• No results found

Advancements in Construction Project Administration Session: 41 October 28, 2014

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Advancements in Construction Project Administration Session: 41 October 28, 2014"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Advancements in Construction Project

Administration

Session: 41 October 28, 2014

Room: C220-222 3:00PM – 3:45PM

Claims Avoidance, Mitigation and Resolution Take Advantage of New Tools

Presented by: Moderator:

Andrew Morse, PSP Chris Engle

Brian Goodreau, PSP

Introduction to ARCADIS

• 6,200 Employees in United States • 30+ years providing construction claims services BUILDINGS ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE WATER Global Company Global Company Experience Experience

(2)

4

On-call Claims Transportation Clients

Introduction – Brian Goodreau

Experience at ARCADIS •5 Years at ARCADIS

-Scheduling projects to $500 million -Claims avoidance, mitigation and

resolution

•BS Construction Management

•Planning and Scheduling Professional (PSP) -Association for the Advancement of

Cost Engineering International (AACEI) •Associate Constructor (AC)

-American Institute For Constructors (AIC)

Introduction – Andrew Morse

Experience at ARCADIS • Over 3 years at ARCADIS • 10 plus years of industry experience • Successfully managed complex construction

schedules on projects ranging from $2 million to well over $1 billion

• Planning and Scheduling Professional (PSP) -Association for the Advancement of Cost

Engineering International (AACEI) • Associate Constructor (AC)

(3)

7

Resolve

Mitigate

Avoid

Notice to Proceed Projec t Com p letio n

Dispute Management

8

Dispute Management

Resolve Mitigate Avoid

Avoid

 Document management

 Schedule development

 Cost controls

 Risk management

 Value engineering

 Document management

 Schedule development

 Cost controls

 Risk management

 Value engineering

Document Management Systems

Avoid •Choose the right system •User training  •Enforce the rules •Choose the right system •User training  •Enforce the rules

(4)

10

Document Management Systems

Resolve Mitigate Avoid Key Features: • Project bookshelf • Process workflows  • Monitor ball‐in‐court • Financial and schedule data Key Features: • Project bookshelf • Process workflows  • Monitor ball‐in‐court • Financial and schedule data 11

Schedule Development

Resolve Mitigate Avoid Basic Software Packages Advanced Software Packages Primavera SureTrak Project Manager Primavera P3 Microsoft Project Primavera P6 Low initial cost High initial cost Limited project capacity Handles small to extremely large projects Single user  Enterprise management Limited analytics Cost / resource / risk analysis Features • Select software • Establish milestones • Develop specifications • Baseline schedule review • Select software • Establish milestones • Develop specifications • Baseline schedule review 12

Schedule Development

Why do contractors schedule?  Why do contractors schedule?  Resolve Mitigate Avoid •TO USE AS A TOOL TO BUILD THE JOB •To provide answers to:  What are you obligated to do?  What are others obligated to do?  What are you building? •Document the as‐built condition •Demonstrate cause/effect •TO USE AS A TOOL TO BUILD THE JOB •To provide answers to:  What are you obligated to do?  What are others obligated to do?  What are you building? •Document the as‐built condition •Demonstrate cause/effect

(5)

13

Schedule Development

Why do owners schedule?  Why do owners schedule?  •Understand the contractor’s plan •Decision making tool •Performance measurement •Baseline to measure delays •Reconcile hindsight and blind sight •Understand the contractor’s plan •Decision making tool •Performance measurement •Baseline to measure delays •Reconcile hindsight and blind sight Resolve Mitigate Avoid 14

Schedule Development

Understand the critical path! Understand the critical path! Resolve Mitigate Avoid “Critical Path. The series of  activities that determines the  duration of the project…it is the  longest path through the  project.”

Why Schedule?

Avoid

(6)

16

Cost Management

Resolve Mitigate Avoid 17 Resolve Mitigate Avoid •Choose the right system •User training  •Enforce the rules •Choose the right system •User training  •Enforce the rules

Cost Management

18 • Most overlooked aspect of claimsContractors have sophisticated systemsOwners lag behindTo equitably and quickly resolve claims, systems  must roll up and be able to accurately capture key  data beyond quantities:Labor and equipment usage Resolve Mitigate Avoid

Cost Management

(7)

19

Risk Management

Resolve Mitigate Avoid Name Company  @RISK Palisade  Crystal Ball Oracle Active Risk Manager (ARM) Sword Active Risk Acumen Risk Acumen Full Monte Barbecana Polaris Booz Allen Hamilton Predict Risk Decisions Primavera Risk Analysis (Pertmaster)  Oracle Proteus Safran North America RiskyProject Intaver Institute • Select software • Identify risks/stakeholders • Hold risk workshops • Establish contingencies • Select software • Identify risks/stakeholders • Hold risk workshops • Establish contingencies “Risk:  Uncertain event or  condition that could affect a  project objective” 20

Risk Management

Resolve Mitigate Avoid Typical Risks: • Design errors/changes • Schedule • Quality • Safety • Existing conditions • Environmental concerns • Project delivery method • Security • Political • Permitting • Funding • Contractual • End user satisfaction Typical Risks: • Design errors/changes • Schedule • Quality • Safety • Existing conditions • Environmental concerns • Project delivery method • Security • Political • Permitting • Funding • Contractual • End user satisfaction

Risk Management

Avoid Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) for Cost Cumulative Distribution

Function (CDF) for Schedule

•Deterministic Schedule: 11/2/2015 •17% probability that project completed on 11/2/2015

•P80 Schedule: 4/4/2016 •Schedule Contingency: 154 Days

•Current Estimate: $272.58 Million •8% probability that project will not exceed current estimate

•P80 Cost: $287.87 Million •Cost Contingency: $15.29 Million

(8)

22

Dispute Management

Resolve Mitigate Avoid

 Update schedule

 Monitor cost

 Good decisions 

 Update schedule

 Monitor cost

 Good decisions 

Mitigate

23

Update the Schedule

Resolve Mitigate Avoid Schedule Maintenance Maintain Schedule Baseline Schedule Tracking Schedule Progress Cost & Resource Management Acceleration Schedule Maintenance & Feedback Output & Deliverables Control Level Schedules Variance & Trends Schedule Analysis Schedule Forecasts Constructability Review Progress Reports & Reviews Recovery Schedules Management Summary Progress  Measurement • Level of effort • Physical progress  • Milestone  achievement  • Activity start/finish • Supervision  judgment Progress  Measurement • Level of effort • Physical progress  • Milestone  achievement  • Activity start/finish • Supervision  judgment 24

The output from schedule review software can 

be voluminous and overwhelming and:

Does not tell the whole storyCannot explain constructabilityMisrepresented as cause for delay Don’t get behind with update review!!

Update the Schedule

Resolve Mitigate

(9)

25

Update the Schedule

Float Suppression Float Suppression Concerns: • Manipulates the critical path to flow  through: –Problem areas  –Work at a high risk of change –Owner responsibilities –Third party responsibilities • False indication of what the contractor  knows is actually happening Techniques: • Activity durations –Excessive/conservative durations –Additional (unanticipated) activities • Preferential logic • Constraints –Insertion of an artificial constraint –Impacts float calculations –Influences the longest/critical paths Resolve Mitigate Avoid 26

Update the Schedule

Resolve Mitigate

Avoid

Update the Schedule

Avoid

Schedule recovery techniques are:

Proactive, not reactivePremium time / multiple shiftsLogic revisions (more aggressive)Stacking tradesResource leveling

(10)

28

Time Impact Analysis (TIA) ‐ traditional scenario: Time Impact Analysis (TIA) ‐ traditional scenario:

Update the Schedule

Resolve Mitigate Avoid Delay Delay Erect Steel Bridge A Erect Steel Bridge A Erect Steel Bridge B Erect Steel Bridge B Erect Steel Bridge C Erect Steel Bridge C 29

Update the Schedule

Delay Delay Erect Steel Bridge B Erect Steel Bridge B Erect S Erect S Erect Steel Bridge A Erect Steel Bridge A Preferential logic does not exist Time Impact Analysis (TIA) ‐ with resource leveling: Time Impact Analysis (TIA) ‐ with resource leveling: • Delays are mitigated • Delays only occur when resources  are over‐allocated • Delays are mitigated • Delays only occur when resources  are over‐allocated Resolve Mitigate Avoid 30

Monitor the Cost

Keys to successful cost control:

Consistent cost reportingQuality inspection reports –Reconcile actual quantities –Identify quantity overruns  • Monitor early warningsTimely pricing of change orders Resolve Mitigate Avoid

(11)

31

Decisions

To be used as an effective claims mitigation 

decision tool schedule and cost systems:

Must be scalable to the project or programMust fit the skills of the userMust work together Resolve Mitigate Avoid 32

Dispute Management

Resolve Mitigate Avoid

 Document review

 Schedule / financial 

analysis

 Litigation preparation

 Document review

 Schedule / financial 

analysis

 Litigation preparation

Resolve

Resolution

Avoidance and Mitigation are the keys to 

successful resolution

Technology will not help at this stage if it was not  employed earlyDocument management and trial presentation  software can help you get ready for mediation,  arbitration or trial Avoid

(12)

34

Document Review

Resolve Mitigate Avoid •Wide range of vendors •Compile documents •Create issue coding •Focus on key issues •Wide range of vendors •Compile documents •Create issue coding •Focus on key issues 35

Litigation Preparation

Resolve Mitigate Avoid Trial Director Office Timeline Plus •Mutual understanding leads to  resolution  •Technology helps present your side of  the story •Mutual understanding leads to  resolution  •Technology helps present your side of  the story 36

Resolution

No magic contract clauseNo magic cost control or scheduling systemNo magic presentation technologyResolution prior to trial still hinges on the  willingness of the parties to settle.  Resolve Mitigate Avoid

(13)

© 2013 ARCADIS 3 December 2014 37

Questions?

Andrew Morse, AC, PSP

Claims Analyst 213 Court Street Middletown, CT 06457 Brian Goodreau, PSP, ENV SP Claims Analyst 213 Court Street Middletown, CT 06457 [email protected] (860) 503-1521 [email protected] (860) 503-1511

References

Related documents

Because of a paucity of information from historical wolverine populations in California and Colorado on which to base such an assessment, we used allometric models to

Layers are defined in process order from bottom to top poly masterslice cc cut metal1 routing via cut metal2 routing via2 cut metal3 routing Cut Layer definition.. LAYER

•
A certificate of completion from a registered 4-year apprenticeship program, or a referral letter from either the registered training committee or Oregon Plumbing Board

As at 30 June 2007, the interests or short positions of the Directors and chief executive of the Company in the shares, underlying shares of equity derivatives and debentures of

Cerebral palsy results from brain damage that occurs in the child during pregnancy, at birth or when the child is very young (up to two or three years old).. These

Thus, it is the optimal strategy for profit-maximizing insurers to compete for good risks only, i.e., insured with (a present value of) expected annual costs lower than (the

Since its inception in 1971, the Connecticut Assessment of Educational Progress has conducted 17 assessments. Although results are reported only on a statewide