Midland ISD
Training Powerpoint
Midland High School
What is your responsibility?
• Staff must be knowledgeable about
components of Bil/ESL program
• Staff must begin making Bil/ESL a daily
component in their teaching life
Who
What
When
Where
Why
How
Who
What
When
Where
Why
How
Who?
• The District takes the negative hit and
consequences of the Stage 4 Intervention
• The program that is targeted is Bilingual/English
As A Second Language
• Students that are negatively impacted due to our
failures as a district are:
– Limited English Proficient (any language)
• Bilingual• English as a Second Language • Parent Denials
Elem. Counselor, Burnet Elem Celina
Rodriguez
ESL Teacher, San Jacinto (LPAC) Luz
Vela
ESL Teacher, Lee High Jesse
Garcia
ESL Teacher, Midland High Victor
Hermosillo
ESL Teacher, Lee Freshman Homer
Lopez
DEIC rep, Crockett Elementary Judith
Jimenez
Principal, San Jacinto JH JoAnna
Rowley
Principal, Crockett Elementary Dolores
Cano
Principal, Midland High Jeff
Horner
Principal, Lee Freshman Fernando
Espino
Bilingual/ESL Director Lorrie
Orosco
Exec. Dir. Elementary Ed Jane
Rambo
Exec. Dir. Secondary Ed Patrick
Jones
Asst. Superintendent Sylvia
Garza
Dir. of Assessment & Accountability Elise
Kail
Advanced Academics - Supervisor (opt.) Susan
Zachary
Exec Dir. Student Services (optional) Betty
Newman
DropOut Prevention/At-Risk Coor. Debra
Acosta
Dir. Special Populations Michele
Harmon
ESL Teacher, Midland High Hiliberto
Ochoa
K-12 Science Supervisor Robert
Pena
Elementary Math Supervisor Irene
Garcia
Parent of 6th and 8th grade students Sarah
Torres
Counselor, San Jacinto JH Jill
Spannaus
Counseling Supervisor Ron
Moss
Principal, Parker Elementary Lisa
Neighbors
Gen Ed Teacher, South Elementary Leah
Coulter
Gen Ed Teacher, Lee Freshman Monique
Nevarez
What?
• Stage 4 Intervention calls for a
TEA On-Site Visit
–
April 20
thAT MHS
• Development of a CORE Team to conduct a
Focused Data Analysis and develop a
Continuous Improvement Plan that addresses
the issues
• Reorganization of the Bilingual/ESL program to
assist students in being successful
• Education of ALL district professional staff on
Bil/ESL CIP parts, requirements and trainings
When?
• Notified
Oct. 13, 2008
• CORE Team identified
Oct. 31, 2008
• 1
stCORE Team meeting
Nov. 6, 2008
• 2
ndCORE Team meeting
Nov. 19, 2008
• 3
rdCORE Team meeting
Dec. 12, 2008
• Finalization of the CIP
Dec. 9, 2008 & Jan. 5,
2009
• CORE Team meeting
• Ongoing meetings to meet requirements of TEA
and the Bilingual/ESL CIP
Where?
• Should affect EVERY classroom and campus in
the district!!!
• Will affect all students PK – 12
• Will affect all bilingual/ESL teachers PK-12
• Will affect ALL teachers employed in MISD
• Will affect all new teachers employed in MISD
• Will affect the teaching styles of many teachers
• Will affect all instructional leaders in the district
Why?
• Indicators noted on PBMAS (Performance
Based Monitoring Assessment System)
• We had
__
indicators ranked at the
lowest possible rating (3)
• As a whole we are at the lowest possible
rating for a district in the Performance
Monitoring System (Stage 4).
3 10.2 3SA 6.3 3SA 8.3 3SA 5.9 Science
Bil Spanish TAKS
2 53.7 3 48.3 0 61.1 3 39.4 2 41.2 Writing 0RI 54.5 0RI 41.7 3 35.4 1 45.1 Social Studies 3 17.7 3 20 3 14.9 0 31.3 1 20.3 Science 3 28.2 3 26.5 3 25 3 20.9 3 25.2 Reading 3 27.1 3 22.8 3 22.8 2 25.5 3 24 Math
ESL Eng TKAS
0RI 44.2 3 28.4 0 36.1 RO 12.5 3 11.4 Science
Bil Educ English TAKS 3 27.3 3 15 LEP RHSP/DAP Diploma 2 7.7 2 6.8 1 3.7 0 1.4 0 1.8 LEP Annual Dropout Rate Indicator Perform ance Level District Rate or Differen ce Indicator Perform ance Level District Rate or Differen ce Indicator Perform ance Level District Rate or Differen ce Indicator Perform ance Level District Rate or Differen ce Indicator Perform ance Level District Rate or Differen ce **Indicators 2007-2008 2006-2007 2005-2006 2004-2005 2003-2004
PBMAS Historical View
PBMAS Indicator District Goals for Improvement
(Current rate and Performance Level) [State rate and expected Performance Level]
Increase PBMAS Indicator #2 (ESL English TAKS):
Math -- from27.1%to 45%(3)[50 and 1] Reading/ELA - from28.2%to 55%(3)[70 and 2] Science - from17.7%to 35%(3) [45 and 1] Social Studies - from54.5%to 65%(RI)[65 and 0] Writing - from53.7%to 65%(3)[65 and 0]
Increase PBMAS Indicator #3 (BE Spanish TAKS Passing Rate):
Science from10.2%to 35%(3)[45 and 1]
Decrease PBMAS Indicator #7 (LEP Annual Dropout Rate [7-12])
by 3.5% to district rate of 4.2%.(7.7% and 2)[2.0% and 1] Increase PBMAS Indicator #8 (LEP RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate)
by 22.7% to district rate of 50%(27.3% and 3)[60% and 1]
Desired results/goals identified in the BE-ESL continuous improvement plan should be integrated, as appropriate, into LEA and campus improvement planning processes. The LEA must ensure that staff members on each campus have a clear understanding of the LEA’s CIP activities. Campus principals must disseminate the CIP to all faculty members and conduct training regarding implementation of CIP activities, including individual staff responsibilities for implementation and evaluation. The LEA must also conduct monitoring to determine the progress of implementation of CIP activities and evaluate completed activities to determine results related to student performance. The LEA must provide the TEA with updates regarding implementation, monitoring, and evaluation activities upon request.
165901 Co/District #: 12-9-2008 (1-5-2009) Submittal Date: Midland ISD LEA: 4 Stage of Intervention:
Bilingual Education / ESL Monitoring System 2008-2009 Continuous Improvement Plan
18 ESC Region #: TIMELINES Initial (beginning) Interim (formative) and Final (summative) for evaluation purposes RESOURCES Materials/supplie s, fiscal, and personnel needed to implement activities ACTIVITIES
Describe the new strategies, initiatives,
and/or redesign activities that will be
implemented to improve key program
components and systems to attain the
desired result. MEASURABLE EVIDENCE OF CHANGE Qualitative and/or quantitative measures of student performance/ program improvement DESIRED RESULT Goal(s) that address each identified area of improvement, including necessary correction of noncompliance
•Bilingual •ESL Elementary •Newcomer •ESL Secondary •Entrance criteria Assessment tools •Sheltered English •Dual Language •Parent Denials •First and Second
Year After Exit Monitoring •Exit Criteria •Late Exit Model •LPAC Process
Create a system whereby the components
of a LEP -- Bilingual/ESL program are in
place within the district and
can be identified by personnel
TEA Identified Indicator #1: Delineation of all program
components for all staff will be made available via a “Midland ISD Bilingual and
ESL Handbook”
CIP p. 2, 3, 4, 5
Existence of an accessible flow-chart of
Bil/ESL Personnel And Job Responsibilities
District Personnel Knowledge about program offerings, professional developments, and communication Within the district concerning all Bil/ESL programs
Develop a scope and sequence
for Bilingual-ESL Department
aligned to TEKS and ELPS
TEA Identified Indicator #2
:Existence of a scope and sequence document that addresses all components of an
ESL program and is inclusive of Newcomers, Dual Language and Elementary ESL
CIP p. 6
Secondary Administration will be trained in
ESL program and Monitoring Strategies ---Elementary Administrators will be Included in all transitional activities
TEA Identified Indicator #3:
SIOP Training for Administrators
Feeder Meeting Agendas and Transitional Documentation Will assist in the correct placement and knowledge of Bilingual/ESL students
Training Agendas and improved placement of Bilingual/ESL students
CIP p. 7-8
Instructional placement and support
of LEP students will be data-driven
TEA Identified Indicator #4: PBMAS Data
Increase % of LEP students graduating on RHSP/DAP plan
Decrease the LEP Dropout Rate
Increase % of LEP students passing Spanish TAKS Science
Increase % of LEP students taking Spanish Math, Reading & Writing TAKS by 5%
LEP PEIMS Data Lists
Graduation Rosters Development of a 5
th& 6thgrade
ESL model Reduction of Transitions for
Bil/ESL students in K-6
Standardized test scores
Alignment of ELA Scope & Sequence with ESL Scope & Sequence CIP p. 9-10
TEA Identified Indicator #5: (cont.)
Instructional placement and support
of LEP students will be data-driven
TEA Identified Indicator #4: (cont.)
Placement of LEP students with ESL Strategy Trained Teachers (emphasis on secondary)
Student Schedules Student Transcripts SIOP Sign-in Sheets Academic Vocab Training
Sign-in Sheets
District List of ESL Certified Teachers
Policy Change in Hiring Requirement for New Hires To become ESL Certified Within one year of hiring Utilization of IPODs for ESL Students to assist in Language acquisition Elem & JH campuses
Provided more targeted Bil/ESL strategies for Students utilizing Various programs in place
CIP p. 11-12
TEA Identified Indicator #5: (cont.)
Instructional placement and support
of LEP students will be data-driven
TEA Identified Indicator #4: (cont.)
Secondary ESL Teachers will Be provided time to assist And monitor LEP students PBMAS data
Standardized test data
Campus membership projections (inclusive Of LEP projections)
Master Schedules CIP p. 13-14
Develop a check & balance system
for the expenditure and use of
campus resources for LEP needs
TEA Identified Indicator #5:
List of expenditures will be available upon demand From each campus and at the district level in Regard to Bil/ESL funds
CIP p. 15
Ensure all district personnel are knowledgeable about and understand the BE-ESL program components, mission, model and expectations
TEA Identified Indicator #6:
Upon development of Bil/ESL handbook, focus meeting at all levels will be held to address
the components and expectations within the program LPAC Trainings
CORE Team Meetings
Define and outline Exit Criteria for Late Exit Transitional Model for District staff Increase success of LEP students in all Programs within the district (PBMAS)
CIP p. 16-17
Educate the community and parents
about the Bil/ESL program and
all components of the program
TEA Identified Indicator #7:
Documentation of designated parent meetings in regard to Bil/ESL program
Involve the community in Bil/ESL Education
Satisfaction surveys for parents (Eng & Span) for the end of each school year
CIP p. 18
Monitor system at each campus
for implementation and
student success evaluation
TEA Identified Indicator #8:
•PBMAS Indicators Improvement
•Standardized State Testing Results Improvement •TELPAS Results
•Increased # of students graduating on RHSP/DAP plan
IFV Bil/ESL Focused Monitoring Results on SIOP strategies Focused Student Profiles (FSP’s)
at each campus
Identify and increase # of LEP students enrolled in: •AVID •PreAP/AP •Dual Credit •GT Classes
PSAT/ACT/SAT Results for LEP students Reduced LEP failures for: •6 weeks •Semesters •Credit Attainment •Algebra Success CIP p. 19-20
Monitor system at each campus
for implementation and
student success evaluation
TEA Identified Indicator #8: (cont.)
Minutes from Campus Bil/ESL Focus Groups
Minutes from faculty meeting and sign-in sheets
Projections of LEP data in regard to PBMAS will be formulated each spring CIP p. 19-20
Instructional Components
of the Bil/ESL Program will be organized
TEA Identified Indicator #9:
Inventory baseline list
Increase availability of Spanish materials and other languages as needed Effectiveness Rating Sheet
For inventory
Professional Development will be related to effective research-based Bil/ESL Strategies
Process will be enacted to create easy access
to and improved communication
regarding LEP student data
TEA Identified Indicator #10:
Staff is knowledgeable about and able to make informed decisions concerning LEP students
CIP p. 22
Increased focus on recruitment and retention
of qualified Bil/ESL Certified staff
TEA Identified Indicator #11
:Documentation from HRS on recruitment activities
Documentation from HRS on statistics of certified recruitments
Create a balanced pay system for Bilingual and ESL Certified Teachers Increase number of certified ESL Teachers
CIP p. 23
A System for Follow-up Training,
Modeling and Support for Bil/ESL Instruction
TEA Identified Indicator #12
:Implementation of Bil/ESL Coaching Model for campus assistance Evidence of more monitoring of out-of-town travel expenditures for professional development
CIP – p. 24
The District Bilingual/ESL CORE Team will meet on a quarterly basis to review the activities and deadlines within this CIP (Continuous Improvement Plan) and make reports and adjustments as necessary.
Activities that will be conducted:
Documentation Notebook of all Activities and Materials in relation to CIP will be maintained in the Bil/ESL Dept. by the Bil/ESL Director
Documentation Notebook of all Data in relation to LEP Activities will be maintained by the Dir. of Assessment & Accountability
Master calendar of deadlines and major activity dates will be maintained both in the Bil/ESL and Accountability Dept.
Analytical charts will be developed to be used in evaluation of program improvement and LEP student performance improvement
Analytical chart will be developed by the Dept of Assessment & Accountability to analyze CIP Upon periodic formative evaluation of the Bil/ESL CIP, the CORE Team will report data and observations to campus principals via a written report. Campus principals will then formally distribute and report information to campus staff.
Bil/ESL CORE Team will be knowledgeable about PBMAS Data and projections as well as standardized test results and projections
Any item that is not meeting standard or deadline will be revisited by the Bil/ESL CORE Team for revision as needed. In the interim period, the Bil/ESL Director may make needed adjustments as long as communication of adjustments has occurred with the Teaching & Learning Executive Staff and been documented and communicated to the Bil/ESL CORE Team via e-mail when possible.
Follow-Up Activities
After the interim benchmark for evaluation, what will we do if the initial plan isn’t working?
¿Tienen preguntas?
This presentation, the full District Improvement Plan, and specific ESL support information including definitions and acronyms can be found on the MHS website under “educator’s corner”.