• No results found

Method Statement Plate Load Test

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Method Statement Plate Load Test"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Method Statement for

PLATE BEARING TESTS

Chulalongkorn University

Saraburi Campus

Contractor: EMC Public company limited

NOVEMBER 2009

BY

(2)

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter Title

Page

Table of Contents... 1

List of Appendix...Error! Bookmark not defined.

List of Figures...Error! Bookmark not defined.

1.0 PROJECT

INFORMATION ... 3

2.0

PLATE LOAD TEST INFORMATIN ... 3

3.0

TEST APPARATUS ... 3

4.0

TEST PROCEDURE ... 3

5.0

RESULTS

OF

TEST ... 4

Appendix

(3)

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

List of Appendix

Appendix A Data Recording Form

Appendix B Sample of Graph of Load-Time-Settlement

Appendix C Sample of Test Data

Appendix D Calibration of Hydraulic Jack

(4)

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

1.0 PROJECT

INFORMATION

x

Project Name :

Chulalongkorn University Saraburi Campus

x

Contractor :

EMC Public Company Limited

x

Location : Saraburi,Thailand

2.0

PLATE LOAD TEST INFORMATION

x

Number of Tests : 11

x

Plate Size :

Dia . 12”x 25 mm

x

Design Load : 20 Tons/sq.m.

x

Proposed Test :

50 Tons/sq.m. (2.5 * design load)

x

Testing Standard :

AASHO T235-74 (1986) / ASTM D1195

3.0 TESTING

APPARATUS

The test apparatus consists of the following:

1. A 10-ton hydraulic jack was used as loading device.

2. A dia.12”x 25 mm thick steel plate was used to distribute the load from the jack to the plate

and to the ground.

3. Three dial gauges with accuracy of 0.01 mm were used to measure the deflections during

loading and unloading.

4 .Back hoe axial was used as reaction load during loading

.

4.0 TEST

PROCEDURE

The test ground was loaded as per AASHO T 235-74 (1986) as per the loading and unloading

steps. These steps were for all the tests conducted.

Loading: 0- 25% - 50% - 75% - 100% - 125% - 150% - 175% - 200% - 225% - 250% of the

design load.

Unloading: 150% - 100% - 50% and 0% of the design load

(5)

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

Each loading and unloading stage was maintained for 15 minutes with readings made at 1, 2, 4,

8 and 15 minutes after the application or removal of load. During the test, records including plots of load

vs. time and load vs. settlement were maintained progressively.

5.0 RESULTS OF TEST

Results of test will be presented in graph form show relationship among load-time-settlement

and prediction of subgrade modulus.

(6)

Appendix-A

Data recording form

(7)

(ITP-C-116/LRS)

Chulalongkorn Saraburi Campus

LOAD SETTLEMENT - TIME RELATION SHIPS

System : ………..……….... Area : ……… Pit 1

Certification No. :

Date : …

26/10/2010

Soil Description

: Silty Sand

Plate Size

: Dia.12" x 25 mm.

Area / Line No.

: ……….

Def. Rate (mm/min) 10.30

Result :

Accepted

Rejected

Re-Compact

Test by :

Check by :

( Rungruang D. ) ( Poosit Sunlakaviset )

Soil Technician Soil Engineer

Date ..…../……./……. Date ..…../……./…….

COMPANY SIGNATURE NAME DATE

(ITP-C-116/LRS) Rev.0 E:\05-PlateBearing-EMC\[PlateLoadTestEMC.xls]Basic Info

14 1.09 15.0 14 0.73 10.0 13 0.73 10.0 12 0.73 10.0 10 0.73 10.0 13 0.36 5.0 12 0.36 5.0 10 0.36 5.0 8 0.36 5.0 0 (bars) 31 (bars) 50.00 50.00 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.36 0.00 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.36 0.36 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.36 0.36 0.36 2 1 2 4 8 14 15 4 8 15 15 0 1 10 13 12 0 0 1 2 4 0 DATE TIME (tons) TIME 26-Oct-10 REMARKS 51 (bars) ELAPSED

ASTM Testing Co.,ltd. Kenber

72 (bars)

Rangsan Gamsantia Poosit S.

SUBMITTED BY RECEIVED BY

t/m^2 G1 G2 G3 (mm)

LOAD APPLIED Avg. Set.

50.00 50.00 Owner : CU Main Conractor:EMC Contractor :

Footing

(8)

Appendix-A

Data recording form

(9)

(ITP-C-116/LRS)

Chulalongkorn Saraburi Campus

LOAD SETTLEMENT - TIME RELATION SHIPS

System : ………..……….... Area : ……… Pit 1

Certification No. :

Date : …

26/10/2010

Soil Description

: Silty Sand

Plate Size

: Dia.12" x 25 mm.

Area / Line No.

: ……….

Def. Rate (mm/min) 10.30

Result :

Accepted

Rejected

Re-Compact

Test by :

Check by :

( Rungruang D. ) ( Poosit Sunlakaviset )

Soil Technician Soil Engineer

Date ..…../……./……. Date ..…../……./…….

COMPANY SIGNATURE NAME DATE

(ITP-C-116/LRS) Rev.0 E:\05-PlateBearing-EMC\[PlateLoadTestEMC.xls]Basic Info

14 1.09 15.0 14 0.73 10.0 13 0.73 10.0 12 0.73 10.0 10 0.73 10.0 13 0.36 5.0 12 0.36 5.0 10 0.36 5.0 8 0.36 5.0 0 (bars) 31 (bars) 50.00 50.00 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.36 0.00 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.36 0.36 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.36 0.36 0.36 2 1 2 4 8 14 15 4 8 15 15 0 1 10 13 12 0 0 1 2 4 0 DATE TIME (tons) TIME 26-Oct-10 REMARKS 51 (bars) ELAPSED

ASTM Testing Co.,ltd. Kenber

72 (bars)

Rangsan Gamsantia Poosit S.

SUBMITTED BY RECEIVED BY

t/m^2 G1 G2 G3 (mm)

LOAD APPLIED Avg. Set.

50.00 50.00 Owner : CU Main Conractor:EMC Contractor :

Footing

(10)

Appendix-B

Sample of Graph for

Load-Time-Settlement

(11)

(ITP-C-116/LRS)

Chulalongkorn Saraburi Campus

LOAD SETTLEMENT - TIME RELATION SHIPS

System : ………..……. Area : ………

Certification No. :

Date : ………..……

Soil Description

: Silty Clay

Plate Size

: Dia. 304 mm. x 25 mm.

Area / Line No.

: ………..

k = Subgrade modulus( t/sq.m./mm.) =9.3

E = Soil Modulus(Mpa.) = k x Dx(1-u^2)/100 = 0.91xKx450/100 ,in which u = Poison ratio,D=Plate Diameter

(Ref. Foundation analysis and design By Joseph E. Bowles 4th Edition page407 Eq.9.6a)

For Silt,Sand&Dry clay, E = 26 MPA

For wet clay, E = 22

MPA

Result :

Accepted

Rejected

Re-Compact

Test by :

Check by :

( Rungruang D. ) ( Poosit Sunlakaviset )

Soil Technician Soil Engineer

Date ..…../……./……. Date ..…../……./…….

COMPANY SIGNATURE NAME DATE

(ITP-C-116/LRS) Rev.0 E:\99-07-PlateBearingTest\[PlateBearingTestReport.xls]Report (1)

SUBMITTED BY RECEIVED BY

Infratech ASTM Co.,ltd.

Rangsan Gamsantia

Owner : CU

Main Contractor: EMC Contractor :

LOAD-SETTLEMENT CURVE

-7.0 -6.0 -5.0 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 0 10 20PRESSURE, (t/m30 40 50 60 2 ) SETTLEMENT, (mm) Actual loading Unloading Linear loading

TIME - LOAD CURVE

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 TIME, (hrs) PRESSURE, (t/m 2 )

TIME-SETTLEMENT CURVE

-7.0 -6.0 -5.0 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 TIME, (hrs) SETTLEMENT, (mm)

Footing

P234    1 Line No. 4/J-K

(12)

Appendix-C

Sample of Test Data

(13)

(ITP-C-116/LRS)

Chulalongkorn Saraburi Campus

LOAD SETTLEMENT - TIME RELATION SHIPS

System : ………..……….... Area : ………

Certification No. :

Date : …

26/10/2010

Soil Description

:  

Plate Size

: Dia. 304 mm. x 25 mm.

Area / Line No.

: P 234    1 [Line 4/J-K]

Def. Rate (mm/min) 15:05 15:05 15:06 15:07 15:09 15:13 15:20 15:20 15:21 15:22 15:24 15:28 15:35 15:35 15:36 15:37 15:39 15:43 15:50 15:50 15:51 15:52 15:54 15:58 16:05 16:05 16:06 16:07 16:09 16:13 16:20

Result :

Accepted

Rejected

Re-Compact

Test by :

Check by :

( Rungruang D. ) ( Poosit Sunlakaviset )

Soil Technician Soil Engineer

Date ..…../……./……. Date ..…../……./…….

COMPANY SIGNATURE NAME DATE

(ITP-C-116/LRS) Rev.0 E:\99-07-PlateBearingTest\[PlateBearingTestReport.xls]Report (1)

15 1.46 20.0 43.72 2.89 40.48 42.11 2.90 43.74 2.86 8 1.46 20.0 40.49 42.12 1.46 20.0 40.52 42.15 2 1.46 20.0 40.61 42.21 43.77 2.80 20.0 40.63 42.22 43.78 0 1.46 20.0 40.73 42.30 43.82 2.72 92 (bar) 44.02 2.39 15.0 15 1.09 15.0 44.02 2.39 8 1.09 15.0 41.23 42.58 15.0 1.09 15.0 41.33 41.27 1.09 43.04 41.71 41.80 42.65 42.63 42.58 42.60 42.58 45.00 42.82 5.0 42.81 0.0 5.0 5.0 43.53 43.52 42.80 43.53 42.82 42.80 45.00 43.52 43.52 43.52 43.13 43.07 43.05 43.04 Rangsan Gamsantia SUBMITTED BY RECEIVED BY

Infratech ASTM Co.,ltd.

113 (bar) 41.76 41.75 41.73 41.72 72 (bar) G3 (mm) G2

LOAD APPLIED Avg. Set.

(t/m^2) G1 2 4 1 Jack Pressure 51 (bar) 26-Oct-10 0 1 DATE TIME (tons) TIME ELAPSED 0.00 0.36 0 1.82 1.09 1.09 1 1.46 4 15 15 0 1 1 2 4 8 15 0 2 4 0 2 4 8 1.82 1.82 1.82 10.0 10.0 1.82 1.82 0.73 15.0 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.36 0.36 0.73 0.36 0.36 0.73 5.0 5.0 25.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 39.90 39.88 41.23 42.80 42.06 41.99 41.87 41.86 42.10 43.11 39.87 41.86 39.97 39.93 41.30 41.24 39.91 43.44 45.00 44.64 44.63 44.63 44.64 44.63 44.04 44.34 43.43 44.34 44.35 43.49 44.07 44.06 43.46 43.46 43.47 3.28 2.36 44.02 2.39 43.71 44.04 44.39 44.36 1.34 1.35 1.35 1.34 3.29 1.81 1.86 1.91 1.92 2.79 1.35 3.25 0 (bar) 31 (bar) 0.00 44.63 1.35 3.30 3.32 3.33 1.91 2.32 2.34 8 0.36 5.0 1.92 Owner : CU

Main Contractor: EMC Contractor :

Footing

Footing

(14)

(ITP-C-116/LRS)

Chulalongkorn Saraburi Campus

LOAD SETTLEMENT - TIME RELATION SHIPS

System : ………..……….... Area : ………

Certification No. :

Date : …

26/10/2010

Soil Description

:  

Plate Size

: Dia. 304 mm. x 25 mm.

Area / Line No.

: P 234    1 [Line 4/J-K]

Def. Rate (mm/min) 16:20 16:21 16:22 16:24 16:28 16:35 16:35 16:36 16:37 16:39 16:43 16:50 16:50 16:51 16:52 16:54 16:58 17:05 17:05 17:06 17:07 17:09 17:13 17:20 17:20 17:21 17:22 17:24 17:28 17:35

Result :

Accepted

Rejected

Re-Compact

Test by :

Check by :

( Rungruang D. ) ( Poosit Sunlakaviset )

Soil Technician Soil Engineer

Date ..…../……./……. Date ..…../……./…….

COMPANY SIGNATURE NAME DATE

(ITP-C-116/LRS) Rev.0 E:\99-07-PlateBearingTest\[PlateBearingTestReport.xls]Report (1)

3.28 45.0 37.17 39.69 41.41 5.58 37.14 39.64 41.37 5.62 8 3.28 45.0 37.23 39.76 41.50 5.50 4 3.28 45.0 3.28 45.0 37.32 39.85 41.59 5.41 37.40 39.92 41.65 5.34 1 3.28 45.0 40.04 41.75 5.22 195 (bar) 2.92 40.0 3.28 45.0 5.06 15 2.92 40.0 5.09 40.25 37.70 40.14 41.88 37.73 40.18 41.92 2 2.92 40.0 8 40.31 1 2.92 40.0 4 2.92 40.0 5.77 4.79 175 (bar) 4.90 216 (bar) 4.85 4.97 6.17 40.79 40.91 5.90 5.97 42.12 40.41 42.18 37.96 40.36 2.92 40.0 38.48 38.44 2.55 35.0 2.55 2.55 2.55 Avg. Set. 6.06 42.95 3.95 3.75 133 (bar) 4.61 8 2.19 30.0 42.44 42.71 42.56 42.53 2.19 3.98 4.40 40.73 42.39 42.35 41.21 41.08 41.00 42.08 42.01 39.04 43.12 43.06 43.00 43.18 39.07 36.59 38.26 36.97 36.85 36.78 38.03 37.83 37.90 37.55 38.70 36.54 35.0 35.0 35.0 38.35 38.30 50.0 36.71 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 2.19 2.55 2.55 30.0 30.0 2.19 2.19 30.0 2.19 30.0 35.0 35.0 30.0 3.65 3.65 3.65 3.65 3.65 3.65 50.0 15 15 0 1 4 8 0 0 2 15 0 2 1 2 4 8 15 2 4 0 DATE TIME (tons) TIME LOAD APPLIED (t/m^2) 1 Jack Pressure 154 (bar) ELAPSED 41.32 G3 (mm) G2

Infratech ASTM Co.,ltd.

6.23 41.19 Rangsan Gamsantia SUBMITTED BY RECEIVED BY 40.91 40.75 4.43 4.52 4.57 41.40 41.14 4.23 3.83 3.89 3.67 42.92 41.11 39.30 G1 39.30 39.21 39.14 39.40 41.25 39.04 39.21 39.10 40.73 40.64 40.60 40.57 39.50 39.38 Owner : CU

Main Contractor: EMC Contractor :

(15)

(ITP-C-116/LRS)

Chulalongkorn Saraburi Campus

LOAD SETTLEMENT - TIME RELATION SHIPS

System : ………..……….... Area : ………

Certification No. :

Date : …

26/10/2010

Soil Description

:  

Plate Size

: Dia. 304 mm. x 25 mm.

Area / Line No.

: P 234    1 [Line 4/J-K]

Def. Rate (mm/min) 17:35 17:36 17:37 17:39 17:43 17:50 17:50 17:51 17:52 17:54 17:58 18:05 18:05 18:06 18:07 18:09 18:13 18:20 18:20 18:21 18:22 18:24 18:28 18:35 18:35 18:36 18:37 18:39 18:43 18:50

Result :

Accepted

Rejected

Re-Compact

Test by :

Check by :

( Rungruang D. ) ( Poosit Sunlakaviset )

Soil Technician Soil Engineer

Date ..…../……./……. Date ..…../……./…….

COMPANY SIGNATURE NAME DATE

(ITP-C-116/LRS) Rev.0 E:\99-07-PlateBearingTest\[PlateBearingTestReport.xls]Report (1) 39.76 39.56 39.60 39.62 39.66 39.71 39.03 39.03 39.03 39.03 39.04 G1 36.54 36.54 36.54 36.54 39.04 39.04 G3 (mm) 0 (bar) G2 39.04 39.04

Infratech ASTM Co.,ltd. Rangsan Gamsantia SUBMITTED BY RECEIVED BY 5.50 Jack Pressure 151 (bar) ELAPSED 39.04 DATE TIME (tons) TIME LOAD APPLIED (t/m^2) 1 2 4 0 4 8 15 15 0 1 2 4 0.00 0 1 2 4 8 15 1.46 1.46 1.46 15 0 1 2 4 8 2.19 1.46 1.46 30.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 2.92 2.92 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 2.19 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 2.92 40.0 40.0 2.92 2.92 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.90 36.85 36.87 36.54 36.80 36.81 36.54 36.54 36.54 36.54 36.83 36.54 36.54 36.54 36.54 39.03 39.03 5.66 40.73 40.74 36.54 36.54 39.03 40.71 36.54 39.04 40.72 40.72 40.72 40.72 6.24 6.24 6.24 41.83 40.71 40.71 41.55 41.60 40.73 6.23 6.23 6.23 6.23 197 (bar) 8 2.92 40.0 5.60 6.23 40.71 40.71 40.71 5.64 41.64 41.70 6.24 39.04 6.23 40.72 Avg. Set. 6.24 40.71 6.24 6.23 5.55 6.23 6.18 41.76 6.24 5.70 6.23 104 (bar) 6.23 6.23 20.0 36.54 39.04 40.73 40.73 39.04 40.73 1.46 20.0 36.54 39.04 0 0.73 10.0 36.56 39.08 40.80 6.19 58 (bar) 1 0.73 10.0 36.56 39.08 40.80 6.19 2 0.73 10.0 36.56 39.08 39.09 40.81 36.56 39.09 40.80 6.19 36.56 6.18 8 0.73 10.0 40.81 6.18 15 0.73 10.0 36.56 39.09 40.81 Owner : CU

Main Contractor: EMC Contractor :

(16)

Appendix-D

Jack Calibration

(17)
(18)
(19)

Project :

Chulalongkorn Saraburi Campus

Contractor EMC PCL Plate Size 0.3048 m.(Dia.) Plate area 0.0730 Sq.m.

Jack Reading and Plate load Table

PLATE Jack Load Jack Pressure Applied Load (Y) Calculate(X) (tons/sq.m.) (kg) bar 0 0 0 LOADING 5 365 31 Y = AX+B X=(Y-B)/A 10 730 51 A= 17.7758 15 1094 72 20 1459 92 UNLODING 25 1824 113 A= 15.6833 30 2189 133 B= -176.3889 35 2554 154 40 2919 175 45 3283 195 50 3648 216 40 2919 197 30 2189 151 20 1459 104 10 730 58 0 0 0

(20)

Appendix-E

(21)

References

Related documents