0095-1137/92/112921-09$02.00/0
CopyrightX 1992, AmericanSociety forMicrobiology
Analysis of Relationships among Isolates of Citrobacter diversus by
Using
DNA
Fingerprints
Generated by
Repetitive
Sequence-Based
Primers
in the Polymerase Chain Reaction
CHARLESR. WOODS,
JR.," 2t
JAMESVERSALOVIC,3
THEARITHKOEUTH,3ANDJAMES R.
LUPSKI2,3*
C. T. ParkerLaboratory, TexasChildren's Hospital,1and Institute for Molecular
Genetics3
andDepartmentof
Pediatrcs,
2Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas77030Received 12June 1992/Accepted 27 August 1992
Oligonucleotide probeswhich match consensus sequences of the repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) elementhybridize to genomic DNA of diverse bacterial species. Primers based on the REP sequence generate complex band patterns with genomic DNA in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a technique named REP-PCR. We used REP-PCR with genomic DNA to fingerprint 47 isolates of Citrobacter diversus. Previously, 37 were assigned electrophoretic types (ETs) by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and 35 were evaluated by using outer membrane protein profiles. Fingerprints were compared by visual inspection and bysimilarity
coefficients(SimCs) based on the number of common bands versus total bands between two given isolates. DNA fingerprints were
highly
similarvisually
for patient pairs and outbreak-related sets. SimCs for these were >0.952. Fingerprints of isolates with different ETsgenerally
were distinctive. Among 21 unrelated isolates representing 15 ETs,only
6 of 210 comparisons had SimCs of 20.952. REP-PCRrapidly
generated DNA fingerprints which werehighly
similar forepidemiologically
linked isolates ofC. diversus and distinct forpreviously
characterized strains within this species. Theability
of this method to discriminate between C. diversus isolates with the samebiotype was similar to that of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and outer membrane protein profiles. REP-PCR may be useful in evaluation ofapparent outbreaks of this or other bacterial species which possess these extragenic, repetitive elements.Traditionally, once bacterial isolates from an apparent outbreak have been determined to be the same species, further evaluation for similarity or relatedness has been based on phenotypic properties. While often sufficient, these methods are not always adequately sensitive to distinguish unrelated strains with similar phenotypes among the
proper-ties assessed (33). Molecular genetic methods, including
plasmid profiles, restriction endonuclease digestionpatterns ofplasmidand chromosomalDNA, and DNA hybridization, have been useful in evaluation of outbreaks of a variety of bacterial pathogens inrecentyears (1,5, 15, 26, 33, 34).
We describe the application of a recently developed method, repetitive element sequence-based polymerase
chain reaction (rep-PCR) (31), for epidemiologic analysis. This method generates fingerprints from genomic DNA
whichidentify specific strains withinabacterial species(31, 32). The term rep-PCR refers to the general methodology involvingtheapplicationofoligonucleotide primers basedon families of short, extragenic repetitive sequences. These
repetitive DNA sequences are dispersed throughout the
prokaryoticchromosome and appeartobeconservedamong many members ofthefamily
Enterobacteriaceae
aswell asother bacterial
species
(8, 13,
21,28, 29,
31).
Consensussequence
probes matching
tworepetitive
sequencefamilies,
the38-bp
repetitive
extragenic
palindromic
(REP)
elementand the 126-bpenterobacterial repetitive
intergenic
consen-sus(ERIC) sequence,hybridize
togenomic
DNAofenteric bacteria, other relatedgram-negative bacteria,
and severaldistantly related bacterial
species (31).
Thepalindromic
*
Corresponding
author.tPresent address: Department of Pediatrics, Bowman
Gray
SchoolofMedicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1081.
portionsof theserepetitiveelements enable the formation of stablestem-loopstructures,but theirprecise functional role isunclear (21).
Outwardly directed primer setsbasedonREPand ERIC consensussequences canbe used to generateclearly resolv-able bandsbyagarosegel electrophoresis after PCR ampli-fication using template genomic DNA from species which
contain these sequences (31). The terms REP-PCR and ERIC-PCR refer to the application of specific repetitive sequences (REP andERIC,respectively)toestablish DNA
fingerprints byPCR. Bands representamplificationof DNA between adjacent repetitive elements within the approxi-mately5-kb limitation of the polymerase extension. Band
patterns provideDNAfingerprintswhich allowdistinctions
between species (31)and betweenstrains withinspecies(3, 31, 32). Differences in band sizes apparently represent
polymorphismsin the distances betweenrepetitivesequence
elementsin different genomes.
Primers of the same base pair length but based on a
randomly assorted repetitive consensus sequence do not generatebandpatternsorgenomic
fingerprints
(32a).
There-fore,
generation
ofrep-PCR
fingerprints
appearstorequire
thatthe
primers
match thespecific repetitive
sequencesanddoesnotrepresentrandom
priming.
Fingerprints
are repro-ducible frommultiplecolonies from thesameplate
andfromdaily samples of serial cultures
(32). Samples
of the samestock strain ofBacillus subtilis used in neonatal
screening
programs at geographically
widespread
institutions alsoyield
reproducible,
highly
similarrep-PCR fingerprints (32).
We
performed
genomic
fingerprinting
of 47 Citrobacter diversus isolatesby
REP-PCR. C. diversuscausessporadic
andepidemic
neonatalmeningitis
which is associated with anunusuallyhigh
frequencyof brain abscess formation(11,
2921on April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
2922 WOODS ET AL.
TABLE 1. Characteristics of C. diversus isolates evaluated in this study
Isolate Source and yr Clinicalsource Biotypea ETbyMEE OMPclassification
Houston 1986 Houston 1986 Houston 1986 Houston 1984 Houston1984 Maryland 1986 Kentucky 1966 Kentucky 1976 Kentucky 1976 Florida 1979 Florida 1979 Houston 1985 Houston 1985 Maryland 1986 Houston1986 Houston1986 Maryland 1985 Louisiana1970 Washington,D.C., 1969 Maryland 1983
St. Louis1991 Delaware 1991 Houston1987 Houston1988 Houston 1989 Houston1986 Houston1986 Delaware1966 Maryland 1985 Maryland 1985 Maryland 1983 Maryland 1983 Maryland 1983 Alabama 1984 Alabama1984 Tennessee 1983 Tennessee 1985 Delaware 1975 Kentucky1972 Maryland 1985 Maryland 1986 Dallas1972 Houston 1986 Maryland1985 Houston1985 Tennessee 1985 Maryland 1986 CSF CSF Wound CSF CSF Stool CSF CSF CSF CSF CSF Respiratorytract Respiratorytract Stool Blood Blood Stool CSF CSF Stool CSF CSF Blood CSF Blood Respiratorytract Blood CSF Stool Stool CSF CSF CSF Vagina CSF CSF Urine CSF CSF Stool Stool CSF Superficialabscess Stool Respiratorytract Peritonealfluid Stool
aBiotypesarebasedonfermentationpatternoffoursugars:dulcitol,rhamnose,sorbose, andsucrose.
b_,notdetermined.
16). C. diversus outbreaks have been evaluated with bio-types (6, 9, 10, 20, 25, 34), serotypes (10, 34), and
antibio-grams(6,9, 25, 34). These methods, while helpfultoidentify and track epidemic strains in small outbreaks, correlate poorlywithoneanother when appliedon alarger scale (22).
Previously, 35 of these isolateswere evaluated byusing
outer membrane protein (OMP) profiles (18) and 37 were
evaluatedby multilocusenzymeelectrophoresis(MEE) (19).
The bank includes four pairs of isolates from the same
patients, oneset ofisolates froma mother-infant pair, and
threesets ofisolates from outbreaks of meningitis. Distinct geographic regions of theUnited Statesarerepresentedwith
16 isolates from the Houston, Tex., area during a 5-year
period and 17 from the Maryland-Delaware-Washington,
D.C.,areaduringa25-year period. This studydemonstrates thatgenomic fingerprinting by REP-PCR is a rapid,
repro-ducible, and useful methodto examine isolates ofbacterial species from apparentoutbreaks ofdisease.
MATERIALS ANDMETHODS
Bacterialisolates. C. diversusisolates(Table 1) have been collected in the C. T. ParkerLaboratoryofTexasChildren's Hospital since 1984. Isolates with known OMP or MEE
typeshavebeendescribedpreviously (18, 19). Isolate 5595
wasprovided by N. Middelkamp, St. Louis, Mo., and 5596
wasprovided by S. Eppes, Wilmington, Del. Other isolates
notpreviously describedwereobtainedfrom local Houston
b 6 6 6 7 7 16 16 16 16 16 14 12 11 11 11 Fig. 1 4632 4637 4635 4023 4036 4583 4410 4511 4512 4509 4510 4277 4278 4577 4472 4476 4576 4408 4407 4578 5595 Fig. 2 5596 4749 5043 5115 4397 4573 4406 4574 4580 4514 4515 4516 4428 4429 2988 4432 4513 4405 4582 4579 4409 4485 4581 4310 4431 4575 F+ A-F+ D+ D+ B+ B+ B-B+ B- G- D-B+ B+ F-d d d d d e c d d d d d d d a a a a a a a e e d e e e e e e e e e e e e f e c c c e c e c c c C- B-B+ B-A+ A+ C- B-B+ D-D+ G-E+ G- D- G-15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 10 9 9 8 5 4 3 2 2 1
J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
on April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
hospitalsfrom 1986 to 1989. The isolates are from diverse
clinical sites: cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) (n = 23), stool (n =
10), blood (n = 5),respiratory tract(n = 4), vagina (n = 1), peritoneal fluid (n = 1), urine (n = 1), a wound (n = 1),and
anabscess (n = 1).
Related sets ofisolates are 4023 and 4036 (CSF cultures fromthe sameinfant5 weeks apart); 4277and4278(tracheal aspirate culturesfrom the same patient several hours apart on the same day); 4472 and 4476 (bloodcultures from the sameinfant3daysapart);4632and 4637(CSFcultures from
the same infant 10 days apart) and 4635 (wound culture
registered thesame day as 4637 from adifferentpatient in the samehospital); 4428 and 4429(maternal vaginalcultureand her infant's CSFculture); 4509and 4510(CSF cultures from different infants in the same hospital 5 weeks apart) (10);
4511 and 4512 (CSF cultures from different infants in the same locationin the sameyear); and 4514,4515, and 4516 (CSF cultures from three different infants in the same
hospitalover a4-monthperiod) (20).
All isolates were maintained as -70°C frozen glycerol
stocks. Biotypes of C. diversus isolates not previously reported (17) were assigned according to the scheme of Richard etal. (27).
REP-PCRfingerprints. Genomic DNA samples from iso-lateswereprepared and quantitatedaspreviously described (31). REP-based primersequences REP1R-I (5'-IIIICGICG ICATCIGGC-3') and REP2-I
(5'-ICGICI'rATCIGGCCT
AC-3')were previously described (31). PCR amplificationswereperformed inanautomatedthermalcycler (first-gener-ation Perkin-Elmer Cetus DNA thermal cycler) with an
initial denaturation
(950C,
7 min) followed by 30 cycles ofdenaturation (90°C, 30 s), annealing (40°C, 1 min), and extension
(650C,
8min)
withasingle final extension(650C,
16min).
Five-microliter samples of each PCR mixture wereelectrophoresed directly in 1% agarose gels containing 40
mMTris
acetate-i
mM EDTAbuffer and 0.5,gofethidiumbromide perml. Gelswere photographedwith a 60-s expo-sure to Polaroid type55 film.
Analysis of band patterns. Sizes of bands generated by
electrophoresis of the PCR amplificationswere assignedby direct comparison to concurrently run 1-kb DNA ladder
standards (BRL Life
Technologies,
Inc.). Thepresence orabsence of bandswithin agel lanewas determinedby two
observers(C.R.W. and J.V.) withone
fully
blindedtoexactgel lane locations of
epidemiologically
linked isolates.DNA fingerprints of isolates first were compared
for
similarity by visualinspection of band patterns. Unlike theSimCanalyses
below,
entire laneswerecompared
without sizerangesby
visualinspection.
Fingerprints
were consid-eredhighly
similar when all visible bandsrepresented
in each isolate had the same apparentmigration
distance. Variations inintensity
and shape did not represent differ-ences. The absence of up to two bands from one isolate when allothervisiblebands in thefingerprints
hadmatching
positions was allowedbefore isolates were considereddif-ferent
by
visualinspection.
Bands in the 900-to3,200-bprange of selectedC. diversus
isolateswere
analyzed
morerigorously by
themethodofvanSoolingen
et al.(30),
which determines a coefficient ofsimilarity
(SimC)
betweenfingerprints
of two isolates asfollows:
k k
SimCAB
=(ai
+bi
-[ai
-bi])l
I
(ai
+bi),
i=1 i=1
where
a,
andb,,
theintensitiesofband i inpatternsAand B, areeither0(not present) or 1 (present) and k is the numberof distinct bands present among patterns A and B. This
coefficient ranges from 0 to 1.0, where 1.0 represents the
identical presence and position of all bands in the two
fingerprintsbeingcompared.
RESULTS
Evaluation offingerprints of C. diversus isolates from the samepatient or
outbreak
Isolates epidemiologically linkedbyrecoveryfrom the same patient or outbreak were used as
the standard of similarity to assess REP-PCR-based DNA
fingerprinting. Isolates of each pair or set have the same
biotype. When available forboth members of a pair (Table
1), electrophoretic types and OMP profiles are identical
within pairs, except for 4277 and 4278, which have OMP
profiles ofB-andB+, respectively.
For eachofthe four pairs of isolates from the same patient
and the isolates from the one mother-infant pair, band
patterns
werehighly similaronvisualinspection(Fig. 1 and 2, bracketed lanes). In several instances one band wasabsentfrom the
analysis
rangeof thepattern
in one memberofa pair. Inthe mother-infant isolate pair (4428 and 4429; Fig.
2),
one lane had asmearcorrelating
withtwobandsinthe other member of the pair. Otherwise, the remaining bandswere present in both members of each of these five
pairs. When differences in band intensity were present in
closely related isolates, these
generally
were evident throughout thefingerprint, suggesting differencesin amountsof amplified DNA in the samples. Bands were considered
present orabsent; differences in intensitywereignored. Among the three outbreak-related sets,
patterns
again werehighlysimilar
onvisualinspection.Among thetriplet of4514, 4515, and 4516(Fig.2), the last differed from theother twobythe absenceofonebandin analysis range. Thepair of
4511 and 4512(Fig. 1) differedby the absence of one band
from thefingerprintof4511.Thepairof4509 and 4510 (Fig.
1)
showed the most apparentdifferences among the related strains:twobandsgreaterthan3,000 bpwereabsent in4509,and two other bands in the2,300- to2,700-bprange also were
of low intensity. The remainder of their bands in each
fingerprint were in matching positions. ERIC-PCR-based
DNA fingerprints of 4509 and4510 wereverysimilar (data
not shown).
SimCsfor the related isolates (seven comparisonsamong
pairs and three comparisons among the outbreak
triplet)
rangedfrom0.952to 1.00withoneexception:
theSimCfor4509 and 4510 was 0.889. SimCs of >0.952 represent no more thanoneband differencebetween two
fingerprints
in the analysis range. We consideredthisdegree
ofsimilarity
between two isolates to be sufficient and necessary to
identify them as the same
strain,
orclone,
ofC. diversus. Analysis ofDNAfingerprints
generated by
ERIC-PCRsup-ported
thehighdegree
ofsimilarity
amongepidemiologically
relatedisolates
(data
notshown).
Comparison ofrep-PCRfingerprintsof C. diversus isolates with MEE and OMP classifications. Visual
inspection
ofrep-PCR
fingerprints
of the 47C. diversus isolatessuggested
18 differentpatterns (Fig.
1 and2). Among
the 29epidemi-ologically unrelated isolates for which both ET and OMP
classifications are known
(18,
19),
REP-PCR
provided
asimilar
degree
ofdiscriminationwithinbiotype
groupsver-sus MEEand OMP
profiles
(Table
2).
Visualinspection
offingerprints of these 29 isolates delineated 16 REP-PCR
on April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
2924 WOODS ET AL.
1 2 3 4 5 6
H]
F]I
m
n
CIn4
oCM t
C0
0 LCO l Il7 8 9 10 11
HF]
Co v- 1 cn o I O L t
I In I Is
12 13 14 15 16
H
I
H
X - N to
CM CM LO IT T
l*
1 ITlt
Il 17 18oL.l 19 20 21 E:
o -o5
u_
- CO LO - n
o r C )-m
vIl
I~ v LO CDI) I) a I
I
FIG. 1. REP-PCR-basedDNAfingerprintsof21C. diversus isolates. Bracketed isolatesrepresent pairsfrom the samepatient (4632and
4637;4023 and4036;4277 and4278;4472 and4476)orfrom thesamemeningitisoutbreak(4511and4512;4509and4510). Isolates 4036to
4410 (lanes5to7)areET6;isolates 4511and4512areET7;isolates 4509 to 4577(lanes 10to14)areET16;isolate4472is ET14; isolate
4576is ET12;and isolates 4408to 4578(lanes18 to20)areET11.
types. MEE and OMP profile classifications delineated 14 and 11 types,respectively. Eachofthe threetypingmethods occasionallydiscriminated between isolatesidentifiedasthe
same strainbyboth of the othermethods.
REP-PCR types determined by visual inspection
corre-lated directly with ETs with the following exceptions: (i) fingerprintsof ETs 1 and 2werethesame, (ii)fingerprintsof each of the three ET 6 isolates were different, (iii)
finger-prints of ETs 8 and 9 were the same, and (iv) therewere
threefingerprintsamongthe 12 ET 15 isolates. Whenmore
thanoneETwasrepresentedbyasingleREP-PCR type, the ETs alwayshad the same biotypebut notalways thesame OMPprofile. ETs 1 and 2 and ETs 8 and 9 differ byallelic polymorphismofonly1of the20enzymesused in the MEE analysis (19). REP-PCR corresponded better with MEE than did either method with the OMP profile classification: mul-tiple ETs and REP-PCR types werepresent in each ofthe four OMPprofilegroupswith morethan twoisolates.
RelationshipsamongC.diversus isolateswithdifferent ETs.
C. diversus isolates with different ETs by MEE (19) were
usedasthestandard ofdifferencetoassessREP-PCR-based
fingerprinting within this one species. The results of the
visualinspection described above suggested thatREP-PCR
wasabletodistinguishbetweenmostMEE-defined strainsof C. diversus. SimCs were determined for the 210 possible
comparisons among a 21-isolate subset, which represented the15 ETs availabletous(wedidnothaveanET13 isolate
in our strain bank). All three ET 6 isolates were included since these had different biotypes and a SimC of <0.950
amongthemselves. Two unrelated isolates from each of ETs
11, 15, and 16 and both ET 9 isolateswere included. Only
oneoftwoET 2isolateswasincluded since these hadhighly
similar fingerprintsonvisual inspection and a SimC of1.0 relativeto each other.
Only 6 of 210 relationships had SimCs of >0.952 (Table3).
One was between isolates with the same ET. Four others werebetweenisolates with thesamebiotype. ETs oftwoof thesepairs (4575 and 4431; 4579 and 4582) again are
poly-morphicatonly 1 of 20enzymesusedin the MEE classifi-cation(19). This confirmed the visual impression that REP-PCRwasabletodistinguishmostMEE-defined strains of C.
diversus.
RelationshipsofC. diversus isolates with thesameET.As described above, isolates with the same ET generallyhad
similarDNA fingerprintsonvisualinspection (Fig. 1 and 2;
see Table 1 for ETs of isolates). Among the ET 15 group
(Fig. 2), all isolates had similarREP-PCR-based fingerprints exceptforisolate 4406 (from 1966; the oldest member ofthe group). The fingerprints of four isolates, 4428, 4429, 2988, and 4432 (from Alabama and Tennessee during a 3-year
period), alsoappearedslightly different relativetotheother ET 15 isolates. These had SimCs of >0.956 among
them-selves and hadSimCs of<0.917 with all other ET 15isolates except4574 (Table 4). SimC analysis suggestedtwo strains
a1)
-o ~0
nu
-6108
bp
5090 bp
-4072
bp
3054 bp
-2036
bp
-1636
bp
W-1018
bp
J.CLIN. MICROBIOL.
on April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
CD Cn to Il cn CD v 0 v o tOCDco cOco N mo
a) v v_ o 0) I0N TO 1- (N a:)-n 0
N- tCln " LO tO to aw 0D LO v
i q et v v1 q Iv q q Iv Ir q
I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I
I
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
co rN
I
0) to) v- 0 v- LO
c0 Co XC
N-t I I Io
i
- 6108bp
-- 5090 bp
-- 4072 bp
3054 bp
2036bp
1636bp
1018bp
-506,517 bp
FIG. 2. REP-PCR-based DNA fingerprintsof26 C.diversus isolates. Bracketed isolatesrepresentasetfromameningitis outbreak (4514,
4515,and4516)or amother-infantpair (4428and4429). Isolates 4397to4432(lanes5 to16)areET 15;isolates 4513, 4405,4582, and 4579
areETs10, 9,9,and8, respectively; andisolates4409to4575 (lanes 21to26) areETs 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, and 1, respectively.
among the other seven isolates, correlating with a
geo-graphicsourceofHouston or Maryland. Thus, visual
inspec-tion suggested three fingerprints, and SimC analysis
sug-gested a fourth strain (Table 4). All of the ET 15 isolates were biotype e except 4432, which was biotype f. Four
different OMPprofileswererepresented bytheseisolates.
SimCs of the unrelated isolates of ETs 16, 11, 9, and 2 were0.909to0.952, 0.909to0.956, 0.909, and1.00,
respec-TABLE 2. Ability of REP-PCRversus MEE andOMPprofiles to discriminateamong C. diversus isolates
No. of strainsidentifiedby: Biotype No.of unrelated
group isolatese ET byMEE OMPprofile REP-PECR type
a 5 3 4 3
c 8 6 4 4
d 5 3 4 3
e 11 4 7 6
Total 29 14c 11 16
aThisanalysisisbasedonlyonisolates for which bothETand OMPprofile areknown.
bREP-PCR typeswerebasedondifferences in fingerprintsapparent on
visualinspection.
cThe ET 3isolate4581was notincluded becauseits OMP
profile
isnotknown.
tively. These SimCs confirmed the impression from visual inspection thatfingerprints within these ETs were similar,
although not always to the same degree as those of the
epidemiologically linked pairs. The members withineach of these ETgroupshad thesamebiotype.
The three ET6 isolates are unrelated epidemiologically
and have different biotypes, although two have the same
OMP profile (Table 1). Visually, their fingerprints were
different(Fig. 2).SimCsamongthesethreeisolatesfailedto reach the level ofsimilarityobserved amongthe
epidemio-logicallyrelated isolates (Table 3).
Analysis of Houston-area isolates and isolates without knownETsorOMPprofiles.FourpairsofunrelatedHouston
isolates with the samebiotype hadfingerprintswhichwere
highlysimilarvisuallyand had SimCs of20.952.Thesewere
4036 and4635,4278 and4635,4397 and4573,and4749 and 5115.Fingerprintsofbiotyped isolates 4632 and4635,which
wereobtained from differentpatientsinthesamehospital10 daysapart,wereslightlydifferentvisuallyand hadaSimCof 0.917. This comparison suggested that these temporally related isolates were not the same strain and arose from differentepidemiologic sources.
Isolate 5595, a biotype a strain (unknown ET) from St. Louis in1991,hadaSimCof 1.0 with isolate4407,anET11 biotypeastrainfromWashington, D.C.,in1969.Theentire fingerprints of these two isolates were highly similar on visualinspection.Isolate5596,abiotypeestrain(unknown ET)fromDelaware in1991,hadaREP-PCR-based SimCof
(¶3
I:S
-L.! C)
o i
v X
6
I
on April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
r- r-H tm r-H o F- %C c £ot- N a, V- Oc tn) o tn
tH
ooooooooooooc
ooc
t t-oo ot ON7 -4Nd
o oo r-w)r4od£
7NC bNeo
Nch
bn00
Ot
1-r0r0
00 w w C~O 10o08%O§
r- r0 OW) 00 0 0N
t- en
r-
C1
Nm
W)
wc0
Fc
r
04tn F o00 00 ON r- I -%C r- t- %O£ 00 ON
C\
00 00000000 00000
_ 0 £cOo en 47 CIONOmF\
:4,t t %O 00 r- 00 t1\, st om^ \ W) tf tn£ F oFooc Fc ro it WI £ oF
_~~~~en0000000000000000,
t-,_ t1 ee£ \0 ON O0N00C
1rh__F tt-^ NN1o°c \2°N
V-t \. o t-£ b o o r'-oo ) W) WIW)%O o
H~~~~~t t-r000000000 00 00 00 0
00 (YONON N O0WIen %ONm
Co tn 'X\OO-O O-O-OO0t-O OOO
o o - co o o- oq oooo o o
o
._
°°
N°
m0 8°
°e
ON N 0Z tO F00\ \ 00t- t0000 00 00 00
0 u
caO I--, m mW) Qr- \FO
r
Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r
v~~~~W
~~~~~~~~~~~~;
00000tf) t00 Q =W)
'o R"o
\9
CiN
Ch!St
C)~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Q0\.0
\J \0 00 \C0 OHNtmmS
C; _c;c;vNc;
m .° mH m oo£ e o o m N^ oo b£ tsovaaJD
-_D F ^ oo X o ^ oo H b o oo b bbNH4t~~~=1r
urtv)etetom et m m s . m m m t m t m t m B Q X~~~r
en te te te te-e ttte 0
2926 WOODS ETAL. J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
on April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
TABLE 4. REP-PCR-based SimCs amongC. diversusisolateswith ET15a
SimICofb: Strain
4573 4406 4574 4580 4514 4515 4516 4428 4429 2988 4432
4397 1 0.750
f0.96]
0.917 0.917 0.917 0.870 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.8704573 11 0.750 10.9601 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.870 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.870
4406 0.720 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.696 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.696
4574 0.960 0.960 0.960 0.917 0.960 0.960 0.960 0.917
4580 1.00 1.00 0.956 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.870
4514 1.00 0.956 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.870
4515 0.956 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.870
4516 0.956 0.956 0.9561 0.909
4428 0.956 1.00 0.956
4429 1.00 0.956
2988 0.956
a Visual inspection suggested threefingerprints:4406, 4428 to 4432, and the others. SimC evaluation suggests that 4573 and 4397 may represent a fourth strain inthis group.
b Double boxes indicate closely related groups of strains; single boxes indicate groups of strains with overlappingsimilarities.
1.0 with 4516, an ET 15 biotype e isolate from the same
geographicareain 1983.
DISCUSSION
C. diversus isolates whicharecloselylinked epidemiolog-ically and have the same ET and OMP profiles had
finger-prints generated by REP-PCR whichappeared highly similar
byvisual inspection. This visual impressionwas confirmed
by quantitative analysis using SimCs.Conversely, isolates of C. diversus with different ETs generally had
REP-PCR-based fingerprints which differed significantly by visual inspection and by analysis using SimCs. REP-PCR provided a degree ofdiscrimination among C. diversus isolates with the same biotype similarto thatprovided by MEE (19) and
OMPprofiles (18). REP-PCRtypescorrelatedwell with ETs
withfew exceptions.
Highly similar fingerprints from C. diversus isolates
ob-tained fromdistinct geographicregions and separated in time
by more than 20 years (5595 and 4407) suggest that the locations of the REP elements within the genome can be verystable over time. A similar observation with respect to
the stability of REP-PCR fingerprints over time has been madewithB.subtilisstrains used innewborn screening (32).
DNAfingerprintsbased on arepetitive sequence from
My-cobacterium
tuberculosis, IS986, were identical in strains passagedfor 6 months in culture and in asingle patientover aperiod of1 year,indicating the stability of repetitiveDNAsequence-basedpatterns (30).
Fingerprints of unrelated C. diversus isolates with the same ETand samebiotype werevery similar in all cases,
althoughoften less sothan
fingerprints
of the epidemiologi-cally linkedpairs.
Mostof thehighly
similarpairs
ofisolateswererecoveredfrom the samegeographicareawithinaspan
of weekstomonths. Isolates fromdifferent
geographic
areas with the same ET which haveSimCsfrom 0.870to0.950may represent the gradual divergence ofprogeny of the parent clone.Biotypes, while simple to determine for this
species,
providetoolittlediversityforuse as anindependent
system for epidemiologic assessment of C. diversus isolates(18).
Outbreak-relatedisolates express thesamebiotype (18),
but thedifferences in the REP-PCRfingerprints
of isolates 4632 and 4635 from Houston supportprevious
observations(9)
thatisolates of thesamebiotype
may berecoveredduring
ashort time period in the same institution yet represent
different strains.
Plasmid profiles havebeen usefulinfour outbreaks with small numbers ofisolates(6,9, 20,34). Plasmid profiles may
change within a given strain over time (9, 34) and do not
correlate well withbiotypes ofserotypes orC. diversus (22). Differentstrains from the same locale with different biotypes
alsomay have the same plasmid profile (9). Chromosomal
restriction endonuclease digestionmay correlate with sero-type but appears to be too cumbersome for use with a large
number of C. diversusisolates (22).
Epidemiologically related C. diversus isolates usually have identicalprofilesamong a group of seven OMPs used in theclassificationscheme of Kline et al. (18). In our experi-encedetectionof thethreeminorOMPs used in this scheme
is variable, whichmay affect reproducibility of this method. Anexampleofthismay be the respiratory isolates 4277 and
4278, which were recovered from the same patient on the same day and have OMP profiles of B- and B+,
respec-tively. The difference between these OMP profiles is the presence of the 32-kDa minor OMP which is associated with
isolatesrecovered from the central nervous system (17).
MEE showed that C. diversus exists as a polyclonal
population with atleast 16 distinct strains (19). MEE
con-firmedthe clonal relatedness of the sets ofepidemiologically
linked isolates used in this study to which it was applied. MEEis apowerfulresearch tool but because of its complex-ity isnotlikelytobecomewidelyavailable forstudyof local
outbreaks ofbacterial disease in atimelymanner.
An ideal method of subtyping bacterial isolates from a
givenspecies wouldbesimple, rapid, sensitive, andhighly discriminatory
(4, 24).
These featuresrarelyareencountered in a single method. The DNA-basedfingerprints generated
by REP-PCR, especiallyas PCR technologyimproves
andsample
preparation
becomessimpler,
may be abletofulfill these tenets.PCR-basedtechniques
alsoforgo
thenecessity
for cultivation whichmaybe crucial with fastidious
patho-gens andobligateintracellular bacteria.
Ribotyping also appears useful to
distinguish
strains within a species (14, 23,35)
and shows greater discrimina-torypower among isolates of the samespecies
than MEE whencompareddirectly(2, 35),
although
theepidemiologic
relevance of this observation is unknown.Ribotyping
re-quiresrestriction endonuclease
digestion,
Southernblotting,
andhybridization
oflabeledribosomal DNA(12),
whichmayon April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
2928 WOODS ET AL.
make this method less amenable than
rep-PCR
for routine clinical use inepidemiologic
evaluations.Biotyping
remains anappropriate
first step for evaluation of apparent outbreaks of C. diversus with the caveat that different strains with the samebiotype
may existconcur-rently
within the same locale. REP-PCR appears to be auseful
adjunct
in terms of itsability
to discriminate among unrelated isolates with the samebiotype
whiledemonstrat-ing
ahigh degree
ofsimilarity
between strains which areepidemiologically
linked. REP-PCR may be an appropriatenextlevel of
analysis
toevaluate relatedness ofC. diversus isolates when a series of isolates with the samebiotype
is encountered. ERIC-PCR has also been useful fordistin-guishing
strains ofC. diversus(data
notshown).
REP- andERIC-PCR methods which use whole cells
directly
from brothcultures orcolonies onplates
allow discrimination of C. diversus isolates within several hours(data
notshown).
The
quantitative analysis
using
SimCwas undertaken toprovide
a moreobjective
analysis
than visual inspectionalone. These results confirmed that a
high
degree
of visualsimilarity
of the DNAfingerprints
oftwoisolatesgeneratedby REP-PCR, especially
when these have thesamebiotype,is sufficient to consider them the same strain. The visual distinctions of
fingerprints
of different strains also wereconfirmed
by
SimC.Therefore,
visualinspection
alone,
without themore
rigorous
mathematicalcomparisons,
maybe
adequate
for routineepidemiologic
use ofrep-PCR,
atleast for C. diversus.
rep-PCR,
based on REP and ERIC sequences, has beenapplied successfully
to assess relatedness of isolates withinthe
species
B. subtilis(32),
Rhizobium meliloti(3),
andEnterobacteraerogenes
(7).
Todate,
these evaluations have involved a limited number of isolatesor lackedacompara-tive standard. Results of this
study
withC. diversus isolates addfurther evidence thatrep-PCR
maybebroadly
applica-bleto
fingerprinting
bacterialgenomesand forepidemiologic
evaluations of outbreaks of bacterial
species
which possess theseextragenic repetitive
elements. This method should beespecially
useful among members of theEnterobacteriaceaeas both ERIC- and REP-based
oligonucleotide
primers
are able to generatesufficiently
complex
DNA band patterns frommostgenera of thisfamily
(31).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thankSheldon Kaplan,MarkKline, and Edward Masonfor criticalreviews.
This researchwassupportedin partbyanAdvancedTechnology
Program grant from the Texas Higher Education Department to J.R.L. J.R.L. acknowledges supportfrom thePEWScholars Pro-gram inBiomedical Sciences. J.V. is arecipientofNational Insti-tutesof HealthpredoctoralfellowshiplF31GM14601-01 SRC-7and also issupported bythe Medical ScientistTrainingProgram at the
Baylor College of Medicine. C.R.W. is a Daland Fellow of the AmericanPhilosophicalSociety.
REFERENCES
1. Blake, P. A., D. T. Allegra, J. D. Snyder, T. J. Barrett, L. McFarland,C. T.Caraway,J.C.Feeley, J. P. Craig, J. V. Lee, N. D. Puhr, and R. A. Feldman. 1980. Cholera-a possible endemic focus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 302:305-309.
2. Brenner, D.J., L. W. Mayer, G. M.Carlone,L. H.Harrison, W. F.Bibb,M.C. de CuntoBrandileone,F.0.Sottnek, K. Irino, M. W.Reeves,J. M.Swenson, K. A. Birkness, R. S. Weyant, S. F.Berkley,T.C.Woods,A.G.Steigerwalt,P. A. D. Grimont, R. M. McKinney, D. W. Fleming, L. L. Gheesling, R. C.
Cooksey,
R.J.Arko,C.V.Broome,andthe BrazilianPurpuricFeverStudy Group. 1988. Biochemical, genetic, and epidemio-logic characterization ofHaenophilus influenzae biogroup ae-gyptius(Haemophilusaegyptius) strains associatedwith Brazil-ianpurpuricfever. J. Clin.Microbiol. 26:1524-1534.
3. deBruin, F.J. 1992. Use ofrepetitive (repetitive extragenic palindromicandenterobacterialrepetitiveintergenicconsensus) sequences and thepolymerasechain reactiontofingerprint the genomes ofRhizobium meliloti isolates and other soil bacteria. Appl.Environ. Microbiol. 58:2180-2187.
4. Falkiner,F. R. 1988. Epidemiological typing: auser'sview.J. Hosp. Infect. 11:303-309.
5. Farrar,W.E. 1983. Molecularanalysisofplasmidsin epidemi-ologic investigations. J. Infect.Dis. 148:1-6.
6. Finn, A., G. H. Talbot, E. Anday, M.Skros, M. Provencher, and C. Hoegg. 1988. Vertical transmission of Citrobacter diversus from mothertoinfant. Pediatr. Infect. Dis.J.7:293-294. 7. Georghiou, P., J. Versalovic, andJ. R. Lupski. Unpublished
data.
8. Gilson, E.,J.-M. Clement, D.Brutlag, and M.Hofnung. 1984.A family of dispersed repetitive extragenic palindromic DNA sequencesin E. coli. EMBO J. 3:1417-1421.
9. Goering,R.V., N. J. Ehrenkranz, C. C. Sanders, and W. E. Sanders. 1992. Longtermepidemiologicalanalysisof Citrobac-terdiversus in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 11:99-104.
10. Graham, D. R., R. L. Anderson, F. E.Ariel, N. J.Ehrenkranz, B. Rowe, H. R. Boer, and R. E. Dixon. 1981. Epidemic noso-comialmeningitis due to Citrobacter diversus in neonates. J. Infect. Dis. 144:203-209.
11. Graham,D. R., andJ. D. Band. 1981. Citrobacterdiversus brain abscess andmeningitis inneonates.JAMA245:1923-1925. 12. Grimont, F.,and P. A. D. Grimont. 1986. Ribosomalribonucleic
acidgenerestriction patternsaspotential taxonomictools. Ann. Inst. Pasteur/Microbiol. 137B:165-175.
13. Hulton, C. S.J.,C. F.Higgins,and P. M. Sharp. 1991. ERIC sequences: anovelfamily of repetitiveelements in thegenomes of Escherichiacoli, Salmonella typhimurium and other entero-bacteria. Mol.Microbiol.5:825-834.
14. Irino, K., F. Grimont, I. Casin, P. A. D. Grimont, and the BrazilianPurpuric Fever Study Group. 1988. rRNA gene restric-tion patterns of Haemophilus influenzae biogroup aegyptius strains associatedwith Brazilianpurpuricfever.J. Clin. Micro-biol. 26:1535-1538.
15. John, J. F., andJ. A.Twitty. 1986. Plasmidsas epidemiologic markers in nosocomial gram-negative bacilli: experience at a universityandreview ofthe literature. Rev. Infect. Dis. 8:693-704.
16. Kline,M. W.1988.Citrobactermeningitis and brain abscessin infancy:epidemiology, pathogenesisandtreatment. J. Pediatr. 113:430-434.
17. Kline,M.W.,E.0.Mason,andS. L. Kaplan. 1988. Character-izationofCitrobacterdiversus strains causing neonatal menin-gitis.J. Infect.Dis.157:101-105.
18. Kline,M.W.,E.0. Mason,andS. L. Kaplan. 1989. Epidemi-ologic marker system for Citrobacter diversus using outer membraneproteinprofiles. J. Clin. Microbiol.27:1793-1796. 19. Li, J., J. M. Musser, P. Beltran, M. W. Kline, and R. K.
Selander. 1990.Genotypic heterogeneityofstrains of Citrobac-terdiversus expressinga32-kilodalton outer membraneprotein associated with neonatal meningitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28: 1760-1765.
20. Lin,F.C., W. F. Devoe, C. Morrison, J.Libonati,P.Powers, R. J. Gross, B. Rowe, E. Israel, and J. G. Morris. 1987. OutbreakofneonatalCitrobacter diversusmeningitis in a sub-urbanhospital. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.6:50-55.
21. Lupski, J. R., and G. M.Weinstock 1992.Short, interspersed repetitiveDNAsequences in prokaryotic genomes. J.Bacteriol. 174:4525-4529.
22. Morris, J. G., F. C. Lin, C. B. Morrison, R. J. Gross, R. Khabbaz,K.0.Maher, B. Rowe, E. Israel, and J. P. Libonati. 1986. Molecular epidemiology of neonatal meningitis due to Citrobacter diversus: a study of isolates from hospitals in Maryland.J. Infect. Dis. 154:409-414.
J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
on April 12, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
23. Owen, R. J., A. Beck, P. A. Dayal, and C. Dawson. 1988. Detection of genomic variation in Providencia stuartii clinical isolates by analysis of DNA restriction fragment length poly-morphisms containing rRNAcistrons. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26: 2161-2166.
24. Parker, M. T.1978.Hospital-acquired infections: guidelines to laboratory methods, European series no. 4, p. 35-39. World Health Organization Regional Publications, Copenhagen. 25. Parry,M. F., J. H. Hutchinson, N. A. Brown,C.-H.Wu, and L.
Estreller. 1980. Gram-negative sepsis in neonates: a nursery outbreakdue tohand carriage of Citrobacter diversus. Pediat-rics 65:1105-1109.
26. Penner,J. L., J. N. Hennessy,S.D.Mills, and W.C.Bradbury. 1983. Application of serotyping and chromosomal restriction endonuclease digest analysis in investigating a laboratory-ac-quired case of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. J. Clin. Micro-biol. 18:1427-1428.
27. Richard,C.,B.Brisou, andJ.Lioult. 1972. Etudetaxonomique de "Levinea"nouveaugenredela famille des enterobacteries. Ann. Inst.Pastuer 122:1137-1146.
28. Sharples, G. J.,and R. G.Lloyd. 1990. Anovelrepeated DNA sequencelocated in theintergenic regions of bacterial chromo-somes.Nucleic Acids Res. 18:6503-6508.
29. Stern,M.J., G.F.L.Ames,N.H.Smith,E.C.Robinson,and C. F. Higgins. 1984. Repetitive extragenic palindromic
se-quences: a major component of the bacterial genome. Cell 37:1015-1026.
30. vanSoolingen, D., P. W. M.Hermans,P. E. W.deHaas,D. R.
Soll, and J. D. A. van Embden.1991.Occurrenceandstability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphismas atoolintheepidemiologyoftuberculosis.J. Clin.Microbiol. 29:2578-2586.
31. Versalovic, J., T. Koeuth, and J. R. Lupski. 1991.Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 6823-6831.
32. Versalovic, J., T. Koeuth, Y.-H. Zhang, E. R. B. McCabe, and J. R. Lupski. 1992. Quality control for bacterial inhibition assays: DNA fingerprinting of microorganisms by rep-PCR. Screening 1:175-183.
32a.Versalovic,J., andJ. R.Lupski.Unpublished data.
33. Wachsmuth,K. 1986. Molecularepidemiologyofbacterial in-fections: examples of methodology and of investigations of outbreaks.Rev.Infect. Dis. 8:682-692.
34. Williams,W.W., J. Mariano,M.Spurner,H. D.Donnell,R. L. Breckenridge, R. L. Anderson, I. K. Wachsmuth, C. Thorns-berry, D. R.Graham, D.W.Thibeault,and J. R. Allen. 1984. Nosocomialmeningitis duetoCitrobacter diversus inneonates: newaspectsof theepidemiology. J. Infect. Dis. 150:229-235. 35. Woods,T.C.,L.0.Helsel, B.Swaminathan,W. F.Bibb, R. W.
Pinner, B. G. Gellin, S. F. Collin, S. H. Waterman, M. W. Reeves, D.J. Brenner, andC.V. Broome.1992. Characteriza-tion of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C by multilocus en-zyme electrophoresis and ribosomal DNA restriction profiles (ribotyping).J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:132-137.