• No results found

MMDA - ATA Proposal for an Industry Based Safety Program v2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "MMDA - ATA Proposal for an Industry Based Safety Program v2"

Copied!
40
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

MMDA - ATA

Proposal for an Industry Based

Safety Program

v2

(2)

Executive Summary

• Every year, approximately 600 people are injured in our industry. In addition to the very real and potentially tragic human cost to our workers, there are direct and indirect costs to our industry that are estimated to exceed $30 million annually. • The Manitoba Motor Dealers Association (MMDA) and Automotive Trades Association of Manitoba (ATA) are proposing to

establish an industry-based safety program to provide relevantsafety and health services targetedto the needs of our work environment. An industry based program would make it easierfor employers and workers to engage in positive safety and health practices to ensure employees are safeand workplaces are productive.

• The proposed program would offer training and safety program support customized to our industry, access to information and resources, and enable companies with effective safety programs to become certified and eligible for discounts on WCB premiums.

• The program would be industry-led. Overseen by the MMDA Board of Directors, it would be guided by a Safety Council with representatives from ATA and MMDA members, shops that are not members of either association, workers and

representatives from Safe Work Manitoba and MPI.

• The program would be funded through a levy on the garage/service station and autobody/paint rate codes. Each employer in these rate codes would pay a levy over and above their WCB premium. This is currently estimated at 8%. Once a company achieves safety certification, it would be eligible for a discount that is currently estimated at 10%, providing a net savings.

• A solid safety program not only keeps workers safe, it further reduces the costs to the business with improved productivity and opportunities for further reductions in WCB premiums. Reducing from the average to the lowest rate in the industry provides an opportunity for savings on WCB premiums of between 31-46%.

• Details regarding the cost-benefit of the program as well as background on who is getting injured in our industry, results of the safety needs assessment survey, and what other associations have achieved are included in this information package. • Industry support is needed for this program to proceed. Please confirm your support by signing the letter attached with this

information package. Questions may be directed to

– Geoff Sine, MMDA Executive Director, at (204) 985-4200, or [email protected]

(3)

Contents

Introduction and Background

4

Industry Profile and Trends

5

– Industry composition, trends

7

– WCB Injury Data and Assessment Rates

10

Industry Needs Analysis (Survey Results)

17

Experience of Other Safety Associations

23

Proposed Safety Association

32

– Programs and Services

33

– Benefits of Program

35

– How program will be funded

37

– Cost – Benefit Analysis

38

(4)

Introduction & Background

Every year, approximately 600 people are injured in our industry. These injuries have direct costs

(*wage loss, medical costs, voc rehab, long term earning replacement) of approximately $3

million per year, in addition to the human cost to those hurt and productivity costs to businesses.

Indirect costs (overtime, downtime, damage to equipment, etc.) estimated at $4-$11 for every $1

direct cost)

(source - SK Motor Safety Assoc.)

Our industry currently pays $6.2 million in premiums.

At $4, results in additional indirect costs of $24.8 million to our industry

The Manitoba Motor Dealers Association (MMDA) and Automotive Trades Association of Manitoba

(ATA) are proposing to establish an industry-based safety program.

– To provide

relevant

safety and health services

targeted

to the needs of our work

environment

– To make it

easier

for employers and workers to engage in positive safety and health

practices

– To ensure employees are

safe

and workplaces are

productive

MMDA has worked with a fee for service provider (One Life) to develop customized services for

the industry, offered at a discount to MMDA members.

(5)

The Automotive and Auto Body Repair

Industry

(6)

WCB Rate Codes

60402 Garage, Service Stations

Category includes

– Automotive garages and service

stations

– New and used car and small truck

dealerships

751 businesses registered with the

WCB pay approximately $4.5 million in

premiums

60404 Body Repairs and Paint

Category includes

– Repair or replacement of damaged

body components of autos, vans,

trucks or buses, including painting.

– Includes auto conversion/customizing,

body shops that sell used vehicles

195 businesses registered with the

WCB pay approximately $1.7 million in

premiums

Possible additional rate codes for future consideration:

• Taxi

Towing

• Retail Gas & Car Wash

Auction & Appraisal

• Power & Rec Equipment

Light Equipment Sales, NEC

(7)

Industry Composition

• Approximately 70% of businesses are small, with less than

$250,000 in payroll.

– Challenging to have in-house knowledge and skills to support a

safe workplace

– “Crippling” when a key employee is injured.

138 32 15 8 2 514 92 55 78 12 -100 200 300 400 500 600 <$250K $250K to <$500 K $500K to ,$1 Million $1 Million <$5 Million >= $5 Million

Number of Businesses by Payroll Size

(8)

Regulatory Environment

• The

Workplace Safety and Health Act

– Regulations undergo revisions on a regular basis

– Fines for offences under the WSH Act have increased

• Increased from $150,000 to $300,000 for first offence and $250,000

to $500,000 for a second offence.

– Shops report more frequent inspections of automotive and auto

body repair businesses

The Workers Compensation Act

– Compliance fines have increased from $1,500 to $5,000 for

workers and $7,500 to $50,000 for employers.

(9)

Labour Market Trends

• Shortage of skilled workers

– Retention is a key concern

– High turnover increases need for standard safety training

• High numbers of vulnerable employees in the industry:

– Young workers

– Older workers

– New workers

(10)

WCB Injury Data – Body Repairs and Paint

• Injury rates have not significantly improved in the last five years.

• No change in time loss; Down modestly in all injuries

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 3.00 3.20 3.50 3.00 3.00 6.80 6.80 6.90 6.50 6.20 Inj ury Rate pe r 10 0 E m pl oy ee s

Injury Rates

-60404 Body Repairs & Paint

(11)

WCB Injury Data – Garage, Service Station

Injury rates in Garage / Service Station businesses in Manitoba have shown

improvement

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 8.30 7.30 7.80 6.90 5.90 Inj ury Rate pe r 10 0 F T E

Injury Rates

60402 - Garage, Service Station

(12)

Comparison to Overall Average

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

T

ime

L

o

ss

In

ju

ri

es

p

er

100

W

o

rker

s

Body Repair & Paint

Garage, Service Station

All Industies

(13)

Comparison to Overall Average

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Day

s

P

a

id

per

FTE

W

ork

e

r

Body Repairs & Paint

Garage, Service Station

Average All Industries

(14)

Who is getting injured?

Occupations

% of Total

Injuries

Automotive service technicians, truck mechanics and mechanical

repairers

40%

Automotive mechanical installers and servicers

15%

Motor vehicle body repairers

13%

Specialized cleaners

6%

Other trades helpers and labourers

3.3%

Heavy duty equipment mechanics

2.4%

Retail salespersons and sales clerks

1.5%

Painters and coaters

1.3%

(15)

How are People Injured?

41% Overexertion

37% Contact with Objects

16% Slips, Trips, & Falls

(16)

WCB Assessments

$2.45 $2.46 $2.34 $2.41 $2.70 $2.58 $1.27 $1.29 $1.21 $1.21 $1.19 $1.14 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 A s s es s m en t pe r $1 00 P ay rol l

Overall Assessment Rate per $100 Payroll

60402 and 60404

Body Repair Garage, Service Station

Average rate for Body Repair is up 5%.

(17)
(18)

Needs Analysis Results

• Survey respondents represented 19% (+) of payroll

32 of 80 respondents did not provide payroll information

– 60402 Garage, Service Station

15%

– 60404 Body Repairs and Paint

23%

• Two focus groups

– 6 participants Garage, Service Station

– 4 participants Body Repairs and Paint

(19)

Needs Analysis Results Cont’d

Overall

Garage

Body Repairs

Employee safety and health training

33.3%

30.3%

30.8%

Resources to develop and support

safety programs

33.3%

24.2%

38.5%

Internal knowledge of injury and

illness prevention methods

28.1%

30.3%

23.1%

Effective, up to date policies and

procedures

28.1%

21.2%

38.5%

Survey respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the following aspects of

safety and health in their workplaces:

(20)

Needs Analysis Results Cont’d

Most survey respondents (63.2%) do not access safety and health

services from

external sources.

Reasons for not doing so include:

• Services available too generic; not relevant for Automotive and Body

Repair industry.

• Perception that safety consultants lack specific industry expertise

• Cost

• Not aware of what services are available from external providers.

– Have to seek them out yourself; industry does not appear to be a target

market for safety services

(21)

Needs Analysis Results Cont’d

Top priorities for Services that could be offered by a Safety Association:

• Information (60% ranked high)

– More important for garages(63%) than body shops (46%)

– Including templates for manuals

• Policies and Procedures (52% ranked high)

– Including Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) resource bank

• Technical, regulatory and standards updates (52% ranked high)

(22)

Key Issues and Concerns

Overall, 40% of Automotive and Auto Body Repair businesses do not have documented

safety programs

(

Body Repair and Paint – 54%, Garage, Service Station – 33%)

– Attention to safety is still very „reactionary‟ in the industry ie. after an incident or inspection

– Cost and effort to develop and implement safety programs is a barrier

– Expectations regarding safety program and procedure requirements unclear

– Difficult to keep policies and procedures up to date as information and regulations change

frequently.

– Lack of safety resources and training relevant for the industry

Inspections becoming more frequent; driving need to strengthen safety programs and

practices

Low employee compliance with and „buy-in‟ to safety programs and procedures. (46%)

– Particularly with long term employees

– Employees striving to be more efficient may cut corners (flat rate)

– Inconsistent standards across industry make it difficult to preach „safety‟ to employees.

– Employers struggle with balancing enforcement (ie. writing-up or sending employees home)

with productivity and employee satisfaction.

Online training is extremely important for rural businesses and production staff.

Some concern that safety association may result in increased reporting requirements and

„red tape‟

(23)

Construction Safety Association of Manitoba

Manitoba Heavy Construction Safety Program (WorkSafely)

Agricultural Manufacturers Safety Association (AMC)

Saskatchewan Motor Safety Association

(24)

Construction Safety Association of Manitoba

CSAM established in 1990 to serve building construction industry

Governed by WCA Board of Directors and CSAM Advisory Committee

20 Staff, including COR coordinator, Training Coordinator, 6 Safety Advisors

Provide training, education, information and resource materials to support safety in the construction

industry

• Prepaid safety consultants advise on all aspects of safety programs and safety management • Quarterly meetings with safety related information a nd presentations

• Safety Program certifcation (COR) for large and small employers (SECOR)

• CSO (Construction Safety Officer Designation) – National standard – Have trained 144 safety professionals in the last 3 years, 350 total.

• Safety program training and customization

• General training, including over 30 on-line courses, offered in Winnipeg, Brandon, rural Manitoba • Annual Safety Conferences – Winnipeg, Westman

• Web-site, downloadable resources - safety promotional materials, safe job procedures, updates on legislative / regulatory changes

65% of construction workers are in COR certified companies

Time loss injuries down 50% since 2000.

• Achieved during period of significant growth in industry activity (and therefore increased risk) – Payroll increased 39% from 2009 - 2014

(25)

Manitoba Heavy Construction Safety

Program (WorkSafely)

• WORKSAFELY is a series of programs offered and supported by MHCA to enhance construction safety practices across Manitoba

– Governed by MHCA Board of Directors

– WORKSAFELY has team of 11; draws on association resources

• Director, Training Coordinator, 3 COR Program / Training Advisors, 5 Safety Advisors

– Programs and services include training, COR certification; increasing conversion/access to electronic tools

– Annual Expos (North in Thompson, South in Winnipeg)

» Education courses for all levels of employees

– Safety Talks (topic specific fact sheets) – CSO, COR Programs

– 26 courses

– Time loss injuries down 40% since 2000, during a time of high industry activity and increased employment (Payroll increased 25% 2009 – 2014).

– The culture of safety has significantly changed within the industry from strong resistance and very poor safety records to a widely recognized moral, legal and ethical responsibility to protect their most important resource, their workers – Over 300 COR certified companies, and growing.

• Some leading companies that had very poor records are now leading in safety.

• There is significant „peer pressure‟ from within the industry to be come COR certified.

• Industry is putting pressure on government to reduce thresholds requiring safety certification to qualify for contracts. Strong interest in the industry as a whole to be seen as safe.

(26)

Construction COR Certification Pilot

Project (2007 to 2009)

COR Certification Incentive Pilot Project was evaluated in 2010

– 181 new firms became COR certified. (240 of 7746 firms)

Benefits realized by COR firms during the pilot period 2007 to 2009

– Health and safety becomes a culture in COR workplaces

• Workers must wear personal protective equipment, follow safety rules, and take

responsibility for their own and other worker‟s health

• Safety is „the only way‟ in COR firms.

• Union reps and employers agreed that COR employers care more about and participate

more in safety.

– COR firms had lower injury rates, reduced time loss injury costs, and shorter claim

duration than non-COR firms.

– COR firm assessment rates were 10-16% lower than non-COR firms during the pilot

incentive period.

– COR firms received a net benefit from the incentive of between $0.10 and $0.16 per

$100 payroll.

(27)

Agricultural Manufacturers of Canada Safety

(AMC Safety)

Training, consulting, audits and certification, resources

Three employees – executive director, safety advisor, safety trainer

Manitoba Safety Committee – Quarterly meetings, venue for employers to

share, help improve safety

Claim durations well below the provincial average for all industries

Moved from 200% risk category to 120% risk category in 2011

Risk Category

Rate Range

Average Rate

200%

$1.80 - $9.00

$3.00

120%

$1.08 - $5.40

$1.80

• Time loss injuries down 7

0

% since 2000

(28)

AMC Safety Performance

(source SAFE Work MB)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Injury Rates AMC vs Metal Works

Ag Equipment Mfg Comparison Mfg

Comparison group includes • Metal Working Parts • Vehicle Manufacturing • Misc Light Manufacturing • Manufacturing Auto Parts

(29)

Performance of Industries with Safety

Associations

0

5

10

15

20

25

T

im

e

Loss

I

nj

ury

Rate

/1

0

0

w

ork

e

rs

Agricultural Implement

Manufacturing

Building Construction

Heavy Construction

All Industries

Net Change

70%

50%

40%

43%

(30)

Saskatchewan Motor Safety Association

Not For Profit Organization, Funded through agreement with WCB

– Board of Directors, incl. representative of WorkSafe SK, SGI, Govt. of SK

Serves two major rate codes

– Automotive, Implement Sales and Service

• 15 rate sub-codes, including

– Implement wholesales, farm implement dealers

– Distributors of bulk oil, fertilizer, chemical, cement powder

– Trailer, motorized sports equipment sales and service

– Commercial parking lots

– Auto rental

– Automotive Service Shops, Towing

• 15 rate sub-codes, including autobody/paint, service stations/garages, variety of

mechanical repair shops, towing

• Time loss injuries down 19% since 2009

(31)

Saskatchewan Motor Safety Association

Programs and Services

– Training

Competent Safety Leader Designation

Safety Fundamentals for Managers and Supervisors

Claims management

Safety Management System workshop

Occupational Health Committee Training

E-learning Courses (WHMIS, Investigation, Inspection, Back Care, Heat Stress, Ladder Safety)

Safety Videos

Webinars (MSA Safety Orientation, Ergonomics for Ag Dealers, Fall Protection, etc.)

– Consulting

Ergonomic Assessments

Safety Perception Surveys

Safety management development and implementation

Worksite inspection, inspection checklists

Hazard analysis and controls

Development of Emergency Response Plans/programs

Development and implementation of Return to Work programs

– Certificate of Recognition (COR)

(32)
(33)

Proposed Safety Association

Mandate

– To improve workplace safety in the garage/service station and autobody repair/paint industry

Governance

– Program proposed as under the umbrella of the MMDA corporate structure

• Guided by a safety committee with representatives from MMDA, ATA, Independent Shops,

Worker Representatives, SafeWork Manitoba, MPI

Services

– Training

• Safety awareness and orientation

• Hazard-specific training

• Supervisory training

– Safety Program Consulting

• Design (develop policies and procedures)

• Implementation (team training on safety procedures)

• Review / evaluation of existing program (safety audit)

– Safety Certification

• Based on WCB standards for safety certification, adapted for industry

• Eligible for WCB premium discount

(34)

Prevention Incentive for Safety Certification

The WCB currently offers a premium discount for companies with

recognized safety certification

– Currently only available for the construction industry in Manitoba (COR

program)

WCB intends to expand its policy to recognize safety certification in other

industries

– Safe Work Manitoba will set minimum standards for certification

– Industry-based certification programs

The financial incentive will be at least as good as the incentive offered for

COR Certification, which is:

– 10% discount on WCB premium in first year

– 5% discount in subsequent years

• SAFE Work MB indicates that a 10% discount on the WCB premium a

reasonable example to use for Automotive and Body Repair Safety

Association (pending policy approval).

(35)

Benefits of Improving Workplace Safety

Healthy, safe employees – “it‟s the right thing to do”;

“It shouldn‟t have to hurt to work here”

Secure livelihood, ability to provide for family

More motivated to work for caring employer

Improved ability to attract and retain skilled workers

Longer career

Productive workplace / business

No lost time due to injuries – from person injured or supervisor / manager or shop in general

• In-direct costs include investigation/reporting, property damage, replacement, productivity

Less need for other staff to work over-time to cover for absence due to injury (lower wage costs, less

burnout)

Greater staff continuity – more efficient and effective

Better customer service

Reduced premiums

• Fewer injuries >> lower premium (slow decline)

• Safety certification >> premium discount (instant savings)

Overall reduction in injury rates for industry

Improved image, ability to attract employees to industry

Reduction in premiums at industry level – opportunity to lower overall risk category

Overall improved industry profitability, sustainability

Ability to re-invest in equipment and technology

Ability for business owners to attract buyers

(36)

What if my company is already safe?

Early opportunity to take advantage of safety certification

– Subsidized access to industry specific training and expertise

– Full safety program development required for certification typically takes

two years

– Businesses with well-developed safety programs likely can achieve

certification within 1 year

• Validate internal program

• Identify additional opportunities for improvement

• Earn 10% discount on next year premium

• Benefit from entire industry improving

– Potential to drop rate category

(37)

How Association will be funded

• WCB will apply a levy to assessment premiums paid by employers

in the industry codes that participate in the industry safety

association.

• The exact levy is to be determined – current levies range from 6 –

10.5%.

– Agricultural Manufacturers of Canada – AMC Safety

7.74%

– Manitoba Heavy Construction (WorkSafely)

8.01%

– Construction Safety Association of Manitoba

3.52%

– SAFE Hospitality

6.76%

Example 1:

– Autobody/Paint average premium ($2.57/$100 payroll) = $6,425 per year

– Add Safety Levy (8% = $514)

= $6,939

Example 2:

– Garage / Service Station average premium ($1.15/$100 payroll) = $2,875 per year

– Add Safety Levy (8% = $230)

= $3,105

(38)

Example Savings – Autobody/Paint

Employer at average rate, safety certifies, reduces premium to minimum rate

Average premium

$2.57/$100 payroll

$6,425/yr (on $250,000 payroll)

Add safety levy

8%

$6,939/yr

Apply safety certification discount

10% (e.g.)

$6,297

SAVE $128 (2% Net savings)

Reduce to minimum rate

$1.80/$100 payroll

(+ Levy – Discount)

$4,410

SAVE $2,015/yr (31% Net Savings)

At Industry Level

Total Payroll

$64,982,698

2014 Total assessment premiums

$1,671,853

With Levy (8%; $133,748)

$1,805,601

(39)

Example Savings – Garage / Service Station

Employer at average rate, reduces premium to minimum rate (on $250,000 payroll)

Average premium

$1.15/$100 payroll

$2,875/yr

Add safety levy

8%

$3,105/yr

Apply safety certification discount

10% (e.g.)

$2,818/yr

SAVE $57 (2% Net savings)

Reduce to minimum rate

$0.63/$100 payroll

(+ Levy – Discount)

$1,544

SAVE $1,331/yr (46% Net Savings)

At Industry Level

Total Payroll

$397,076,664

2014 Total assessment premiums

$4,546,607

Add Safety Levy (8%; $363,729)

$4,910,335

(40)

Next Steps

• Confirmation of industry support

– Letters / signatures from firms representing 50%+ of rate code payroll

• Approval by WCB / SAFE Work to proceed to next stage

• Development of Safety Program (funding support from WCB)

– Establish NFP

– Recruit staff

– Develop programs, services, etc.

• Approval for levy funding

• Target Program Launch - 2016

Establishing a safety association to specifically serve our industry

needs your support

References

Related documents

tion of a response message to introduce (in the resource data eld) an arbitrary domain name for which the target server is not authoritative, and then including incorrect

Is Social Media Challenging the Authority of the Judiciary? Rethinking the Effectiveness of Anonymised and Super Injunctions in the Age of the Internet.. electronic firewalls),

Patent Tying Cases According to the Supreme Court in Illinois Tool Works v.. The Court in its 2006 term decided three patent cases and reversed the Court of Appeals for the

Biglan rightly recognizes that to signifi- cantly change society for the better, we must address larger social forces— for example, the negative effects of poverty and

As local popular memory and some Russian orientalists observe, pīrs had significant power and authority among the local people and their guidance was sought in

Resultant heating degree plots for a sample day, month and year using both methods show the largest differences of up to 20 percent occur on the daily time frame, with

CFSE assay measured human CD4 T cell proliferation showing increased division when stimulated with CD3+CD28 mAb.. Furthermore, subsets of human T-cells, CD4 and CD8, can be

Az üvegházak révén az Európai Unió egész területén foly- tatnak kertészeti termesztést, még az olyan északi orszá- gokban is, mint Norvégia és Svédország. Itt