic acid b such infants.
SUMMARY
Using
au
iml)rovedl
assay
technique
with
ascorbate-protecteci L. casei, the folate
con-temit of variotms milk preparatiomis was
deter-mined. There was much variation among the
differemit milk preparations,
but
im all
cases
the vakmes were muchi higher than those
previ-ousby reported. Problems in the interpretation
of these data arid their clinical significance
are
discussed.
J.
LAWIIENCE NAIMAN, M.D.FRANK A. Osmu,
\I.D.
The Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School am-md ti-me Children’s Hospital Medical Center,
Boston, Massachusetts
.300 Longwood
AvenueBoston 02115
REFERENCES
1. llodson, A. Z. : The microbiological assay of
“fohic acid!” applied to milk.
J.
Nutrition, 38:25, 1949.
2. Collins, R. A., et a!.: The folic acid amcl Vitamin
B1 comitemit of the milk of various species.
J.
Nutrition, 43:313, 1951.3. herbert, V. : The assay and nature of folic acid
activity in human serum.
J.
Clin. Invest., 40:81, 1961.4. Herbert, \T, Personal comumiiunicatiom.
5. 1Iandbook of Imifant Formulas, Ed. 2. Cleve-land, Ohio: l3aker Laboratories Inc., 1963.
6. Herbert, V., Larrabc’e, A. H., an! Buchanan,
j.
\I. : Studies om-mthe ic!entificatiomi of a folate compound of hum:in serum. J. Chin. Invest.,41:11:34, 1962.
7. Xaiman, j. L., and! Oski, F. A. : Unpublished observations.
8. Luhby, A. L., amd Silverman, j. \I. : Letter to the Editor. PEDIATIIICS, 32:46:3, 196:3. 9. Shiojania, A. s1., amid Gross, S. : Folic ack!
de-ficiencv and premiiaturity. j. Pecliat., (i4:323, 1964.
\Ve would like to exiiress Our (1l)l)r(ci1tiom1 to
\Iiss Denise lluiiter for her technical assistamice in this )roject amid to the c’mplovees of thie \lilk Laboratory of ti-me Children’s I lospital \Iedical
Center for their cO-ol)eratioml. \Ve should! also like to express our gratitimc!e to Dr. Louis K. Diamond for stimulating our imiterest imi this project.
A New
Method
for Use of the
Crosby-Kugler
Intestinal
Mucosal
Biopsy
Capsule
Intestinal
miicosa!
biopsy’,
introdlucediby
Shinerl in 1956, is a imseful diagmiostic am-mci in-vestigatiomiab prcedtire which has received genera! acceptance.2’ Examimiation of fresh
small
intestimial
mnucosa
with
tile dissectimigmicroscope and of fixed! sectioned speciniens
with
light
and
electron
microscopes
has
re-vealed abmormalities imi a large number of
disease states. These imchmde non-tropical prue
(
celiac disease, ghimten-sensitive en teropathv,idiopathic steatorrhea),2_m tropical sprue,
\Vhip-pie’s disease (intestinal hipoclystrophy), regional enteritis, intestimiab lvmphangectasis, Bassemi-Kornzweig syndrome (a-beta-hipoproteinemia,
acanthocvtosis) , acquired idiopathic
hlypogam-Fic. 1. Biopsy capsule assembled and don-me secured